[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:12]
>> I AM SHARE WE WILL DISPENSE WITH THE FORMALITIES. ACTUALLY, WE HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AT THE VERY BEGINNING.
I DO NOT SEE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE.SO, I AM GOING TO OPEN A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME BEFORE WE GET STARTED? I SEE NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT AND I'LL HAVE ANOTHER ONE AT THEEND IN CASE MEMBERS SHOULD COME . WE APPRECIATE THE SHERIFF
[1. Project Update Presentation by WGI]
DEPARTMENT PROVIDING SECURITY FOR US TODAY.THANK YOU. IF WTI WOULD LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND PRESENT THEIR INFORMATION, FEEL FREE.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. WE ARE HERE TODAY TO PRESENT YOU UPDATES ON OUR ARTICLE. THE ZONING CODE WITH WG ITEM I HAVE WITH ME MISS MARIANNE - - TWO OF OUR PLANNERS LEBANON FOR MENTAL IN THIS PROCESS IN THIS REVISION PROCESS.
WE ARE PRIMARILY TO FOCUS ON ARTICLE 3 WHICH IS THE ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND UPDATE THE DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR THE ARTICLE AND GIVE YOU AN UPDATE AS WELL ON ARTICLE 7 AND SECTION 115, THE DEFINITIONS A LITTLE LATER ON IN THE PRESENTATION AS WELL.
THIS SLIDE HERE, THIS IS THAT THERE IS ONE BIG TAKE AWAY FROM THE PRESENTATION OR IF YOU NEED A LITTLE SOUND OF WHAT THOSE CHANGES ARE INTIMATE WOULD BE TOO SLIDE HERE.
THESE ARE THE SUMMARY OF THE MEMBERS WHO WILL BE MAKING THIS ARTICLE. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH REALLY TRYING TO REDUCE AND ELIMINATE ANY SORT OF REDUNDANCIES AND CONSOLIDATING REQUIREMENTS THROUGHOUT , THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO REDUCING THE BULK OF THE DOCUMENT BUT ALSO OF THE CONFUSION AND LEAVING ISSUES OR AREAS WITH THINGS TO BE MISINTERPRETED AND MAKING A MUCH SIMPLER DOCUMENT TO GO THROUGH. WE WERE TO PROVIDING DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPLATES FOR WAYS TO ORGANIZE THE DIFFERENT CODE SECTIONS AGAIN, TO KIND OF IMPROVE THE READABILITY AND USABILITY OF THE CODE AND REFERENCES THROUGHOUT.
AGAIN, THOSE CROSS-REFERENCES DIRECTLY BACK TO OTHER SECTIONS AND ARTICLES IN THE PATIENT RATHER THAN REPEATING THEM THROUGHOUT, MAKING IT MUCH EASIER TO READ.
WE ARE USING GRAPHICS AND ILLUSTRATIONS, WE ARE NEEDING TO HELP EXPLAIN THINGS, SOMETIMES A PICTURE SAYS A THOUSAND WORDS. SO, THE TRIBES OF FINE PROVIDE AGAIN, SOME CLARITY THROUGH THAT.
LASTLY, WE INTRODUCED USE OF MATRICES THROUGHOUT.
THIS IS A TABLE, WE HAVE EXAMPLES WILL SHOW YOU WHERE WE LIST ALL THE USES, THOSE HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED, CLEANED UP AND IDENTIFIED WHAT DISTRICTS THEY ARE PERMITTED IN AND WHAT KIND OF APPLICATION PROCESS YOU WOULD GO THROUGH IF THOSE USES ARE ALLOWED IN THOSE DISTRICTS. AGAIN, MUCH MORE VISUAL AND USER-FRIENDLY. WE STARTED WORKING ON'S ARTICLE BACK IN PROBABLY NOVEMBER OR DECEMBER, MAKING REVISIONS TO ITS, THE FIRST DRAFT WAS PROVIDED IN EARLY APRIL.
WE HAD A STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATION ON MAY 1 AND ONLINE RIGHT NOW, THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE. THE DRAFT THAT IS ONLINE IS THE FIRST DRAFT PRESENT TO STAKEHOLDERS ON MAY 1. WE HAVE SINCE BEEN WORKING WYTHE COUNTY STAFF RECEIVING COMMENTS FROM STAFF, RECEIVING COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD AND THE STAKEHOLDERS AND EXCITED TO INCORPORATE THOSE COMMENTS INTO A SECOND DRAFT WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE ON JUNE 14.
RIGHT NOW, WHAT IS IN PROCESSES THAT IS THE WE HAVE RECEIVED COMMENTS AND ADDRESS THOSE COMMENTS FOR A, B, C AND D AND WORKING ON MAKING COMMENTS FOR ADDRESSING REVISIONS FOR THE BALANCE OF THE ARTICLE. MARIANNE WHEN SHE GETS IT WILL GO THROUGH AND EXPLAIN A LITTLE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO VERSIONS. THOSE OF YOU THAT IS OF THE REVIEW THE FIRST DRAFT WILL SEE AND UNDERSTAND WHAT WE HAVE CHANGED HAVE BEEN WORKING ON FOR THE SECOND DRAFT WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS.
I WILL HAVE MARIANNE WALK THROUGH THE CHANGES PART BY PART AND WE WILL TALK A LITTLE MORE AT THE END ABOUT TIMING
AND SCHEDULE. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, I AM MARIANNE FROM WGI AND I WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROPOSAL MINUTES OF ARTICLE 3. SO, THIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PRETTY MUCH
[00:05:06]
SUMMARIZED THAT ARTICLE 3 IS A VERY LARGE DOCUMENT SO WE DIVIDE THEM INTO SIX DIFFERENT PARTS BEGINNING WITH PART A, GENERAL PROVISIONS, PART B, NONCONFORMITIES AND FUTURE LAND-USE CATEGORIES AND THE DENSITY PROGRAM CAN BE FOUND IN PART C. ZONING DISTRICTS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE NOW IN PART D, TYPES OF USES AND STANDARDS IN TYPE E AND LAST PART IS F WHICH IS TECHNICAL STANDARDS WHICH INCLUDES LIGHTING, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING.HE WILL GIVE A BRIEF UPDATE ON SECTION 115 WHICH IS THE DEFINITION FOR THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
LET'S GET RIGHT INTO THE PARTS. FIRST ONE, PART A, GENERAL PROVISION. IN THIS PART, YOU WILL SEE THE INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTY'S ZONING DISTRICTS.
HE WILL ALSO REFERENCE THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND THE COUNTY WEBSITE. IN THIS PART, YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS A LOT OF THESE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS THAT CAN BE COMMONLY APPLIED TO ALL THE ZONING DISTRICTS, IN SOME CASES FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY WITHIN CLAY COUNTY.I GIVE YOU SOME EXAMPLES FOR WHAT I MEAN BY GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
THIS COULD BE AN INTERPRETATION OF THE CODE, WHEN THERE IS CLARITY IN THE CODE, WILL MAKE A DETERMINATION OFTHAT .
MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT AND ALSO MEASUREMENT OF SETBACKS AND I WILL DO SOME EXAMPLES. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE EXAMPLES WHERE WE USE GRAPHICS TO ALLEVIATE ALL THESE SETBACKS.
