[00:00:03] >> WELCOME TO THE FINANCES AND AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING. ON THE COMMITTEE IS MYSELF AND COMMISSIONER ROLLINS. WE HAVE PLENTY OF STAFF HERE TO HELP US THROUGH THE MEETING. WE'LL GET STARTED WITH PUBLIC COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE ANYONE? >> MR. OTTO, PLEASE PRESS STAR SIX TO UNMUTE YOURSELF. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD HAS BEGUN, YOU MAY SPEAK. >> WE'LL MOVE ON AND SEE IF THERE IS ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK. SEEING THERE IS NO ONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND START WITH ITEM ONE WHICH IS THE [1.  Second Amendment to Agreement #2014/15-155 with Push Media, LLC-Bus Bench Siting] SECOND AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT WITH PUSH MEDIA REGARDING BUS BENCH CITING. >> LET ME START US OFF. THIS IS SECOND AMENDMENT ACTUALLY TO THE EXISTING AGREEMENT THAT THE COUNTY HAS WITH PUSH MEDIA. AND THE PURPOSE FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS ONE ITEM WHICH I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT OR PUSH MEDIA WILL PRESENT IS THE ADDITION OF CERTAIN ADDITIONAL BUS BENCHES. BUT THE SECOND ISSUE IS ALSO IF YOU'LL RECALL WHEN THE AGREEMENT PROVIDED FOR PAYMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADVERTISING TO BE MADE TO THE COUNCIL ON AGING. SINCE THERE IS NO LONGER COUNCIL ON AGING IT'S BEING AMENDED SO THE ADVERTISING REVENUES ACTUALLY COME TO US. AND IT'S THE PROVISION IS THE SAME AMOUNT THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR COUNCIL ON AGING WHICH IS 15%. ONE SLIGHT CHANGE IS THAT IN CONNECTION WITH COUNCIL ON AGING THE AGREEMENT PROVIDED FOR THE REVENUES TO BE PAID MONTHLY. WE HAVE CHANGED THAT TO PROVIDE THAT THE REVENUES WILL BE PAID TO THE COUNTY QUARTERLY AND WE'VE LAID OUT THE TERMS ON WHICH THEY WILL BE. WE ARE STILL WORKING WITH PUSH MEDIA TO COLLECT THE MONEYS THAT ARE OWED FOR 2019. THEY'VE MADE A PARTIAL PAYMENT. AND WE'RE EXPECTING THE NEXT PAYMENT SHORTLY. AND THEN THEY'LL NEED TO CATCH UP UP UNTIL THE TIME OF THE AMENDMENT. AND THEN I WILL LET PATRICK OR JOSH ADDRESS THE ISSUE ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL BUS BENCHES. >> I'VE REPRESENTED THIS COMPANY FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW, BACK TO SEVERAL YEARS AGO WHEN YOU APPROVED THE FIRST BENCHES THAT WERE INSTALLED. AND SINCE WE NOW HAVE APPROXIMATELY 71 OR SO THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY INCLUDING GREEN COVE SPRINGS. THIS AMENDMENT WILL ADD AN ADDITIONAL TEN BENCHES TO THE AREA ALONG THE RED AND BLUE LINES. SPECIFIC LOCATIONS ALONG BOULEVARD TO FILL IN GAPS AND COLLEGE DRIVE NEAR WHERE THE VETERAN'S CLIN SEC. TO CONTINUE TO MEET THE NEED FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN OUR COMMUNITY AND ASSISTING THOSE THAT DON'T HAVE TRANSPORTATION GET TO THE APPOINTMENTS THAT THEY MUST GET TO. AS A PUBLIC SERVICE, GREAT PARTNERSHIP WE'VE HAD WITH THE COUNTY OVER THE YEARS. WE'VE BEEN IN CONVERSATION SINCE THE FALL ABOUT THESE TEN STOPS AND WITH JTA THERE HAS BEEN CHANGEOVER WITH JTA AND THEIR STAFF THAT SLOWED THIS DOWN A LITTLE BIT. NONETHELESS HERE WE ARE FINALLY TO THE NUMBER ONE SPOT ON THE AGENDA. THANK YOU FOR THAT. WANT TO SEE IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE PATRICK HERE WITH PUSH TO SHARE WHERE YOU WHERE THE TEN STOPS ARE LOCATED. THERE IS AN EXISTING 30 STOPS AWE PROVED IN THE LAST -- >> IN THE PAST YOU'VE PROVED 68 BUS BENCHES OR BUS STOPS. 32 OF THOSE ARE CURRENTLY IN USE. 36 OF THEM ARE NOT IN USE BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT PUSH MEDIA REACHED OUT THE JTA TO MAKE SURE THAT IF THEY ADD A BUS STOP SIGN [00:05:03] FOR THOSE 36 THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED THAT JTA WILL NOT CHARGE THE COUNTY FOR THOSE STOPS. >> RIGHT. GIVE SOME HISTORY ON WHEN HOWARD CAME ON TO THE JOB HE STARTED LOOKING AT THE STOPS AND BENCHES. THERE HAS BEEN CONCERNS HE HEARD ABOUT THESE BENCHES. SO WE GOT HIM UP TO SPEED ON THE DECISIONS THAT WERE MADE BY YOU AND YOUR COLLEAGUES PREVIOUS COMMISSIONERS AS WELL TO PLACE THESE BENCHES. WHEN JTA TOOK OVER, THEY INCORPORATED THE FIRST 30 OR SO STOPS BECAUSE THEY HAD PREEXISTING BUS STOP SIGNS. PATRICK THROUGH HIS COMPANY OFFERED AT NO COST TO THE COUNCIL ON AGING TO INSTALL THE SIGNAGE AS WELL AS THE POLES. WHEN JTA TOOK OVER, HE CEASED DOING SO AT THE TIME NOT KNOWING WHO THE CONTACT IS AND SO FORTH OR WHAT THE ARRANGEMENT IS GOING FORWARD. MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN THEY TOOK OVER THEY TOOK OVER THE ORDINARY CARAL SET OF STOPS THAT HAD SIGNAGE. THOSE THAT DIDN'T HAVE THE SIGNAGE THEY FAILED TO INCORPORATE THEM AT THE TIME. WE'LL ASSUME THOSE STOPS THEY SHARED WITH US SINCE THEY ARE ON THE EXISTING ROUTE AND PATRICK WILL BE DOING IMPROVEMENTS ON THOSE. INCREASING THE PSY SIZE OF THE PADS ON THOSE TO MEET JTA STANDARDS AND INSTALLING THE SIGNAGE. JTA TOLD US THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE MONEY TO DO THE SIGNAGE SO WE DECIDED WE'LL PAY THAT AND PROVIDE THAT AT NO COST TO CONTINUE PROVIDING THIS ESSENTIAL SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY AND ADDING ON AN ADDITIONAL TEN STOPS WHICH JTA DID CONFIRM WITH US AND THE COUNTY MANAGER WOULD BE AT NO COST. WE'RE WAITING TO HEAR BACK FROM THEM FOR THAT CONFIRMATION. >> I THINK THIS PROBABLY NEEDS TO BE AGENDA ITEM. I'M GUESSING ONE COMMISSIONER WILL HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ON IT. JUST TO TALK ABOUT I. BUT I THINK THAT WORKING WITH JTA IS KEY ON THIS TO MAKE SURE THERE IS A SMOOTH PROCESS ■MOVIG FORWARD. THAT THERE IS GOOD COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION. >> I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. SO THERE IS 71 BENCHES BUT 68 APPROVED. IS THAT 68 LOCATIONS OR MAYBE THERE IS MORE