Aug 23, 2022 BCC Agenda

[00:00:08]

>> IF EVERYONE WOULD PLEASE TAKE YOUR SEATS.

OR ACTUALLY, YOU COULD STAND. WE WILL GET STARTED.

WE WILL HAVE OUR IMPLICATION BY COMMISSIONER BURKE.

THEN WE WILL HAVE THE VETERAN LED LEDGE BY PETTY OFFICER FIRST CLASS HM1 ARTHUR BELARDE. AND HE WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE. PLEASE PRAY WITH ME IF YOU WILL.

DEAR LORD THANK YOU FOR THIS DAY.

THANK YOU FOR BRINGING US HERE FOR THIS MEETING TONIGHT.

I PRAY YOU WILL HELP US TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION TO GUIDE US TO KNOW THAT THE RIGHT THINGS TO DO HERE.

THANK YOU FOR OUR COUNTY AND THE BLESSINGS YOU HAVE BESTOWED UPON US. THANK YOU FOR THE MILITARY AND FIRST RESPONDERS AND CONTINUED TO GUIDE US IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION HELP US ALL TO BE SAFE, IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY,

AMEN. >> OKAY, PATTY OFFICER FIRST CLASS HM1 ARTHUR BELARDE SERVED AS ACTIVE DUTY AND RETIRED AFTER TEN YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE U.S. NAVAL RESERVE.

HE ACHIEVED THE RANK OF E--6 DURING HIS CAREER.

HE IS AN ORANGE PARK RESIDENT AND CURRENTLY WORKS AS AN ORTHOPEDIC TECHNICIAN. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.

>> I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR

ALL. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW

WORDS. >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME OUT HERE. LEADING THE PLEDGE FOR YOU.

I RETIRED OUT OF THE MILITARY. I DID NOT NECESSARILY HAVE A PURPOSE BUT I FOUND ONE AND I OPENED A JUJITSU SCHOOL HERE IN ORANGE PARK. FROM THERE I GOT TO MEET SOME UNIQUE PEOPLE. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR HAVING

ME. >> ALL RIGHT.

[CALL TO ORDER]

SO LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT FEAR ALL OF THE COMMISSIONERS

[PET ADOPTIONS]

>> OF EXPERIENCE-YEARS-OLD WHICH CLEO IS LOOKING FOR A FOREVER HOME. SHE IS TRAINED AND KNOWS BASIC COMMANDS. SHE IS A LITTLE DOG'S SELECTIVE.

WE RECOMMEND BRINGING YOUR DOG UP TO MEET HER SO WE CAN MAKE SURE THEY ARE A GOOD MATCH. DON'T HAVE ANY ANIMALS, EVEN BETTER SHE DOES NOT MIND BEING THE CENTER OF YOUR WORLD.

NEXT WE HAVE CLEVELAND A NEUTERED MALE, MIXED BREED WHO WEIGHS 52 POUNDS. IS A GOOD BOY.

HE LOVES EVERYONE AND LIFE IN GENERAL.

HE WILL STILL NEED BASIC TRAINING SINCE HE IS A PUPPY BUT HE IS AS GOOD AS IT GETS WHEN IT COMES TO PERSONALITY.

HE IS UP TO DATE ON HIS VACCINES AND HEARTWARMING NEGATIVE.

OUR FIRST CAT TODAY IS A SPAYED FEMALE DOMESTIC SHORTHAIR, THREE MONTHS OLD. SHE IS ONE OF OUR MANY KITTENS LOOKING FOR HER FOREVER HOME. PLEASE COME OUT AND MEET HER.

SHE IS UP TO DATE ON HER VACCINES AND SHE IS MICROCHIP.

AND LASTLY, WE HAVE NOT SHOW. A DOMESTIC SHORTHAIR THREE MONTHS OLD. A SWEET PLAYFUL KITTEN THAT WOULD LIKE TO GO HOME WITH HER KITTEN FRIEND.

SHE IS UP TO DATE ON HER VACCINES AND MICROCHIP.

[00:05:01]

[PROCLAMATIONS/RESOLUTIONS]

>> WILL MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS JOIN ME DOWN FRONT.

>> ALL RIGHT. PROCLAMATION IS FOR CONSTITUTION WEEK AND CLAY COUNTY. PRESIDENT EISENHOWER SIGNED A JOINT RESOLUTION FOR EACH YEAR AS CONSTITUTION WEEK.

THIS ANNUAL CELEBRATION OF THE CONSTITUTION CAME ABOUT AFTER THE DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION PETITION CONGRESS TO COMMEMORATE THE CONSTITUTION ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1787.

WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE SOPHIA CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION HERE WITH US TODAY TO ACCEPT THE PROCLAMATION. CHAIR TERRY IS A RARE CHAIRPERSON AND AFTER HE READS THE PROCLAMATION YOU CAN INTRODUCE US TO YOUR FELLOW DAUGHTERS.

>> IT IS MY PLEASURE TO READ THIS PROCLAMATION.

WHEREAS ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1787 THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WAS SIGNED BY 39 DELEGATES BEGINNING ITS TWO-YEAR JOURNEY TO BECOME THE PRINCIPLE OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT IN A REPUBLIC IT DEDICATED TO RULE BY LAW. WHERE SEPTEMBER MARKS THE 235TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE DRAFTING OF THE CONSTITUTION OF AMERICA BY THE CONSTITUTION CONVENTION MAKING IT THE WORLDS LONGEST CHARTER OF GOVERNMENT WHICH STILL TODAY STANDS AS A TESTAMENT TO THE TENACITY OF AMERICANS TO MAINTAIN AND WHEREAS THE ANNUAL CELEBRATION OF THE CONSTITUTION BEGAN IN 1955 WHEN THE DAUGHTER OF THE RESOLUTION.

OBSERVANCE OF CONSTITUTION WEEK. WHERE HE WAS LATER ADOPTED BY THE U.S. CONGRESS AND SIGNED INTO PUBLIC LAW, DESIGNATING THE. BEGINNING AND ENDING ON EACH YEAR TO COMMEMORATE THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS DOCUMENT AND HOW IT STILL SERVES US TODAY. WITH APPROPRIATE CEREMONIES AND ACTIVITIES WE WILL DO THIS. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DO HEREBY PROCLAIM SEPTEMBER 17 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 23 AS CONSTITUTION WEEK AND CLAY COUNTY.

AND CALLS UPON ALL CITIZENS TO STUDY THE CONSTITUTION AND REFLECT ON THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING AN AMERICAN WITH THE RIGHTS OF IT INVOLVES. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

IT CARRIES 40, CONGRATULATIONS. >> NOW HERE'S THE MICROPHONE SO HI MY NAME IS TERRY I HEAR THESE ARE MEMBERS FROM THE SLIMMING CHAPTER WE HAVE OUR REGENT BARBARA OUR SECOND VICE REGENT CAROL. AND BETTY PRICE WHO IS ALSO ON THE CONSTITUTION COMMITTEE. WE REALLY APPRECIATE THIS PROCLAMATION. IT IS A VERY IMPORTANT PART.