THE GREEN AREA AS THE FRONT, THE TWO BLUE AREAS ARE THE - - LIGHT BROWN IS THE REAR. IT IS PRETTY CLEAR.YOU MAY HAVE TO INTRODUCE ANOTHER GRAPHIC SHOWING HOW TO MEASURE THE EXACTSETBACKS . THE NEXT EXAMPLE ON GRAPHICS, THIS ACTUALLY SHOWS THOSE IN COMPATIBLE USES, WHETHER SEPARATION RESTRICTIONS APPLY. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE.
HERE HE USED AN EXAMPLE OF THOSE PLACES THAT SELL ALCOHOL AND ALLOW CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ON THE PREMISES.
THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO THOSE RESTAURANTS THAT SELL ALCOHOL.
THOSE ARE STRICTLY, I DON'T WANT TO USE THE TERM COCKTAIL LOUNGE, BUT THAT APPLIES. IT'S BASED ON THE LICENSING,
THE COP AND WHAT THEY SELL.>> CAN ASK A QUESTION BEFORE WE GET TOO FAR OFF? I KNOW YOU WILL MAKE UPDATES TO THIS BUT THAT GRAPHIC THAT YOU HAVE UP THERE, I REMEMBER, AND I MIGHT BE WRONG, MAYBE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY CAN CORRECT ME, DIDN'T WE CHANGE THE MEASUREMENT TO BE PORTAL TO PORTAL AND NOT PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE?
>> YES. DO YOU MIND IF I ANSWER THAT? THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF MEASUREMENTS AND THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE. WE WILL UPDATE THIS EXAMPLE WITH THE OTHER TYPES OF MEASUREMENTS.
PORTAL TO PORTAL AND LOT LINE TO LOT LINE.
>> GOT IT, SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU.
>> NO, THAT IS FINE. IT HAS TO BE SEPARATED FROM ITS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS LIKE A PLACE OF WORSHIP AND AMONG US ARE IN LINEAR FEET. THE COMMISSIONER WAS RIGHT, WE WILL SHOW YOU IN ANOTHER EXAMPLE HOW TO MEASURE FROM PORTAL TO PORTAL. SO, MOVING ON TO PART B WHICH IS NONCONFORMITIES. THE TERM NONCONFORMITY UNDER THE CURRENT CODE INCLUDES NONCONFORMING LOT, THE SIZE, NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE AND NONCONFORMING USE.
SO, WE IDENTIFIED ONE FOURTH COMPONENT OF THE NONCONFORMITIES, THESE ARE YOUR SITE IMPROVEMENTASSOCIATE UNDER THE PRIOR DEVELOPMENT .HIS COULD BE YOUR PARKING, THE DIMENSION OF THE PARKING DOES NOT COMPLY TO CURRENT CODE, ARE MISSING LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN A PARKING AREA WHICH IS REQUIRED BY CURRENT CODE, THE WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
THOSE ARE GOOD EXAMPLES OF WHAT WE CALL NONCONFORMITY SITE ELEMENTS. UNDER THIS TYPE, THAT'S RIGHT LIMITATION AND IMPROVEMENTS FROM THOSE NONCONFORMITIES.
[00:10:01]
WE ALSO CLARIFY HOW TO DETERMINE IMPROVEMENT VALUES.AS YOU MAY KNOW, SOME OF THESE NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES NEED REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE. THAT CLARIFICATION WILL HELP THEM TO DETERMINE THE LIMITED AMOUNT THAT THEY CAN DO IMPROVEMENTS FOR THOSE NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES.
NOW WE ARE IN PART C WHICH IS THE FUTURE LAND-USE AND DENSITY PROGRAM. SO, WHAT WE HAVE DONE HERE IS, WE HAVE IDENTIFIED ALL THE ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE COUNTY AND ALL THE LAND-USE CATEGORIESAND PUT THEM IN A TABLE . WE PUT THEM IN A CHECKMARK.
I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE, YOU HAVE A PIECE OF LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL - - ZONING DISTRICT IS AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL. IF YOU COME IN FOR AN APPLICATION, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO REZONING.
THE ZONING DISTRICT ÃMY FUTURE LAND-USE.
HE WILL TALK ABOUT DENSITY IN THE NEXT SLIDE.
UNDER THIS PART, WE ALSO INCLUDE THE EXEMPTION WHICH IS BEING CARRIED FORWARD. THE CURRENT CODE IS BEING CARRIED FORWARD TO THE NEW CODE WITH SOME KIND OF REFORMATTING.
NOW WILL TALK WITH THE DENSITY PROGRAM.
THE FIRST, THE SLIDESHOWS YOU THE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAMS AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY THESE INCLUDE THE CLUSTERING SYSTEM, TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT IN THE INFILL AREA, TRANSFERRED ELEMENT OF RIGHTS AND WE ARE ALSO CONSOLIDATING THOSE DENSITY INCENTIVE PROGRAMS UNDER THE TWO MASTER-PLANNED COMMUNITIES. THE SECOND COLUMN SHOWS THE RECEIVING AREAS LIKE SPECIFIC FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
THE FIRST EXAMPLE THAT I USE I , IF YOU HAVE A PIECE OF LAND WITH RURAL RESIDENTIAL, YOU CAN ASK FOR ADDITIONAL DENSITY THROUGH THE CLUSTERING SYSTEM THAT IS THE SECOND ROW OF THE SLIDE. THAT IS MORE COMPREHENSIVE AND EASY, IT'S EASIER FOR THE READER TO FOLLOW.
SO NOW, THIS ONE IS, WE ARE IN PART D WHICH IS ZONING DISTRICT AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
CLAY COUNTY HAS A LOT OF ZONING DISTRICTS.
THIS CHAPTER INCLUDES ALL 39 STANDARD ZONING DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF ELEMENT DISTRICTS AND THE DISTRICTS THAT ARE UNDER SPECIAL REGULATIONS LIKE IN THE OVERLAY.
I POSTED SOME EXAMPLES THERE ON THE SLIDE.BUT WE HAVE ALSO DONE IS CLAY HILL OVERLAY DESIGN GUIDELINES THAT IS EMBEDDED IN ARTICLE 8. AT THE COUNTY'S RECOMMENDATION, WE RELOCATED THEM UNDER THIS DIVISION.
HOW DO WE ORGANIZE ALL THE ZONING DISTRICTS? WE ARE CREATING TEMPLATES LIKE ANGELA WAS MENTIONING.
WE CREATED IS TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING WHEN YOU OPEN UP THE ZONING DISTRICT PORTION OF THIS CODE, EVERYTHING IS LAID OUT IN THIS ORDER. THE FIRST ONE IS THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT. PROVIDE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DISTRICT ANDFOLLOWED BY THE DENSITY .
IT'S IN THE TABLE FORMAT IT TALKS ABOUT THE PATENT TO THE END ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM DENSITY. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM. IT IS JUST WHAT IS ALLOWED TO GO UP TO. THE NEXT ONE IS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD. THIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOT SIZE WHETHER IT HAD TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 ACRE, HALF AN ACRE. AND OTHER REQUIRED DIMENSIONS LIKE THE LOT WITH, THAT DEPTH AND THE SETBACKS.