THAN ONE BENCH? >> THERE IS A TOTAL OF 68 BUT SOME OF THAT MIGHT HAVE INCLUDED GREEN COVE. >> OK. THAT ANSWERS THAT QUESTION. AND THEN THE TEN STOPS, WHAT YOU ARE TELLING US IS THOSE STOPS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN WITH JTA? >> YES. >> THEY ARE ALREADY APPROVED? >> YES THEY REQUESTED THE TWO ON COLLEGE AT THE V.A. THEN THEY WANTED A COUPLE OVER COPPER GATE LANDING TO FILL IN THE GAP TO CREATE MORE ACCESS TO THE LINE. SOUR NOT WALK TWO MILES TO GET TO A STOP AND ANOTHER TWO MILES TO GET BACK. IT CREATES MORE ACCESS TO THE LINE. >> WHEN THIS COMES BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMISSION NEXT WEEK, WILL WE HAVE THE LETTERS FROM JTA BECAUSE THEY ARE GOING TO WANT TO SEE IT. >> THAT'S WHAT WE'RE CAN REQUESTING. WE'VE HAD CHALLENGES GETTING IN TOUCH WITH THEM. WE FINALLY HEARD FROM THEM TODAY. THEY'VE HAD STAFF CHANGES. WE ARE BEING DILIGENT AND WORKING WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER AND ATTORNEY ON THAT. >> GOOD. WE'LL PUT THIS ON THE MEET AGENDA FOR NEXT WEEK. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. >> ON THE GRAPHICS , THE RED LINE AND BLUE LINE IS UP AND THOSE WERE THE DOTS, THOSE TEN STOPS. SOME OF THE LINES WERE STOPS COIN SIDE WITH BOTH LINES OBVIOUSLY. JUST SO YOU'LL SEE. SO THOSE WERE EASILY DEPICTED. THEN THERE IS A FINAL GRAPHIC AND I'D ASK PATRICK TO PUT ALL OF THOSE 36 STOPS THAT WERE THERE THAT WHAT ENDED UP HAPPENING IS THEY WERE STOPS FOR OVER TO JTA. THE CRITICAL PART WITH THAT IS WE'RE NOT GOING TO INCUR ANY ADDITIONAL COST BY HAVING THAT STOP THERE. I THINK THE BUS DOESN'T STOP UNLESS SOMEBODY IS STANDING THERE WAITING OR SOMEBODY IS ON BOARD TO STOP THERE. THERE IS A CONVENIENCE FOR RESIDENTS IN THE COMMUNITY THAT YOU HAVE THOSE STOPS THERE SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO WALK BLOCKS DOWN TO GRAB A STOP. AND THEN THEY'VE DONE A FANTASTIC JOB TO GET THE LIST [00:10:05] THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET, WHAT THE LAST SECTION OF TEN ARE INDICATED IN THERE. CLEANED EVERYTHING UP. PUT IT UP GRAPHICALLY AND FINALLY THE MONEYS BECAUSE IT'S ALWAYS SHOW ME THE MONEY. $4,254 WAS IN A CHECK MADE OUT TO THE COUNTY ON THE 8TH OF JUNE. THAT WAS 50%. THERE IS ANOTHER 50% COMING AND THEN WE'LL GET THOSE QUARTERLY AS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY MENTIONED. TRYING TO SIMPLIFY IT. IT'S NOT THAT EASY TO COMPREHEND @IT. THERE IS A LOT OF MOVING PARTS WITH THIS. REALLY APPRECIATE THE PARTNERSHIP WITH PATRICK AND THAT. ULTIMATELY IT WOULD COST US SOME MONEY IN SOME WAY TO PUT THE BENCHES THERE AND THE SIGNS. AND JTA WOULD HAVE JUST PASSED ON THAT COST TO US. THOSE ARE SOME OF THE KEY THINGS. >> OK. GOOD PARTNERSHIP. WE'LL SEE Y'ALL NEXT WEEK. >> MOVING ON TO I'M 2, [2.  RFP #19/20-39, Professional Lobbying Services] RFP19/20-39 PROFESSIONAL LOBBYING SERVICES. >> THE RFP WE ISSUED. OUR CURRENT AGREEMENT EXPIRED JUNE 30. WE RECEIVED THREE PROPOSALS. WE HAD A COMMITTEE OF THREE THAT EVALUATED THE RFP PROPOSALS THAT WAS OUR PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR ECONOMICS DIRECTOR AND EXTENSION OFFICE DIRECTOR. THE RANKING IS BEFORE YOU. THE FIORENTINO GROUP RANKED HIGHEST. SOUTHERN GROUP AT 81.33. STRATEGOS GROUP 76.33. WE ASK TO YOU CONSIDER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO GO WITH THE NUMBER ONE FIRM OR IF YOU WANT PRESENTATIONS WE CAN GET THOSE SCHEDULED. >> I THINK JUST GO WITH THEM I. DON'T NEED TO SEE A PRESENTATION. >> THEY ARE VERY REASONABLE. I THINK THAT IS LESS THAN WE PAID THEM BEFORE. >> UNDER THE CURRENT AGREEMENT THEY WERE CHARGING 5,000 AS A MONTHLY RETAINER AND PROPOSAL WAS 4500. >> WE'LL PUT THIS ON CONSENT TO SELECT THE RECOMMENDED TOP PERSON. >> THANK YOU. >> ITEM 3, INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT [3.  Interlocal Agreement between Clay County and JEA] BETWEEN CLAY COUNTY AND JEA FOR A SETTLEMENT DATED 3/29/02. >> THIS IS A NEW INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH JEA. BACK IN 2002 APPARENTLY THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WAS ACTUALLY ENTERED INTO BETWEEN CCUA, JEA AND DRI PROPERTY OWNERS UP IN THE OAK LEAF AREA. AND UNDER THAT AGREEMENT THERE WAS A PROVISION THAT THE COUNTY WOULD BE PAID SOME MONEYS FROM JEA UNDER THE AGREEMENT THERE WAS AN INITIAL PAYMENT SUPPOSED TO BE FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD AND THEN A TRUE UP. THE INITIAL PAYMENT OF 500,000 WAS MADE. NOBODY EVER FOLLOWED UP OR EVER REALIZED THAT THERE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A TRUE UP AFTER THAT TEN YEARS. FAST FORWARD AND EARLIER THIS YEAR WHILE JOYED WHO USED TO WORK AT JEA WAS STILL WITH US, SOMEONE FROM JEA REACHED OUT TO US AND SAID WE THINK WE OWE THE COUNTY SOME MONEY UNDER THE OLD AGREEMENT. SO JODIE WORKED ON IT BEFORE SHE LEFT. AFTER SHE LEFT ALONG WITH MIKE PRICE, KELLY AND I WORKED WITH JEA AND CAME TO LEARN THAT THE COUNTY IS DUE BACK FROM THE 2002 TIME PERIOD ALONG WITH THE TRUE UP A LITTLE BIT IN EXCESS OF $2 MILLION. WHAT JEA PROPOSED WAS THEY GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE PAYMENT OF THE $2 MILLION. AND MOVING FORWARD LET'S REVISE THE AGREEMENT SO IT'S NOT THE TEN YEAR PAYMENT WITH A TRUE UP. BUT JUST DO AN ANNEWEL PAYMENT. WHAT THIS PROVIDE FOR IS TO MODIFY THAT AND TO PROVIDE THAT THEY'LL MAKE THE $2 MILLION PAYMENT TO THE COUNTY ONCE THE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED. AND THEN MOVING FORWARD ONCE A YEAR SO FOR INSTANCE FOR THE 2020 YEAR THEY'LL PAY NEWS JANUARY 21 THE AMOUNT THAT IS OWED. WE THINK IT WILL BE AROUND 200-250,000 A YEAR. >> WILL THAT BE GENERAL FUND? >> WE'RE NOT SURE. [00:15:01] WE'RE RESEARCHING IT. WE'RE NOT SURE WHY WE WERE INCLUDED IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, WHETHER IT WAS DUE TO A FRANCHISE FEE OR PUBLIC SERVICE TAX. >> MAYBE IT'S A GOOD THING FOR US THEY DIDN'T SELL. >> THEY BROUGHT IT TO OUR ATTENTION AND WE'RE ANXIOUS TO GET THE AGREEMENT MOVING AND GET MONEY. >> VERY GOOD. >> WHAT DO WE NEED? I MEAN YES. >> I THINK I DON'T THINK IT HAS TO GO TO THE BOARD. IT CAN GO TO CONSENT. BEFORE MIKE PRICE LEFT HE DID AN ANALYSIS OF THE NUMBERS BACK FROM 2002 FORWARD AND AGREED WITH THEIR FIGURE. >> VERY GOOD TO HEAR. SO THAT WILL GO ON CONSENT [4.  