[Call to Order] [00:00:10] [Approval of Minutes] ITEM ON THE AGENDA WOULD BE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM TH THIRD MEETING. SO, HAS EVERYBODY HAD A LOOK AT THEM? THEY SEEM TO HAVE, IN MY MIND, TO HAVE COVERED ALL OF THE MAI POINTS. BUT, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING FOR CORRECTIONS OR ADDITIONS IN MIND? OKAY. OKAY I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THEM, THEN . >> I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES . >> SECOND . >> OKAY, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THEM? OKAY. THERE BEING NONE, I WILL CALL THE QUESTION. ALL IN FAVOR? ANY OPPOSED ? OKAY, VER OOD. THE MOTION CARRIES. THE MINUTES OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON FIELD, I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN DO MUCH WITH THAT, BECAUSE DEIRDRE, I THINK HAD TH LEAD ON THAT, RIGHT? >> TWO OF THE THREE . >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT W SET THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED IN THE PACKET. >> OKAY. OKAY, WE HAVE THE DRAFT . >> IT IS IN AN EMAIL FORM, THAT IS WHAT SHE HAD SENT TO ME. >> OKAY, THOSE WHO HAVE HAD A THANKS TO SCRUTINIZE , ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THOSE MINUTES? OKAY. THEY SEEM TO B ACCEPTABLE TO THOSE WHO HAVE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED THEM. I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THEM AS WELL. >> I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVED . >> OKAY, A SECOND. >> SECOND . >> OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? GOING, GOING. ALL RIGHT, I WILL CALL THE QUESTION ALL IN FAVOR OF ADOPTING THE BRANDON FIELD SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES ? SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE . >> AYE. ALL RIGHT, SEEMS THAT IS UNANIMOUS AS WELL. WE WERE GOING TO HAVE SOME COMMENTS ON THE WEST TOCOI SIGNAGE UPDATE FROM MR. GOULD , AND POSSIBLY MR. , BUT I DO NOT SEE THEM TODAY . BETH, DID YOU SAY YOU TALKED TO THEM? >> ACTUALLY, WE NEED TO DO THE PUBLIC COMMENT FIRST. I'M SORRY IT IS A LITTLE HIDDEN IN THERE. >> OKAY . >> THEN BILLY GOULD WILL SPEAK COMMENTS? >> I KNOW, IT FEELS CRAZY. [Old Business] LAUGHTER ] >> IT SEEMS THAT THERE ARE NONE SO WE WILL MOVE ON APPARENTLY THERE IS SOME QUICKER SOLUTION FOUND BY MR. GOULD AND HIS NEIGHBOR TO THIS MATTER. >> YES, AFTER THE LAST MEETING I GOT WITH THE COUNTY ENGINEER RICHARD SMITH , AND WE GOT THE WORDING FOR THE SIGNAGE. THE WITH THE CLAY COUNTY ARCHIVES MADE SURE THERE WAS NO OFFICIAL BOUNDARIES , WHICH THERE IS NOT SO, I CHECKED WITH THE ENGINEE AND WE DECIDED ON DOING A MILE RADIUS FROM WHERE THE FERRY WA . AND I GOT A PICTURE OF THE SIGN THAT WE PUT UP , AND THE MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION THAT I PASSED OUT. AND I TALKED TO MR COOK , HIM AND MR. BEIDLER ARE WORKING ON THE STATE APPLICATION FOR THE HISTORICAL MARKER , AND THEY WILL BE IN [00:05:01] TOUCH WHEN THEY HAVE IT FILLED OUT , AND THEY ARE READY TO MOV FORWARD WITH ITS. >> SO, IS IT IN THE CASE THAT THIS SIGN HAS POSTED, DID IT SHOW THESE POINTS? >> YES . >> OKAY. OKAY. BUT, THERE IS ALSO A MAP. VERY GOOD. SO, AT AS SUCH TIME AS THEY WANT TO APPLY FOR A STATE MARKER WE WIL HEAR FURTHER FROM THEM? >> YES, THEY ARE WORKING ON FILLING OUT THE APPLICATION , INDICATING THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. AND HIM AND MR. RICK BESELER WERE PLEASED OF TH LOCATION AS WELL. >> OKAY, THEY ARE AWARE THAT AN FACTUAL ASSERTIONS IN THAT STATE SIGNED WILL HAVE TO BE BACKED UP? >> YES, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FROM THE BOARD ON THIS? >> OKAY. SO, THE BRANAN FIELD MARKER , THAT WAS REALLY AT THE LAST POINT I THINK IT WAS DEIRDRE THAT HAD THE LEAD, BUT CAN CERTAINLY SAY THAT THIS ATTACHED TEXT DOES REPRESENT A NICE BLENDING OF WHATEVER WAS MADE. BUT, MANY EYES CAN FIND THINGS THAT ARE JUST ONE OR TWO MAYBE CANNOT. SO, LET'S GIVE THAT A LAST LOOK OVER. WELL, YES. DID EVERYBODY BRING A COPY OF WHAT BETH HAD SENT US ALREADY? RIGHT, I LIKE THAT LAUGHTER ] >> FOR THE RECORD, WHAT YOU ARE BEING HANDED OUT IS THE SAME AS WHAT WAS IN THE AGENDA PACKET. THAT? >> YES . >> AM I CORRECT IN THINKING THAT THIS NEEDS TO BE LETTER PERFECT ? BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE STATE? >> WHEN YOU SAY LETTER PERFECT EXACT GRAMMAR AND SPELLING AND EVERYTHING? YES . >> YES, IT HAS TO BE . >> YES, IT IS? >> IT WOULD HAVE TO BE. IF YOU SEE SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE ADJUSTED? >> YEAH. SO, LINE 2 , TOWARD TH END , IT'S PUBLIC EXHIBITION, THERE SHOULD BE NO' AFTER THE . WORLD WAR TWO , WW W SPACE TWO, NO SPACE THERE. >> YEAH, WELL, I AM AT THE POINT BEFORE WHERE WE ARE COMPLETELY SHORT OF CHARACTERS