THE NEXT ONE IS ADDITIONAL STANDARDS.
NOT EVERY ZONING DISTRICT IS ADDITIONAL STANDARDS.
SOME OF THEM HAVE COMPATIBILITY OR ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO PROTECT THOSE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS.
THOSE SPECIFIC STANDARDS ARE IN THIS SUBSECTION.
THE LAST SUBSECTION IS THE TYPES OF USE.
IF YOU PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THINK WHAT CAN I DO IN THIS PIECEOF PROPERTY , WE REFER YOU BACK TO THE NEXT PART WHICH IS E AND THAT CONTAINS ALL THE DIFFERENT USE TYPES.
THERE IS A LOT OF CROSS-REFERENCING IN THE CODE.
THE LAST DIVISION OF PART D INCLUDES ALL THE MASTER PLAN
[00:15:01]
COMPONENTS. DIVISION 11, WHILE WE WERE RESEARCHING FOR ARTICLE 3, THERE ARE A LOT OF SIMILAR REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN - - AND LAKE ASBURY.WE HAVE DONE IS, RATHER THAN REPEATING THEM IN THE FIRST MASTER PLAN AND REPEATING THEM AGAIN IN THE SECOND MASTER PLA , LET'S JUST PUT THEM IN ONE DIVISION.
SOME OF THESE ITEMS ARE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND CONTAIN SOMETHING SPECIFIC TO THESE TWO MASTER PLAN.
HOWEVER, WE DEFER THE ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS TO ARTICLE 2 WOULD TALK TO THE PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. WE ALSO HAVE THOSE THINGS LIKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, WE ALSO INTRODUCED THE TERMPROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THOSE NONRESIDENTIAL PROJECTS.
INTERPRETATION FLEXIBILITY CANNOT BE ESTABLISHED CRITERIA FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR.
THEY MAKE HIS JOB EASIER. WENT TO DETERMINE HOW TO - - NOT CREATE - -. THE BULK OF THESE FACILITIES ARE ACTUALLY IN THE LAST PART OF ARTICLE 3, PART F. LASTLY IS THE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THOSE NONRESIDENTIAL OR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT. SOME EXAMPLES ARE STREET LAYOUTS, ORIENTATION, PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AND PARKING. WITH THIS, WE WILL MOVE DOWN TO PART B. THIS IS ALSO THE MOST INTERESTING PART BECAUSE IT TALKS ABOUT USE TYPES AND THE ABILITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SO, WHAT WE DID IS LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT USES AND CLASSIFY THEM UNDER UNDERUSED CATEGORIES. TO BEGIN WITH AGRICULTURAL - - INSTITUTIONAL AND SO ON. WE CREATE A TEMPLATE, A VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT IN PART D. IF YOU LOOK FOR ONE USE, THEY WILL ALWAYS GIVE YOU A DESCRIPTION OF THE USE AND SOME EXAMPLES, PARTICULAR EXAMPLES OF THE USE.
THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARD, SOME OF THEM HAVE USED SEPARATION.
INSTEAD OF CALLING THEM SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS, CALL UNPERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USE AND THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT HOW IT IS BEING LAID OUT.
THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF WHAT WE CALL CONDITIONAL USE, ACCESS, STORAGE, HOURS OF OPERATION.
LASTLY IS THE ACCESSORY WITH THE CROSS-REFERENCE TO USES, FOR EXAMPLE IF YOU HAVE A WAREHOUSE, THOSE CLASSIFIED AS INDUSTRIAL USE. HOWEVER IF YOU SAY YOU KNOW WHAT? I WILL HAVE AN OFFICE THERE, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, IN THAT CASE YOU CAN SAY YES, I'LL HAVE AN OFFICE THERE. BUT, IT HAS TO BE LIMITED TO A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF THE ACCESSORY USE WILL NOT BECOME ANOTHER PRINCIPAL USE. SO NOW COME TO THIS USE MATRIX.
THIS IS WHAT ANGELA TALKED ABOUT, WE CREATED A USE MATRIX.
YOU'LL SEE A LOT OF THE USE MATRIX UNDER EACH USE CATEGORY.
I'M USING THE AGRICULTURAL USE AS AN EXAMPLE.
ON THE FIRST COLUMN, YOU WILL SEE WE LISTED OUT DIFFERENT TYPES OF AGRICULTURAL USE. THE EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES WOULD BE THINGS LIKE HOTELS, STABLES, THOSE KIND OF THINGS AND NOW WAS ALTERED UNDER THE TERM EQUESTRIAN FACILITY.
THE FIRST ROW ON THE USE MATRIX IS THE ZONING DISTRICT WHERE THEY ARE ALLOWED THROUGH A PROCESS.
THE P STANDS FOR PERMITTED USE PROCESS AND THE C STANDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PROCESS. IT IS PRETTY EASY TO FOLLOW AND YOU WILL SEE A LOT OF THESE USE MATRICES THROUGHOUT THIS PART D. PROHIBITED USES ACTIVITY, THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW
[00:20:04]
THE CONSOLIDATED ALL THESE USES THAT ARE REPEATED IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT. WHILE WE JUST PUT IN ONE TABLE? THE PERMITTED USES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS TABLE AND THE FIRST COLUMN IS THE DISTRICT WHERE THESE ACTIVITIES, USES OR STRUCTURES ARE NOT ALLOWED. FOR INSTANCE, - -. I JUST WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THE ACCESSORY USE.THE ACCESSORY USES THAT YOUR PRINIPAL USE, IT HAS TO BE AFFILIATED WITH THE PRINCIPAL USE, IT HAS TO BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SITE. HERE IT, WE GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE LIKE A DAYCARE OR IF YOU'RE RUNNING A SCHOOL OR CHURCH, YOU MAY HAVE A DAYCARE, AFTER-HOURS PROGRAM.
IT MAY BE COLOCATED USES IS THE SAME SITE AS OUR PRINCIPAL USE.
EARLIER THIS MORNING AND WE PRESENTED THE SLIDE TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER. THEY HAD QUESTIONS ON THE ACCESSORY USE IN TERMS OF HOW BIG THEY CAN BE.
ORIGINALLY, WE SUGGESTED A MAXIMUMOF 30% .
THEY SUGGESTED THAT WE REVISIT THE PERCENTAGE TO MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT CREATING ANY NONCONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH RESIDENTIAL USES, LIKE YOUR GARAGE, YOUR CARPORT OR SOME PLACES WHERE THEY HAVE PRIVATE PLANE LANDING IN THOSE FINGERS. YOU WILL REVISIT THIS ITEM AND PRESENTED TO YOU ON THE SECOND OR THIRD DRAFT.
I WILL SHOW YOU PICTURES OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON THE NEXT SLIDE. THESE ARE SOME GRAPHICS THAT WERE PRODUCED SHOWING YOU THAT IF YOU HAVE SOME ACCESSORY DWELLING IN A SINGLE-FAMILY LO , YOU CAN HAVE ACCESSORY UNIT FOR YOUR OLDER PARENTS, SO LONG AS IT IS NOT TALLER THAN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE. THE BUILDING CAN BE THE SAME OR LESSER THAN A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE.