WE FOCUS ON THE PROGRAMS THAT ARE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PATRIOTISM AND EDUCATION. AND DURING THIS WEEK COMING UP IN SEPTEMBER WE WILL BE EXTENDING INFORMATION ABOUT CONSTITUTION WEEK TO SOME OF THE SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES AND CLAY

[00:10:03]

>> WHEN TOLD THAT SO WE CAN GET A PICTURE.

[PRESENTATIONS]

>> OKAY. NOW WE WILL MOVE FORWARD WITH OUR PRESENTATION. WE HAVE A VETERAN SERVICES PRESENTATION. SOME OF THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED. DISABILITY CLAIMS AND APPEALS FOR DENIAL CLAIMS AND BURIAL SPIRIT AND ALSO NON- SERVICE-CONNECTED. THIS IS THE FUNDING THAT IS BROUGHT BACK INTO THE CLAIMS THAT THE VETERANS TO RECEIVE.

AS YOU CAN SEE STARTING THIS FISCAL YEAR AND MOVING BACKWARDS, JUST A QUICK NOTE ON THE 2021.

WHEN THEY CAME FROM THEIR OUTSIDE COUNTIES THEY BROUGHT WITH THEM SOME CLAY COUNTY RESIDENTS THAT THEY WERE SERVING SO THAT KIND OF PUMP THE NUMBERS ARE.

BUT AS YOU CAN SEE THEY HAVE DONE GREAT WORK BRINGING IN FUNDING AND HELPING OUT OUR LOCAL VETERANS.

AND CURRENTLY WE HAVE ONE AND A HALF.

WE WILL BE ASKING THAT WE MOVE IT TO FULL TIME.

JUST SOME THINGS WITH THIS, IT CREATES EASIER ACCESS TO SCHEDULING AND A TIMELY RESPONSE.

I AM SURE YOU KNOW, WE HAVE QUITE A FEW VETERANS HERE AND HAVING ONLY ONE FULL-TIME VSO IS A LOT OF WORK.

CALLS COME IN EVERY WEEK TRYING TO GET APPOINTMENTS.

HAVING ANOTHER OFFICER THERE FULL-TIME WILL HELP WITHOUT.

COMMUNITY OUTREACH. REACHING VETERANS THAT MAY NOT KNOW WHAT WE DO. AND WE CAN REACH INTO AREAS THAT MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO COME TO US.

ALSO BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS WITH NONPROFITS.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE DISCUSSED PROVIDING BASIC FUNDING FOR EVENTS. AND HELPING IMPLICATIONS AND THAT TYPE OF THING ON A SMALLER SCALE, FOR ANY VETERAN CENTERED EVENT. AND PARTNERING WITH OUR VETERANS COUNCIL WHO WILL BE DOING THE NEXT PRESENTATION.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I STEP AWAY?

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >> THIS IS JESSICA AND SHE WILL BE DOING THE PRESENTATION FOR VETERANS COUNSEL.

>> GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS AND GUESTS.

WE APPRECIATE YOUR INTEREST IN OUR ORGANIZATION.

I AM THE TREASURER FOR THE VETERANS COUNCIL OF CLAY COUNTY FLORIDA. I AM PRESENTING TODAY ON BEHALF OF OUR PRESIDENT. HE IS SERVING TODAY BY SUPPORTING VOTING. THE EFFORTS HERE IN CLAY COUNTY.

THIS IS A LIST OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

[00:15:06]

WE WANT CLAY COUNTY TO BE KNOWN AS THE COUNTY THAT TAKES CARE OF VETERANS. WE HAVE REBRANDED THE COUNCIL WITH A NEW NAME TO LINE UP WITH THE OTHER COUNCILS.

AND RAISE FUNDING. OUR VISION INCLUDES TAKING CARE OF VETERANS AND OUR MISSION PROVIDES ONE VOICE ON BEHALF OF VETERANS. THIS SLIDE PROVIDES OUR MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS. WE HAVE GROWN SUBSTANTIALLY.

WE WILL CONTINUE OUR EFFORTS TO EXPAND MEMBERSHIP.

OUR MEMBERS AND FORMED THE COUNCIL OF THE ORGANIZATION'S DEEDS AND PRIORITIES AND EVENTS. AND COUNSEL CAN BRING THOSE TO THE COUNTY WITH ONE VOICE. OUR STRATEGY, IS TO HAVE FOUR CONCURRENT GOALS CONDUCT FUNDRAISING AND INCREASE

FUNDRAISING. >> EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND HOME TO CONTACT IF THEY HAVE UNMET NEEDS.

IF THEY NEED TO BE WITH OTHERS WITH A SIMILAR EXPERIENCE OR IF THE RESOURCE PROVIDERS HAVE SOMETHING THEY CAN GIVE TO VETERANS. AS VETERANS WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE NEED BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW WHAT RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE.

THEY CALLED THIS THE UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS.

TRAINERS CAN'T LOOK THEM IN THE EYE IDENTIFY WHERE NEEDS CAN BE MET VETERANS DON'T LOOK FOR HANDOUTS BUT WILL TAKE A HANDOUT WE WANT THEM TO REGAIN THEIR INDEPENDENCE AND REGAIN RELATIONSHIPS. COMMUNITY CENTER FUNDRAISING HAS BEGUN AND WE WILL REACH OUT TO OUR PARTNERS TO IDENTIFY EFFECTIVE PATHWAYS. WE DON'T PROCESS CLAIMS AT THE CENTER. WE SUPPORT FOR MORE OFFICERS AND THE COUNTY. VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES SUBMIT IT BECAUSE SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG.

IT TAKES TIME TO SUBMIT A CLAIM. BETWEEN THIS, WE CAN EDUCATE AND ENCOURAGE VETERANS TO SUCCEED. THE COUNCIL INTENDS TO PROVIDE ONE VOICE FOR THE MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS.

RECOGNIZE THAT OUR PARTNERS HAVE GREATER EXPERIENCE ESPECIALLY IN GRANT REQUESTS. WE HOPE THEY CAN HELP US FIND QUALIFYING GRANTS AND DOCUMENTATION CREATION.

WE WANT EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE CARE.

AND THAT SUPPORTING THEM IS A PRIORITY IN CLAY COUNTY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. >> DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY

QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. >> I THINK CONGRESS IS GETTING A LOT OF PHONE CALLS. TO SAY NO THAT EVERYBODY QUALIFIES FOR THAT. AND THERE ARE CERTAIN

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS. >> I KNOW IT DOESN'T GO INTO ONE OCTOBER AND THEY ARE KEEPING THE NUMBERS.

TO THE COUNCIL ITSELF WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN THAT MANY IT JUST GOT ANNOUNCED AT THE LAST MEETING SO WE HAVE NOT ASKED THE MEMBERS IF THEY HAVE QUESTIONS. BUT WE ARE WORKING CLOSE WITH KEITH AND SHERRY TO MAKE SURE WE KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SAYING AND THAT WE ARE SAYING THE SAME THING TO MAKE SURE THE VETERANS ARE GETTING THE INFORMATION THAT THEY NEED.