RFQ #19/20-40, Owner's Representative Services for 2020 Transportation Bonding Projects] AGENDA. ITEM 4 OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES FOR THE 2020 TRANSPORTATION BONDING PROJECTS. >> THIS TRULY STARTS THE ENGINEERING PROCESS FOR THE BONDING PROGRAM. HAD TWO FIRMS SUBMIT PROPOSALS. THEY WERE RANKED BY MYSELF, SHA REESE AND STEVE WHO IS IN CHARGE OF OUR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. AND THE WGI CAME OUT ON TOP. SCORES WERE CLOSE. THEY ARE TWO VERY GOOD FIRMS. >> WE CAN PUT IT JUST ON THE AGENDA FOR APPROVAL OR DO PRESENTATIONS FROM EACH , WHAT DO YOU THINK? >> BOTH FIRMS ARE AVAILABLE IF YOU WANT TO DO PRESENTATIONS AT THE BOARD. >> THEY ARE BOTH GREAT FIRMS. DO YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE? >> NO. >> I THINK IN TERMS OF HELPING US BETTER UNDERSTAND PRESENTATIONS WOULD PROBABLY GIVE US KIND OF A BETTER IDEA OF WHAT BOTH ARE OFFERING. >> OK. SO THEY COULD DO A PRESENTATION AT THIS COMING ONE? >> YES, MA'AM. >> THE REASON I THINK THAT'S A GOOD CHOICE IS IF WE GET TO NEXT WEEK AND THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS SAY WE WANT TO SEE A PRESENTATION. >> THIS IS A PRETTY BIG SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT. I KNOW WE WORK WITH BOTH ORGANIZATIONS ON OTHER THINGS. THERE ALSO WILL BE DESIGN WORK RIGHT? >> WHAT WILL COME AFTER THIS IS AFTER WE'VE HIRED OUR PERSON THAT IS GOING TO MANAGE THE PROGRAM BEFORE US, WE'LL PUT OUT THREE RFQ'S FOR OUR SIX PROJECTS TWO EACH. WHEN THOSE GET AT 30% DESIGN STAGE THEN WE'LL GET OUR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ON BOARD AND GO THROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESS SO IT WILL BE ALL THREE FIRMS AT THAT POINT. >> ALL RIGHT. IF YOU'LL LET BOTH FIRMS KNOW WE'D LIKE A PRESENTATION ON TUESDAY, WE'LL KEEP THINGS MOVING. >> BRIEF. >> YES BRIEF. >> WE'LL PUT THAT ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. >> THIS IS JUST A RENEWAL FOR [5.  Second Renewal for Bid #16/17-22, Cold Mix Asphalt] OUR EXISTING BID. WE SPEND ABOUT $70,000 A YEAR PATCHING POTHOLES AND THIS IS WHERE WE GET OUR MATERIALS FOR IT. AND NO INCREASE IN COST. >> I SAW THAT. >> CONSENT MAKES SENSE ON THIS. >> WE'LL PUT THIS ON CONSENT. ITEM 6 IS FOR THE MOTOR GRADERS. [6.  Bid No.19/20-35, Four (4) Motor Graders] >> YES, MA'AM. WE BASICALLY ARE BUYING FOUR MOTOR GRADERS AND TRADING IN FOUR. AND WHAT YOU SEE IS THE COST DIFFERENCE JUST AS THOUGH YOU ARE AT A CAR LOT, IT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A TRADE IN FOR WHAT WE GOT FOR ALL FOUR OF THESE AND WHAT WE'RE PAYING FOR THE MOTOR GRADERS WE'RE GETTING AN EXTENDED WARRANTY. >> AND WAS THIS A BID THAT WE PUT OUT? >> THIS WAS A BID WE PUT OUT OURSELF. AND WHAT WE DID IS THE GRADERS THAT WE HAVE ARE FIVE YEARS OLD. WE HAD THE LAST BID FIVE YEARS AGO THERE WAS A GUARANTEED MINIMUM. THAT'S WHAT WE ASKED FOR WAS WE GET A GUARANTEED MINIMUM FOR THE BUYBACK. WE HAD A MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE TIME. ALL WE WERE DOING IT WAS PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE. THE OIL CHANGES, TIRES, ANYTHING ELSE DURING THIS PERIOD WE GOT THE LAST ONES FROM CATERPILLAR. THEY PROVIDED ALL THE REPAIRS. AND IF THEY KEPT A GRADER MORE THAN THEE DAYS THEY HAD TO PROVIDE US ONE WHILE THEY WERE REPAIRING THE GRADERS. >> BECAUSE OF THE SIZE, I THINK MAYBE WE SHOULD PUT IT ON THE [00:20:02] AGENDA. >> I'M GOOD EITHER WAY. I WOULD BE FINE WITH CONSENT. I'M ALSO FINE ON THE AGENDA. BECAUSE IT IS -- >> WE'LL PUT IT ON CONSENT. IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO PULL IT, THEY CAN. >> AND ITEM 7. AMEND NUMBER FIVE TO THE SIGNAL [7.  Amendment #5 to the Traffic Signal Maintenance and Compensation Agreement with FDOT] MAINTENANCE AND COMPENSATION AGREEMENT WITH DOT. >> WE DO THIS EVERY YEAR. DOT PAYS US TO MAINTAIN THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS. THEY ADD THEM AND THE DOLLARS CLIMB EVERY YEAR. THIS WILL DO US UNTIL NEXT YEAR. >> THAT'S INCOME COMING IN SO WE CAN PUT THAT ON CONSENT. >> HOPEFULLY NO ONE WILL ARGUE WITH THAT. >> ITEM 8 THE DOCTORS LAKE DRIVE AT WOODSIDE DRIVE PIPE CULVERT [8.  Bid #19/20-38, Doctors Lake Drive at Woodside Drive Pipe Culvert Replacement] REPLACEMENT. >> IT'S BEEN FAILING FOR YEARS. WE PUT THIS OUT TO BID WITH OUR DRAIN LINE CONTRACTORS AND I WAS NOT HAPPY WITH WHAT I GOT. BUT WE DID LEARN SOME THINGS. AND WE MODIFIED THE DESIGN A LITTLE BIT AND FELT LIKE IT WOULD BE BETTER TO GO OUT FOR A COMPETITIVE BID. OUR BIDS CAME IN $200,000 LOWER. WE OPENED UP THE CONSTRUCTION AREA A LITTLE BIT BY GETTING A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SO THEY WERE NOT IN SUCH A TIGHT AREA. >> GOOD. VERY GOOD. >> CONSENT. >> AND ITEM 9 FAMILY COURT [9.  Family Court Magistrate Services Agreement-First Amendment] MAGISTRATE SERVICES AGREEMENT. >> AT THE REQUEST OF JUDGE LUSTER, WE ALREADY THIS H THIS AGREEMENT IN PLACE FOR THE FAMILY COURT MAGISTRATE. BUT THEY NEEDED TO ADD SOME ADDITIONAL HOURS SPECIFICALLY AN ADDITIONAL 26 HOURS PER MONTH. AND AS YOU'LL RECALL THE FUNDING FOR THIS AGREEMENT ACTUALLY COMES OUT OF THE $65 COURT FEE. SO IT'S ALLOCATED AS THEIR FUND AND THERE WERE SUFFICIENT FUND. SO THEY JUST REQUESTED THE AGREEMENT BE AMENDED TO ALLOW THE ADDITIONAL HOURS. >> THAT COMES TO $6,500 TOTAL RIGHT? >> YES. AND IT DATES BACK TO I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S INCLUDED IN HERE, BUT I THINK IT DATES BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF MAY FOR HER TO HAVE THE ADDITIONAL HOURS FOR MAY FORWARD. >> ALL RIGHT. >> PROBABLY CONSENT WOULD BE FINE? >> YEAH. >> PLEASE NOTE WE'LL PUT THAT ON CONSENT. MOVING ON TO THE BUDGET [10.  