THE SECOND DIAGRAM SHOWS A NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND STRUCTURE, AND WE HAVE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
THIS GIVES YOU SOME EXAMPLE OF THE FLOW AREA.
THIS IS ALL FOR DEMONSTRATION AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES.
AT THIS POINT WE ARE NOT PERFORMING THAT 30% WOULD BE CONDUCTED IN THE CODE. I WANT TO MENTION A LITTLE BIT ON THE TEMPORARY USES. WE ALL KNOW THE TEMPORARY USES ARE NOT PERMANENT USES AND I GIVE YOU SOME EXAMPLES.
THIS MAY BE YOUR GARAGE SALES, IT IS NOT REALLY NEED A PERMIT OR SPECIAL PERMIT PROCESS. WE PUT IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS IN THE CODE. THERE ARE SOME OTHER TEMPORARY USES SUCH AS PUMPKIN SALES, CHRISTMAS TREE SALES, KIND OF ON THE SCHOOL SITE AND DOES REQUIRE SPECIAL PERMIT.
THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO GO TO THE - - SIGN AFTERWARDS THE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS. THIS IS AN INTERESTING PART TWO, I CALL THAT A TEMPORARY PLACEHOLDER FOR A LOT OF THESE CO-REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY BE BEST FIT IN OTHER ARTICLES OF THE LAND DEVELOPING CODE. WHEN YOU OPEN UP PART F, YOU SEE THAT THE FIRST VERSION OF THE CODE IS IN ADEQUATE FACILITIES AND ONLY APPLIES TO THE FEET MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES. SO, WE SEE A LOT OF THESE THINGS LIKE DESIGN STANDARD, ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS.
THOSE ARE NOW ALSO IN THIS DIVISION.
THE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES, ARTICLE 4 YOU HAVE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT. IT IS UP TO THE COUNTIES AND STAFF TO SAY IN THE FUTURE, MAYBE WE CAN MARRY THE TWO, THIS PART AND THE ARTICLE TOGETHER AND MAKING UNDER ONE AREA. SAME CONCEPT ON PARKING AND
[00:25:09]
LANDSCAPING . WE FIND THAT THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS IN ARTICLE 3 THAT ARE NOT REFLECTED IN LANDSCAPING. THE 50 FOOT BUFFER IS NOT THERE. AGAIN, THE TIME COMES WHEN THE COUNTY IS READY TO DO AMENDMENT OF HIS ARTICLES THEY CAN CERTAINLY DON'T UPDATED RELOCATE THESE REQUIREMENTS INTO THAT ARTICLE. THE LAST DIVISION IS 11 AND IT TALKS ABOUT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION, SPECIFICALLY ON PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS.WHAT WE CREATED WAS ALMOST A CHECKLIST FOR THE EFFORT OF THE APPLICANTS. WHEN THEY SEE THAT THEY SAID WE DID NOT MISS ANYTHING. WE HAVE OUR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MY SURVEY, WE MAKE THE APPLICATION CONSISTENT AND EASY TO DECLARE THE COUNTY STAFF CAN START COMMENCEMENT OVER THE APPLICATION. SOME OF THIS INFORMATION IN ARTICLE 2 AND 12, AGAIN, THEY CAN UPDATE THESE TWO ARTICLES IN THE FUTURE. THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF MORE GRAPHICS THAT WE PROVIDED THEM HOW TO MEASURE THE WIDTH OF THE ALLEY AND THE SEPARATION OF THE NEIGHBORING PARK AND THOSE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.OKAY, AS ANGELA SAID, WE DID HAVE A MEETING WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS. WE DID SUBMIT THE FIRST DRAFT, IT'S ALREADY ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE.
THE COUNTY ALSO SUGGESTED DURING THE PRESENTATION OR COMMENTS REVIEW, SUGGEST THAT TO A NUMBER OF THE CODE UNDER THE PROPOSED STANDARD. IT'S A NUMBER WHICH IS ARTICLE 3. THE CHAPTER IS IN THE ALPHABETS, THE DIVISION IS UNDER NUMBER AND SECTION WILL BE NUMBER IN THAT MANNER.
SO UNDER THE FIRST DRAFT, WE PROPOSED A TIER SYSTEM.
WHAT WE DID WAS WE CREATED THREE TIERS.
WE SPLIT ALL THE ZONING DISTRICTS AND SAID THIS CLASSIFIED UNDER TIER 1 WHICH IS THE LOW INTENSITY AND MEDIUM INTENSITY WHICH IS TIER 2 AND TIER 3 WOULD BE HIGH INTENSITY.
HOWEVER, THE STAFF RECOMMENDED TO REMOVE IT BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO CREATEANOTHER LAYER OF COMPLEXITY .
WE LISTENED AND WE DID REMOVE ALL OF THAT.
ALSO, WE TRY TO SIGNIFY THE TERM DENSITY INTENSITY.
THIS COMBINED THE WORD DENSITY AND INTENSITY UNDER THE TERM INTENSITIES. THE DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AND INTENSITY FOR NONRESIDENTIAL.
PROPOSING THE TERM ADDITIONAL STANDARDS, SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS, THE COUNTY AND STATE CHANGES BACK TO PERMITTING AND CONDITIONAL USE . THIS IS WHAT WE'VE DONE SO FAR BETWEEN THE FIRST DRAFT AND THE SECOND DRAFT.
THE SECOND DRAFT IS NOT COMPLETED, BUT IT WILL BE AVAILABLE IN THE MAY JUNE TIMEFRAME.LAST TIME I WILL GIVE YOU A QUICK UPDATE ON SECTION 115.
AS YOU MAY REMEMBER WHEN WE PRESENTED THE ARTICLE 7 WHICH IS THE SIGN CODE TO SOME OF YOU, WE SAID HEY, ALTHOUGH DEFINITION AND ARTICLE 7 WILL BE RELOCATED IN SECTION 115.
NOW WE DO THE SAME.ARTICLE 3, WE RELOCATED ALL THE DEFINITIONS TO SECTION 115 AND WE WILL RENUMBER THEM AND PUT THE IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. WITHOUT MICHAEL CLEMENT PRESENTATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
WHAT DO WE DO FOR THE NEXT FOLLOW-UP MEETINGS?
THEY CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS NOW. >> TO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE
[2. Full - Group Session Discussion and Questions]
QUESTIONS TO ASK AT THIS TIME? >> COMMISSIONER: I KNOW SOME OF
[00:30:09]
THIS YOU WILL BE TAKING CARE OF AND YOU PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE REVISIONS ON THIS. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT. WHEN YOU TALKING ABOUT THE ACCESSORY USES AS AN EXAMPLE, IT SEEMED AS IF YOU WERE MAINLY FOCUSED ON THE PERCENTAGE OF THE BUILDING THAT COULD BE IN PACCESSORY USE FOR THE PROPERTY. WHAT I WANT TO GET TO WAS ALTHOUGH WE DON'T USE IT MUCH IN OUR CODE, WE HAVEACCESSORY DWELLING , THE IDEA OF HAVING AN APARTMENT IN THE BACK, OR OUR GARAGE APARTMENT MAY BE. I BELIEVE OUR CODE RESTRICTS THE SIZE OF THAT BUILDING IF I RECALL CORRECTLY.IF YOU CHANGE IT TO A PERCENTAGE FOR ACCESSORY, WE CAN BUILD ONE OF THESE MANTRAS IN THE FRONT AND BUILD A 4000 SQUARE-FOOT HOUSE IN THE BACK AND CALL IT AN ACCESSORY
DWELLING.>> WE MAKE THAT VARY CLEAR UNDER THE ACCESSORY USE.