>> THESE WERE NOT COVERED. UNDER ILLNESSES AND AS OF ONE OCTOBER THEY WILL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS KEITH WILL BE HAPPY TO FIELD THE QUESTIONS.

[00:20:25]

>> WE HAVE BEEN PLANNING. THEY HAVE BEEN PLANNING TO HOST A FEW COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND TOWN HALLS TO DISCUSS THIS ACT TO MAKE SURE VETERANS UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS AND HOW THEY CAN MOVE

FORWARD WITH THAT AS WELL. >> TO PIGGYBACK.

-- VERY FEW TIMES PEOPLE HAVE TOLD ME I NEED UP MICROPHONE.

WERE TRYING TO SCHEDULE ONE TO GET EVERYONE TOGETHER.

I HAVE INFORMATION WHERE SOMEONE WAS HOLDING ONE AT THE ELKS LODGE. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION WE ARE GETTING HUNDREDS OF CALLS WILL WAS PUT OUT OVER TV ISN'T WHAT IT SAID. THERE'S BEEN A BIG CALL.

SO THE SECOND WILL BE A TREMENDOUS HELP.

>> I THINK IT ALWAYS WORKS. PEOPLE CAN ASK QUESTIONS AND BOUNCE OFF OF EACH OTHER. I THINK IT'S THE BEST WAY TO GET

THINGS OUT. >> IS THAT IN THE FUTURE.

DOES THE PART-TIME OR WANT TO GO FULL TIME THAT YOU HAVE?

>> I JUST WANT TO SAY, AT LEAST TWO AND A HALF.

WERE STILL NOT FINISHED WITH THE BLUE NAVY.

WE HAVE A LOT OF VIETNAM VETERANS THAT ARE HAVING TROUBLE AND THEY NEED THAT. SO WE CAN GET TO FULL-TIME

PEOPLE AND MAYBE FUNDING. >> WE WILL START WITH TWO OF THEM. HOW ABOUT THAT.

>> WE HAVE ONLY SEEN THIS A FEW TIMES.

I THINK THAT HAS HELPED. FOR THE FIRST WEEK OR TWO PEOPLE WENT AND THEY WERE ABLE TO SEND IT OVER.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

>> MOVING FOR PERMISSION. THIS IS THE WORKSHOP ON THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING. AND OF MEETING OF AUGUST 16.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OF CORRECTIONS WHICH WE WORKED OUT.

THEY WERE NOT SIGNIFICANT. >> ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY AYE.

[PUBLIC COMMENTS]

IT CARRIES 4-0. >> OR NOT WE WILL MOVE INTO PUBLIC COMMENT. THE FIRST IS FROM PAT LEE.

>> COMMISSIONERS, I AM PAT LEE. I LIVE ON FLEMING ISLAND.

WHY WOULD PEOPLE IN THIS BUILDING TOTALLY IGNORE THE SAFETY CONCERNS FOR PEOPLE AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY.

FOR THE SAME REASON THEY THINK THIS IS IT CONNECTED.

THIS PROCESS WAS ABYSMAL. THE SIGN BLAMING THE POST OFFICE FOR LOSING SIX NOTIFICATION LETTERS.

IN 2020 THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION TO ENLARGE THE PERIOD.

EVERYTHING WAS IDENTIFIED. WHEN THE SAME QUESTION WAS ASKED

[00:25:01]

THE FIX WAS IN. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE GOT THE MULTIMILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT TO BUILD THIS PARK BEFORE THE COMMITTEE HE HAD EVEN HELD A HEARING.

AND TEN MONTHS BEFORE THE OWNERS CLOSE ON THE LAND, WHAT VISION.

YOU HAVE SEEN THE COMPROMISE THAT CLAY COUNTY PUT TOGETHER AND YOU CHOSE TO IGNORE IT. THE REQUIRED PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT REIT THE DIFFERENCES AMENITIES WHICH OFTEN ARE LET'S GO BACK TO THE SEPTEMBER MEETING WHERE YOU AUTHORIZE THIS.

THERE IS NO SWIMMING POOL NO CONVENIENT STORE AND NO RESTAURANT LIKE MIKE BROWN SAID A THE MEETING.

THE POND IS APRIL. YOU CANNOT SWIM IN BY FLORIDA LAW AND IN THE WINTERTIME WILL BE 50 DEGREES.

THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND THE MEETING SAID TALKED ABOUT THIS ONE. WE ARE TOLD THE CLAY COUNTY UTILITIES WILL NOT BE DOWN THERE FOR TEN YEARS AND IT IS 6 MILES TO GREEN COVE SPRINGS. THE ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM ARE CLEANOUT STATIONS AND THEY NEED SIX OF THEM BY FLORIDA LAW.

NO SEWER IS A DEALBREAKER FOR RVS COMING TO A RESORT.

MICHAEL'S TESTIMONY, GO BACK. THIS IS A DONE DEAL.

WE WILL GET NO HELP FROM CLAY COUNTY.

WE ARE TOLD THIS IS PRIVATE VERSUS PRIVATE, BULL.

YOUR RICH FRIENDS DID NOT DO THIS.

THIS WAS AGRICULTURE BEFORE THIS COMMISSION STEPPED IN.

THANK YOU. >>

>> I HAVE A LETTER HERE FROM THE CAPTAIN THAT HE WOULD LIKE ME TOO READ. LET'S BE CLEAR THE PRIMARY MISSION AS STATED IN THE JOB DESCRIPTION IS SAFETY.

WHEN I WAS YOUNG BOY MY FATHER WAS TEACHING ME HOW TO RIDE A BICYCLE. HE SAID SAFETY WAS PARAMOUNT NOT TO LEAVE ON THE SIDEWALK IN ORDER TO PROTECT OTHERS.

MARK DRIVER INSTRUCTOR CAUTIONED ME FOR THE DANGERS OF DRIVING A CAR AND THAT IS PARAMOUNT FOR EVERYONE ON THE ROAD AND SIDEWALK SPIRIT DRINKING AND DRIVING WAS UNSAFE AND I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHER PEOPLE. EARLY ON IN MY NAVY.

THERE WERE TWO WORDS ON THE BOARD.

IT SAID INDIAN SIGNS. THAT MEANT I WAS TO IDENTIFY AND FIX ALL SAFETY ISSUES. WHETHER IT WAS RUNWAY OR SOMETHING STUPID THAT WOULD PUT YOU IN HARM'S WAY.

MY ACTION AND DECISIONS IMPACTED OTHER SHIPMATES AND I KNOW WHAT THAT MEANT. IT WAS INCUMBENT UPON ME TOO SEEK SAFETY RELATED ISSUES AND TAKE ACTION.

ACTION THAT WOULD SAVE THE LIVES OF OTHER PEOPLE IN THE AIR AND ON THE GROUND. YOU COMMISSIONERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING THE TIME TO FOLLOW THROUGH IMMEDIATELY IF REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF CLAY COUNTY RESIDENTS.

IF DRAMATIC SAFETY ISSUES WERE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION.

IT'S IMPORTANT THAT PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO DO THE WORK, MAKE SURE THAT SO FAR NOTHING HAS HAPPENED.