Budget Resolution - Donated Food for COVID-19 Response] RESOLUTION FOR DONATED FOOD FOR COVID-19 RESPONSE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M BRINGING TODAY THE RESOLUTION FOR YOU TO FINALIZE THE DONATIONS WE RECEIVED FROM THE ORGANIZATIONS FOR OUR COVID-19 RESPONSE FOR THE FOOD TO OUR CITIZENS AND IT'S FINAL $4,105. WE NEED TO ALLOCATE IT AND MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IN THE BUDGET BALANCES. >> OK. >> CONSENT. >> WE'LL PUT THIS ON CONSENT AGENDA FOR NEXT TUESDAY. >> THANK YOU. >> AND YOU ARE UP FOR THE NEXT ONE. NUMBER 11, BUDGET AMENDMENT TO REALLOCATE FUNDING OF CIP [11.  Budget Amendment to Reallocate Funding of CIP Projects for the CARES Act Projects] PROJECTS FOR THE CARES ACT. >> I HAVE A COUPLE OF DOCUMENTS I WANT TO DISTRIBUTE. >> OK. >> IF I MAY, I'LL BRIEF THESE SHEETS SHOULD LOOK FAMILIAR. THESE ARE THE ONES I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BRIEF AT THE LAST SPECIAL BCC MEETING AT THE END OF THE MONTH OF JUNE. WHAT SHE'S DONE IS BASED UPON OUR DISCUSSION FROM THAT BCC MEETING, SHE WENT AND UPDATED AND ADDRESSED CONCERNS THAT SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAD ALSO THROUGHOUT. SOME OF THE BIGGEST THINGS ARE HERE IF I POINT YOU DOWN TO ROAD RESURFACING, IF YOU REMEMBER WE HAD THE IN THAT FIRST COLUMN, I'LL RESTREW SHEET WITH YOU, THE FIRST COLUMN IS WHAT IS BUDGETED. THE SECOND COLUMN IS REVISED BUDGETED FOR THE CURRENT YEAR AND THEN THE FOLLOW ON YEARSISM WANT TO POINT OUT ON ROAD RESURFACING, I KNOW ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAD CONCERNS ABOUT THE NUMBERS. SHE WAS ABLE TO LOOK AT THIS AND PUT THIS ANOTHER 300,000 FOR EACH YEAR ON THE FALLOUT YEAR. IT WAS ONLY 2 MILLION, WENT TO $2.3 MILLION ON THAT. SHE'S ALSO GOTTEN TOGETHER WITHDALE TO MAKE SURE THAT ACROSS THE BOARD WAS ABLE TO HANDLE AND ALL OF OUR COMMITMENTS WE HAVE FOR THE REST [00:25:03] OF THE YEAR AND THAT WAS THERE. AND THEN I THINK LET ME JUST TAKE A LOOK. SHE JUST CLEANED UP SOME OF THE AREAS WITH REGARDS TO THE TRAFFIC ELEMENTS. DIDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING WITH REGARDS TO REVENUE. AND THEN PARTS AND REC WENT THROUGH THOSE REMAIN THE SAME. AGAIN IT'S KEY TO TAKE A LOOK AT SHE DID MOVE ON THAT STATE ROAD 23 WORKING WITHDALE AND MOVING THAT FROM THIS CURRENT YEAR TO BUDGET YEAR 2023 ON THAT. AND THEN THE TWO MAIN ITEMS WITH REGARDS TO CIP THAT WOULD BE CRITICAL. IF WE DID NOT RECEIVE FUNDING BACK FROM THE STATE ON THIS WOULD BE 6095 AND THAT IS COLLEGE ROAD COLLEGE DRIVE. THAT WOULD BE RESTORED MANY A FUTURE YEAR OF 24-25. AND THEN E911 CONSOLIDATION WOULD RESTORE IN THAT FUTURE YEAR 24-25. THIS WAS THE WORST CASE SCENARIO. THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT I LOOK FORWARD IF WE DID NOT GET THE FULL REIMBURSEMENT AND WHAT WOULD BE AT RISK. I WOULD ANTICIPATE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER TO TRUE HAD BACK UP BASED UPON OUR REVENUES THAT WE RECEIVE FROM THAT. THE OTHER TWO SHEETS THAT SHE HAS, SHE JUST THIS WAS AN EASY WAY TO PUT IT. SHE PUT ANYTIME OUR NORMAL BUDGET WAY FOR THESE NEXT SHEETS WITH REGARDS TO REVENUE AND THE EXPENDITURES. ANY QUESTIONS? >> I DID HAVE ONE QUESTION ON THE SHERIFF'S CAPITAL 6078, IT SAYS HE REQUESTED 1.7 BUT WE PUT THIS 1.3S THAT SOMETHING HE'S AGREED TO 234. >> NO. >> ON THAT THE SHERIFF HAS REQUESTED THESE ARE ADDITIONAL VEHICLES. WE DIDN'T GET AN EXACT NUMBER OF VEHICLES. 1.3 IS WHAT IS IN THE CURRENT CIP. HE DID REQUEST 1.7. WHAT YOU CALCULATED WAS 1.3. >> NO PROBLEM. >> I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS. BUT DID WE GET AN UPDATE FROM THE STATE ON THE KEYSTONE WHETHER THAT WOULD QUALIFY OR NOT WHILE WE'RE TALKING CARES ACT? >> WE'VE TALKED TO LYNN A COUPLE OF TIMES. WE'RE STILL ON THE YOU CAN'T BUILD OUT OF THE GROUND. WE'RE DISCUSSING ABOUT WHERE THAT COULD GO AND THEN WE'LL GO BACK WITH THE STATE. THE COUPLE OF THINGS WE'VE TALKED ABOUT DON'T SEEM TO BE FEASIBLE ACCORDING TO THE CITY AT THIS POINT IN TIME. WE'RE STILL DISCUSSING IT WITH HER. >> CONSIDER THE IMPORTANCE IT SHOULD GO ON THE AGENDA. >> I AGREE. >> WE'LL MOVE ITEM 11 TO THE [12.  Budget Resolutions to Address CARES Act Funding] AGENDA. ITEM 12 TO ADDRESS BUDGET RESOLUTIONS FOR THE CARES ACT FUNDING. >> SINCE WE'RE PREPARING TO MOVE THE FUNDING AROUND TO FUND CARES ACT VERSION TWO SUPPORTING RESOLUTION FOR THE CARES ACT FUND TO RECEIVE THE MONEYS FROM THE CIP FUND AND OUR BOND FUND WHERE WE HAVE TO SHOW THE REDUCTION IN THE SURTAX REVENUE RECEIVED. SO ALL THE TRANSFERS BETWEEN THE FUNDS ARE BALANCED AS REQUIRED FOR FLORIDA STATUTES. >> ARE THESE RESOLUTIONS CONTINGENT UPON THE PREVIOUS -- OK ALL RIGHT. IT WILL NEED TO GO ON AGENDA BECAUSE WE HAVE TO APPROVE ONE BEFORE THE OTHER. >> ITEM 12 WILL GO ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. [13.  FY 20/21 Budget Requests from BCC & Constitutional Offices] ITEM 13. 