[00:00:10] >> I GUESS WE HAVE A QUORUM SO WE WILL GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED, EVEN THOUGH WE DON'T HAVE A TON OF PEOPLE. FIRST THING, THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. [Approval of Minutes] FIRST ORDER OF THE MEETING IS TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING WHICH WAS IN DECEMBER, BELIEVE IT OR NOT. HAPPY NEW YEAR, EVERYBODY. ANY COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION ON THE AGENDA? HEARING NONE, I NEED SOMEONE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THEM AS THEY ARE. I HEAR A MOTION, A SECOND? ANYONE OPPOSED? >> SINCE OUR CLERK IS OFFLINE, SO TO SPEAK, JUST MENTION WHO MADE MOTIONS AND SECOND. JUST FOR HER MINUTE TAKING, IT'S A LITTLE EASIER. >> WHEN YOU COME ON AND MAKE MOTIONS AND SECONDS DO YOU WANT ME TO COME BACK? >> NO. >> TINA WAS PRIMARY, APRIL WAS SECONDARY AND THE MOTION PASSED WITH ALL IN FAVOR. [Items 1 - 3] OKAY, THAT TAKES CARE OF THAT BUSINESS, WHICH MOVES US TO THE OLD BUSINESS, WHICH I WILL HAND OVER TO LOOK THROUGH THE THREE PARCELS WE WERE LOOKING AT IN DECEMBER. I ATTACHED TO THE AGENDA THE THREE REPORTS WE DID. THEY WILL LOOK SIMILAR BECAUSE WE USED THE SAME E.I.R. REPORT THAT WE GAVE YOU THE FIRST TIME AROUND WHEN YOU EVALUATED TO DECIDE IF IT MADE IT TO THE ELIGIBILITY POOL OR NOT. BUT WE HAVE ADDED, FOR THIS MEETING'S ITERATION, ADDED THE STAFF REPORT PORTION AT THE VERY END, THE LAST PAGE. SO WE GAVE YOU FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING AND REAL ESTATE PERSPECTIVES AND THEN A GENERAL RECOMMENDATION WHAT THAT AMOUNTED TO. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THEM. BUT WHAT WE WOULD DO IS, FOR EACH OF THESE, AT THIS POINT, AND AT THIS POINT WHERE WE ARE AT THE PRACTICE IS THESE PARCELS, AT THE LAST MEETING WERE DEEMED TO BE ELIGIBLE, RIGHT? SO THEY WENT INTO THE ELIGIBILITY POOL. AND THE NEXT STEP FOR THEM IS FOR STAFF TO BRING BACK THIS MORE CONSOLIDATED REPORT. AND THEN YOU DETERMINE WHETHER YOU WANT TO ADVANCE THEM TO THE BOARD, WHICH IS CALLED A PRIORITY POOL. IF NOT, THEN THEY GO BACK INTO HOLDING, THEY WILL STAY INELIGIBLE. WE DON'T JUST ELIMINATE COMPLETELY. AND YOU WOULD VOTE ON EACH OF THESE INDEPENDENTLY. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT, I GUESS, WE ALL NEED TO KIND OF WORK OUT IN THIS WHOLE PRACTICE POINT IS STAFF IS GOING TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THIS INFORMATION. DO YOU WANT US TO PROVIDE IT TO YOU LIKE I DID IN THE AGENDA? AND THEN YOU, ON YOUR OWN, BEFORE THIS MEETING, THIS VERSION OF THE MEETING WHERE YOU ARE MAKING A DECISION, GO THROUGH THE MAP AND BRING YOUR OWN SCORE SHEET? OR DO IT LIKE WE ARE DOING IT TONIGHT, STAFF BRINGS IT TO YOU, YOU CAN ASK US QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT WE PUT IN. AND THEN AT THE NEXT MEETING, YOU WOULD BRING YOUR SCORES IN AT THAT MEETING? AND THAT MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT MUCH TO TAKE IN RIGHT AT THE MOMENT, BUT. I'M GOING TO BRING UP THE MAP IN A FEW MINUTES. THAT WE'RE USING. TO RANK THE ATTRIBUTES FOR EACH PARCEL. I GUESS I WILL WALK THROUGH THESE. AND THEN KIND OF GIVE YOU THAT INFORMATION FOR EACH OF THESE. AND THEN WE CAN MOVE ON TO LIKE THE MAP PART OF IT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU FEEL LIKE. AND YOUR COMFORT WITH THIS PROCESS. IT'S NEW FOR ALL OF US. >> CHAIRPERON CORBY: I THINK WORKING THROUGH THIS STUFF WOULD HELP AND THEN THE MAP. [00:05:02] BECAUSE I DON'T THINK ANY OF US HAVE SEEN THAT YET. JUST AS A DISCUSSION POINT WHILE WE MOVE FORWARD, TO ME, I KIND OF THINK IF WE TAKE THE APPLICATIONS AND YOU WENT ROUGHLY THROUGH THE SCORE SHEET ON OUR OWN TIME, ANYTHING YOU DON'T KNOW, OR UNDERSTAND WE CAN COME, BUT IF WE HAVE TO GO FROM SCRATCH ON 7-12 PARCELS, I THINK THAT'S TOO MUCH TIME. LET'S WALK THROUGH THE EXAMPLES AND WE CAN DISCUSS IT AS A GROUP AFTER. THAT'S THE WAY I WOULD LEAN TO SAVE EVERYONE'S TIME LATE ON A TUESDAY. >> THAT SOUNDS GREAT. EXCEPT THE ATTACHMENTS DIDN'T COME THROUGH TO ME. >> OKAY. >> SO I DON'T KNOW. >> I DIDN'T SEND, DID I SEND ATTACHMENTS? OR NO, I DIDN'T. IT WAS THE LINK TO THE COUNTY'S WEBSITE BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS THERE. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: ONE WAY TO FIX IT, POTENTIALLY, THE ISSUE -- MAYBE YOU HAD THE SAME ISSUE. WHEN YOU GO TO THE AGENDA AND PULL THEM UP, THEY DON'T COME UP AS A PDF, THEY COME UP AS A WEB PAGE PDF. SO MAYBE IF YOU COULD SEND THE PDF'S THEMSELVES WOULD BE EASIER TO PULL THEM UP. >> NO, BECAUSE THEY WILL BE REALLY BIG AND I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO EMAIL THEM. >> I'M LOOKING AT IT AND I'M GETTING THE SAME THING. IT DOESN'T LINK. >> OKAY. I'M GOING TO HAVE TO PAUSE FOR A MOMENT AND WALK OVER TO HER DESK. >> MAYBE I'M DOING SOMETHING WRONG. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: DO YOU ALL HAVE A WAY TO SHARE, DO WE HAVE A WAY TO SHARE A DRAFT? IS THAT POSSIBLE? >> HERE IS YOUR MAIL. >> IN GOOGLE DRIVE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE COUNTY USES. >> IF I CLICK ON HERE, NOTHING. >> YEAH, NO, THAT'S DIFFERENT. >> OKAY. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: OR DROPBOX OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. YOU DON'T KNOW. >> THAT WAS JUST THE AGENDA, IT WASN'T THE -- >> RIGHT. >> YEAH, NOT THE ITEMS. >> LET ME WALK THROUGH IT OFFLINE. >> OKAY. YOU KNOW WE DID, I JUST REMEMBERED. WE HAD TROUBLE GETTING IT, I KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. YOU DIDN'T GET IT BECAUSE -- WHAT YOU GOT IS BASICALLY THE AGENDA TO SAY, HEY, THESE ARE THE ITEMS WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT. NO, THEY DON'T HAVE. SO LET ME BRING THAT UP SO EVERYBODY CAN SEE THE SAME THING. BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE... PUTTING THESE ALL OUT NOW ON THE WEBSITE. OUR NEW SOFTWARE. YOU ARE GOING TO GET A LINK FROM ME THAT'S GOING TO TAKE YOU TO THIS SAME PLACE. THIS IS THE AGENDAS AND MINUTES. OOPS, NO IT'S NOT. HANG ON. WRONG PAGE. AGENDAS AND MINUTES. THE LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE FOR MARCH 17TH. THERE'S AN HTML LINK YOU CAN CLICK ON. YOU CAN'T OPEN THE DOCUMENT IT OPENS UP. SO THERE'S THE AGENDA. AND THE BLUE HYPERLINKS ARE FOR THE MINUTES AND THE THINGS THAT WERE ATTACHED. SO EACH PARCEL'S EVALUATION REPORT IS ATTACHED THAT WAY. IF YOU WANT TO PRINT, LIKE I SAID, YOU CAN'T PRINT THIS PAGE OF THE AGENDA ITSELF. THE OTHER WAY TO DO IT IS TO CLICK ON THE PDF LINK. THE LITTLE PINK, THAT'S THE SECOND COLUMN. IT WILL OPEN UP A PDF. IT WILL HAVE ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS IN IT IN ONE DOCUMENT ONCE IT LOADS. THERE IT GOES. THAT IN ADOBE YOU CAN PRINT. IT WILL HAVE A PRINT ICON. THIS WILL BE THE ENTIRE AGENDA. SO THEN THERE'S THE MINUTES FROM ALL THE MEETINGS. AND THEN EACH STAFF REPORT THAT'S ATTACHED. AND IT'S ALL ONE DOCUMENT. YOU CAN DO IT EITHER WAY. BUT YOU WILL NEED TO GO HERE IF YOU WANT TO PRINT THE FRONT PAGE, YOU KNOW. YOU PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO PRINT OUT THE ENTIRE THING BUT YOU WANT TO BRING A LAPTOP OR TABLET OR HAVE PRINTED OUT STUFF. YOU ARE GOING TO NEED, FOR [00:10:03] EVALUATING THE PROPERTIES, SO. I APOLOGIZE. FOR THE CONFUSION. IT WASN'T JUST YOU. WE COULDN'T GET IT TO POPULATE PROPERLY ON TIME. AND SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. BUT GOING FORWARD, YOU SHOULD BE GETTING A LINK FROM ME THAT SAYS THE AGENDA IS ON THE WEBSITE. YOU KNOW, CLICK HERE. IT WILL TAKE YOU TO THAT. AND YOU CAN DOWNLOAD OR JUST PRINT OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO. DON'T NEED THAT AGAIN. OKAY. SO THIS WAS THE FIRST ONE OF THOSE THREE PARCELS. DO YOU WANT A LITTLE REFRESHER ABOUT WHAT WAS IN THIS REPORT? I KNOW YOU SAW, I WILL JUST KIND OF SKIM THROUGH IT. THE FIRST PAGE WILL GIVE YOU THE PARCEL INFORMATION. WHO THE APPLICANT WAS. IF IT'S THE SAME AS THE OWNER. THE OWNER INFORMATION. WHETHER IT MEETS PRIMARY OR SECONDARY CONSERVATION GOALS. A LITTLE DESCRIPTION ABOUT THE PROPERTY. AND THEN A BUNCH OF MAPS. LOCATIONAL, AERIALS, SOILS. FLOOD ZONES. TOPOGRAPHICKS. A HABITAT MAP, HISTORIC RESOURCES MAP AND A LITTLE ABOUT WHAT IS SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY. AND THEN THESE STAFF ASSESSMENTS. FOR THIS ONE, LIZA DOES ALL OUR ENVIRONMENTALS AND SAMANTHA AND I WILL DO PLANNING STAFF. MOSTLY THAT WILL BE HER. AND REAL ESTATE IS CALEB. AND IN THIS CASE STAFF WAS SPLIT IN ITS RECOMMENDATION WHETHER OR NOT IT SHOULD GO FORWARD. BUT WE WILL GIVE YOU WHATEVER OUR COLLECTIVE ASSESSMENT IS FOR EACH PARCEL. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE BASED THESE ASSESSMENTS THAT WE DO ON THE MAP. WHICH I NEED TO BRING UP FOR YOU. SO THIS IS GOING TO BE THE ONLINE MAP. AND ONCE WE HAVE FINISHED TALKING ABOUT IT TONIGHT, WE HAVEN'T MADE IT PUBLIC YET, SO THE LINK IS NOT ON OUR WEBSITE ACTIVELY, BUT IT EXISTS AS AN ACTIVE MAP. SO AFTER TONIGHT, WE WILL START THAT PROCESS SO IT WILL BE READY FOR THE NEXT MEETING. AND I THINK I'M PROBABLY GOING TO WIND UP LETTING LIZA DRIVE IN JUST A MINUTE BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THIS A LITTLE MORE IN DEPTH THAN I HAVE. BUT FOR EACH OF THE -- LET ME GO FIND THAT. YOU REMEMBER YOUR SCORE SHEET THAT HAS ALL OF THESE CRITERIA, RIGHT? SOME OF THEM ARE A LITTLE BIT... DOES THAT LOOK FAMILIAR TO EVERYBODY? YEP? SO FOR EACH OF THOSE WE NEED TO HAVE A CORRESPONDING DATA LAYER. OR MORE THAN ONE IF WE FEEL THAT, YOU KNOW, WE NEED ADDITIONAL SOURCES. OR THERE'S MORE THAN ONE THAT GETS YOU THAT INFORMATION. BUT AT LEAST ON THIS MAP THAT WILL GIVE YOU THE DATA YOU NEED TO MAKE THE ASSESSMENT. FOR THAT PARTICULAR CRITERIA. THERE ARE A COUPLE CRITERIAS ON THERE, MORE NEAR THE BOTTOM THAT ARE MORE SUBJECTIVE AND NOT DATA-BASED. SO THOSE, OF COURSE, WOULDN'T BE ON HERE. BUT FOR THE REST OF THE TRUE ENVIRONMENTAL STUFF WE SHOULD HAVE LINKS. I