THE PROFESSIONAL PILOTS HAVE PLEADED WITH YOU AS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD YOU HAVE PURPOSELY AVOIDED THE SAFETY ISSUES WHICH CAN BE FIXED IMMEDIATELY. NOT A SINGLE DOLLAR WE HAVE ASKED TO BE PUT ON THE AGENDA TO POSE A SOLUTION.

[00:30:01]

BY NOT FIXING IT YOU PUT PEOPLE IN HARM'S WAY.

THIS WILL NOT BE SENT TO THE GOVERNOR.

>> NEXT WE HAVE WILLIAM. >> I'M A PROUD REVERENCE THAT.

I'M PROUD OF OUR COMMUNITY. THE REASON I AM HERE TONIGHT IS IN REFERENCE TO COUNTY MUNICIPAL CODE 15.5 WHICH IS DISTURBING THE PEACE. AND WHAT HAS BROUGHT THIS TO MY ATTENTION. I DISCUSSED THIS PREVIOUSLY WITH COMMISSIONER CELLA WHEN THEY FIRST INITIATED IT.

AND OUTSIDE BAND. IT IS ON HIGHWAY 17.

CONSIDERING THE IMPLICATIONS OF NOISE.

AND IT WAS LOOKED AT, AND NOTHING I AM AWARE HAS COME OF IT. IT IS LIKE A CAMEL'S NOSE UNDER THE TENT. SATURDAY NIGHT BROUGHT EVERYTHING TO A HEAD. IF YOU LOOK AT THE FIRST PAGE WHERE IT SHOWS THE SHORTEST POINT FROM MY HOUSE TO THE HIDEOUT IS 2600 FEET APPROXIMATELY.

WHICH IS ABOUT HALF OF A MILE. TONIGHT WHEN YOU GO HOME, LOOK AND SEE THE DISTANCE OF HALF OF A MILE.

THAT WILL GIVE YOU A POINT OF REFERENCE TO WHAT I AM REFERRING TO. LAST NIGHT I WENT TO MY BACK PORCH AND I COULD HEAR BLATANT PROFANITY FROM THE FINGER OR WHOEVER HAD THE MICROPHONE AT THAT TIME.

I WON'T GET INTO THAT WITH YOU. BUT IT WAS ALSO ABOUT CHILD MOLESTERS AND STUFF. KEEP IN MIND I AM 2600 FEET FROM THERE. AND I COULD HEAR IT LIKE YOU AND I ARE TALKING IN HERE. I HAVE A RECORDING.

I WOULD NOT DO THE PROFANITY. BUT JUST TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE, THIS IS WHAT I HEAR ON MY BACK PORCH.

THAT IS HALF OF A MILE. SO THE PEOPLE LIVING CLOSER TO THAT. I CAN'T EVEN IMAGINE HOW THEY ARE FUNCTIONING. MY MOTHER SAID SHE SHE COULD HEAR IT. AS SHE SAID USUALLY I HEAR THIS ON THE SUNDAY AFTERNOON. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WOULD CALL THAT LAST NIGHT. AND JUST TO MAKE YOUR BREACH, I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED A FEW SECTIONS AND IT IS IN REFERENCE TO DOG BARKING AND AMPLIFIED NOISE AND NOISE FROM ADJOINNG PROPERTIES AND THEY ALL HAVE SIMILAR LANGUAGE.

AND THEY ALL WOULD SAY, THE PROHIBITED STATION SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR A PERSON TO KEEP ON ANY PERMITS A DOG THAT IS WHINING OR ENTER MENTORING THAT IS HEARD OR CAPABLE BEING ERRED ERRED BY A PERSON OF ORDINARY HEARING ABILITY OF SUCH

[00:35:05]

THERE ARE NO LIMITATIONS, THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT.

OKAY. >> I WOULD LIKE SOME HELP IN

ADDRESSING THAT. >> OKAY, WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING TO SPEAK. THANK YOU.

>> NEXT WE HAVE SHANDA ELLIS. DID I SAY YOUR NAME RIGHT?

I APOLOGIZE. >> HELLO HELLO.

I'M THE MANAGER OF FAMILY SERVICES.

I THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY.

>> I'M SORRY THEY CANNOT HEAR YOU.

>> ON THE MANAGER OF FAMILY SERVICES.

I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT CHILDREN SERVICES IS DOING. THEY PROVIDE THREE HEAD START PROGRAM SPIRIT AND WE ADMINISTERED THE PROGRAM AS WELL. FAMILIES THAT WORK OR GO TO SCHOOL BUT NEED HELP RECEIVED A VOUCHER.

TRADITIONALLY THE COUNTY HELPS US WITH A GRANT TO HELP MEET THE FEDERAL MATCHING REQUIREMENTS. IN SCHOOL READINESS WE HELP THE PARENTS, AN EXAMPLE, A FAMILY OF FOUR, THE MAXIMUM THEY COULD MAKE THEY TRY TO PUT TOGETHER FUNDS BY THIS SCAN HAVE AN EFFECT ON FAMILY INCOME. CHILDCARE IS EXPENSIVE AND THE COSTS CAN BE MORE THAN THE FAMILY BUDGET ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR AN INFANT. 86% RECEIVING SCHOOL READINESS SERVICES HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED FOR ONE YEAR COMPARED TO THOSE WAITING FOR SERVICES. 85% OF THE PARENTS FEEL LIKE SCHOOL READINESS IS GIVING THEM BASIS INCREASING THE IMPACT.

THIS MEANS WE CAN SERVE 75 ADDITIONAL CHILDREN WITH YOUR MATCHING FUNDS. THIS GRANT IS USED TO PAY FOR CHILD CARE SUBSIDIES AND NONISSUES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OR OTHER EXPENSES. WE THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING IT

IN YOUR UPCOMING BUDGET. >> DR. BOB.

>> COMMISSIONERS, EVERYONE. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO YOU. AS BOARD CHAIR I AM REQUESTING THAT NO DECISION OR BOATS BE TAKEN TODAY ON THE NONPROFIT FUNDING POLICIES I FEEL THAT PUBLIC INPUT MAY BE BENEFICIAL'S AND DEVELOPING A POLICY THAT WILL BE IN PLACE FOR A LONG TIME TO COME. AT THE MONTHLY MEETING LAST WEEK

[00:40:01]

TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO ONE THERE WAS MADE AWARE OF THIS PRIOR TO THAT. AND NOTE NONPROFIT HAD BEEN CONSULTED. PUBLIC INPUT AND TRANSPARENCY WILL LEAD TO BETTER POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST BUT NO VOTER DECISION BE MADE TONIGHT UNTIL THE PUBLIC AND NONPROFITS HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH IN ON THIS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> CAN WE HAVE SOMEONE TAKE A LOOK AT THE NOISE ORDINANCE.

MAYBE THERE IS SOMETHING WEEK CAN DO WITH THAT IS OR ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT PUBLIC COMMENT?

>> YOUR ITEMS THAT YOU WANTED TO SPEAK ON THAT ITEM.

OR YOUR CARD SAID THAT. ANYONE ELSE FOR JUST REGULAR PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY.