20/21 BUDGET REQUEST FROM THE A. >> WE HAVE BRIEFS AND I HAVE SOME DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. >> BUDGET SEASON STARTED ON MAY 1 WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE CONSTITUTIONALS TO SUBMIT THEIR BUDGET REQUESTS IN. I ASKED ROLL GAY TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND PUT IT IN THE FORMAT AND SHE'LL TAKE OVER THE BRIEF IN A MINUTE. AND THEN WHAT. THE INCREASE IN VALUE THROUGHOUT [00:30:11] ENTIRE COUNTY WAS 7.5%. THAT EQUATES TO APPROXIMATELY 5-$6 MILLION IN AD VALOREM CHANGE YEAR OVER YEAR IF YOU MAINTAIN THE SAME MILLAGE RATE. THE SECOND AREA OF REVENUE WOULD BE AN AREA THAT I'M GOING TO HAVE DEBBIE BRIEF ON THE 14TH OF WHERE WE STAND WITH REGARD TO SALES SURTAX, GAS TAX AND THAT. TO SUMMARIZE AND EASIEST WAY FOR KNOW SUMMARIZE IS WE RECEIVED AT THE END OF JUNE IFTH NUMBERS FOR APRIL. IF YOU REMEMBER APRIL WAS WHERE WE WERE REALLY IN THE THROWS OF EVERYTHING SHUT DOWN. THE LOSS OF REVENUES THAT WERE EXPECTED THERE WERE ALMOST $600,000 IN REVENUE IN JUST ONE MONTH. THE PREVIOUS MONTH WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR MARCH AND WE KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER WAS. THAT WAS APPROXIMATELY $300,000. IF YOU REMEMBER IN RESPONSE TO THAT, THE STATE SAID THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO ALLOCATE 95% OF OUR SHARED SALES SURTAX. THEY WERE ONLY GOING TO GIVE US 50% OF THOSE NUMBERS. ALSO WHAT IS TRANSPIRED WAS THE GOVERNOR VETOED A LOT OF ITEMS FROM THE BUDGET AND MOVE AGO HEAD INTO UNKNOWN TIMES WITH REGARDS TO REVENUE. IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THIS AND SIMPLIFY IT OVERALL AND WE'LL GET A BRIEF FROM WEB DION THIS ON NEXT TUESDAY WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS LESS EACH MONTH. SUM GAME OF 0 WITH REGARDS TO REVENUE. IN ORDER TO, THAT UP, I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT SLIDE HERE RIGHT NOW. BUT THAT'S JUST AN EASY WAY TO EXPLAIN IT. IF YOU REMEMBER FINALLY I ASKED THE CONSTITUTIONALS IF THEY COULD TO KEEP THINGS AS EVEN ACROSS THE BOARD AS THEY COULD YEAR OVER YEAR AND NOW SHE WILL BRIEF YOU ON WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE. >> WE PUT A SMALL PRESENTATION ON THE SUBMITLES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES AND OPERATION BUDGET FOR THE BOCC. KEEP IN MIND THIS IS EXPENDITURES AND THE FIRST ONE IS SUPERVISOR OF ELECTION. YOU CAN SEE INCREASE IN THE BUDGET DUE TO THE COVID 19 AND REQUIREMENTS CURRENTLY OF CONSIDERING OPENING THE SUPER CENTERS FOR VOTING AND INCREASED POSTAGE DUE TO THE PRECAUTION AND EMERGENCY MEASURES. THE BUDGET USED FOR HAD SUBMISSION IS THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE TO INCLUDE ALL THOSE SPECIAL THINGS WE REQUIRED TO DO IF THEY ARE NO LONGER GOING TO BE MANDATORY. THEN THE BUDGET WILL BE DECREASING. THE PROPERTY APPRAISER BUDGET AFTER REVIEWING THE INCREASES AND DECREASES HE CAME OUT WITH $545 NET DECREASE BETWEEN LINE ITEMS IN HIS BUDGET. SO PRETTY MUCH STAYED FLAT. THE TAX COLLECTOR BUDGET IN OUR COUNTY IS PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REV ON AUGUST 1. LAST YEAR HE SUBMITTED 4.7 MILLION AND CURRENTLY YOU WILL SEE HIS SUBMITLE ON AUGUST 1 FOR THE NEXT YEAR. THE CLERK OF THE COURT, THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPONENTS TO THE BUDGET OF THE CLERK REQUESTED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. AND THE FIRST LINE ITEM IS THE ACTUAL CLERK OF COURT BUDGET WHERE THE COUNTY REQUIRES TO SUBSIDIZE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLERK FOR FLORIDA FROM STATUTE. YOU CAN SEE SMALL DECREASE OF 90,000 BASED ON DIFFERENT RECONCILIATIONS BETWEEN ITEMS AND OPERATION. THE NEXT THREE LINE ITEMS ARE ADDRESSING THE TRANSITION. AND AS YOU CAN SEE THE FIRST LINE ITEM SHOWS HOW MUCH IT COST THE BOARD AROUND THE DEPARTMENT AND THE VALUE JUDGMENT BOARD. AND THE NEXT BREAKOUTS REQUEST FROM THE CLERK TO DO THOSE OPERATIONS. THERE IS DIFFERENT DETAILS INVOLVED ON WHAT IS GOING TO BE DONE BY THE CLERKS TEAM AND WHAT IS GOING TO BE DONE BY THE NEWLY DEVELOPED BTM. SLIGHT DECREASES AND CHANGES AND INCREASES ARE DUE TO THOSE ITEMS. THE SHERIFF BUDGET IS AS SUBMITTED BY THE SHERIFF ON MAY 1 TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE SHERIFF'S GENERAL FUND OPERATIONS. THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE HIS SPECIAL REVENUE REQUEST AND CAPITAL REQUEST WHICH WE JUST DISCUSSED IN CIP. YOU CAN SEE THE INCREASE [00:35:02] REQUESTED. AND THE BOCC, AGAIN THIS BUDGET INCLUDES ONLY PERSONNEL AND OPERATIONS THERE. IS NO CAPITAL OR ANY SPECIAL REVENUES HERE. >> IF I MAY ADD SO IT IS QUITE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER $3.2 MILLION, APPROXIMATELY $2 MILLION OF THAT IS IN ERP OR SYSTEM CALLED WORK DAY IN THEIR BUDGETED PLAN. THESE WERE BRIEFED TO YOU AS WORST CASE FOR TO US BACK DOWN FROM THESE NUMBERS. >> OK. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >> THIS IS OBVIOUSLY JUST A PRELIMINARY LOOK AT IT. >> LEFT-HAND SIDE IS A BREAKOUT OF 1204 WHICH IS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FOR THE JAIL AND SHERIFF'S OFFICE. REPAIRS OF MAINTENANCE THE CHART ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE SHOWS THE REQUESTED PROJECTS THERE. >> I GUESS THE ONLY THING I WOULD ASK IS GIVEN SITUATION WITH THE FUNDING THIS YEAR, IS THERE ANY WAY THIS COULD BE SPREAD OVER TWO YEARS AND I'M NOT EXPECTING AN ANSWER TONIGHT. WE KNOW THESE THINGS NEED TO BE DONE BUT CAN WE SPREAD THEM OUT? >> IT'S MY OPINION THERE ARE ALWAYS MUST HAVES AND NEEDS AS OPPOSED TO WANTS. WE ALWAYS LOOK AT HEALTH AND SAFETY FIRST AND OPERATIONAL IMPACT ITEMS. THERE ARE CERTAINLY BOTH OF THOSE IN HERE. STUFF LIKE AT THE TOP, THE CHILLER REPLACEMENT THAT HAS TO BE PROGRAMMED. THE GENERATOR, I'D SAY THAT'S A MUST HAVE. THEN IMPACTS LIKE SECURITY IS THE BIG CONCERN THERE. YOU TALK ABOUT THE CAMERAS. >> THE REST OF THE REMODELS AND UPGRADES YOU HAVE TO WEIGH THEM OUT AGAINST THE IMPACT AND DECIDE WHERE THE LINE IS, WHERE YOUR WANTS AND DESIRES MEET ECONOMICS. >> RIGHT. >> OK. >> THAT WAS THE ONLY COMMENTS I HAVE. >> I JUST DON'T SEE -- IT SEEMS LIKE EACH YEAR IT'S A MASSIVE NUMBER. AND I HAD HOPED THAT WE WERE GETTING A GRADUAL INCREASED PLAN OVER TIME. BUT LAST YEAR 10 MILLION. THIS YEAR 6 MILLION PLUS ADDITIONAL FOR CAPITAL. SEEMS LIKE IT'S IT'S ASK FOR THE MOON AND HOPE -- IT'S LIKE A NEGOTIATING TECHNIQUE NOT AN ACTUAL THIS IS WHAT WE NEED WHICH IS UNFORTUNATE. >> OK. WE'LL MOVE THAT TO CONSENT AND PRESENTATIONS SET AT THE MEETING I'M ASSUMING. >> YES, MA'AM. >> MOVING ON TO ITEM 14. THE PERFORMANCE GRANT AGREEMENT [14.  