TO USE. THE SECOND WORLD WAR WOULD BE A BETTER STATEMENT ON THIS . >> THAT IS YOUR WRITING, BUT IF YOU ARE WRITING WW TWO, THAT AND IS WRITTEN THAT WAY. >> ALSO, BRANAN FIELD IS EXPELLED TWO DIFFERENT WAYS IN THAT DOCUMENT. YES , DOUBLE UP TWO ENDS IN THE SECOND TO LAST PARAGRAPH , ONE EVERYWHERE ELSE >> LET'S SEE. >> IN THE THIRD PARAGRAPH, SECOND LINE , THE LAST WORD MULTIPLE, IS THAT MEANT TO REFE TO AGE RUNWAYS? >> WHICH PARAGRAPH? >> THIRD PARAGRAPH , LAST WORD CONVERSIONS OF MULTIPLE 4000 FOOT RUNWAYS. IS THAT AGE RUNWAYS? >> SO, THERE ARE AGE RUNWAYS THAT CONVERTS TO A CENTRAL POINT, THAT WAS THE UNIQUE GEOMETRY? SO, RATHER THAN SAYING MULTIPLE, IT SEEMS MORE ACCURATE TO SAY EIGHT, BECAUSE [00:10:05] THERE WERE EIGHT. AND THERE IS PICTURE OF THE RUNWAYS IN THE CONVERSION CENTER. >> WELL, THE THINGS , THEY GO ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE CENTER, AND IN EFFECT YOU HAVE MORE THAN . >> WELL, ARE THERE AGE RUNWAYS THAT ARE 4000 FEET LONG THAT DO CONVERGE IN THE CENTER? WE HAV A DIAGRAM SOMEWHERE OF THAT RUNWAY SYSTEM . >> OR WOULD IT BE FOUR? THEY RUN ACROSS THE CENTER, THAT WOULD BE RUN ONE WAY, WOULD IT NOT? >> ARE THOSE 8000 FOOT RUNWAYS? OR ARE THEY EACH 4000 FEET? >> WE CAN CHECK . I WILL NOTE THAT AS A QUESTION . >> IT WOULD JUST BE MORE CLEAR >> OKAY. SO, SHALL WE PUT EIGHT THEN? INSTEAD OF MULTIPLE? >> IT NEEDS TO BE CONFIRMED. >> WELL, THAT IS A POINT. I WAS NOT TOO THRILLED WITH THAT LANGUAGE MYSELF. BUT, IT WAS NOT REALLY MY PROJECT . >> WELL, IT IS JUST CONFUSING . YOU NEED GEOMETRY, THEY ARE LOOKING DOWN. THEY CAN SEE THE CONVERGENCE. THIS MAKES IT MORE VAGUE . >> OKAY, WE WILL SAY IT INSTEAD OF MULTIPLE. >> OKAY, JUST CHECK IT OUT AND MAKE SURE IT IS CORRECT . >> DID YOU WANT TO HAVE WORLD WAR TWO SPELLED-OUT ? WITH THE WORD COUNT, WE ACTUALLY HAVE XP MAC YES, IT WAS. >> THAT IS GOOD. RIGHT NOW IT I AT 12:19 AND 1235 IS YOUR LIMIT. SO, IT IS 12:19 RIGHT NOW. SO, WE COULD SPELL IT OUT HERE . >> THEN WE WOULD HAVE ENOUGH TO SPELL OUT THE SECOND WORLD WAR THAT YOU WANT SECOND WORLD WAR OR WORLD WAR TWO? HOWEVER YOU WANTED WE WILL CHANGE IT. >> THEN YOU HAVE TO SEE -- SAY THE SECOND WORLD WAR . >> AND OTHER THINGS, THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH , THE FIRST LINE, DECADES LATER, SHOULD BE A,? WHAT ? WHERE? DECADES LATER? >> YES, ON THE ORIGINAL . >> THAT SEEMS TO ME TO BE OPTIONAL. >> THAT WHOLE SENTENCE IS PRETT AWKWARD . DO THE SUBDIVISIONS OVERLAP ONE ANOTHER? OR DO THE OVERLAP BRANAN FIELD AS IT WAS IN 1953? AND AND DOES THE FIRS POST EXPRESSWAY ALSO OVERLAP TH OTHER THINGS ? >> YES, I GUESS WE CAN ESCAPE THAT TO SOME DEGREE BY STRIKIN OUT DECADES LATER AND SAYING TODAY . >> THAT MAKES MORE SENSE. >> AND , I THINK PUTTING OAK LEAF SUBDIVISION STREETS IN THE FIRST EXPRESSWAY >> THE SUBDIVISION IS IN THAT SENTENCE TWICE, THAT IS PART OF WHAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT ACTUALLY IT IS OAK LEAF PLANTATION AND THERE ARE MANY SUBDIVISIONS . >> INSTEAD OF HAVING A, , IT HA THE WHAT ARE THEY? THE BRACKETS THE PARENTHESES. >> SO, I AM CHANGING IT LIKE TO SEE WHAT I AM DOING . >> I THINK THERE WAS PERHAPS A POLITICAL CONSIDERATION LAUGHTER ] >> IS THAT NOT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING? >> OKAY, WHERE IT SAYS OAKLEY SUBDIVISION, I FEEL LIKE INSTEA OF A, IT SHOULD BE PARENTHESES >> THAT IS JUST ME . >> WOULDN'T BE, TO ME, THE WHOL AREA IS CONSIDERED OAKLEY, YOU DON'T NEED TO SEE OAKLEY SUBDIVISION , OAKLEY AND THE FIRST POST EXPRESSWAY . >> LOGICALLY I AGREE WITH YOU , BUT THERE IS THE FACT THAT ONE OF THE CHIEFS SPONSORING ENTITIES IS THE OAKLEY PEOPLE. THEIR NAME AS OPPOSED TO, IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE ARE SOME SUBDIVISIONS . >> THE THING IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER SUBDIVISIONS THAT AREN'T OAK LEAF IN THAT GENERAL AREA, [00:15:04] APPARENTLY. SO, I DON'T KNOW. >> SO, THE NAME OF OAK LEAF IS OAK LEAF PLANTATION, THE SUBSIDIZATION OF BRANAN FIELD ARE PART OF OAK LEAF PLANTATION THAT STREET IS OAK LEAF PLANTATION PARKWAY. AND THE EXPRESSWAY GOES ACROSS , DOES I NOT? DOESN'T IT GO THROUGH? A OPPOSED TO OVERLAPPING IT? >> WELL, IT WAS GOING OVER IT, THEN YOU SAY CERTAINLY, WHAT WAS BRANAN FIELD IS UNDERNEATH EVERYTHING. FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY . IT WAS A 2 LANE RD. AT ONE POINT , IT BECAME THE FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY . >> OKAY, THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN IT OVERLAPS BRANAN FIELD . >> IT KIND OF DOES . >> IT REPLACED IT . >> IF THERE IS A BETTER WORDING , I IMAGINE EVENTUALLY WE COULD COME UP WITH ONE. HAVE AT IT. THIS WOULD BE THE TIME. >> IS READ SUPPOSED TO BE CAPITALIZED? IT SAYS BRANAN FIELD ROAD? >> YES . >> OH. >> I HATED THIS . >> IF YOU KEEP OAK LEAF SUBDIVISION , THE SUBDIVISION SHOULD NOT BE CAPITALIZED. BUT WHY YOU NEED TO HAVE TWO SUBDIVISIONS IN THAT SENTENCE, DON'T UNDERSTAND. >> WELL, YES, I SUPPOSE THE FIRST GROUP WE COULD SAY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES? I DON' REALLY KNOW WHAT THE CLASSIFICATION IS . YOU KNOW, THEY SEEM TO BE PART OF A TROOP INSTALLATION , TO THE EXTENT THAT I PAY ANY ATTENTION TO IT. SO. RESIDENTIAL HOUSING? RESIDENTIAL HOUSING ON BRANAN FIELD ROAD, OAK LEAF PLANTATION SUBDIVISION. >> HOW ABOUT THE WORD NEIGHBORHOODS TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE FIRST SUBDIVISIONS? >> THAT IS A GOOD IDEA. NEIGHBORHOODS. >> SO, IT SOUNDS SO CONFUSINGL REPETITION, WE COULD SAY HOUSING DIVISION . >> WELL, RESIDENTIAL . WHAT TO DID YOU SAY? >> NEIGHBORHOODS. THE NEIGHBORHOODS. >> THAT IS WHAT THEY CALL IT WHEN YOU LOOK UP OAK LEAF, OAK LEAF PLANTATION IS A PLANNED COMMUNITY , THEN ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS GO UP TO IT. >> ALL OF THE BUILDERS DID DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOODS, BUT IT IS ALL PART OF OAK LEAF PLANTATION. >> I DON'T KNOW THAT ALL OF IT IS OAK LEAF, I FORGET WHERE TH BORDER OF IT ENDS. OKAY . >> SO, I AM GOING TO MAKE A COP OF THIS PARAGRAPH HERE. >> OKAY, SO OVERLAPPED BY THE OAK LEAF NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDIVISIONS? HOW DO YOU WANT THIS? THE ORIGINAL IS THE TOP ONE AND I WILL CHANGE THE BOTTO ONE SO YOU CAN HOW IT LOOKS. >> I DON'T KNOW, I GUESS I DEFE TO EVERYBODY ELSE HERE. BECAUS I JUST HAVE AN IMPRESSION THAT THERE IS MORE TO THE AREA THEN BRANAN FIELD JUST COVERED, THEN SIT SIMPLY OAK LEAF , WHETHER THAT BECOMES IMPORTANT. BUT, I AM SURE THAT THE OAK LEAF PEOPL WOULD HATE TO NOT BE MENTIONED [00:20:03] >> I WANT TO SAY SOME PAIN LIKE THEY DO WANT IT TO MENTIONED A OAK LEAF, BUT TODAY THE SITE IS OVERLAP , IT IS ALSO COMMERCIAL , RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS : PERHAPS? OAK LEAF TATIAN, BRANAN FIELD ROAD . BECAUSE IT IS MORE THAN RESIDENTIAL. >> MAYBE SOMETHING ABOUT RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT? TOUCH AS ? >> THAT'S TRUE . >> THAT IS IN THE OF ALL COUNT THAT IS PRIMARILY DO FALL . >> IT IS PART OF THE ARGYLE FOREST. SO, ONE BIG DEVELOPMENT. >> I THOUGHT THE ARGYLE FOREST WAS ON OUR SIDE . >> IT SPLIT. IT IS ACROSS BOTH . >> YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH DEPAU TO GET TO IT. >> TO WHAT? >> OUR PART OF ARGYLE. THERE I NO DIRECT ROAD INTO OUR PART O ARGYLE. SO, ALL RIGHT, WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF THE GROUP? WE HAVE A NUMBER OF COMMENTS INDICATING THAT WE HAVE SOME WORK THAT OUGHT TO BE DONE . >> WELL, ONE THING THAT NEEDS T BE DROPPED JUST AS WE ARE TELLING A STORY, AND WHEN IT IS ON THE MARKER IT WILL NOT BE IN THE PARAGRAPHS , IT WILL BE ONE BIG BLOCK PARAGRAPH, SO YOU AREO TELLING THE STORY OF THE U.S. NOR NAVY FORMED THE GROUP IN 1946 , THEN JUST A FEW YEARS LATER, 1953, THEY SOLD BRANAN FIELD . WHY DID THEY DO THAT? I THERE WAS SOME CONTEMPATION, IF THEY SOLD IT WHEN THEY MOVED THE BLUE ANGELS OPERATION, FOR EXAMPLE , OR THEY REPLACED THE TESTING AREA . >> THE BLUE ANGELS MOVED SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE THEY SOLD IT. >> BEFORE 1953? SO THEY ONLY USED IT FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS . >> THEY ONLY USED IT FOR 6 MONTHS. IT WAS NOT THAT LONG THAT THE BLUE ANGELS , FROM MY UNDERSTANDING. AS I UNDERSTOOD THE NARRATIVE OF THE PEOPLE WH CAME UP WITH THIS , THEY WERE TRAINING PILOTS BEFORE THAT , EARLIER IN THE WAR. BUT, THEY WERE EVOLVING THIS PROJECT TO MAKE THEIR PERFORMANCE A SPECTACLE . >> WELL, IT WAS THE ARMY AIR FORCE, BUT THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE EVENTUALLY. WELL, NO, THE ARE STILL THE NAVY AIR WAS . SO, I BELIEVE THAT IT WAS OPERATING AS A TRAINING PLACE LONGER THAN JUST A FEW MONTHS ANGELS PART . >> YES, THEY WANT TO EMPHASIZE THE FACT THAT IT STARTED THERE WHETHER THEY CALL THAT THE BLUE ANGELS THEN OR NOT. BECAUSE OTHERWISE IT WOULD BE PRETTY THIN. I MEAN THE FIRST EXHIBITION, AS I READ THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS, THE FIRST EXHIBITION AS THE BLUE ANGELS WAS NO LONGER THERE, IT WAS THAT THE NAVAL AIR STATION THAT THEY FIRST CAME OUT AS THE BLU ANGELS. SO, THE WHOLE IDEA OF THIS, I THINK , IS TO SAY REGARDLESS OF WHERE THEY ENDED UP, THIS IS WHERE THE WHOLE THING STARTED. I AM NOT SURE WHY THIS ISSUE IS COMING UP NOW PATRIOTISM , AND IT IS GOOD FOR TOURISM , I SUPPOSE , TO EMPHASIZE THAT CLAY COUNTY HAS A ROLE IN ALL OF THIS, EVEN THOUGH IT DID NOT KEEP IT FOR VERY LONG SO. IF WE ARE NOT [00:25:13] ABLE TO FORWARD THIS THING ON , I DON'T KNOW, HOW MUCH LONGER D WE HAVE