CAN SOMEONE ADDRESS WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE AIRPARK, IF THEY HAVE SET A LOT AGAINST US, WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE WITH IT.

>> SURE. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TOO UPDATE? SO BOTH HAVE MET WITH THE ORGANIZATIONS REPRESENTING AVIATION ENTHUSIASTS. AND AGAIN, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE LDCS TO UPDATE THOSE TO PROTECT THOSE FOR THE PUBLIC AIRPORTS AND THEIR FIELDS. AND MOVING FORWARD ON THAT AND LOOKING AT THAT, THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS.

THERE IS NO ONE PRIME EXAMPLE. SO IT IS A BIT DIFFICULT TO GET THAT AND TO MOVE FORWARD WITH IT BUT WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS.

IS THE ONLY UPDATE I HAVE AND THE PROTECTION OF ANYONE OUTSID OF THE BOUNDARIES IN THE AIRPORT.

>> SO IT'S AT A STANDSTILL OR ARE THEY DEVELOPING IT?

>> I DON'T HAVE AN UPDATE ON THAT PARCEL.

I DON'T HAVE A CURRENT UPDATE FOR IT.

CHARISSE WAS HERE, SHE WILL TALK TO THIS GENTLEMAN AND SHE WILL

ADDRESS THAT. >> WE HAVE BEEN MEETING ON A WEEKLY BASIS WITH ORGANIZATIONS TO IDENTIFY THE SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FOR PUBLIC AIRPORTS. WE HAVE PUBLIC AIRPORTS NOT BEING PROTECTED. WE HAVE TO BE CAUTIOUS AND CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASKED FOR, YOU MAY GET IT TYPE THING.

SO WE ARE RESEARCHING ALL OF THE FAA REGULATIONS AND DON'T REALLY APPLY TO PRIVATE AIRPORTS. WE ARE TRYING TO EMBED THE PUBLIC SAFETY PART INTO PRIVATE AREAS SO IT'S A LOW DIFFICULT BUT WERE GETTING THERE, IT'S NOT WE MET SIX DAYS AGO.

SO WHERE ARE LOOKING AT LOCAL AND NATIONAL RESOURCES TRYING TO

RESOLVE THIS ISSUE. >> I SEE HERE A LOT OF ANGER.

AND RIGHTLY SO. BUT DON'T THINK WE DON'T DO ANYTHING. TRUST ME.

WE CARE. THAT IS OUR JOB.

WE HERE ON FACEBOOK WE DON'T DO ANYTHING BUT WE DO.

TRUST ME, WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING.

YOU APPOINTED COMMISSIONER RENNINGER.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

IS ANYTHING ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO PULL?

DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >> I MOVED TO APPROVE THE

CONSENT AGENDA. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED?

[7.  Presentation of 6/30/2022 Investment Report(T.Green/A.Bramlitt)]

[00:45:02]

>> ON THE FINANCE OFFICER FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. WE WILL MAKE THIS VERY QUICK THIS IS OUR QUARTERLY UPDATE REQUIRED BY OUR INVESTMENT POLICY. WE WILL WALK THROUGH IT.

WE HAVE NOT CHANGED.NUMBERS ALL OF OUR INVESTMENT COMMITTEE.

FOR PURPOSES TO PROVIDE OVERALL STRATEGY AND DIRECTION.

WE'VE NOT CHANGED OUR STRATEGY OR MEMBERSHIP YOUR WE ARE GOING CHURCHYARD TO GET EVERYONE TOGETHER BEFORE THE NEXT QUARTERLY REPORT BECAUSE THERE WILL BE SOME DECISIONS WE HAVE TO MAKE AS TO WHERE WE WOULD LIKE TO MOVE OUR EXCESS FUNDS AND WE WILL GET SOME SHORTLY. REALLY QUICKLY FOR THE MARKET.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS CONTINUED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES. THE TARGET RANGES TO POINT 25 WHICH IS WE KNOW THAT INFLATION AS WE ALL GO TO THE FUEL PUMPING GAS STATION AND GROCERY STORE, IT IS RUNNING HARD.

IT IS HAVING SOME EFFECT BUT WE DO EXPECT THE FEDS TO RAISE INTEREST RATES. THEY NEED IN SEPTEMBER.

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO US. WE KNOW WE ARE IN A VOLATILE MARKET. WE ARE CONTINUING TO LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE AND INVEST PRUDENTLY.

REALLY QUICKLY, THE CASH AND INVESTMENTS.

THIS IS SIMILAR TO LAST MONTHS TOTAL.

THE YEAR TO DATE YOU CAN SAVE OUR NEXT COLUMN WE HAD THIS IN INTEREST. YOU ARE SEEING THOSE ENTRIES AND INTEREST RATES AS A LOT OF THE PORTFOLIOS ARE VERY LIQUID.

YOU CAN SEE HOW IT HAS GONE UP FROM Q1, Q2 AND Q3.

WE ARE SEEING IMPROVED RETURNS ON OUR FUNDS.

THE SUMMARY, THIS IS A CHART BUT THIS IS A REQUIRED COMMUNICATION TO THE BOARD AND THE PUBLIC. WE ARE IN COMPLIANCE IN ALL CATEGORIES. YOU CAN SEE OUR INVESTMENT SO WE ARE MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE INVESTMENT POLICY WITH RETURNS AND WITH HOW WE HAVE DISTRIBUTED THE MONEY.

THE ONE THING YOU WILL NOTICE FLORIDA SAFE IS AN AREA WE PULLED FUNDS OUT BECAUSE THE RETURN WAS LOW.

WE HAVE GOTTEN SOME GOOD -- OUR DAILY RETURNS.

WE WILL BE LOOKING AT MOVING FUNDS INTO THAT ACCOUNT, AS WE MOVE ON. THIS IS JUST A HIGH SUMMARY.

YOU CAN SEE THE VOLATILITY. MOST OF THE MONEY IN FLORIDA PRIME YOU CAN SEE HAS GONE FROM 1% AND THE LOW WAS LESS THAN .1%. AVERAGE 3.5.

YOU ARE SEEING ALL OF THOSE ITEMS CHANGE.

THE WELLS FARGO IS A NEW STATISTIC.

THAT IS OUR OPERATING CASH WHICH REALLY ISN'T AN INVESTMENT.

WE DO EARN POINTS BUT WE PAY OUR BANK FEES OUT OF THAT.

THAT IS ONE OF THE AREAS WE WILL BE WORKING WITH WELLS FARGO ON TO SEE IF WE CAN GO INTO A PRODUCT THAT WOULD ENHANCE THAT.

WITH THAT, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?

>> IN TERMS OF THAT WELLS FARGO. AND I KNOW YOU USUALLY GET LESS BECAUSE YOU'RE MOVING MONEY. BUT WHEN I WAS ON THE INVESTMENT

[00:50:05]

IS THAT SOMETHING THE COMMITTEE COULD LOOK AT AT THEIR NEXT MEETING. WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER AND I THINK CHARISSE WAS IN THAT MEETING AND THEY PRESENTED US WITH PRODUCT AND WE COULD ACT ON THAT BUT IT DID OPEN MY EYES THAT THERE MAY BE SOME THINGS LOOKED AT AS TO IF WE COULD BE SERVED BETTER. YES.