THERE IS A SECTION IN PART B THAT TALKS ABOUT ACCESSORY USE IN THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT IS ONE OF THE USE THAT MOST OF THE CURRENT CODE RESTRICTED TO 40% OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE, I BELIEVE IT'S 12 50 FT.B2, WHICHEVER IS LESS.
MOST OF THEM, EVEN THOUGH I'M SORRY WITH NOT REFLECTTHIS TYPE OF INFORMATION ON THE SLIDE , IT IS IN THEIR.
>> I UNDERSTAND, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THESE THINGS ARE BEING THOUGHT ABOUT. THE OTHER ONE IN ACCESSORY USE, I KNOW IT'S IN THE CODE NOW THAT THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS NOT SUPPOSED TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTUR , BUT I THINK THERE ARE SOME INTEREST IS INSTANCES WHERE THAT MIGHT NOT WORK OUT. I'M THINKING OF A SPECIFIC ONE.
ALL THE HOUSES THAT THE LOW SLOPE USE ROOFS ON THEM.
THOSE PEOPLE GOT ONE OF THOSE RV BUSES.
THEY LIKE TO PUT UP A METAL STRUCTURE TO PARK IT UNDER AND THAT BUS MAY BE TALLER THAN THE HOUSE.
BY THE TIME HE PUT A ROOF OVER IT, IT IS FALLEN ONTO THE HOUSE. I JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT IN YOUR MIND TO THINK ABOUT THAT AND HOW WE MIGHT DEAL WITH THAT. I WOULD HATE TO SELL SOMEONE WE CANNOT PUT A COVER UP FOR YOUR RV BECAUSE HER HOUSE IS TOO
SMALL. >> THAT'S AN EXCELLENT QUESTION, WE HAD A DISCUSSION THIS MORNING WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHETHER WE CAN DO LIMITATION ON THE HEIGHT FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. FOR INSTANCE - - IT HAS TO BE A CERTAIN HEIGHT TO ACCOMMODATE THAT.
>> COMMISSIONER: THE IDEA THAT WE DO MULTIPLE BUILDING THESE HUGE GARAGES, BUT THERE MAY BE USES GOING TO LOOK AT THAT.
I DID NOT HEAR ANYTHING, I THINK IT'S IN THIS ARTICLE BUT WITH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, THEY ARE PART OF THIS ARTICLE?
>> YES, IT IS IN THEIR. >> COMMISSIONER: ONE OF THE ISSUES WITH THEM, AND IT MAY BE COMPLETELY OUT OF THE PURVIEW OF WHAT YOU ARE DOING. NO STAFF IS HERE AS WELL.
WE HAVE A LOT OF PCD IN THIS COUNTY.SOME OF THE FRAMEWORK ON HOW TO DO ONE IS IN THE CODE.
THE PROBLEM ARISES WHEN YOU WANT TO GO LOOK AT ONE, LIKE ME AS A COMMISSIONER. I SEE SOMETHING AND I GO I THINK THERE IS A USE OF THE PROPERTY THAT WE DO NOT APPROVE IN THAT DEVELOPMENT, BUT I CAN'T FIND IT.
I KNOW STAFF HAS ACCESS BUT THE PUBLIC SHOULD HAVE EASY ACCESS TO WHAT THEY SAID THEY COULD OR CANNOT DO.
I DON'T WANT TO MENTION THE PARCEL, BUT I KNOW ONE THAT I DRIVE ALL THE TIME. WE SPECIFICALLY SAID NO OUTDOOR DISPLAYS. THERE ARE OUTDOOR DISPLAYS ALL OVER THE PROPERTY. IT'S VERY HARD OTHER THAN THE MEMORY TO REMEMBER WHAT WAS IN THAT PCD.
>> THAT WILL BE A CO-ENFORCEMENT ISSUE.
THE TIME THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED, YOU GO BACK TO THE PRIOR CODE. IF THEY VIOLATE THAT, USING THE
[00:35:06]
EXAMPLE OUTDOOR DISPLAY, THAT WOULD BE AN EXAMPLE OF THE COD. >> ANDERSON THE CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUE. I THINK YOU MIGHT BE DIRECTING MORE STAFFING YOU GUYS. THERE SHOULD BE A WAY IT IS THAT NEEDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR SUPERB IT IS OUT THERE THAT SAYS I WANT TO NOTE THAT USE IS VALID.
I CAN GO LOOK AT THE ZONING MAP ENTERED THE CODE AND SEE IF IT ALLOWED IN THE ZONING, BUT IF IT TURNS OUT THAT PERSONAL IS A PCD, MY DUTY IS - - EXTREMELY LIMITED.
THAT'S NOT YOU IS PROBABLY MORE OF THE STAFF.
WE NEED TO COME UP WITH A WAY OF THINKING AND HOW TOMAKE
INFORMATION EASILY AVAILABLE . >> IS AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE IF YOU DO A PUBLIC RECORDS SEARCH.
IT'S NOT THE EASIEST WAY TO DO IT BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED TO KNOW THE PARCEL ID, BUT IF YOU GOING TO OUR ZONING MAP, THEY WILL TELL YOU THE ORDINANCE NUMBER AND FROM THERE YOU GO TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC ACCESS AND LOOK AT THE ORDINANCE NUMBER. IT WILL PULL UP THE DOCUMENT WHICH HAS PCD IN IT AND YOU CAN SEE THE USES.
THE OTHER THING IS CODE ENFORCEMENT.
YOU CAN FILL OUT A FORM AND THAT CAN BE CHECKED INTO.
>> I HAD A NEIGHBOR IN THAT WAS DOING SOMETHING ILLEGALLY AND HAD TO DO EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAID.
ONLY BECAUSE I KNEW MY PERSONAL NUMBER.I PULL UP THE COUNTY MAP, FIND MY PERSONAL NUMBER, LOOK AT THE LAND-USE AND WHAT IS PERMITTED. THAT IS TOO HARD FOR THE AVERAGE CITIZEN. THE EASIEST WAY TO DO THAT IS TO - - CALL THAT UP AND IMMEDIATELY FIND OUT IF IT IS
ALLOWED OR NOT. >> YOU CAN ALSO LOOK AT THE ADDRESS ON OUR MAP. IF YOU HAVE THE ADDRESS NUMBER, YOU CAN PULL IT UP THAT WAY. IF YOU CLICK ON THE ZONING LAYER AND TURN THAT ON, YOU CAN SEE THE ZONING.