TO ACTUALLY GET IT IN FRONT OF THE STATE TO REVIEW IT? > IT IS IN YOUR TIMEFRAME , THEY MEET MORE OFTEN THAN THEY USED TO, SO WHATEVER TIME YOU GET IT COMPLETED , WE WILL SUBMIT IT. WE DON'T HAVE A DEADLINE AT THIS POINT . >> RIGHT, SO WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY MORE MEETINGS THEY WILL HAVE THAT WE COULD GET IT IN . WELL, IT IS ALMOST TOO LATE NO . >> YES, THE FISCAL YEAR. YES. >> IT WAS AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, RIGHT? >> YES . >> SO, IT WOULD BE SAD IF WE CANNOT GET THIS THROUGH THE PIPELINE IN TIME. SO, IT IS ON THING TO MAKE SOME ADJUSTMENTS BUT IF WE REWRITE IT IN CIVIL PARTS, THEN I FORESEE IT MAY NOT MAKE IT. THAT IS JUST A CONSIDERATION. IT HAS TO TELL A STORY , AND IT HAS TO INFORM THE READER ABOUT TO THAT PLACE , WHICH IS AUGMENTED BY THE OTHER INSTALLATION THAT IS GOING IN , IS THAT CORRECT? SO, IT WOULD SEEM TO BEHOOVE US TO MAKE I AS ACCURATE AS IT CAN BE , AS STORYTELLING AS IT CAN BE . >> THAT IS FUN, WE'VE HAD A LOT OF TIME TO CONSIDER THAT UP TO NOW . SO, DO WE WANT TO HAVE ANOTHER MEETING? OF COURSE, IT IS UNFORTUNATE DEIRDRE IS NOT HERE, WOULD SHE BE AVAILABLE? DID SHE SAY WHERE SHE IS? >> I BELIEVE SHE COULD BE AVAILABLE IN THE NEXT WEEK OR TWO. I THINK SHE IS NOT AVAILABLE THIS WEEK. >> OKAY. WHO WANTS TO BE ON ANOTHER SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING CONCERNING PUTTING THIS TO THAT? >> I WILL SERVE AND PARTICIPAT . >> OKAY, ANYONE ELSE? >> I WILL. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OF COURSE I WOULD COME BACK . >> WE WOULD MEET HERE? OF COURSE, DEIRDRE, NO DOUBT WOUL BE INVOLVED. >> THE MEETING COULD BE WHEREVE I CAN GET ONE THAT UP . >> LAST TIME I THINK YOU DID IT HERE . >> YOU DID MEET HERE, YES, THAT IS RIGHT. >> SO, ANYONE ELSE WANT TO BE PART OF IT? WE ARE ASSUMING DEIRDRE WILL BE >> I MEAN I HAVE BEEN IN THREE MEETINGS, MAYBE SOMEBODY ELSE NEEDS A CHANCE TO PUT IN THEIR IDEAS. >> I DON'T KNOW. YOU HAVE MORE EXPERIENCE THAN MOST ABOUT WHERE THE BORDERS ARE OF THINGS , THAT IS A VALUABLE ELEMENT IN THIS CALCULATION . >> I CAN BE AVAILABLE , IT'S NO PROBLEM . >> ALL RIGHT. SO, WE WILL ROPE IN MR. -- AS AN EXPERT COMMENTATOR AS NEEDED. OKAY. SO, THAT CAN INFORM US OF THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR THE SUBCOMMITTEES AND THE ACTUAL MEETING TIME , THEN EVERYBODY CAN GO TO WORK . >> I CAN SET UP THE MEETING NOW , THAT IS THE VERY LAST MEETING WE MET IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE BOARD MEETING, I CAN SET IT UP FOR A DIFFERENT TIME . 4:00 IS WHAT I THINK WE HAD BEFORE, 4:0 PM ? DOES THAT WORK WITH SCHEDULES? >> YES, I GET OFF AT LIKE 3:15 OR 3:20. >> WITHOUT GIVE TIME TO CREATE CLEAN COPY FOR THE BOARD TO REVIEW? >> I AM NOT SURE . >> YEAH, COULD IT BE A SEPARAT [00:30:03] TIME? THAT IS UP TO YOU. YOU LET ME KNOW AND I WILL SCHEDULE THE MEETING WHEN YOU NEED IT. >> AS FAR AS I KNOW I AM NOT GOING ANYWHERE EXOTIC THIS MONTH. >> SO, WHENEVER IT IS CONVENIEN FOR DEIRDRE. >> OKAY. I WILL SET THAT UP FOR YOU ALL. >> SO, THE MEETING TIME WOULD BE 4:00 YOU SAID? >> NO, WE DID NOT SAY . >> I WILL SET IT UP FOR 4:00 IF THAT IS A TIME THAT WORKS FOR YOU ALL . >> OKAY, BUT DO WE HAVE A DATE? >> NOT YET , WE NEED TO FIND OU WHEN EVERYONE IS AVAILABLE. >> OKAY, SO, I GUESS WE WILL HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE , UNTIL THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAN MASSAGE I FURTHER. WE MIGHT HAVE TO DUST OFF SOME EARLIER DRAFTS. SO, WE NEED TO VOTE ON A MOTION TO TABLE? YES. OKAY, I WILL TAKE IT UNTIL WE CAN FURTHER MEET. >> BUSINESS. WHAT DO WE HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT ST. MARYS [New Business] THING? WOULD THAT BE A SIMILAR KIND OF BUSINESS? OKAY . SO, I THERE ANY NEW BUSINESS THAT PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF? ARE THE BOARD MEMBERS STILL ABLE TO BRING THINGS UP AS NEW BUSINESS AT THIS MEETING? >> UNDER BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS, THEY CAN . >> OKAY, BUT NOT IN THE BUSINESS? >> IF IT IS NOT LISTED AS NEW BUSINESS, IT IS TECHNICALLY NOT IN THE BUSINESS. [Certificates of Approval] >> IT'S DIFFERENT WITH THE NONPROFIT PEOPLE. OKAY, CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL, WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE NONE [Public Comment] OKAY, PUBLIC COMMENT , WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PRESENT . LITTLE MORE IN LIGHT INTO EXACTLY WHAT CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL ARE? BECAUSE I KNOW WE SEEM TO GO BY IT EVERY TIME SO, I AM JUST CURIOUS . >> OH, WHEN IT IS THE DUTIES O THIS BOARD , WOULD BE TO APPROV ANY REQUEST BY A DESIGNATED HISTORIC PROPERTY , TO MAKE AMENDMENTS , OR DEMOLISH, OR WHATEVER , TO THAT HISTORIC