FY 2020/2021 FDEM Performance Grant Agreement G0103 and Acknowledge Memorandum Ratification] AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT MEMORANDUM. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. THE FIRST ONE NUMBER 14 IS A FEDERAL ALLOCATION FOR 74,195. WE USE THIS FOR PLANNING, TRAINING AND EXERCISE WHICH IS OUR NORMAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS A FEDERAL ALLOCATION WE GET ON AN ANNEWEL BASIS. THIS IS THE CONTRACT AND THEN THE MEMO WHICH NOW THE STATE REQUIRES A MEMO OF PROOF OF VERIFICATION AND RECEIPT. SO THOSE ARE THE TWO THINGS IN THIS. >> OK. [00:40:01] >> CONSENT. >> CONSENT. THAT IS MY THOUGHT TOO. WE'LL PLACE THIS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. ITEM 15 PREPAREDNESS ASSISTANCE [15.  FY 2020/2021 FDEM Preparedness and Assistance Grant Agreement A0125 and Acknowledge Memorandum Ratification] GRANT. >> THIS IS THE STATE ALLOCATION FOR THIS. THIS IS USED AGAIN FOR PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND THIS IS USED FOR SALARY. THIS IS AN ANNEWEL RECURRING GRANT WE GET. >> CONSENT AGENDA. ITEM 16. [16.  Agreement with Charles Perry Partners, Inc.-Installation of Extractor Laundry Equipment-Fire Station 11] AGREEMENT WITH CHARLES PERRY PARTNERS ON THE INSTALLATION OF THE EXTRACTOR LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT. >> YES, MA'AM. IN THE LAST BOARD MEETING THE BOARD ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD TO CHARGES PERRY PARTNERS IN $169,725. THIS IS SIMP THINK AGREEMENT THAT WILL COVER THAT WORK. >> AND THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO APPROVE ACCEPTING THE GRANT. I THINK WE CAN PUT IT ON CONSENT. THANK YOU. [17.  Bid #19/20-33, Public Safety Radio Tower Upgrades - Equipment Purchase And Installation] BID ITEM 17, REGARDING THE PUBLIC RADIO TOWER. >> THIS IS RESULT OF THE RFP FOR BID 19/20-33 FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AT THE RADIO TOWER SITES. IT'S GOING TO INCLUDE THE HVAC AND BACKUP TO. THAT OPSOGEN RATE TOSSER AND TOWER LIGHTING FOR MOST ALL THE SITES. ONE SITE HAS TOWER LIGHTING AND ONE HAS A GENERATOR. WHEN THEY SUBMITTED THIS IT WAS FOR 1.20 MILLION. WE PUT IN THERE THEY THEY SUBMITTED AN ALTERNATE TO THE BID TO REPLACE THE REMAINDER OF THE SHELTERS WHICH IF YOU'LL REMEMBER WE WERE -- [INAUDIBLE] AND LOOK AT THOSE THE PREBID INSPECTIONS. FOUND OUT THOSE REMAINING SHELTERS THEY WOULD SUBMIT A BID FOR THAT. WITH WE'VE LOOKED AT THAT AND FOUND THAT VERY ACCEPTABLE. WE'RE ASKING YOUR APPROVAL FOR 1,547,029 NOT TO EXCEED THAT. >> BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT WE'RE GOING TO SEND THIS ON TO AGENDA. >> ANY QUESTIONS? >> NO. LOOKS LIKE WE SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST A COUPLE OF DECADES OF GOOD SERVICE OUT OF THESE NEW UPGRADES WE'RE DOING. JUST HAS TO BE DONE. [18.  Operative IQ Licensing Agreement with Bound Tree Medical, LLC] ITEM 18 OPERATIVE IQ LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH BOUND TREE MEDICAL. >> AN INVENTORY SYSTEM. THE INITIAL ROLLOUT WOULD BE TO USE IT FOR MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND ROLL IT INTO OUR SUPPLIES AND TRACKING OF STUFF. WHILE WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO GAIN THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE AN INVENTORY SYSTEM OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, IT'S BEEN KEY TO WHY WE DON'T HAVE ONE NEEDING TO MOVE FORWARD. >> DEFINITELY WANT TO INVENTORY SOMETHING AS COSTLY AS WELL AS CAN BE USED. >> IT WILL BE MORE DATA AND BE ABLE TO TRACK DOWN TO VILE WHERE THE MEDICATION IS AND WHERE IT'S BEEN USED. >> PERFECT BECAUSE YOU COME TO PICK ME UP, I WANT TO YOU HAVE THE MEDICINE THERE. >> ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER? >> NO. >> ANY PREFERENCE WHETHER IT'S ON CONSENT OR REGULAR? >> I'M GOOD WITH CONSENT ON THIS. >> IT'S A PRETTY LOW AMOUNT. THANK YOU. >> AND NUMBER 19 THE 12TH RENEWAL OF THE OF THE SWAGIT [19.  12th Renewal of the Swagit Productions, LLC Agreement #2007/2008-130] PRODUCTIONS. >> THAT'S WHAT WE USED FOR CLOSED CAPTIONING AND VIDEO RECORDING THE, THE COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR BROADCASTING OUR MEETINGS. THIS IS THE 12TH RENEWAL. IT'S THE COMPANY THAT HAS ALL OF OUR CURRENT HARDWARE WE BOUGHT THROUGH A YEAR OR TWO AGO WE ADDED THE ADA PORTION OF THEIR HARDWARE TO OUR SYSTEM. THEY HAVE OUR ARCHIVE. TO MOVE THIS TO ANOTHER PROVIDER WE'D HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT TRANSFER AND REPURCHASE THE HARDWARE. WE'RE ASKING FOR THE SOLE SOURCE OF SWAGIT? >> THIS IS WAIVING THE PURCHASING AGREEMENT AAPPROVING THE SOLE SOURCE? >> YES, MA'AM. >> ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT ONE? >> NO. I THINK WE CAN PUT IT ON CONSENT. IF ANYBODY HAS CONCERNS THEY CAN PULL IT. >> IT'S PRETTY CLEAR UNLESS YOU WANT TO SPEND A LOT MORE MONEY, WE NEED TO STAY WHERE WE ARE. [00:45:05] >> AND THEY ARE DOING A GOOD JOB. >> MOST OF THAT IS FOR SERVICES. EVEN IF YOU SWITCH, YOU'D STILL PAY FOR THAT SERVICE TO DO THE CLOSED CAPTIONING TO BE COMPLIANT. >> ITEM 20 DONATION OF SURPLUS [20.  