GOOD POINT. AND WE CAN LOOK AT THAT.

ONE OF THE THINGS I WOULD QUESTION IS THE TIMING OF IT.

DEFINITELY LOOK AT MOVING SOME OF THE EXCESS CASH OUT OF WELLS FARGO INTO ANOTHER INSTITUTION OR WHOEVER IT MAY BE THAT THE COMMITTEE WANTS TO DO THE RESEARCH ON.

I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE DELAY THIS MAINLY BECAUSE WE JUST IMPLEMENTED WORKDAY AIDE AND A HALF MONTHS AGO.

WE DID A LOT OF AUTOMATIC CONNECTIONS WITH THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO DO THAT NOW ON TOP OF GOING INTO YEAR END FOR THE FIRST TIME AND HAVING BRAND-NEW AUDITORS TO ME IS A RISK.

FOR JUST THE TREASURY MANAGER SERVICES.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T LOOK AND WE SHOULD LOOK AT AN ALTERNATIVE SOURCE. WELLS FARGO HAS PROVIDED ONE.

WE'VE DONE A LITTLE RESEARCH. THEIR INVESTMENT IS A US-BASED COMPANY AND IT WOULD DAILY SWEEP OUT OF OUR ACCOUNT.

IT EARNED SIX BASIS POINTS LESS THAN THE OTHER PULLED PHONES -- FUNDS USE. DO WE WANT TO STAY WITH THAT WHICH IS EASY, BECAUSE IT SLEEPS ANYTHING OVER THE MINIMUM AND WE DON'T HAVE TO MANAGE IT ACTIVELY EVERY DAY BUT YOU WILL GIVE UP TEN BASIS POINTS TO DO THAT. THAT IS ONE OF THE TOPICS I WANT THEM TO LOOK AT AND DISCUSS. WHAT IS IT THAT WE WANT TO DO.

BUT FROM A TIMING STANDPOINT. RIGHT NOW WELLS IS GIVING US REALLY GOOD SERVICE. WE AUTOMATED THE PROCESS AND CUT IT DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY. SO IT DOESN'T MEAN WE DON'T WANT TO LOOK AT IT I WOULD JUST SAY WE HAVE MAYBE A YEAR OR TWO

EARLY. >> AND IF I COULD, WE TALKED ABOUT THAT WHEN WE WERE IN THE EARLY STAGES AND AT THE TIME THE RECOMMENDATION WAS LET'S NOT DO ANYTHING.

WHEN DOES IT BECOME NOT TOO EARLY BUT THE RIGHT TIME.

I WOULD LIKE THE COMMITTEE TO LOOK AT THAT WITH THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES AND BRING US BACK SOME INFORMATION AS TO WHY

WE SHOULD STAY OR MOVE AHEAD. >> WE CAN DEFINITELY DO THAT.

>> COMMISSIONER. >> ID I -- I DISAGREE WITH THAT.

WE HAVE $86 MILLION THAT .01 AVERAGE.

THAT IS NOTHING. IT'S FREE MONEY TO THEM.

NEXT YEAR, TOTALLY UNREASONABLE. I THINK ONE MONTH WE SHOULD LOOK AT. I KNOW IT WILL CAUSE WORK.

BUT WE ARE LOSING SO MUCH MONEY THROUGH WELLS FARGO AND THEY DON'T HAVE A GREAT HISTORY OF SERVICE.

ORANGE PARK SWITCHED FROM WELLS FARGO TO SOUTH STATE.

'S ALLSTATE I DON'T KNOW WHAT PRODUCTS THEY HAVE.

I'M NOT ON THE COMMITTEE THAT THEY SHOULD BE PRIORITY ONE, NOT

TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. >> SO COMMISSIONER, IF I MAY.

I THINK WE CAN BRING IT UP AND TALK ABOUT THE STRATEGY.

THERE WILL BE QUITE A BIT OF CASH COMING IN.

WE HAVE SOME NOW. SO TO AMY'S POINT.

MAYBE THE HAPPY MEDIUM AND ALL OF THE NUANCES WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT, IS TO LOOK AT THE EXCESS CASH AND CONSIDER SOMETHING FOR THAT. AND THAT WILL BUY US TIME TO GET

[00:55:02]

>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ANSWER IS.

BUT TO KICK THIS CAN DOWN THE ROAD, LOOKING AT THIS IT HURTS

ME. >> THAT IS THE AVERAGE.

>> IT ISN'T HARPER -- THOSE FUNDS.

THAT WILL BUMP UP 15 MILLION MORE DOLLARS.

>> EXACTLY. AND WE WILL NOT LEAVE THOSE IN THE OPERATING ACCOUNT. THEY WILL GET MOVED OUT INTO ONE

OF THE OTHER INVESTMENT -- >> I THINK WE CAN COME UP WITH A STRATEGY THAT WILL GET US WHERE WE NEED TO BE WITH THE EXCESS CASH. WE BOTH AGREE THAT HAVING ALL OF THAT CASH IN AN ACCOUNTING NOT BRINGING IN CASH IS NOT A GOOD

STRATEGY. >> I AGREE WITH THAT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> MADAM CHAIR, IF I MAY CAN WE BRING THE NUMBER NINE WE HAVE SOME GAS IN THE AUDIENCE AND

[9.  Discussion regarding Northeast Florida Multipurpose Youth Sports Complex]

THAT WOULD HELP. >> YES, WE WILL MOVE 20 ITEM

NUMBER NINE. >> COMMISSIONERS, JUST AS TERESA BRINGS UP THE POWERPOINT. WE HAVE SOME GUESTS AND THIS IS THE GROUP WE PURCHASED THE LAND FROM.

THE 250 ACRES. I SEE MATT IS HERE.

I SEE BILL IS HERE. AND I THINK I ALSO SAW CHARLES.

THIS WAS A PUBLIC AND PRIVATE VENTURE.

WE RECEIVED A 3 MILLION-DOLLAR MATCHING GRANT THIS IS WHERE WE WENT OUT WITH A BID. AND IN JUNE.

OBVIOUSLY IT WON'T BE A SURPRISE THE BID CAME BACK PRETTY, BASED UPON NUMEROUS FACTORS. HERE, JUST TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW, A PICTURES WORK OF THOUSAND WORDS.

THIS IS NEXT TO THIS AREA. AND THE PROPOSED PARK TO THE EAST IS PINI FARMS. AND TO THE SOUTHWEST IS CAMP LANDING. THIS IS A SATELLITE VIEW OF THE AREA APPEAR TO THE LEFT IS 21. THIS IS A MASTER PLAN THAT I JUST RECEIVED. I JUST WANT YOU TO TAKE NOTE THAT 21 IS TO THE LOWER PORTION. AS YOU COME INTO THE DRIVE THE MULTIPURPOSE FIELD IS TO THE LEFT AND YOU CAN SEE THAT.

I WILL GET INTO THAT IN A MINUTE.

THE FUTURE PHASES ARE LISTED AND HIGHLIGHTED IN THE BACKGROUND.