PROPERTY, THERE ARE NONE THAT ARE THE DID BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . SO, UNTI THAT TIME YOU WILL NEVER HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL. IT IS ON YOUR AGENDA BECAUSE WHEN I SAID TO THE FORMAT FOR THIS AGENDA, THIS IS ONE OF YOUR DUTIES . SO, IT IS THERE, SHOUL IT BE NEEDED. >> OKAY, THANK YOU . >> I UNDERSTAND IT IS CONFUSING TO HAVE IT ON THE AGENDA WITH N MATERIAL TO BACK IT UP. THAT I THE PURPOSE OF IT. >> OKAY. SO, WITH THAT, UNDER YOUR STAFF? >> YOU HAVE ANOTHER PUBLIC COMMENT COMING. >> NO. WHAT PUBLIC COMMENT? >> ON THE AGENDA. >> MR. PRES.? >> YES, IT IS PUBLIC COMMENTS. JUST ANOTHER ONE. >> THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO PUBLIC COMMENTS . >> HE READ IT ALREADY, HE WENT BACK AND ASKED THE QUESTION. OH, OKAY . [00:35:02] >> I GUESS I AM STILL CONFUSED. >> OKAY, WE NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENTS AMERICAS A TIME, AND CLOSE IT. YOU HAVE T ASK THE QUESTION PRIOR TO THE OPENING. >> OKAY, THE BOARD IS OPEN TO ANY PUBLIC COMMENT THAT THE PUBLIC HAS HEARING NONE. HEARING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAK [Staff Comments] >> THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR STAFF COMMENTS . >> I WILL TRY TO MAKE THIS EASIER. SO, BARRING HOUSE HAD PRESENTED AN APPLICATION FOR MARKER IN GREEN COVE SPRINGS, AND YOU ALL HAVE AGREED TO WORK ON THAT MARKER . HOWEVER, NOBOD STEPPED UP TO CHAMPION THAT , WHO WANTED TO WORK ON THAT MARKER FOR THE BOARD. SO , I AM RAISING THIS NOW , BECAUSE SHE WAS INTERESTED IN THE PROGRESS OF IT, AND WE HAVE NOT MADE ANY PROGRESS , BECAUSE NOBODY HAS VOLUNTEERED TO WORK ON THE MARKER, SPECIFICALLY. >> BUT, SHE HAS SUBMITTED A TEX PICKS YES, SHE DID. >> WHICH, IF IT SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY THE FACTUAL DOCUMENT, IT LOOKS OKAY TO ME . HAS EVERYBODY HAD A LOOK AT IT? I THINK SO AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS MEETING. >> YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COPIES? >> I DID NOT SEE ANY. >> I HAVE NOT EITHER. >> TWO MORE? OKAY. I HAVE GOT THIS ONE. AND THIS ONE. THEY ARE SELLING LIKE HOT CAKES. SO SHE WAS ON THE AGENDA FOR THE AUGUST 3 MEETING AND IT WAS IN THE PACKET TO THE AUGUST TO THE AUGUST 3 AGENDA. >> WELL, THERE IS ONE POTENTIAL REDUNDANT THE THAT I CAN SEE, BUT OTHER THAN THAT , IT AWARE OF ANYTHING THAT IS WRONG WITH IT. >> SO, WE WILL NEED TO HAVE SOURCES FOR ALL OF THE STATEMENTS THAT ARE MADE IN HERE, WE WILL NEED TO HAVE SOME DATA TO VERIFY THAT , WHICH, I AM ASSUMING SHE CAN PROVIDE THAT? AND I CAN PROVIDE HER CONTACT INFORMATION IF SOMEBOD IS GOING TO TAKE ON THIS MARKE PROJECT. >> CONTACT INFORMATION . >> IT SHOULD BE IN THE APPLICATION. >> WELL, SO, IT IS NOT ON THE ACTUAL APPLICATION FORM, THEN? BECAUSE OF COURSE PAT IS LISTE AS THE APPLICANT HERE , AND SHE IS AN OFFICER OF THE CHURCH THERE . SO. IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT , AGAIN, SINCE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE TO GET THIS THROUGH AND SHE WAS QUITE WOULD NOT LET HER COME BECAUSE SHE IS RECOVERING FROM THAT BAC SURGERY. IS IT POSSIBLE TO VOT TO SUBMIT THIS , ASSUMING SHE HAS GOT TO COME UP WITH THE BACKUP DOCUMENTATION? OR TO TELL HER THAT SHE CAN GO AHEAD AND SUBMIT IT , ASSUMING WE HAV NO PROBLEM, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, WITH THE TEXT. >> THERE ARE SOME ISSUES. I THINK. [00:40:06] >> I CANNOT HEAR YOU . >> THERE ARE SOME ISSUES WITH THE GRAMMAR , I THINK, IN THE TEXT . >> OH, WHAT? >> THE LAND FOR THE CHURCH WAS GIFT OF THAT HE IS DAVID'S FAMILY. DAVID'S FAMILY? >> THE LAND FOR THE CHURCH . >> IT WAS A GIFT OF THE THADDEU DAVID'S FAMILY . YOU WANT A,? >> THE THADDEUS DAVID'S , I TAK THAT TO MEAN THE NAME OF THE FAMILY . >> OKAY . >> THAT IS A LITTLE UNUSUAL, I SHOULD BE DAVIS USUALLY. >> JUST A MINOR ONE, LIKE ACCORDING TO PARISH RECORDS , JUST MOVE THE, OVER. THE SECON PARAGRAPH, THIRD LINE, ACCORDIN TO PARISH RECORDS , OVER 200 OF THEM . >> OKAY. HOPEFULLY THAT SQUEAK IN . >> I THINK IT WOULD READ BETTER IF IT SAID THE LAND FOR THE CHURCH , VALUED AT $500 WAS A GIFT TO THE THADDEUS DAVID'S FAMILY, PERIOD . >> YES. >> JUST MOVING THAT UP A LITTLE BIT. >> OKAY , YEAH, THAT ADDS A COUPLE OF COMMENTS , BUT HOPEFULLY THEY WOULD SKI SQUEA THROUGH. DID SHE TELL US WHAT THE WORD COUNT CAME TO? >> IT IS UNDER 1235, YOU HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF ROOM . >> OH, OKAY. SO, WE WANT TO MOV THAT UP AFTER LAND FOR THE CHURCH, RIGHT? >> YEAH. VALUED AT $500. MECH YES. PARAGRAPH WE TALK ABOUT THE CHURCH BEING ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER IN 1979 . THEN THAT IS DROPPED AND WE GO TO 2002. THEN, GO BACK TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES . I THINK IT WOULD BENEFIT THE WHOL THING IF IT WERE IN A MORE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER , AS OPPOSE TO BRINGING THINGS UP MORE THAN ONCE . >> YES, WELL THAT IS TWO DIFFERENT BUILDINGS , TWO DIFFERENT REGISTERS , IT LOOKS LIKE >> TWO DIFFERENT REGISTERS? >> THE SECOND BUILDING WAS MOVE THERE BEFORE 1979. >> IS IT ONE IS THE CHURCH AND ONE IS THE FELLOWSHIP HALL? >> YES , OH. THE CHURCH. SHE DOES NOT LITERALLY SAY THAT THE FELLOWSHIP IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL NATIONAL REGISTER , THAT MAY BE THE CASE . >> SO, THAT IS NOT CLEAR , THAT NEEDS TO BE CLEARED OUT. BUT, I ANY CASE , I THINK THE POINT IS WELL MADE THAT IT WOULD LOOK BETTER IF THAT DATE THAT WAS PLACED AT THE NATIONAL REGISTER SHOULD BE IN PROXIMITY TO 2000 OH, OKAY. OKAY, I SEE. YES, THA IS RIGHT. SO, IF WE MOVED THE FIRST NATIONAL REGISTER ASSIGNMENT DOWN TO BE THE BEGINNING OF THE LAST PARAGRAPH , THEN WE WOULD HAVE IT, RIGHT? SOMEBODY READ HOW YOU WANT THI TO READ ? YOU ARE SAYING THE CHURCH WAS PLACED IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER IN 1979, DO YOU WANT THAT TO MOVE DOWN TO IN 2002, THE PARISH HALL? >> YES, THE LEAD , IF THERE IS GOING TO BE A PARAGRAPH, IT WOULD BE THE LEAD TO THAT . YES . >> SO, IN THAT CASE , THE NATIONAL HISTORIC REGISTER IN THE FIRST USE, THEN YOU CAN DRO THE REGISTER OUT OF THE SECOND [00:45:04] USE. >> YES, YES. >> SO, YOU WANT TO THE SECOND ONE TO SAY ARMY CHAPEL CAMP LANDING WAS ALSO ADDED? >> THE LAST CLAUSE TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES? >> WE MOVE THAT UP TO THE FIRST ONE, I GUESS. >> OH, THAT LAST PARAGRAPH, OR THE LAST, I SHOULD SAY, SENTENC OF THE FIRST PARAGRAPH TALKING ABOUT IT HOW IT IS RECOGNIZED WITH EVERYTHING ELSE MOVING AROUND, THAT MAKES SENSE TO ME TO PUT FORWARD EXCEPT FOR THE ADDITION OF THE RUBBER ROOM, JUST PUT EVERYTHING ABOUT THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING AN IT HAS REALLY BEEN MODIFIED , OTHER THAN THE HVAC , SO, SEPARATING THAT OUT. >> WELL, THE OTHER THING IS THAT TALKING ABOUT THE GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE TWICE IS KIND OF REDUNDANT. WE DON'T REALLY NEE THAT TO PRESERVE SOME EXTRA COMMENTS . >> TRUE, SO, THE CARPENTER GOTHIC . >> SURE., BECAUSE WE PICKUP TH WHOLE CONCEPT OF GOTHIC REVIVA ARCHITECTURE. >> YEAH. WHERE AS THE CARPENTER GOTHIC CHURCH WERE THE ONES WITH ST. JOHN'S . >> THAT IS SOMETIMES WITHIN A QUOTE TYPE OF THING . >> THE CARPENTER GOTHIC? >> YES. >> WELL, ANY OTHER INSIGHTS? DOES ANYBODY KNOW IF THAT IS CORRECT? THE ECCLESIASTICAL USAGE TO CAPITALIZE THE WITH THE REV. JOHN FREEMAN? >> IT IS CORRECT . >> OKAY. I KNOW THE REST OF IT IS. >> DOES THAT FIRST SENTENCE REQUIRES SOME MORE COMMAS? THE FIRST SENTENCE, DOES IT REQUIRE SOME MORE COMMAS? >> THE FIRST SENTENCE? >> AFTER YOUNG? >> OH, THAT IS A LONG FIRST SENTENCE. >> OKAY, DO YOU WANT A, AFTER YOUNG? >> I THINK IT SOUNDS BETTER IF YOU SAY IT WAS ORGANIZED IN 1878 AS A MISSION CHURCH FOR TH DIOCESE . >> YES. >> AND THE RIGHT, THAT SHOULD B CAPITALIZED . >> OH, THE RIGHT REV.? >> YES, THAT SHOULD BE CAPITALIZED . >> OKAY, JUST ASKING. >> IS THERE ANY WAY TO CHECK O THIS? I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS IN FLORIDA MEMORY IF IT WAS [00:50:04] REALLY SPELLED DAVID'S? HOPEFULLY IT WAS. BUT, WE CAN BURN IT DOWN . >> I THINK WE WILL HAVE TO HAVE SOME DOCUMENTATION OF THE GIFT OR THERE IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE SOMETHING TO DOCUMENT THAT. >> ALL RIGHT. >> SO, WE PUT IN THE REVISIONS AND SEND THEM BACK ? WHAT WOUL BE THE NEXT BEST STEP TO GET I MOVED? >> I WILL TRY TO COBBLE TOGETHE THE CHANGES YOU HAVE MADE. I AM NOT SURE THAT I HAVE GOTTEN ALL OF THEM . AND I MAY SEND THAT OUT TO YOU, IF YOU WILL REPLY BACK, AND LET ME HAVE A OTHER CHANGES THAT YOU HAVE, I CAN PU IT TOGETHER. AND I CAN SEND IT TO HER AND LET HER KNOW, SHE MA BE WATCHING TONIGHT, BUT I WILL LET HER KNOW THAT WE NEED THE PACKING MATERIAL. FOR REFERENCES, FOR ALL OF THIS. >> ARE THE PARISH HALL AND FELLOWSHIP HALL THE SAME IN? TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS , THA IS A GOOD POINT, THOUGH. IT HA TO BE , BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO SIZABLE BUILDINGS THA WE HAVE GOT OTHER THAN DIRECTORY, WHICH IS APPARENTLY DOOMED. >> BUTTS, THE JUMPING AROUND WITH THE DATE IS WHAT MAKES IT HARD TO READ. >> SO, OKAY. WHERE IS PARISH HALL, THEN I WILL SHIP HALL? >> NO. THIS IS NOT KOSHER TO ASK. WHEN AND THE BOARD IS IN SESSION , THIS WOULD BE FOR BETH. WHEN THE BOARD IS IN SESSION , CAN IT COMMUNICATE BY TELEPHONE WITH ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC? >> WE COULD ASK PAT THESE THINGS . >> I WOULD NOT THINK SO. >> OKAY. WE CAN SEND HER A COMMUNICATION