Donation of Surplus Fire Trucks to Argyle Volunteer Fire Dept.] FIRE TRUCKS TO THE ARGYLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT. >> THE TWO TRUCKS THAT ARE REFERENCED IN HERE, THEY ARE A 2001 AND 199 EMERGENCY ONE CUSTOM VEHICLES THAT HAD A FAIRLY LONG AND ADDERROUS SERVICE LIFE WITH US. THEY WERE PUT INTO THE DEALS SURPLUS PROCESS TO ATTEMPT TO RESELL THEM TO ANOTHER GROUP. BUT THE PRICING FOR THOSE CAME WELL UNDER $5,000. $5,000 IS SORT OF OUR BREAKOVER POINT WHERE WE WOULD GO TO ONE OF THE VENDORS AND OFFER THEM TO BUY IT BACK AND AT LEAST GET SOMETHING FOR THE VEHICLE. AS THEY SHOWED UP ON THE DEAL, WE GOT A REQUEST FROM THE ARGYLE FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM WALTON COUNTY WHO SAID WE'RE IN TROUBLE, OUR APPARATUS IS OLD. WE'D ASK IF THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER DONATION OF THE UNITS. WE TOOK A LOOK BACK AT THE UNITS, WE REJECTED THE BID. THEY TRAVELED FROM WALTON COUNTY TO THE COUNTY TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE APPARATUS AND WOULD LIKE TO RECEIVE IT. THEY SENT A MEMO TO THE BOARD REQUESTING SUCH I. RECOMMEND WE PROVIDE THOSE DONATIONS TO THEM IN LIEU OF THE SURPLUS ITEMS AND ALLOW THEM TO REPURPOSE THEM AND HOPEFULLY TAKE CARE OF THEM FOR ANOTHER FEW YEARS HOWEVER LONG THAT WILL BE. THEY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRANSPORTING THEM FROM HERE TO THEM AND ANY REPAIRS BECAUSE IT'S AN AS IS DONATION. >> [INAUDIBLE] . >> THEY ARE A NONPROFIT ENTITY. THEY ARE PART OF THE COUNTY AND PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE COUNTY THROUGH AS A DISTRICT. >> WE'LL PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA I THINK. SINCE WE'RE GIVING SOMETHING AWAY. I ACCEPTLY SUPPORT IT. WHEN THEY ONLY HAVE A VOLUNTEER DEPARTMENT, THAT TELLS YOU A LOT RIGHT THERE. >> IT DOES. >> THERE ARE PEOPLE THERE COMMITTED AS VOLUNTEERS, THEN THAT MAKES ME FEEL GOOD THAT WE CAN HELP THEM OUT. >> UNDERSTOOD. >> THANK YOU. >> DONATION OF A SURPLUS VEHICLE TO THE CITY OF KEYSTONE HEIGHTS. [21.  Donation of Surplus Vehicle to the City of Keystone Heights] >> SO THE KEYSTONE HEIGHTS AIRPORT AABOUT 12 YEARS AGO RECEIVED THREE SURPLUS VEHICLES THROUGH THE CITY OF KEYSTONE HEIGHTS AND FROM THE COUNTY. THEY HAVE ONE LEFT OUT OF THE THREE. THAT ONE IS A GO THOUSAND TWO CHEVY IMPALA WITH OVER 160,000 MILES. I CAN TELL YOU FIRSTHAND WHEN I WENT OUT THERE TO MY LAST MEETING, THE OLD GIRL ON HER LAST LEG. SO THEY ARE REQUESTING -- >> MY CAR HAS THAT MANY MILES ON IT. >> IT WAS NOT JUST MILES. SHE'S WRITTEN A LETTER AND THROUGH THE CITY OF KEYSTONE HEIGHTS IS REQUESTING THIS, THAT THIS TRANSFER WOULD GO THROUGH THE CITY. WE'VE IDENTIFIED A VEHICLE. IT'S A GO THOUSAND EIGHT FORDOES CAPE WITH 82,000 MILES ON IT AND THE APPROXIMATE VALUE IF IT WAS TO BE SOLD OUT THERE IS ABOUT $4,500. THIS IS BROUGHT TO YOU AND POSSIBLY TO THE BOARD FOR FINAL APPROVAL. AND JUST LOOKING TO HELP THEM OUT SO THEY CAN REPLACE THAT. >> I THINK THIS SHOULD PROBABLY GO ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. >> I'M GOOD WITH THAT. >> I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR TO US SUPPORT OUR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES WHEN WE CAN. APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT TO US HOWARD. ITEM 22 IS FUTURE COMMITTEE ITEMS. [22.  Future Committee Items] >> 22, I CAN COVER THIS. A FEW ITEMS TO BRIEF YOU. ONE WITH OUR COVID NUMBERS, THEY ARE INCREASING. BUT WE'VE BEEN FORTUNATE REALLY THAT THE HOSPITALIZATIONS HAVE REMAINED LOW. AND THE DEATHS HAVE REMAINED [00:50:01] FLAT AT 34. WE'RE PLUS 57 FOR DAY OVER DAY IS MY DAILY BRIEF TO YOU AND PLUS ONE FOR HOSPITALIZATION. I CAN TELL YOU COUNTY WIDE, ORANGE PARK IS NOT GOING TO SURGE JUST YET. THOUGH COUNTY WIDE THERE IS OVER 60 INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE IN THE HOSPITAL BEING SEEN FOR COVID 19 SYMPTOMS AND TREATMENT. WE'RE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE. >> THIS WEEK? >> YES, MA'AM. WE'RE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON THAT. I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT NUMBERS AND JOHN WILL HAVE TO HELP ME OUT, NUMBERS IN ICU FOR THAT? I CAN'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. WE FOUND THAT REALLY THE NUMBER OF VENTILATORS ACROSS THE BOARD THERE IS NO ISSUE THERE FOR US. ICU'S AREAS WHERE THEY ARE ABLE TO FLEX AND PUT THE PATIENTS IN THOSE PARTICULAR BEDS. AND THEN JOHN JUST MENTIONED TO ME THERE IS A FACILITY THAT WE CAN TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS TO IF THEY ARE ELDERLY AND PART OF AN ALF. >> YES IN JACKSONVILLE. ST. VINCENTS HAS A LARGE NETWORK OF HOSPITALS. BEFORE THEY GO ON AN INTERNAL SURGE THEY CAN TRANSPORT PATIENTS OUT TO THE OTHER HOSPITALS. ORANGE PARK DOESN'T HAVE THAT. HEATHER HAS BEEN WORKING WITH LISA AT ORANGE PARK TRYING TO IDENTIFY ANY OF THOSE PATIENTS THAT ARE NURSING FACILITY COVID POSITIVE PATIENTS IN THERE, THEY ARE BEING RELOCATED TO THE DOLPHIN HAD JACKSONVILLE WHICH IS A STRICTLY COVID POSITIVE FACILITY CONTRACTED BY THE STATE TO PUT POSITIVE COVID PATIENTS AT. >> WE HAVE 60 PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL RIGHT NOW IN CLAY COUNTY? >> YES, MA'AM. >> NO. THOSE ARE TOTAL HOSPITALIZATIONS TO DATE. >> NUMBERS RUN TOGETHER APP A WHILE. >> THOSE ARE TOTAL TO DATE THAT'S BEEN HOSPITALIZED SINCE MARCH. >> VERY GOOD. OK. >> AND ALSO AS THE BOARD'S REQUEST FROM THE SPECIAL MEETING TROY WORKED DILIGENTLY AND I'LL LET HIM BRIEF THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT NONPROFIT AND I THINK HE HAS SOME NUMBERS TO BRIEF YOU ON. >> SO ON THE CARES ACT JUST TO CATCH YOU UP TO DATE WHERE WE'RE AT, WE'VE SPENT ABOUT $100,000. WE HAVE PENDING PO'S FOR ABOUT 750,000 MORE SO THAT IS THINGS THAT WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING. PART OF THAT IS AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD FOR THE COUNTY MANAGE TORE EXECUTE. WE DID EXECUTE OUR CONTRACT WITH THE CONSULTANT TO COME ON BOARD TO HELP US REVIEW OUR PROJECTS. THE NONPROFIT APPLICATION WENT LIVE ON MONDAY. WE'RE GIVING THEM UNTIL FRIDAY FOR THE FIRST ROUND SO WE CAN BRING BACK A LIST OF THE NONPROFITS ON TUESDAY FOR YOUR APPROVAL. WE'VE NOTIFIED THE NONPROFITS BY EMAIL. WE'VE MADE PHONE CALLS TO SEVERAL OF THEM TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE AWARE OF THE TIME FRAME AND WHAT IS GOING ON. WE'VE SET UP AN EMAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CARES TEAM. SO CLAY CARES AND THIS GOES STRAIGHT TO THE TEAM AND WE'VE BEEN ANSWERING EMAILS. I SAID 15 HERE. I THINK WE'RE UP TO 25 EMAILS PEOPLE HAVE SENT IN ASKING QUESTIONS ANTICIPATING THE BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL GRANT PROGRAM. WE HAVE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE WEBSITE SO AS THEY COME ONLINE THEY CAN GO TO THE WEBSITE AND ALERT THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SITE THERE. IS A BUTTON ON THERE FOR CLAY CARES SO THEY CAN AGREE GOLDEN GAUNTLET STRAIGHT TO THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CARES ACT. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED THE INFORMATION DRAFTED BY THE LEGAL TEAM TO SUBMIT THEIR REIMBURSEMENTS SO WE'VE STARTED TO RECEIVE THOSE IN. KAREN'S TEAM IS WORKING ON AN RFP SCHEDULE SO WE'LL KNOW HOW BUSY WE'RE GOING TO BE GETTING THE BIDS OUT FOR THEIST VARIOUS ITEMS. KAREN'S TEAM IS WORKING ON THE APPRAISALS FOR THE TWO PURCHASES FOR THE WAREHOUSE AN PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT SO THEY ARE ACTIVELY WORKING ON THAT. THEN WE WILL BE PROVIDING THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS TO THE MUNICIPALITIES BY THE END OF THE WEEK. I'VE KEPT COURTNEY'S TEAM BUSY AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE TEAMS AND EVERYBODY ON THE CARES ACT TEAM. WE'VE BEEN DOING A LOT IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. >> HEAVY LIFT. >> GOOD JOB ON NOTICING THE PUBLIC. ON THE WAY HERE I HEARD CLAY COUNTY IS SENDING OUT $750,000 TO NONPROFITS. [00:55:05] >> IT'S A TRUE TEAM EFFORT. >> ANNA LISA. WE APPRECIATE YOU. >> THAT'S A GOOD JOB. GETTING THE WORD OUT THERE IS RELIEF COMING IS SUPER BIG. Y'ALL HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB. WE DID HAVE -- I HAD A NOTE [PUBLIC COMMENTS] HERE. DID WE HAVE SOMEBODY THAT CALLED IN THAT WANTS TO TRY AGAIN? >> >> CAN YOU HEAR SNOW. >> YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU MR. OTTO. >> CAN YOU HEAR 44? >> YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU. GO AHEAD PLEASE. >> YES, MA'AM. I WAS TRYING TO GET THROUGH EARLIER BUT WASN'T ABLE TO. THANKS FOR ALLOWING THE PUBLIC COMMENT TO BE ABLE TO PHONE IN WHETHER YOU ARE HAPPEN I DID CAPPED OR WORKING. I WAS TOLD THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS NOT TAKING PHONE CALLS TONIGHT. THIS IS SOMETHING THE CITIZENS SHOULD DO ON A REGULAR BASIS. I GUESS YOU ARE NOT TAKING TEMPERATURES TONIGHT AND ALL CITIZENS ARE BACK TO WORK AT THE COUNTY BUILDINGS. I WAS NOT HAPPY THAT HE HUNG UP ON ME THE OTHER DAY. THE BCC HAS BEEN VERY UNJUST. [INDISCERNIBLE] . >> MR. OKAY TTO PLEASE REFRAIN FROM -- >> >> $129 MILLION. I THINK I HEARD YOU SPEAK MA'AM? >> YOU ARE DOING FINE NOW. GO AHEAD. >> OK. I DID SEND YOU ANOTHER AUDIO TO BE PRINTED. [INDISCERNIBLE] . >> WE'RE NOT DOING ANY CAMPAIGNING ON THE LINE OK. THAT IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. >> MA'AM, HE IS THE ONE BOARD MEMBER THAT COSTED OUR COUNTY TIME AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER AND COST US MONEY. AND WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPEAK ABOUT THAT. THE CITIZENS SHOULD BE ABLE TO KNOW 129 MILLION -- [INDISCERNIBLE] THERE ARE TWO COMMISSIONERS THAT KICK CITIZENS OUT OF THE MEETING FOR DOING THE SAME THING THAT OTHER CITIZENS DO. >> THANK YOU. AND I BELIEVE YOU HAD A COUPLE MORE ITEMS. >> JUST TO CLARIFY AND WE GET A DAILY REPORT WITH REGARDS TO THE HOSPITAL. 111 IS FROM MARCH AND THIS NUMBER THAT I NORMALLY BRIEF YOU ON. ON THE NUMBERS THAT ARE HERE, THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 40 PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL INPATIENT AT ORANGE PARK THAT ARE COVID AND ABOUT 20 AT ST. VINCENTS. HALF OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS ARE USING AN ICU ROOM. >> TODAY? >> YES TODAY. I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT. THAT THE VIRUS IS STILL OUT THERE AND STILL AFFECTING EVERYONE AND WE HAVE TO DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE TO STOP THE SPREAD. >> JUST A QUICK QUESTION. ARE THE PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL DID THEY GO TO THE HOSPITAL WITH COVID SYMPTOMS AND THAT'S WHY THEY WERE THERE OR BECAUSE THEY ARE TESTING EVERYBODY THAT GOES TO THE HOSPITAL FOR SOMETHING'S AN THEN FIND OUT THEY ARE COVID BUT THAT'S NOT WHY THEY WENT? >> JOHN, DO YOU KNOW THAT? [01:00:01] >> IT'S ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. SOME OF THEM ARE TRANSPORTED AND HAD DIFFICULTY BREATHING AND THAT'S THE REASON BECAUSE I HAVE COVID. WE HAVE A LOT OF ASYMPTOMATIC CASES. IT'S IN OUR COMMUNITY. YOU AND I DON'T KNOW WE HAVE IT BUT WE'RE SHEDDING IT TO OTHER PEOPLE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE ENCOURAGING RESIDENTS WEAR YOUR MASK AND KEEP PHYSICAL DISTANCING. IT'S IN OUR COMMUNITY AND CONTINUALLY SPREADING IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE TO STOP IT BY DOING THIS. >> SO THEY ARE NOT TRACKING IF THEIR REASON FOR HOSPITALIZATION WAS INITIALLY COVID? >> RIGHT. >> A LOT OF TIMES THERE ARE CONFIRMED COVID PATIENTS AND SUSPECTED COVID PATIENTS. THAT'S WHERE THE 65 NUMBER JOHN GOT HE MENTIONED BEFORE. THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT ALSO. AGAIN, WE ARE MONITORING THIS DAILY. THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE REST ASSURED IF THERE IS ANY NEED TO SURGE, THERE ARE PROTOCOLS AND A SURGE PLAN AHEAD AS NEEDED. AND AGAIN THAT AVERAGE AND MEDIAN AGE IS STILL IN THE FORTIES THAT IS THERE. AND SO I THINK ACROSS THE BOARD AND WE'RE COMING OUT OF THIS HOLIDAY WEEKEND. HOPEFULLY PEOPLE HEEDED JOHN'S MESSAGE HE GAVE OUT PRIOR THE JULY 4 WITH REGARDS TO FIREWORKS AND MAINTAINING THE DISTANCE. WE STILL HAVE TO KEEP WORKING ON THIS TOGETHER. >> VERY GOOD. >> DID YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? >> I THINK * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.