SO GOING BACK TO NORTH ORIENTATION TO THE TOP OF THE PAGE. THIS IS THE CONCEPT.

IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT IT THIS ENCOMPASSES EIGHT FIELDS OUTLINED IN RED. THE PARKING LOT IN THE CENTER WITH THE RESTROOM FACILITY TO THE NORTH OF THE PARKING IN THE MIDDLE THAT SEPARATES FIVE FIELDS FROM THREE FIELDS TO THE EAST. AND AREA FOR THE TRAIL WOULD GO ALONG THE SIDEWALK THAT CROSSES THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE FIELD

[01:00:03]

WE HAVE OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WORKING FOR AN EVEN BETTER DESIGN. THERE IS AN EVENT THAT COULD HAVE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. IT COULD ALSO HAVE FOOD TRUCKS AVAILABLE AND WE HAVE TALKED, MATT MENTIONED SOME SHADE STRUCTURES AND POSSIBLY TO THE EAST AND WEST ON THE FIELD.

>> THIS IS AN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN WITH REGARDS TO THE RESTROOM FACILITY. TAKE A LOOK AT BAD.

WE SCALED BACK A LITTLE BIT ON THAT BUT WE TALKED ABOUT IT THE OTHER DAY TO ADD SOME CAMPUS SALE AND COVER ON EITHER SIDE OF SLOPE TO IT. AND THAT DESIGN WOULD BE THROUGHOUT THE PARK. AND THIS STRUCTURE IS SHOWN HERE ON THE SIGN THAT WILL BE OUT ON 21.

SO I KIND OF ALLUDED TO SOME CONSTRAINTS AS WE HAVE BEEN MOVING THROUGH THIS. INFLATION, THE ECONOMY, FUEL COSTS HAVE DEFINITELY CONSTRAINED OUR BUDGET.

WE HAVE DEALT WITH WETLANDS ON THIS PROPERTY AND PARCEL.

SO WE HAVE HAD TO TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT THE WETLAND SPIRIT WE HAVE SEEN A DIFFERENCE IN WHAT WE ORIGINALLY THOUGHT AND THIS HAS TAKEN A GREAT DEAL OF TIME WE'RE TALKING MONTHS WITHIN THE PERMITTING AND THAT. THE USABILITY HAVE ALSO BEEN A CONSTRAINT. BUT PERMITTING TIMELINE AND DOUG GRANT TIMELINE. WHEN YOU PUT OUT AN RFP LIKE THIS, THE CLOSER TO START THE PROJECT MEANS THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO MANY BIDDERS ON IT. IF WE COULD GET SOME RELIEF ON THAT, THAT WOULD BE GREAT. OUR CURRENT GRANT SAYS IT NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF DECEMBER.

>> FROM THE BOARD LOOKING FOR CONSISTENCE -- WE HAVE TALKED TO OUR REPRESENTATIVES ABOUT THIS SPIRIT THEY WILL BE ENGAGED, WILL DO IT LIKE LAST TIME. WE DID RECEIVE A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION BEFORE AND THE UPDATED SITE PLANS LIKE I ALLUDED TO, EVEN AS WE SPEAK, HE WILL COME UP WITH SOME OTHER IDEAS BOTH SITE AND WHEN WE REBID THIS WE WOULD USE THE UPDATED SITE PLAN.

WE WOULD HAVE AN ALTERNATE OF THREE AND WHAT WITH THE CLASS B.

WE HAVE REQUESTED ADDITIONAL FUNDING.

BASED ON THE ANTICIPATED BUDGET CONSTRAINTS WE HAVE HAD.

WERE OPTIMISTIC ON RECEIVING THAT AND ANY OTHER FUNDING OUT THERE. ON WHAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE WHEN YOU HAVE EXPECTATIONS IT HAS BEEN A GREAT PARTNERSHIP WITH REGARDS TO THE WETLANDS AND THE SOIL WE HAVE BEEN THINKING OUTSIDE OF THE BOX AND USING FILLED TO THE NORTH AND INSTEAD OF BIDDING THAT OUT. WE COULD THE AMOUNT OF ACREAGE TO GET TO THE FULL AMOUNT THAT WE SIGNED THE CONTRACT FOR TO GET US TO THAT NUMBER. WITH THAT BEING SAID I WANTED TO

[01:05:03]

DISCUSSION. >> WHAT IS THE EXTENSION

REQUESTED? >> WE WOULD ASKED FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION. WE WILL EXTENDED TO THE END OF

DECEMBER 2,023. >> IF WE COULD GET THE EXTENSION IN MAY GIVE US IN TERMS OF THE FINANCIALS WE HAVE SEEN GOING UP SO HARD WITH INTEREST RATES GOING UP I AND SOME OF THE COST COMING DOWN FOR BUILDIG MATERIALS IT MAY WORK TO OUR ADVANTAGE TO STRETCH THAT OUT. AS WE SAID YESTERDAY, WE SAT WITH THE TEAM AND DISCUSSED SOME OF THE THINGS HAPPENING.

I THINK THE WETLANDS, CONSEQUENTLY, THE COSTS THAT ARE INCREASING. WE DO NEED TO LOOK AT THE $500,000 THAT WE HAVE PUT IN A REQUEST TO STATE DELEGATION SO THEY COULD COME UP WITH THAT MONEY, AS A MITIGATING FACTOR OF HIGHER COSTS. I THINK WE ALSO NEED TO LOOK AT HELPING THE OLD PROJECT WITH SOME FUNDS.

I THINK TO BE ABLE TO BE COMPETITIVE AND GET THE VISITORS WE WANT TO COME IN AND SPEND MONEY IN THE COMMUNITY AND TAKE UP THE HOTEL ROOMS AND GO TO RESTAURANTS,.

>> WE THOUGHT THERE WAS AN ACRE SO IT IS NOT AND THE OTHER THING WAS EYE-OPENING THAT THE SITE WORK SPECIFICALLY HAS DOUBLED.

AND THAT IS IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS.

IF YOUR IN THAT BUSINESS THAT IS A GOOD THING FOR THE REST OF US NOT SO MUCH. AND TIMBER THAT IS WHY, A LOT OF YOU DON'T HAVE VACANT LAND IN YOUR DISTRICTS BUT IN MIND WE DO AND I GET CALLS ABOUT WHY ARE THE TREES BEING CUT AND TIMBER

PRICES ARE AT RECORD HIGH. >> YOU NEED A MOTION TO MOVE

FORWARD. >> JUST A CONSENSUS.

>> I AM SURE OUR GUESTS APPROVED TO.

>> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU WE WILL MOVE FORWARD WITH THE TIME CERTAIN'S BECAUSE

[21.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Ordinance and Resolution to Amend the Capital Improvement Plan (R. Kantor/T. Nagle)]

ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

>> HELLO I AM THE BUDGET MANAGER.

THIS IS TO SIMPLY UPDATE PROJECTS IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT ALSO KNOWN AS THE PROJECTS WITH THE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THEY ARE NOW THREE PROJECTS FUNDED WITH IMPACT FEES THAT ARE RELATED TO THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THE CONSTRUCTION OF RADAR ROAD, AND IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY ROAD 315 AT WILLOW SPRINGS ALL FUNDED FROM DISTRICT THREE IMPACT FEES. IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS ROAD.