APOLOGIZE IT'S TAKEN US SO LONG TO GET THIS TO YOU. ALREADY TO BE GIVEN TO YOU. BUT A NUMBER OF THOSE LINKS, DATA SOURCES, YOU KNOW, WERE A LITTLE TOUGH TO GET AND OUR G.I.S. TEAM WAS HAVING SOME TROUBLE WITH THAT. BUT I THINK WE ARE GOOD NOW. SO YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO COME IN HERE AND TURN ON LAYERS AS YOU ARE INTERESTED IN. MAKE SURE ASSESSMENT FROM IT AND MOVE ON FROM IT. YOU PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO HAVE A LOT OF THEM OPEN AT THE SAME TIME. BUT I THINK, LIZA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO KIND OF WALK THROUGH SOME OF THESE AND TELL THEM WHAT YOU FOUND AS YOU WERE TRYING TO ASSESS IT? >> YES. I HAD A LITTLE TIME WITH IT. LIZA CANE PARKS AND RECREATION. STARTING HERE WITH THE ADDRESS [00:15:06] BOX YOU CAN PUT IN AN ADDRESS, I BELIEVE YOU CAN ALSO PUT IN APAR SELL NUMBER. -- A PARCEL NUMBER. LET'S SEE IF THAT WORKS. WELL, I HAVE BEEN USING JUST THE ADDRESS AND THAT WORKS PERFECTLY FINE. 220, OVER TO THE LEFT HERE. YOUR BASE LAYER, OR YOUR BASE MAP. AND THE MEASUREMENT TOOL. MEASURE MILEAGE. PUSH THAT TO SEE YOUR MILES. I'LL ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT. I'LL START WITH THE FIRST LAYER, THE PARCEL DATA. AS YOU ZOOM OUT, THE LINES CAN GET KIND OF MUDDLED. BUT IF YOU CLICK ON THESE LITTLE DOTS ON THE RIGHT, YOU CAN CHANGE THE TRANSPARENCY. AS FAR AS PROTECTED AND ENDANGERED SPECIESES WE HAVE A COUPLE THINGS HERE, WE HAVE THE RED WOODPECKER. IF YOU CLICK OP THE I HERE IT WILL HIGHLIGHT SOME AREAS AS YOU ZOOM OUT. YOU SEE SOME LOCATIONS AROUND DOCTORS LAKE. IF YOU CLICK ON THE DOTS AGAIN TO THE RIGHT YOU CAN LOOK TO DETAILS TO GET MORE INFORMATION ON THIS LAYER. FOR CATEGORY ONE ON OUR MATRIX, THE PROTECTION OF WATER DRINKING RESOURCES WE HAVE THE WATER SUPPLY. WE WILL CLICK BACK ON THE I AND THAT WILL REMOVE THE EAGLE'S NEST AND WE CAN SEE THE WATER SUPPLY. WHICH ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE. YOU WILL SEE THERE'S SOME KIND OF YELLOW DOTS HERE. A LITTLE MORE TRANSPARENT ON THE PARCEL LINES. THOSE ARE PUBLIC WATER WELLS. >> THE PARCEL MAP BUT THERE'S OTHER THINGS WHERE THE AERIAL IMAGE. >> THE WELLS TEND TO BE A LITTLE HARDER TO SEE AND I THINK WE HAD ISSUES WITH MAKING THOSE EASIER. BUT AS YOU ZOOM OUT THEY ARE A [00:20:05] LITTLE EASIER TO SEE. JUST WHEN YOU ZOOM IN, IT DOES GET HARDER. THE PINK DOT IS THE PRIVATE WELLS. AND THEN AS WE GO TO THE NEXT CATEGORY, PROTECTION OF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES. LIKE I SAID, WE HAVE A FEW OPTIONS HERE. WE ARE STILL WORKING ON GETTING MORE LAYERS. WE HAVE THE EAGLE'S NEST, RED COCKADED WOODPECKERS. THAT'S ALL FOR THAT CATEGORY. PROTECTION OF RARE AND IMPORTANT HABITATS. WE HAVE A FEW OPTIONS FOR THAT. WE HAVE THE LONG LEAFS, SPECIFICALLY FOR LONG LEAF. I'LL LET YOU SEE THAT. UNDERNEATH, OF COURSE, YOU WILL SEE A KEY. THE COOPERATIVE LAND COVER. YOU HAVE A LOT MORE OPTIONS, A LOT MORE KEYS FOR DIFFERENT HABITATS. THERE'S OUR SPOT IN THE MIDDLE. CLICK AND REMOVE THAT. AND A FEW OTHERS. HABITAT CONSERVATION PRIORITIES. GO WITH THE DARKESTCOLOR BEING THE HIGHEST PRIORITY. UNDER REPRESENTATIVE NATURAL COMMUNITIES. IF YOU GO TO THE DETAILSHERE, YOU WILL SEE THAT THESE ARE UNDERREPRESENTED NATURAL COMMUNITIES THAT MAKE UP LESS THAN 15% OF THE ORIGINAL EXTENT OF THAT COMMUNITY. FOR THE PROTECTION OF ARMS AND -- FOREST. WE DON'T HAVE LAYERS AT THE MOMENT. WE ARE STILL WORKING ON GETTING LAYERS. WE HAD A LITTLE TROUBLE FINDING THE SPECIFIC ONES FOR THAT. SOCIAL AND HUMAN VALUES. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANYTHING REALLY RESOURCE-BASED. ACTUALLY, LET ME SCROLL DOWN HERE. I THINK WE HAVE -- WE HAVE SOME PARKS. LET ME SEE IF I CAN FIND IT. PRIORITY AREAS FOR NEW PARKS. WITH THE DARKER COLOR BEING THE HIGHEST PRIORITY. >> THAT'S A COUNTY-SET PRIORITY? >> I DON'T THINK SO, NO. WHERE DOES THAT LAYER COME FROM? >> THAT'S FROM THE COUNTY MASTER PLAN. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF DETAIL ON THIS ONE. MAYBE WE CAN GET MORE ADDED TO IT. SO THERE'S TWO FOR THOSE, ONE FOR PLACE AND ONE FOR URBAN AREAS. AND THEN AS FAR AS ACQUISITION ISSUES, I DID ADD ON, OR HAD ADDED ON HERE WHERE THE, SORRY, GIVE ME ONE SECOND. THE FLORIDA FOREVER PROJECT BOUNDARIES. GO BACK AND TAKE OFF OUR PARKS HERE. BOUNDARIES. THAT WAS ADDED. AND THE PURPLE HIGHLIGHTED BOUNDARIES THOSE ARE AREAS THAT HAVE YET TO BE UNACQUIRED PORTIONS. SO THOSE COULD BE POTENTIAL MATCHING FUNDS FOR PROPERTIES. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? [00:25:05] I WILL DO MY BEST TO ANSWER. HAD A LITTLE BIT OF TIME, JUST A LITTLE MORE THAN STAFF TO PLAY AROUND IT AND KIND OF GO THROUGH THE MATRIX. >> THANK YOU. I WILL SEND YOU ALL AN EMAIL WITH THE LINK. AND I'LL SEND YOU A TABLE WITH THE CRITERIA AND THEN THE CORRESPONDING DATA LAYERS THAT WE THINK THEY MATCH UP. AND YOU GUYS NOW HAVE ACCESS TO THE AGENDA. SO IT'S ON THE WEBSITE. SO YOU CAN PULL UP THESE THREE PRACTICE ONES. AND TRY IT OUT. AND TRY TO FILL IN YOUR SCORES, WHAT YOU THINK. I THINK IT WOULD BE PROBABLY BENEFICIAL TO DO THAT BETWEEN NOW AND APRIL AND THEN COME BACK FOR THE APRIL MEETING AND ACTUALLY HAVE YOUR DISCUSSION OF, YOU KNOW, WHAT SCORES DID YOU PUT DOWN AND KIND OF DO THAT DISCUSSION AND VOTING THING. BUT THAT'S JUST KIND OF MY FEEDBACK. IF THAT'S WHAT YOU FEEL, THEN WE WILL GO WITH THAT ROUTE. BECAUSE I KNOW YOU HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GET HANDS-ON YET WITH THIS MAP AND SCORE SHEET TO MAKE SENSE OF IT AND UTILIZE IT TO MAKE A GOOD DECISION. >> WILL YOU ATTACH THE RUBRIC? >> I WILL EMAIL, YEAH. THE SCORE SHEET AGAIN. AND I WILL SEND YOU THE TABLE, LIKE I SAID, THAT KIND OF MATCHES THEM UP SO YOU KNOW WHERE TO LOOK TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION IS KIND OF LIKE WHAT LAYERS. AND AS YOU DO THIS, IF YOU FIND THAT, BECAUSE THIS IS MY BEST GUESS, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, THAT A CERTAIN ONE REALLY CAN ALSO BE ANSWERED BY ANOTHER LAYER, PLEASE, YOU KNOW, EMAIL ME AND LET ME KNOW. BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, I WANT TO END UP WITH A FINAL TEMPLATE THAT WE CAN ALL RELY ON THAT IS YES, THESE CRITERIA ARE ANSWERED BY THESE LAYERS. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT DEAL WITH THE G.I.S. WORLD MORE OFTEN, IF YOU HAVE OTHER SOURCES THAT WE NEED TO PUT IN HERE, THEN PLEASE DO LET US KNOW. SO WE CAN GET THE MAP FINALIZED AND GET IT PUSHED TO THE PUBLIC'S VIEW AND ACCESS. >> I WAS GOING TO SAY, WE ARE KIND OF WORKING, AT D.O.T. WE ARE KIND OF WORKING ON A SIMILAR MAP. FOR NORTHEAST, NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA. ARE YOU LIMITED >> THESE ARE DATA LAYERS THAT ARE ALL PUBLIC LAYERS. IF YOU ARE SEEING DATA LAYERS ON THE MAP YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH, THAT YOU THINK FITS IN WITH THESE, THEN ANSWERS, THEN LET US KNOW. WE CAN GO OUT AND GET THOSE, AS LONG AS THEY ARE PUBLIC SOURCED DATA, THEN WE CAN INCORPORATE IT. IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT IS USED TO ANSWER ANY OF THOSE RELATE CRITERIA. >> D.O.T. HAS A SPECIFIC ONLINE SCREENING TOOL. AND THAT'S OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THERE'S A PUBLIC-FACING SIDE. THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING. PROBABLY NOT THE LAYERS SPECIFIC TO THE COUNTY BUT IT'S PRETTY BROAD. NATURAL RESOURCES AND CULTURAL STUFF. LAND COVER. IT COVERS, IT'S REALLY BROAD. >> YEAH, JUST SEND ME A LINK. >> AND THAT IS ALREADY UNDER CONSERVATION EASEMENT. PUBLIC LANDS. I'M NOT SURE IF THAT'S A LAYER YOU HAVE IN THERE? >> IT IS UNDER -- LET ME JUST TURN OFF. >> THAT'S ONE OF OUR EVALUATION KEYS IS ADJACENCY. >> YES, WE HAVE LOCAL, STATE AND PRIVATE. PRIVATE IS SORT OF LIMITED. >> I KNOW I CAN GET THAT LAYER. [00:30:15] >> I DON'T SEE THAT COMING UP HERE. >> IT SHOULD BE UNDER PRIVATE. I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE EASEMENT. >> GO DOWN A LITTLE BIT. I'M INTERESTED IF -- BANKS ARE ON THERE. >> NO. LET ME GO LOOK AT THE DETAILS. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT BLUE AND PRIVATE. >> CAN YOU CLICK ON IT? USUALLY THERE'S A POP-UP. IF YOU CLICK ON ONE OF THE PARCELS. >> ONE OF THE PURPLE ONES. THEY HAVE IT TURNED ON. YOU COULD SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. >> VACATION BANK. EXCELLENT. THAT'S A GOOD LAYER. >> THAT'S THE FLORIDA NATURAL LAYERS INVENTORY LAYER. IT IS SELF REPORTED SO THERE COULD BE STUFF MISSING. IT'S GENERALLY PRETTY GOOD. THERE'S THE NATIONAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT DATABASE. FOR THE MOST PART IT'S PRETTY GOOD. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: NEVER MIND. YOU GOT IT. GOOD JOB. >> ALL RIGHT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: SO I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS WE NEED TO DECIDE FOR THEM, HOW DO WE WANT TO GO ABOUT LOOKING AT THESE? DISCUSSION ON THAT. ARE WITH GOING TO DO IT ON OUR OWN TIME AND BRING IN FILLED OUT SCORE SHEETS OR DO EVERYTHING FROM SCRATCH HERE? WHAT DO YOU THINK? >> I THINK WE PROBABLY NEED TO DO IT ON OUR OWN AND BRING THEM FILLED OUT. OTHERWISE WE WILL BE HERE FOREVER ARGUING ABOUT POINTS AND STUFF. IF WE JUST BRING OVER OUR SCORES AND GO OVER THEM. HOW MANY APPLICATIONS DO WE HAVE? >> WE HAVE SEVEN AT THE MOMENT. AND THEN I HAVE A CALL BACK TO SOMEONE. THE WINDOW CLOSED, TECHNICALLY FEBRUARY 28TH. BUT WE HAVEN'T MOVED FORWARD. QUITE IN THE TIMELILESS I HAD ANTICIPATED. SO IT IS UP TO YOU. I'VE PROMISED A PHONE CALL TO THIS OTHER GENTLEMAN BY FRIDAY. IF HE WANTS TO MOVE FORWARD, AND IF YOU WANT TO INCORPORATE THAT NEXT LAST KIND OF APPLICATION THEN I WILL OR WON'T AT YOUR DIRECTION. BECAUSE I THINK WE HAD THAT OPPORTUNITY SINCE WE HAVEN'T STARTED MEETING THESE, OR DOING ANY EVALUATIONS YET. IF THAT PERSON WANTS TO, WE COULD CONSIDER IT. OR I COULD TELL HIM THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU NEED TO WAIT FOR THE FALL IN THE NEXT CYCLE OR WHATEVER. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I THINK WE COULD ANSWER THAT NOW. I WOULD MAKE A MOTION, SINCE WE HAVEN'T STARTED WE CAN ALLOW PEOPLE WHO HAVE REACHED OUT TO BE ENTERED INTO THE PROGRAM. >> WE ONLY HAVE SEVEN. THE MORE THE MERRIER AT THIS POINT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: EVERYONE IN FAVOR? >> I'M SEEING NODS EVERYWHERE. I WILL TAKE THAT FORWARD. I WILL REACH OUT TO HIM AND LET HIM KNOW. OKAY. SO THEN OUR NEXT STEP GOING FORWARD IS GOING TO BE, I WILL EMAIL YOU THE LINK TO THE MAP AND THE TABLE TO SAY HOW TO SCORE AND ANOTHER COPY OF THE SCORE SHEET SO YOU HAVE IT IN FRONT OF YOU. AND I WILL SEND YOU A LINK TO THE COUNTY WEBSITE SO YOU CAN EASILY GO AND GET THE AGENDA ONLINE AND THESE THREE PRACTICE PARCELS. FROM TONIGHT'S AGENDA. SO YOU WILL HAVE THE PARCEL NUMBER. MOST OF THESE, WELL SOME OF THESE HAVE ADDRESSES SO THAT MAKES IT EASIER. WE JUST HAVE THREE PARCELS SO IT'S NOT TOO COMPLICATED. YOU TAKE A STAB BETWEEN NOW AND THE APRIL MEETING AT THE SCORE SHEET, TO THE APRIL MEETING. YOUR SCORES AND ASSESSMENT HOW YOU THINK YOU WANT TO VOTE AND WE CAN USE THAT MEETING TO, YOU WOULD GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF DISCUSSING AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO DISCUSS YOUR VOTES OR YOU JUST WANT TO HAVE, HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DISCUSS AND ARRIVE AT A DECISION OF VOTING ON, DOES THIS PROJECT GET RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD FOR ACQUISITION OR NOT? SO, WE WILL NEED TO COLLECT AND GET YOUR SCORE SHEETS, I THINK. THEY NEED TO BE A PART OF THE RECORD FOR THE BOARD. SO THAT THEY KIND OF HAVE THIS UNDERSTANDING OF HOW, WHAT KIND OF BACKED UP YOUR VOTE, COLLECTIVE -- IT'S GOING TO BE ONE COLLECTIVE VOTE, YES OR [00:35:04] NO. YOU'RE NOT SENDING INDIVIDUAL VOTES. BUT YOUR SHEETS DO REPRESENT THE TECHNICAL BACKGROUND OF YOUR VOTE. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? SO WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THAT TO THE BOARD. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I'M STILL JUST GOING TO GO ON RECORD HERE. I'M UNCOMFORTABLE RECOMMENDING TO THE BOARD WITHOUT A VALUE. >> OH. >> WITH A DOLLAR AMOUNT YOU MEAN? >> YEAH. I CAN SAY THIS LOOKS LIKE A WORTHWHILE PROPERTY. BUT THEY WANT ALL $42 MILLION FOR THAT FOUR ACRES AND IT'S NOT WORTHWHILE IN THE END. >> RIGHT. GOTCHA. >> I MEAN, I COULD SAY IT'S A WORTHY PROPERTY TO EXAMINE BUT UNTIL WE GET VALUES, I'M JUST NOT REAL COMFORTABLE SAYING I WOULD RECOMMEND ANYTHING TO THE BOARD. IF THAT MAKES SENSE. >> IS THIS A WAY POTENTIALLY, BECAUSE THEY COULD ALSO PUT IN THEIR APPLICATION WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR. BUT IF THEY DON'T, I ASSUME YOU ARE DOING THE REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS. IS THERE A WAY TO PUT IN THERE THIS IS ABOUT A $2,000 AN ACRE PROPERTY, WE WOULD EXPECT TO ACQUIRE FOR NO MORE THAN $3,000. IS THAT A NUMBER YOU COULD GIVE US? >> I COULD. I'M HESITANT TO DO THAT IF WE HAVEN'T ACTUALLY NEGOTIATED. >> YEAH. >> I DON'T LIKE TO TELL THEM WHAT I'M THINKING AND THEN GO IN -- >> IT DOES RUIN IT? >> VALUE SO I'M COMING AT IT FROM THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. >> YEAH. WELL, YOU KNOW. LIKE THE CURRENT, LIKE THE TAX VALUE OF THE PROPERTY? >> WE COULD. BUT IT'S WILDLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT THE ACTUAL VALUE MAY BE. >> I KNOW. >> CALEB. >> WE GOT RED-LIGHTED. >> YOU GOT RED-LIGHTED. >> BECAUSE YOUR VOICE ISN'T BEING PICKED UP BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT ON THE MIC. YOU COULD LEAN OVER MY SHOULDER. JUST STAND UP HERE. THE MIC WILL PICK YOU UP. >> LET'S SEE WHERE WERE WE? OH YEAH, I'M HESITANT TO PROVIDE A VALUE BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T NEGOTIATED FOR THE PROPERTY. THAT'S ONE THING. TWO, IF WE PUT A PROPERTY APPRAISER'S VALUE THAT'S NOT GENERALLY ACCURATE. VERY RARELY. IT COULD BE REALLY BAD NOT ACCURATE. AND THE ASSESSED VALUE IS NOT THE SAME AS AN APPRISAL. AL -- APPRAISAL. YOU HAVE TO BE AN APPRAISER TO DO THAT, THAT'S A CERTAIN CERTIFIED SKILL, THAT'S NOT WHAT I DO. I'M NOT SAYING WHAT I DO ISN'T ACCURATE BUT THE NOT THE SAME THING. >> IF THERE'S A NEARBY COMPARABLE, COULD YOU PUT THAT DOWN? LIKE A NEARBY COMP? >> UM, POTENTIALLY WE COULD DISCUSS THAT. I'M KIND OF ON THE SAME SHEET OF MUSIC AS YOU. WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LOT BEFORE, IF I RECALL. >> WHAT IF WE HAD JUST A FINAL APPROVAL. LIKE WE GIVE IT TO YOU. THESE ARE THE THREE WE THINK YOU GO NEGOTIATE WITH A LAND OWNER AND THEN YOU COME BACK AD SAY, WELL THIS ONE IS $4 MILLION, THIS ONE IS $78 MILLION. >> WELL, I THINK HE IS GOING TO DO THAT FOR THE BOARD. >> THAT'S WHERE THEY GET TO MAKE THAT DECISION. >> THEY MAKE THE DECISION ON THAT. I MEAN... PLUS, WE DON'T KNOW, WE'RE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO KNOW WHAT THE OWNER WANTS PROPER THE PROPERTY EITHER. ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE THE PERSON NOMINATING IT EITHER. THEY MAY OR MAY NOT WANT TO SELL. THEY MAY HAVE A WILDLY SKEWED OPINION OF WHAT THE PROPERTY IS WORTH. IT COULD BE REALLY LOW OR REALLY HIGH. THERE ARE A LOT OF VARIABLES IN THERE. I DIDN'T KNOW, YOU KNOW, WE ARE ALL NEW DOING THIS. WHEN I PUT IN MY ASSESSMENT OR MY RECOMMENDATION, I WAS KIND OF LOOKING AT IT FROM A STANDPOINT OF DO WE NEED TO BUY THIS BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE WILL SCOOP IT UP AND DEVELOP IT LATER? OR IS THIS SOMETHING THAT, YOU KNOW, I THINK IS KIND OF SAFE AND PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE DEVELOPED BECAUSE OF WHAT IT IS, YOU KNOW. IS IT GOING TO BE HARDER TO DEVELOP BECAUSE IT'S WETLAND. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WAY TO DO IT. BUT WHEN WE WERE DIFFERENT, THE SPLIT OPINION, THAT'S WHERE I WAS ON. >> I LIKE THAT ANALYSIS THAT YOU PUT IN THERE ABOUT WHY YOU DIDN'T RECOMMEND. IT'S ALL WETLAND, IT'S TINY, IT'S NOT GOING ANYWHERE. IT MAKES SENSE TO ME. >> I WALKED THAT PROPERTY TOO. I'M LIKE, YEAH, THAT'S NOT [00:40:02] GOING TO HAPPEN. THAT'S KIND OF MY TWO CENTS ON THE VALUE. I GOT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, AND I'M THINKING THE SAME THING. I'M THINKING YEAH, I WOULD BUY THIS IF IT'S NOT SO MUCH MONEY, LET'S PICK IT UP. IF IT'S REALLY EXPENSIVE, NO, WE HAVE BETTER THINGS TO BUY, BUT WE DON'T REALLY KNOW THAT AT THIS STAGE OF THE GAME. >> YEAH, I WAS HONESTLY JUST TRYING TO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME. >> I'M WITH YOU ON THAT. I HAVE A FEELING THAT THE GOOD STUFF WILL SHAKE TO THE TOP. AND IF WE CAN MAKE A DEAL WE WILL MAKE A DEAL. THAT'S KIND OF THE WAY I LOOK AT IT. >> SO MAYBE THE TACT WE SHOULD TAKE IN RECOMMENDATIONS IS WE AE RECOMMENDING ASSUMING AN AGREEABLE PRICE. >> THAT'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE THE CASE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET EVERYTHING WE WANT. AND SOME THINGS WE WILL BE SURPRISED WHEN WE DO GET IT. >> CAN I ASK, ARE SOME OF THE ONES NOMINATED, ARE THEY NOMINATED BY OTHER PEOPLE? IN OTHER WORDS IS THERE SOMEONE OUT THERE SAYING, I SAY COOPER HAS SOME LAND THAT WE OUGHT TO BUY? COOPER DOESN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT. IS THAT THE CASE? >> I THINK ONE OR MAYBE TWO WERE LIKE THAT. I THINK THE OTHERS WERE THE PROPERTY OWNER. >> I'M JUST THINKING IF THAT IS THE CASE, THE FIRST QUESTION SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK IS GO FIND THAT MAN THAT OWNS IT AND SAY IS THIS SOMETHING YOU WOULD EVEN CONSIDER. IF IT'S NOT, YOU ARE WASTING A LOT OF THIS MAN'S TIME FOOLING WITH IT. >> RIGHT, AND I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THOSE APPLICATIONS AND REACH OUT TO EVERY PROPERTY OWNER AND HAVE THAT CONVERSATION OF, YOU KNOW, ARE YOU AWARE, FIRST OF ALL, ABOUT THIS. AND YOU KNOW, IF THEY DIDN'T ALREADY SIGN IT. AND THEN EVEN IF THEY DID, WE NEED TO HAVE THE CONVERSATION, HERE IS THE PROCESS, HERE IS WHEN THE MEETING WILL BE. PLEASE COME AND THAT KIND OF THING. I WILL DEFINITELY BE REACHING OUT. BECAUSE YEAH, THERE'S NO POINT. IF I REACH OUT AND THE PROPERTY OWNER SAYS, I DON'T EVEN WANT YOU TO CONSIDER IT AND I'M NOT BRINGING IT TO YOU, I WILL BRING IT TO YOU IN THE EXTENT OF COMING AND SAYING SOMEBODY NOMINATED THIS PROPERTY. BUT I REACHED OUT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN MOVING FORWARD, SO. YOU KNOW. END OF STORY THERE. YEAH. >> THERE'S STILL VALUE IN REACHING OUT TO THEM. >> YEAH, HE MAY CHANGE HIS MIND AND NEXT YEAR. >> SOMETIMES IT'S NO, AND LATER IT BECOMES YES. I LIKE HITTING THEM UP AND STAYING ON THEM. >> OF THE SEVEN APPLICANTS ARE THEY SPLIT BETWEEN CONSERVATION AND FULL FEE? >> HONESTLY, I DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T GOTTEN INTO THEM AT THAT LEVEL TO REALLY READ YET. I WAS NOTICING WE GOT THEM. THERE WAS ACTUALLY ONE MORE THAT CAME IN VERY EARLY ON THAT THE CAN'T DIDN'T SIGN IT. I REACHED BACK OUT AND EMAILED AND SAID THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING THIS APPLICATION, BUT IT WASN'T SIGNED. THE FIRST THREE WERE LIKE THAT. AND TWO OF THE THREE SIGNED IT AND RESUBMITTED BUT ONE DIDN'T. >> IS THERE A CHANCE TO PARTNER WITH OTHER GROUPS? >> FOR ACQUISITION? >> YEAH. >> ABSOLUTELY. YEAH. WE TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. I THINK AS WE GET A LITTLE MORE SEASONED, WE DEVELOP SOME OF THOSE RELATIONS IT WILL BE EASIER AND QUICKER FOR STAFF TO SAY THAT ONE IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MATCH. WE COULD PROBABLY INTEREST THIS GROUP OR THAT GROUP. >> CAMP LANDINGS ZONE. >> YEAH. IT'S ALREADY NEXT TO PROPERTY BY SAINT JOHN'S RIVER. IT ALREADY HAS AN EASEMENT OVER. >> THAT WOULD BE A GOOD LAYER TO HAVE, ACTUALLY. THEY ARE A BUFFER ZONE. >> SO THE REP LAYER IS THREE MILE RADIUS AROUND LANDING. I COULD GIVE YOU THE LAYER. BUT IT'S REALLY