AFTER THE MEETING . >> OKAY, WE CAN PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION TO YOU ALL. >> OKAY, PARISH HALL, FELLOWSHI HALL. SHE MUST HAVE MEANT THAT THEY ARE THE SAME THING , OR THAT WE SHOULD CALL THEM THE SAME THING. >> I HAVE THE FEELING , MENTIONING THE HVAC SYSTEM SEEM A LITTLE SUPERFLUOUS TO ME . BUT, THAT UNDERCUTS THE GLORIOUS SIGNIFICANT . NOT THAT YOU ARE INSIDE THE BUILDING, I GUESS. >> AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND, I WOULD HAVE TO DOUBLE CHECK , WHERE IT IS IS THE SAME GLASSED WINDOWS COSTING HOWEVER MUCH MONEY , USUALLY IN CHICAGO STYLE, WHICH HE WOULD USE FOR HISTORY , THEY WANT TO THE SIMPLE PAST TENSE . SO, LIKE TH STAINED-GLASS WINDOW COST $100 WHEN THE CHURCH WAS BUILT, INSTEAD OF THE STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS COSTING. >> SO, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE INSTEAD? >> YOU WOULD HAVE THE STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS COST 110 WHEN THE CHURCH WAS BUILT AND CREATED AT THE STUDIO. USUALLY THEY JUST WANT SIMPLE PAST TENSE. BUT LIKE I SAID, I HAVE TO CHECK >> SUGGEST USING COST INSTEAD OF COSTING? >> YEAH. >> SO, INSTEAD OF OH, YEAH. I [00:55:09] SEE. BUT, THEN , WE ARE CREATED, IT STARTS TO CONFLICT WITH THAT . >> IT STARTS WITH AND WE ARE CREATED , USUALLY WE DO COSTED IN CHICAGO STYLE, AS FAR AS I REMEMBER, IT IS US TO SIMPLE PAST TENSE. >> OKAY, SO STRIKE OUT ING , THEN YOU HAVE TO INSERT , I GUESS, AND AND? >> YOU COULD ALSO SAY THE STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS CREATED AT COLGATE STUDIO COST $1100 WHEN THE CHURCH WAS BUILT. IS THAT MORE CLEAR? >> WELL, THAT WOULD SAVE A WORD OR TWO. >> IT LOOKS LIKE THEY CALL IT O THEIR WEBSITE, THE PARISH HALL THE OTHER INTERESTING THING THERE, IT'S AS THEY ARE A GIFT OF THE THADDEUS DAVID FAMILY . >> SO, SHE WILL HAVE TO CLEAR THAT UP. >> ST. MARY'S CHURCH. WHERE THEY HAVE GOT THE HISTORY. >> OKAY. SO, CREATED IN NEW YORK. >> IT COST 1100 WHEN THE CHURCH WAS BUILT, PERIOD. OKAY. SO, THE DAVID THING IS A QUESTION . DAVID OR DAVID'S ? >> IF THE FAMILY IS DAVID , IT WOULD BE POSSESSIVE, AT THAT POINT I SAY IT SHOULD BE WAS A GIFT FROM THE THADDEUS DAVID' . I THINK THE THE MIGHT NEED TO MARKET THEIR . >> WHEN YOU FOUND IT ON THE INTERNET? >> MARY'S WEBSITE , IT JUST SAY THAT HE IS DAVID . I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS DAVID'S . >> BUT YOU DON'T NEED THE LETTER S. >> CORRECT. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. >> BUT NOT DAVIS? >> NO, DAVID. >> YES, I REMEMBER HAVING THOSE TWO THINGS . >> SO JUST KEEP THE S OUT? >> I KNOW, THAT IS TO ME THAT I CORRECT. IS OKAY, THE CANON WITH THE DIOCESE. HE HAS HAD A LOT OF HEALTH ISSUES IN THE LAST YEAR. I WILL CALL ALLISON. FROM BETH , AND RUN THEM BY PAT TO MAKE SURE THERE IS NOT ANYTHING ELSE . WELL, SHE IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE OUT DOCUMENTATION. SO, FIRST WE CAN GO AHEAD AND HAVE IT CATCH UP , WE HAVE NEVER DONE THAT BEFORE. I THINK THEY ALWAYS WANT THE DOCUMENTATION BEFORE WE ACTUALLY FORWARDED TO THE STATE THAT YOU, AS A BOARD, ARE GOING TO WORK ON THIS ONE? OR WILL ON OF YOU WORK ON THIS WITH PAT? >> WELL, I WOULD BE WILLING TO WORK ON IT WITH PAT , SINCE I A IN TOUCH WITH HER ON OTHER THINGS TOO. WE ARE BOTH ON THE [01:00:02] COUNTY MUSEUM SO I WOULD BE WILLING TO DO THAT. BUT IF IT I ANYBODY ELSE , YOU ARE AN EXPERIENCED EDITOR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO PARTICIPATE? >> WELL, PARTICIPATE ] WELL, I DON'T KNOW, HAVE YOU WORKED WITH PAT BEFORE? OKAY. SO, THEN I PROPOSE WE FORM A SUBCOMMITTEE, IS THAT WHAT WE HAVE TO DO? AND GET TOGETHER WITH PAT . OKAY. WILL YOU BE ABLE TO FINAGLE THE NEXT ROOM AND DATE ? >> CERTAINLY, IF MORE THAN ONE OF YOU IS GOING TO WORK WITH HER, YES, WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A PUBLIC MEETING. >> WOULD ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO B IN ON THIS? IT IS A NICE CHURCH DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE DATE . >> OKAY. OKAY, VERY GOOD. SO, IF PAT WAS TOO LATE UP TO APPEAR FOR SUCH A MEETING , WOULD WE BE ABLE TO COMMUNICATE WITH HER B TELEPHONE WHILE THE COMMITTEE I MEETING ? THE SUBCOMMITTEE? AGAIN , OTHER ORGANIZATIONS CAN DO THAT. BUT . >> I AM GOING TO ASK THE CLERK' REPRESENTATIVE ON THAT ONE IN THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING, CAN THEY? >> DO THESE THINGS HAVE HOOKUP ? IF THE VOICE APPEARS ON ONE O THESE , IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT THEY ARE VIRTUALLY HERE. >> NOT IN THIS SETTING, WE DON' TYPICALLY HAVE PEOPLE BY PHONE ATTENDING MEETINGS HERE. SO, YEAH . >> IT WOULD BE A MATTER OF RECORD IF IT WAS RECORDED, RIGHT? >> IT HAS TO BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THE