YOU SELECT THE GO THROUGH THE STEPS THAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT PARCEL OR ZONING. WE'RE NOT QUITE THERE YET, - - ORDINANCE 2018 21, IT OPENS OF THE DOCUMENT BUT I DON'T THINK
WE'RE QUITE THERE YET. >> BO FIGURED IT OUT BUT HE'S A FAIRLY SMART GUY. I'M SURE I CAN FIGURE IT OUT.
THE AVERAGE CITIZEN HAS A QUESTION ON THIS, THEY GIVE UP.
IT'S ALMOST LIKE A WEBSITE SEARCH.
I GOT THROUGH THE FIRST PAGE OF MY FUTON MUMBLING, I AM DONE.
THEY JUST GIVE UP UNLESS THEY HAVE A REAL VESTED INTEREST IN IT. WE NEED TO MAKE IT EASIER.
>> WE HAVE A VERY RESPONSIVE CODE ENFORCEMENT GROUP.
>> THAT MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASEDEPENDING ON WHAT HAPPENS .
>> WE WILL GET THERE. I'M CONFIDENT THAT SOMEDAY ALL OF OUR COMPUTER SYSTEMS WILL BE LINKED AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO POINT AND CLICK ON EVERYTHING AND BE ABLE TO SEE EVERYTHING.
>> THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION. THE ONLY OTHER COMMENT I WANT TO MAKE RIGHT NOW UNTIL I CAN SEE THE DRAFT AND LOOKED THROUGH IT IS, I LIKE THE CHARTS.
THE IDEA THAT YOU CAN LIST ALL THE USES AND GO DOWN AND SEE IF THERE ARE PERMITTED OR NOT PERMITTED, THAT'S A HUGE IMPROVEMENT OVER WHAT WE HAVE TODAY.
YOU HAVE TO WADE THROUGH THAT PARAGRAPH AND FIND IT.
I'M SURE WE ARE KEEPING THE LANGUAGE IN THERE THAT SAYS IF IS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED, IT IS THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S
INTERPRETATION. >> THAT IS A VERY IMPORTANT
STANDARD. >> YOU MENTIONED AND PROHIBITED USES THAT YOU WON'T USE A MATRIX.
>> THAT'S TEMPORARY USE. IT'S ALLOWING A LOT OF DISTRICTS, WE CREATED A MATRIX THAT REFLECTS OFF OF THE SEVEN DISTRICTS. IT HAS BECOME A BIT
[00:40:01]
OVERWHELMING. I THINK THERE IS ENOUGH REQUIREMENTS EXPLANATION UNDER THE TEMPORARY USE THAT IS GOING TO BE CLEAR TO AN APPLICANT. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT, CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG, THIS SHOULD BE A SPECIAL PROCESS.>> A LOT OF THE BE PERMITTED TO SPECIAL PERMIT EXPECT EXCEPT
GARAGE SALE. >> DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS, JOE? >> COMMISSIONER: I WOULD LIKE TO PIGGYBACK, YOU AND I HAD BASICALLY THE SAME QUESTIONS.
I WANTED TO PIGGYBACK IN SOME OF THE THINGS THAT RALPH MENTIONED FROM THE STORAGE FOR RV AND BOAT AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. I ALSO NOTICED MY DRIVE AROUND CERTAIN AREAS OF THE COUNTY THAT SOME INDIVIDUALS HAVE THESE LARGE METAL BUILDINGS AS AN ACCESSORY FOR THE PROPERTY.
SOME OF THEM ARE FAIRLY TALL, WILL THOSE BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE SAME WAY AS THE STORAGE FACILITIES?
>> IF IT IS CONSIDERED AS AN INSTRUCTOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THEN IT WOULD DEFINITELY BE ADDRESSED IN TERMS OF THE
HEIGHT . >> AS FAR AS HEIGHT GOES, I CAN UNDERSTAND THE RV AND BOAT THING BEING A CERTAIN HEIGHT THAT IS, WITH SOME OF THESE BUILDINGS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT UP ARE TO BE USED AS WAREHOUSES AND STORAGE SPACES FOR BUSINESS MATERIALS AND THINGS LIKE THAT? THAT IS WHY I AM ASKING THAT QUESTION WHETHER THAT WOULD BE PERMISSIBLE WHERE THERE WILL BE A HEIGHT RESTRICTION METHOD HAS TO BE IN THE HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE. >> AT THIS POINT, WE DON'T HAVE A FIRM ANSWER ON THAT BUT WE WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AGAIN.
WE TALKED ABOUT THE EXCEPTION, THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS WE SAY YES, IT IS LOGICAL AND REASONABLE TO ALLOW THEM TO HAVE TALLER THAN 25 FEET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE 25 FEET, BUT ASAN EXAMPLE .
MOST OF THESE BUILDINGS SHOULD NOT GO HIGHER THAN 25 FEET.
THE EXCEPTION WILL EXCLUDE THE 25 FEET LIMIT AND ALLOW THEM, IT CAN GO NO HIGHER THAN THAT. THE LOCATION OF THAT AND WHERE IT IS LOCATED IS REALLY IMPORTANT.
YOU DON'T WANT TO ON THE FRONT OR SIDE STREET.
IT HAS TO BE ALL SCREENED. THE DIFFERENT AREAS THAT WE
HAVE TO CONSIDER. >> CHAIR: DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION ABOUT THE COMMISSIONERS?
>> I CAN TALK ALL DAY ON THIS, YOU KNOW THAT.
[LAUGHTER]. I WOULD WANT TO LOOK AT THE DRAFT. I KNOW IT'S PRETTY LONG TO
START WRITING COMMENTS ON IT. >> THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DRAFT AVAILABLE MIDMONTH.IF YOU HAVE COMMENTS AT THIS TIME, WE CAN ADDRESS THEM TO LDC CHANGES AT CLAY COUNTY.COM.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE EMAIL NOTICE THAT WE RECEIVED FOR THIS WORKSHOP, THERE'S A LINK THERE TO THE WEBSITE AND IT TAKES YOU TO ALL OF THESE MEETINGS, THE DRAFTS, THE MARKUP AND THE COPY. IT'S VERY USEFUL AND - - DRAFT IS AVAILABLE IN THIS PROCESS FOR COMMENT WILL PROBABLY STILL
BE AVAILABLE ATTHAT TIME . >> YOU ARE CORRECT, THE SECOND DRAFT WILL BE AVAILABLE ON JUNE 14.
THAT DRAFT WILL INCORPORATE THE CHANGES THAT MARIANNE DISCUSSED TODAY AND FEEDBACK WE RECEIVED FROM THE STAKEHOLDERS DURING THE MAY MEETING AS WELL AS COMMENTS THAT WE RECEIVE THROUGH STAFF ON PARTS A, B AND C.
WE HAVE ADDRESSED THOSE COMMENTS AND HAVE INCORPORATED
[00:45:01]
THOSE INTO THE SECOND DRAFT. THAT IS JUNE 14, THAT WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE. MOVING FORWARD THROUGH JUNE AND JULY, WGI WILL CONTINUE WORKING ON WILL BE DRAFT THREE AND WILL INCORPORATE ANY COMMENTS HE RECEIVED, CONTINUED COMMENTS WE RECEIVED FROM ANYONE AS WELL AS FROM YOU GUYS AND THATBCC TODAY.AFTER THAT MOVING INTO AUGUST, STAFF WILL BE TAKING THE LEAD ON TEACHER CHANGES IN MOVING THE PROCESS FORWARD.WE ARE REALLY GOING TO HAVE THREE REVISIONS AND THREE DIFFERENT REVISION PROPERTY MOVING FORWARD.