EASY. >> I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK OF OTHER WAYS TO HELP YOU RAISE FUNDS. I MEAN $42 MILLION SOUNDS LIKE A LOT. >> THE OTHER THING TOO, WHEN CAM WAS IN HERE FROM THE LAND TRUST WE MISSED THE CYCLE FOR THE RURAL AND FAMILY LANDS PROGRAM. BUT POTENTIALLY IF WE KNOW SOME THAT ARE IN THE QUEUE, WE CAN APPROACH NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST, AND TRY TO GET A 50% MATCH. THAT'S ONE OUTSIDE OF THE BUFFER TO RAISE MONEY. THAT WOULD RAISE THE SCORE, BECAUSE ONE OF THE BOXES IS DOLLAR VALUE. I SEE NODDING. >> YES. MATCHING DOLLARS ARE ALWAYS ENCOURAGED . [00:45:05] >> THEY ARE THE BEST. >> SO JUST TO CLARIFY TO MAKE SURE WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THESE THREE BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING, RUN THROUGH THE MATRIX WITH THE MAP AND COME BACK WITH OUR SCORES ON PRACTICE THREE. AND OUR APRIL MEETING WILL BE PRACTICING OUR DISCUSSION AND HOW WE WILL MOVE THROUGH APPROVAL ON A FAKE SET. AND POTENTIALLY MAYBE TEN DAYS OUT FROM THE MAY MEETING WE WILL BE AVAILABLE TO LOOK AT THE PARCELS AND TRY TO DO THE FULL SUITE OF 7-9 OR WHATEVER IT ENDS UP BEING IN MAY. >> YEAH, SEVEN ISN'T A HUGE NUMBER. I THINK WE COULD BRING THEM ALL TO YOU. WHETHER YOU GO THROUGH ALL SEVEN IN ONE MEETING OR WE SPLIT IT UP INTO TWO, THAT'S FINE. IF DISCUSSION RUNS. >> THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY, I KNOW THIS STUFF WITH THE PRACTICE,THE LEAD TIME WASN'T THAT IMPORTANT WITH IT. BUT FOR THE MAY ONE, LIKE FOR ME, I WILL HAVE TO SIT DOWN ON A WEEKEND AND FOCUS AND GO THROUGH THEM ALL. SO GETTING THAT STUFF OUT TO US A LITTLE EARLIER WOULD BE HELPFUL. >> RIGHT, DEFINITELY. I WILL MAKE A POINT OF DOING A TWO-WEEK KIND OF WINDOW. THERE'S NO REASON WE CAN'T DO THAT. >> AND THEN MAY WOULD GET US THROUGH, AND I'M TRYING TO GET IT RIGHT IN MY OWN HEAD. THE MAY MEETING WE WOULD VOTE ON YEA OR NAY INTO THE PROGRAM. AND THEN WE REVISIT THEM AGAIN TO SAY IF THEY ARE PRIORITY WITHIN THE PROGRAM, RIGHT? ISN'T THERE A SECOND TIER? >> RIGHT. THE SECOND ONE -- SO, IN MAY YOU WOULD GET A SHORT REPORT FROM US SAYING IT MEETS THE CRITERIA OR IT DOESN'T, KIND OF THING. >> THESE ARE THE SHORT REPORTS WE ARE LOOKING AT. THE EXAMPLES. OR IS THIS A LONG REPORT? >> THAT'S REALLY THE LONG ONE. AT THIS POINT, YEAH. THERE WAS A SHORTER VERSION. MORE OR LESS TO TELL YOU WHERE IT WAS. AND THEN JUNE WOULD BE, AT THAT ONE YOU WOULD VOTE TO BASICALLY ASK, AT THAT POINT, YEAH, YOU ARE ELEVATING IT TO THE ELIGIBILITY STATUS AND THEN STAFF DOES THE MORE DETAILED ANALYSIS AND THEN WE WILL I WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THE CONTRACT WITH THE CONSULTANTS TO SEE WHAT KIND OF LEAD TIME THEY HAVE. WHAT CAN THEY BRING TO THE ANALYSIS PART OF THAT. THEY WOULDN'T BE BRINGING SOMETHING TO THE FIRST ASSESSMENT MEETING IN MAY. BUT FOR THE JUNE ONE, IF OUR TIMING CAN WORK OUT, PERHAPS WE CAN INCORPORATE THEIR ASSESSMENT AS WELL. THAT'S THE IDEAL GOAL IS TO HAVE THEM KIND OF DOING THAT. AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE THE FINAL DECISION YOU WOULD MAKE ABOUT GOING ONTO THE BOARD. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: THESE ARE PRIORITY. SO MAY, LET'S CALL IT SEVEN, WHATEVER IT ENDS UP BEING. IN MAY WE PUT ANYWHERE FROM ZERO TO SEVEN FORWARD INTO THE PROGRAM. AND POTENTIALLY IN JUNE THE CONTRACTORS COME BACK WITH A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THOSE, LET'S SAY SEVEN MADE IT. BUT POTENTIALLY US AS MEMBERS WOULD NEED TO COME TO JUNE WITH THE TOP TWO OR THREE OF THAT POOL WE THINK ARE PRIORITY. HAVE A LITTLE LEAD WORK SO WE COULD HASH OUT IN A GROUP WHAT WE AS A GROUP WILL SAY AS OUR PRIORITY. WHO KNOWS MAYBE EVERYBODY HAS THE SAME TOP THREE AND THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. BUT THAT WOULD PUSH US THROUGH JUNE. WHEN DOES THE NEXT ROUND START? >> PRESUMABLY WE WOULD DO THAT, I MEAN IF WE ARE GOING TO DO THIS EVERY SIX MONTHS, BECAUSE THAT WAS KIND OF OUR GOAL, PROBABLY WE WOULD HAVE, I DON'T KNOW IF WE WANT A TWO MONTH OR A THREE-MONTH WINDOW AGAIN. WE HADN'T REALLY TALKED ABOUT IT. BUT IT COULD BE AS LONG AS ANYBODY THINKS WE NEED. BUT PROBABLY IT WOULD BE JULY, AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER, WHATEVER. TEN WE WOULD START THE CYCLE OVER AGAIN OF BRINGING IT FORWARD. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: IF WE COULD HAVE A LAYER OF PROPOSED. I KNOW YOU COULD PUT THE ADDRESS IN. BUT IF YOU COULD JUST HAVE SO YOU CAN JUST TURN THEM ON AND SEE THEM ALL. AND THEN AS WE MOVE FORWARD, IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE ONES THAT ARE MOVING FORWARD. AND THEN THE NEXT LAYER PROPOSED. BECAUSE THEN, IF WE GET A PIECE [00:50:03] THAT IS NEXT TO A PIECE WE ARE TRYING TO ACQUIRE, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO TAKE HIM A WHILE TO GET THERE. >> YEAH. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? >> IT DOES. THE WEIRD LOOK IS I'M GOING PROS AND CONS. THEY ARE COMPETING FOR ATTENTION. BUT YEAH. WE COULD CERTAINLY PUT LAYERS IN. OBVIOUSLY ONCE WE HAVE ACQUIRED THINGS THEY WILL GO INTO A WHOLE OTHER LAYER. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: THE ONLY REASON I WAS TRYING TO GAME OUT THE TIMING, IT GETS BACK TO THE RURAL AND FAMILY LANDS. IF WE CAN GET OUR SYNC MATCHED UP WHERE WE ARE CLOSING AS THE RURAL AND FAMILY LANDS PROPOSAL IS OPENING WE KNOW IT'S GOING INTO THE PROGRAM WE COULD REACH OUT TO NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST AND SAY WOULD YOU PUT THIS THROUGH AS A PROJECT AND WE COULD KIND OF WORK TOGETHER PURCHASING TOGETHER. BECAUSE WE ARE OUT OF SYNC WITH THAT PROPOSAL SYSTEM. >> OKAY, WHAT TIMING DO WE -- >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I WOULD HAVE TO ASK. I DON'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. >> I FEEL IT WAS, WE WERE JUST OFF, RIGHT? YEAH. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: SO IT MIGHT EVEN TAKE A YEAR TO GET BACK AROUND. >> KEEP IN MIND TOO THAT LEAVING YOU, IT'S THEN GOT TO GO TO THE BOARD AND THEY HAVE TO MAKE DECISIONS. SO THERE'S ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO MONTHS. WELL, TWO MONTHS EASILY. AND MAYBE MORE BECAUSE THEY WILL VOTE TO BASICALLY SAY PULL THE PLUG ON, OR THE TRIGGER ON ACQUIRING. BUT THEN THERE'S THE SEVERAL MONTHS OF NEGOTIATIONS AND STUFF. SO WE WOULDN'T ACQUIRE FOR QUITE A BIT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: SO THE OPTIMAL TIME GET THE BOARD APPROVAL AS THE RURAL FAMILY LANDS IS OPENING SO YOU COULD TALK WITH NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST TO TRY TO PUT PROJECTS TOGETHER. >> YEAH. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I WAS JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND TIMING. >> NO, THAT'S GOOD. IF YOU COULD THINK OF OTHER PROGRAMS LIKE THAT WE NEED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ON TIMING, LET ME KNOW. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: REPI IS YEAR ROUND. THAT ONE IS EASY. >> OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE DODIE? OR FOR THE OLD BUSINESS? >> FOR THIS PART, NO. I THINK WE'VE TALKED ABOUT ALL OF THAT PART. WE WRAPPED IN THE MAP UPDATE [Map Update and Discussion of Data Source Information] AND DISCUSSION. BACK TO YOU. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: OKAY, SO THE ONLY OTHER ITEM ON THE AGENDA, HEATHER AND I HAVE SERVED FAITHFULLY AS YOUR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT BUT WE HAVE ELECTIONS TO DO FOR THE NEW FISCAL YEAR. THE NEW CALENDAR YEAR. MY QUESTION IS CAN WE NOMINATE PEOPLE WHO AREN'T HERE? [LAUGHTER] >> NO, YOU REALLY SHOULDN'T DO THAT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I THINK IT'S ONLY FAIR. SO WE NEED SOMEBODY, LET'S DO PRESIDENT FIRST. CHAIRMAN, I GUESS. CHAIR. ANYONE WILLING TO VOLUNTEER? >> YOU'RE DOING IT. >> I THINK YOU ARE DOING A GREAT JOB, MATT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: I APPRECIATE THE VOTE OF CONFIDENCE. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE A COMPETING OPINION? LOVE TO HEAR IT. >> UNLESS YOU AND HEATHER WANT TO SWITCH. TAG TEAM IT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO DO VICE PRESIDENT? OR KEEP HEATHER TOO? >> AGAIN, I THINK HEATHER IS DOING A GREAT JOB, SO. I LIKE Y'ALL AS THE FACE OF OUR COMMITTEE. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: WOW. >> YOU ARE DOING GREAT. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: THIS WOULD BE THROUGH THE END OF THE CALENDAR YEAR? >> YEAH, IT'S A CALENDAR YEAR. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: WELL, SEEING AS WE DIDN'T REALLY DO MUCH IN THE FIRST TERM, IF IT'S OKAY. REALLY ON THE ALTERNATE TUESDAY GOING TO THE BOARD MEETING WHERE STUFF IS COMING UP, RIGHT? WOULD BE THE ONLY REAL -- >> YEAH, REALLY. YEAH. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: OKAY. >> THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER THING THAT YOU NEED TO DO, IS YEAH, IT'S REALLY JUST THE CHAIR OR VICE CHAIR CAN FILL IN IF YOU CAN'T MAKE IT. AND HONESTLY, WHEN OTHER THINGS GO FORWARD LIKE THAT, TYPICALLY THE BOARD DOESN'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF QUESTIONS. THIS BEING THE FIRST TIME, THEY WILL. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: OKAY. WELL, I HEAR A MOTION FROM THE GOOD COOPER MURPHY THAT WE KEEP CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR THE SAME. I HEAR A SECOND FROM MR. PADGETT. ALL IN FAVOR? >> AYE. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: OKAY, WELL, WITH THAT VOTE. I GUESS CONTINUING ON AS THE CHAIR, I WILL OPEN IT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. WHICH I DON'T THINK THERE IS ANY. AND THEN I WILL CALL IT CLOSED. DODIE, UNLESS YOU HAVE ANYTHING [00:55:05] ELSE FOR US? >> NO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> CHAIRPERSON CORBY: WE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.