MEETING. >> OH, SURE, OF COURSE. IN OTHE WORDS, IF WE HAD SOMEHOW HAD A HOOKUP THAT WORKED , IF SHE COULD NOT BE PRESENT , BUT SHE WAS AWARE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON? THAT WAY WE COULD HOPEFULLY MOVE THIS FORWARD TO WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE . >> RIGHT, SHE COULD CERTAINLY ATTEND YOUR SUBCOMMITTEE MEETIN BY PHONE , IF YOU WISH TO HAVE HER DO THAT . >> OKAY, ALL RIGHT. THAT IS WHA I WANTED TO KNOW. ALL RIGHT. ARE THESE ROOMS, BY THE WAY, EQUIPPED WITH THAT? EQUIPPED T SPEAK WITH THEM ON A SPEAKERPHONE? NO, I THINK YOU WOULD JUST HAVE HER ON YOUR CEL PHONE . >> OKAY, THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. OKAY, GOOD. >> SHE MIGHT EVEN BE ABLE TO MAKE A MEETING . >> SHE MIGHT. BUT , APPARENTLY, FROM WHAT I HEARD FROM HER TODAY, SHE IS NOT REALLY SUPPOSED TO BE GOING AROUND DOING ANYTHING. >> I SAW HER AT THE MUSEUM THE OTHER DAY . >> I KNOW, SHE WAS HOBBLING AROUND BUT HER HUSBAND GROUNDE HER BECAUSE THAT IS CONTRARY TO WHAT THE DOCTOR TOLD HER. >> OKAY . >> IT WAS HE WHO BROUGHT ME THESE PAPERS, FOR EXAMPLE. ALL RIGHT. SO, WE WILL AWAIT TO TH AVAILABILITY OF THE DATE AND TIMES FOR THE SUBCOMMITTEE TO MEET ALSO, AS WELL. DOES THAT REQUIRE A MOTION, PERHAPS? OR SUBCOMMITTEE? >> NO . >> OKAY, GOOD. >> STEP, , ALL RIGHT. I GUESS THE STAFF COMMENTS ARE EXHAUSTED, IS THAT CORRECT? SO [Board Member's Comments] THAT CLOSES. SO, WE ARE LEFT WITH THE MEMBERS OF OUR OWN BOARD TO MAKE THEIR COMMENTS. >> -- OKAY, THERE BEING NONE HEARD . >> OH, I HAVE SOMETHING. I WANT [01:05:04] TO APOLOGIZE BEING A LITTLE BIT LATE TODAY , I THOUGHT WE WERE STILL ON 6:30 , AND I WAS GOING TO BE ON TIME FOR 6:30. ANYWAY I HAD FORGOTTEN THAT WE MOVED I UP TO 5:30, SO I APOLOGIZE. >> OKAY, THANK YOU, THAT IS VER GRACIOUS AND UNDERSTANDABLE THIS HAPPENS TO ME AT TIMES TOO SO, ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS ? ANYTHING COMING OUT OF HER THAT YOU ARE AWARE OF THAT WE MAY NEED TO BE ATTENDIN TO >> I WANTED TO ASK , IF A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WANTED T DO SOMETHING WHERE YOU TAKE THEM TO THE MUSEUM? >> THE COUNTY MUSEUM? >> WHAT THE OLD BUILDINGS? 22 TAKE THEM? >> YEAH, WITH A JUST REACH OUT TO YOU AND ASK YOU? >> YES, EVERY SUNDAY FROM 2:00 TO 5:00 . >> IT IS ONLY ON SUNDAYS? I REMEMBER SOMEBODY SAYING ANYTIM . >> WELL, THAT IS TRUE TOO. >> THERE IS A DESIGNATED PHONE NUMBER NOW , AND AN EMAIL CONNECTION FOR THE COUNTY MUSEU , ALTHOUGH EXACTLY WHAT IT IS RIGHT NOW . >> WITH THE CALL HIM OR DO THEY HAVE TO CALL THAT PHONE NUMBER? >> NO, THAT IS A SEPARATE ENTITY . >> THIS IS A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT COUNTY OWNS THE BUILDING, BUT WE RUN IT . W ARE VOLUNTEERS PICKS YOU CAN PASS ON TO THEM, IF THEY ARE ON FACEBOOK, THE CLAY COUNTY , FLORIDA HISTORY FACEBOOK GROUP I AM ON THAT, IF THEY SEND ME A MESSAGE I WILL RESPOND TO THEM. >> WHAT IS THE NUMBER? >> THE NUMBER TWO WHAT? >> THERE IS A PHONE NUMBER, I JUST DON'T REMEMBER . >> OH, I DON'T HAVE THAT, I AM SORRY . >> I MEAN I DON'T KNOW IF YOUR NUMBER IS LISTED . >> WELL, THE WEBSITE PROBABLY HAS THE PHONE NUMBER MENTIONED I AM JUST NOT SITTNG IN FRONT OF A COMPUTER NOW. >> WILL, ONE OF THE STUDENTS THAT I HELP WAS ASKING ABOUT I . >> WELL, WE HAVE ENOUGH OF A RUNNING START, YES. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF STUDENT GROUPS THAT HAVE ALREADY COME , EVEN THIS YEAR. BUT, SINCE IT IS VOLUNTEER-BASED , WE HAVE THE NOTICE AND THE TIME IT MATTERS AND SO WE NEED TO GET A FEW PEOPLE ASSEMBLED TO SHOW THEM AROUND FOR SECURITY IN THIS PITCHER VERY GOOD . IT IS ENCOURAGED. >> AND, I AM NOT SURE IF THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TALES FROM THE CLINIC, WHICH IS AROUND HALLOWEEN, OCTOBER TIMEFRAME , AT THAT TIME , WE HAVE A LOT OF STUDENT CHARACTER ACTORS WHO PLAY DIFFERENT CHARACTERS IN CLAY COUNTY HISTORY SUGGESTS SOME OF THE PEOPLE YOU HAVE HEARD OF AND KNOW ABOUT, THEY G THROUGH SKITS AND EVERYTHING. SO, THAT IS AROUND OCTOBER. IF YOU ARE ON FACEBOOK OR IF THEY ARE ON FACEBOOK, I AM AT BRANDI HARRIS , AND YOU CAN SEND ME A TEXT WE ARE HOPING EVERY SUNDAY FROM 2:00 TO 5:00. HOWEVER, SOMETIME PEOPLE HAVE FAMILY FROM OUT OF TOWN COMING IN AND THEY WILL NO BE THERE ON SUNDAY, IF THEY SEN ME A MESSAGE I CAN MEET THEM AND SHOW THEM AROUND AND THEY CAN SEE THE HISTORIC CABOOSE AND THE RAILROAD MUSEUM AND ALL OF THAT STUFF. >> OKAY. >> WE HAVE STUDENT VOLUNTEERS THAT HELP OUT TOO. SO, IF THEY GOT A HOLD OF THE CLAY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY THEN WE COULD ASSIST THEM IN THAT REGAR . >> OKAY, THANK YOU. >> OKAY. WHOOPS . IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE US? * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.