IN AUGUST, THEY WILL GO BACK AND RESET WITH ARTICLE 7. WE HAD ARTICLE 7 IS THE SIGNAGE CODE IN.
OPEN THAT WORK WITH YOU GUYS ON THAT.
THAT HAS BEEN A LEGAL REVIEW FOR THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS AND SHOULD BE WRAPPING UP THE SUMMER.
WE WILL BE READY FOR ADOPTION IN SEPTEMBER.
AUGUST AND NOVEMBER IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENTS AND REVIEW OF WHAT WILL BE THE THIRD DRAFT OF ARTICLE 3.
THAT WILL PAUSE FOR A MINUTE WHILE THE COMPANY IS UPDATES ARE MADE. DURING THIS PROCESS WE REALIZE THAT THERE WAS SOME LANGUAGE IN THE COMP PLAN - - MASTER PLAN AREAS WITH TERMINOLOGY AND VERBIAGE, THAT WILL ALL BE PULLED OUT OF THE COMP PLAN AN INCORPORATED WHERE IT BELONGS , IN ARTICLE 3. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT COMP PLAN PROCESS IS TRANSMITTED IN THE CAN BEFORE BEFORE ANY SORT OF FINAL ADOPTION OF THE ARTICLE 3 LANGUAGE.
THAT COMP PLAN NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE WE CONTINUE IN ARTICLE 3 THE FINAL ADOPTION OF ALL THE THINGS ARTICLE 3 WILL PROBABLY BE SOMETIME NEXT SPRING.
BY THE TIME THAT GETS FINALIZED AND WE GET ARTICLE 7, PLAN CHANGES SQUARED AWAY. JUST SO EVERYONE AGAIN, TO REITERATE, THE DRAFTS ARE ALL AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY'S WEBSITE, NAVIGATE THROUGH THESE TABS AND YOU WILL GET TO THE SCREEN HERE WHERE THIS WILL GIVE YOU LINKS TO THE DRAFTS.
RIGHT NOW IS THE FIRST DRAFT, JUNE 14 THE SECOND DRAFT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THERE'S A COPY OF THE CODE THAT UNDERLINES ALL
THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE. >> CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE SIDE
OF THE NAVIGATION ON IT? >> WE ARE WEARING TO THE TIMELINE I JUST PRESENTED, THAT HAS TO BE UPDATED ON THE WEBSITE. NEED TO MAKE THE CHANGE OF THE WEBSITE AS WELL, AS WE LOOK AT THIS TIME AND THAT IS PRESENTED ON THEIR SO EVERYONE CAN TRACK THE PROGRESS.
>> THIS MAY BE A QUESTION FOR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY.
IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE MEET AGAIN TO REVIEW THIS, ARE WE ABLE TO CONTACT WGI DIRECTLY TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS? WHAT IS THE PROPER METHOD? THAT'S THE LDC CHANGES? SO IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION, SEND
IT THROUGH THAT PORTAL? >> YES CLIENT THAT WAY WE CAN TRACK TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE EVERYTHING TRACKED AND
ADDRESSED . >> COMMISSIONER: THANK YOU.
>> COMMISSIONER: I DID HAVE A QUESTION WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT COMPREHENSIVE CODE AMENDMENTS .
HOW MANY OF THOSE ARE WE LOOKING AT? HOW BIG OF A BUNDLE WILL THAT BE AND MORE IMPORTANTLY ITS STAFF? THOSE WELCOME TO THE COMMISSION BEFORE THEY GET TRANSMITTED. I WAS LOOKING AT A COUPLE OR TWO DAYS WORTH? WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AS FAR AS HOW THE HEARING GOES FOR THOSE THINGS?
>> SO, YES. YOU WILL HAVE TO DO A COMPANY IN SAVANNAH FOR FOR TWO REASONS.
PART OF IT IS THIS PROJECT. YOUR COMPETENCY PLAN AS A HIERARCHY OF ZONING CODES AND ZONING CODE HAS TO BE COMPLIANT WITH THE COMP PLAN. WE ARE FINDING THINGS IN THE
[00:50:01]
COMP PLAN THAT ARE ZONING MATTERS, ESPECIALLY IN THE MASTER PLAN. THERE'S A LOT OF ZONING REGULATIONS THAT MEANS TAKE OU .AS YOU MAKE CHANGES TO THE ZONING CODE, THAT WILL PROBABLY BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS IN THE COMP PLAN.
IN ADDITION, THIS IS OUR - - YEAR WHERE EVERY - - COMP PLAN.
WE HAVE TO DRAFT A LETTER BY THIS FALL AND SEPTEMBER TO SEND TO GEO TO SAY THIS IS WHAT WE ABLE TO THE STATE STATUTE TO USE THAT HAPPENED SINCE HER LAST UPDATE AND THIS IS WHAT WE THINK WE WANT TO CHANGE IN RESPONSE TO THAT.
RATHER THAN DOING IT TWICE, WE COMBINE ALL THAT.
WE WILL HAVE ONE, FAIRLY LARGE CHANGE.
IT WILL REALLY BE ONE DOCUMENT ADDRESSING ALL THOSE ITEMS.
>> WILL THAT DOCUMENT BE 50 PAGES OR 1500 PAGES?
>> IS THAT FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT.
WE ARE NOT DOING A WHOLE COMPETENCY PLAN, WE WILL HAVE TO ADDRESS ANY CHANGES THAT STATE STATUTE MIGHT IMPACT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ZONING CODE.
BEYOND THAT, WE ARE NOT UPDATING THE CONTENT OF PLAN HOLISTICALLY. IT WILL PROBABLY JUST BE THE
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT. >> WE NEED TO DO THIS BECAUSE WE ARE DOING IT LOOKS LIKE GOOD WORK.
BY THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF PLAN AMENDMENTS AND THEY CAN SOMETIMES TAKE A WHILE TO GO OVER AND PUSH THROUGH.
IT WAS LIKE THERE ARE QUITE A FEW OFTHEM .
YOU MENTIONED THE - - REPORT, I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE BEEN SEVEN YEARS AS WE DID A REPORT BUT I GUESS.
WITH ALL THE CHANGES AT THE STATE LEVEL, TO BE UP TO THE FULL PROCESS? WHAT PUBLIC HEARING? USUALLY THEY GO BACK AND HIRE SOMEBODY.
>> YOU WILL HAVE TO DO WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
YOU HAVE TO ADDRESS WHATEVER STATUTORILY HASCHANGED .
THEY WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT.
>> THIS WORK IS TAKING CARE A LOT OF WHAT WE USED TO DO?
>> IN A WAY, YES. >> COMMISSIONER: EVENTUALLY WE WILL HAVE A NEW COMP PLAN TO APPROVE?
>> PROBABLY THREE ELEMENTS. THE THREE FUTURE LAND USE
ELEMENTS WOULD BE MY GUESS. >> COMMISSIONER: IS SPEAKING OF WHICH, I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION THAT CAME TO MIND BUT IT IS FOR THE CONSULTANT. WHAT ABOUT THOSE THINGS LIKE CAMP LANDING COMPATIBILITY ELEMENT? IS THAT PART OF WHAT WE ARE DOING FOR THE MILITARY COMPATIBILITY? I MENTIONED ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITY IN THE OLD COMP PLAN, WE ARE TO HAVE AN ELEMENT OF THE MILITARY COMPATIBILITY WITH CAMP LANDING.
AT AN OFFICE IN ARTICLE 3 WHERE IT IS.
>> IS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLA .
LAST COMMENT AND I'LL BE QUIET, I REALLY LIKE THIS PROCESS.
IT IS LONG OVERDUE. I KNOW WE'VE ONLY CONTRACTED I GUESS TO DO THESE TWO ARTICLES, BUT HOPEFULLY SOMEBODY OUT THERE AT THE COUNTY IS THINKING BELLING TO GO THROUGH THE REST OF THESE ARTICLES AND CLEANUP THE SAME WAY.
I KNOW IT'S ONLY MONEY BUT AS LONG AS WE ARE IN THIS PROCESS,
WE MIGHT AS WELL FINISH IT. >> CHAIR: AND THE OTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION OUT OF THE COMMISSION?
>> COMMISSIONER: HAD A QUESTION FOR STAFF AND IT DID NOT COME INTO MY HEAD UNTIL I STARTED LOOKING AND WAITING THROUGH THE STUFF, - - WE IDENTIFIED THE BRAND FIELD MASTER PLAN AND LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN, YET THE FIRST PLAN THAT CLAY COUNTY EVER HAD WAS OUR - - PLAN. I SPENT 35 YEARS WORKING ON IT TRYING TO GET IT NAILED DOWN AND GET IT SOLIDIFIED WE DON'T
[00:55:05]
HAVE TO FIGHT IN CITY HALL, YET I FEEL LIKE THAT HAS BEEN KICKED TO THE CURB AND LEFT TO THE DOG TO PICK UP THE PIECES.THEY ARE COMING IN AND PASSING OUT PARCELS LEFT AND RIGHT WHEN THE PLAN CALLED FOR TO BE SOMETHING ELSE.
I'M NOT ASKING FOR THIS WHOLE THING TO BE WRITTEN AND WE COME UP WITH THE MASTER PLAN. IT WOULD SURE MAKE LIFE SIMPLER FOR THE PEOPLE ARE COMING ISLAND WHO WERE NOT TO WORRY ABOUT THE PARCEL THAT IS VACANT RIGHT NEXT TO THEM AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY WILL PUT THE GARAGE ON IT OR NOT.
IF AN APPLICATION COMES IN - - I DON'T SOUND LIKE I'M COMPLAINING BECAUSE THE COUNTY IS DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB, WE ARE JUST WORK HARD FOR A LONG TIME TO GET THAT PLAN DOWN.
WE HAVE A PLAN BUT IT IS GOING TO BE PICKED APART.
WE OF THE LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN.
IF YOU COME IN AND WANT TO MODIFY THAT, YOU TO GET AN ACT OF CONGRESS BECAUSE IT IS PRETTY WELL SET IN STONE.
THE MASTER PLANS WERE ALL UNDER ONE UMBRELLA, THE FLEMING ISLAND PLAN WAS NOT DONE UNDER ONE UMBRELLA, BUT WE RELY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BACKUP ON FLEMING ISLAND TO STICK TO THE PLAN THE IDENTIFIED. I'M NOT ASKING FOR AN ANSWER, IT'S KIND OF A RHETORICAL QUESTION BUT I GUESS I NEED TO TALK TO - - ABOUT THAT. WHY ALL OF A SUDDEN NOW FLEMING ISLAND IS BEING TREATED AS A STEPCHILD AND WE ARE BEING LEFT TO WHATEVER THE DEVELOPERS WANT TO DO WITH IT.
THANK YOU. >> CHAIR: THANK YOU.
WE CAN ASK CONSULTANT STAFF TO REFLECT ON THAT AND SUGGEST HOW WEMIGHT ACCOUNT FOR THAT . MARION, DID YOU WANT TO SAY
SOMETHING? >> UNFORTUNATELY I DON'T HAVE A RESPONSE FOR THAT BECAUSE IT IS NOT IN THE CODE, BUT THE PARAMETERS OF OUR REVIEW WHICH IS IN THE CURRENT CASE.
>> I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU ARE WORKING WITH STUFF THAT IS ALREADY IDENTIFIED . THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BACK IN THE LATE 70S PAST THE CITIZENS OF FLEMING ISLAND, BUT THE PLAN ANDWHEN THE PLAN WAS DONE , IT WAS ROLLED INTO THE CLAY COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AT THAT TIME, IT WAS IDENTIFIED AS A MASTER PLAN. IT'S KIND OF HIDDEN, BUT IT WAS JUST JUST INCLUDED IN THEIR. THE PEOPLE ON FLEMING ISLAND LIKE TO CONSIDER THEMSELVES A PLAN DISTRICT AND NEED TO BE CONSIDERED THAT INSTEAD OF JUST AS AN EXTENSION OF WEST OF - -
OR OTHER PLACE IN CLAY COUNTY. >> LET US FOLLOW UP WYTHE COUNTY STAFF AND SEE WITH THE DIRECTIONS GOING TO BE.
WE DON'T WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THAT ONE.
>> THANK YOU. >> I WANT TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF WHAT PETER SAID. I'VE BEEN AROUND LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT THERE WAS KIND OF, YOU CAN CALL IT A SHADOW MASTER PLAN OR SOMETHING BEFORE PEOPLE UNDERSTOOD MASTER PLANS AND UNFORTUNATELY, ALL THAT WORK PREDATES VIRTUALLY EVERYBODY THE COUNTY HERE.THEY QUICKLY LOSE SIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THERE WERE PUT IN PLACE MAPS THAT SAID THIS WILL BE RESIDENTIAL. IT SHALL NEVER BE COMMERCIAL.
IT WILL BE RESIDENTIAL REGARDLESS OF HOW CONSISTENTLY MIGHT BE WITH THESURROUNDING AREA , THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION BACK AT THAT TIME WAS THAT WOULD BE THE PLAN GOING FORWARD. I'M WITH PETE, WE HAVE SEEN IT CHIPPED AWAY AND CHIPPED AWAY. IT IS JUST SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN WE LOOK AT SOME OF THESE PARCEL THAT FALL WITHIN THAT. IT'S PRETTY SIMPLE, IT'S FLEMING ISLAND FROM DOCTORS LAKE TO BLACK CREEK, IS THAT
WHOLE AREA THAT IS INCLUDED. >> CHAIR: THANK YOU, ANYTHING
[01:00:02]
ELSE FROM THE COMMISSION? HEARING NOTHING, I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD JUST IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION. I DON'T SEE ANYONE, I WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND DECLARE THAT WE ARE ADJOURNED.OUR NEXT MEETING IS THURSDAY JULY 7.
SIX, SORRY. EVERYONE HAVE A HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.