THIS IS FUNDED FROM DISTRICT TO IMPACT FEES.

THESE ARE SHOWN IN EXHIBIT V ON TABLE TWO ON PAGE FIVE.

IT IS ON THE HANDOUT. THIS IS UPDATED REFLECTING INFORMATION GAINED AT THE WORKSHOP LAST MONTH.

THE PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING, I MADE A MOVE TO SHOW

[01:10:03]

IMPACT FEE PROJECTS RIGHT THERE. >> DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR RICH. I WANT TO POINT OUT THE I DON'T WANT ANYONE GETTING CONFUSED ON WHERE THE MONEY IS BEING SPENT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DOES ANYONE WANT TO SPEAK ON ITEM 21? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD. MY UNDERSTANDING IS WE CAN MOVE THESE ITEMS AS LONG AS YOUR MOTION INCLUDES ALL OF THOSE.

>> AND I MAKE A MOTION EVERYTHING LISTED.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

[22.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Public Hearing for the purpose of considering the entry into five Purchase and Sale Agreements in connection with the County’s Community Development Block Grant–Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Voluntary Home Buyout Program along with approval of associated documents and requests related to closing (J. Ward)]

>> NOW WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER 22.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING ANY GRANT DISASTER RECOVERY FILE PROGRAM ALONG WITH THE APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUESTS RELATED TO CLOSING.

>> GOOD EVENING. AS YOU STATED BEFORE YOU, YOU HAVE FIVE PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT FOR THE PROGRAM WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON. WE HAVE FIVE PROPERTIES THAT ARE BEING BROUGHT TO YOU WITH YOUR APPROVAL.

WE WILL BEGIN CLOSING ON TWO OF THEM THIS FRIDAY AND THEN WE HAVE THREE MORE PROPERTIES THAT WILL BE COMING TO YOU IN THE NEXT 4-6 WEEKS. WE ARE DOWN TO EIGHT PROPERTIES.

THESE FIVE IN FRONT OF YOU, WE HAVE 3.7 IN THE PROGRAM.

ONCE WE PURCHASE ANKLES ON THE PROPERTIES WE WILL WORK WITH THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT TO EVALUATE TO SEE IF HAVE THE PROCUREMENT.

QUESTIONS. >> DID ANY OF THEIR HOMES OR RESIDENTS REQUIRE RELOCATION. SO THIS WAS THE ONLY ONE.

WE WERE ONLY GOING TO DO THE PEOPLE RENTING AND WE DID NOT DO ANY OF THE RELOCATION. ONCE WE MOVE FROM WHERE YOU STARTED THE PROGRAM. IT WAS WHAT YOUR HOME VALUE WAS WORTH WHICH OBVIOUSLY, HOME VALUES HAVE CHANGED SINCE THEN.

QUITE A FEW PEOPLE WERE PUSHING AT THE STATE LEVEL TO CHANGE THAT UNLESS THEY WENT TO FAIR MARKET VALUE.

>> THE SECOND QUESTION IS. A VARIETY OF OPPORTUNITIES TO REPURPOSE THIS LAND. DO WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING

WITH THIS LAND? >> WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH PARKS AND READ. YOU CAN DO A KAYAK LAUNCH.

IF THE DOCS ARE GOOD, WE ARE HAVING THOSE DISCUSSIONS, BUT WE CHOSE NOT TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON THOSE.

JUST THEN, HE IS TAKING A LOOK AT THE PROPERTIES AND GETTING AN IDEA OF WHAT WE COULD DO. IS IT WORTH US DOING ANYTHING OR ONE WHERE WE HAVE SOME PROPERTIES WHERE WE MAINTAIN AND ARE NOT REALLY WORTH DOING ANYTHING WITH.

>> OKAY. >> MAY BE, CAN YOU PARK THINGS ON THEM IF YOU DON'T HAVE A PARKING LOT.

[01:15:02]

>> MAY BE, THINKING OF MAKING OFF-SITE PARKING FOR THE

MIDDLEBURG BOAT RAMP. >> WE HAD SOME OF THE RESIDENTS REACHING OUT WITH CONCERNS. AS WE MOVE FORWARD WE WILL DISCUSS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA.

BUT YES, YOU CANNOT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

DO WE HAVE A BUDGET. >> THEY PULLED SOME OF THAT MONEY BACK AND PROGRAMS AND CURRENTLY HAVE THIS.

WE ARE WORKING ON UPDATING THIS FOR THE CONTRACTORS TO ACCEPT WHETHER WHEN THEY DEMO THE HOMES IN THOSE FIVE THINGS.

SO WE MOVE FORWARD, THAT'S ON SPARE.

>> LIKE I SAID. EVEN AFTER THE AWARD, WE HAVE HAD SOME HOME SPARE WE HAVE HAD THREE THAT HAVE BACKED OUT.

>> JUST STAND BY WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.

I SEEN ON. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD.

>> DOES EACH HAVE TO HAVE A BOAT OR JUST ALL THREE OF THEM

TOGETHER? >> JUST MAKE SURE THE BOARD IS APPROVING ITEM C WE WANT THE COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

DOCUMENTS AT CLOSING. >> I WILL MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER ABC. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> YOU HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

[23.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Public Hearing regarding Annual Rate Resolution for Solid Waste Disposal Assessments for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Jolley)]

ITEM NUMBER 23. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ANNUAL RATE FOR ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.

>> YES, THIS IS YOUR ANNUAL RATE RESOLUTION.

THIS IS BOOK DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT WHICH YOU DISCUSSED EARLIER WHICH ARE DIRECTED TO KEEP THE ASSESSMENT RATE AT THE SAME AMOUNT. IT WAS $72.

>> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION? ANYTHING FOR COURTNEY? WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR? I C9 WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVE APPROVAL.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

THE ITEM PASSES 4-0. NEXT HOUR -- ARE THEY THE SAME?

[24.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Public Hearing regarding Annual Rate Resolution for Solid Waste and Recovered Materials Collection Services Assessments for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Jolley)]

ITEM 24 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ANNUAL RATE FOR RECOVERED MATERIALS COLLECTION SERVICES ASSESSMENT.

[01:20:02]

>> AND THE CONNECTION WITH THIS IS THE ANNUAL RATE.

AGAIN, THIS IS THE ANNUAL RATE ASSESSMENT FOR COLLECTION WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN THE DISPOSAL. PREVIOUSLY HAD A BOARD MEETING, THE SETTING UP THE RATE WAS DISCUSSED AND AS YOU RECALL THE MAXIMUM RATE OF ASSESSMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN SET IS $161 AND THE BOARD DIRECTION WAS TO REVISE THE RATES OF THE ANNUAL RATE BE SET AT $161 FOR THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR.

>> SO THERE'S NO CHANGING THAT. >> IT IS CURRENTLY AT 154.

AND IT WILL BE ASSESSED AT 151. ALL RIGHT, ANY QUESTIONS? WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK OF THE COLLECTION SERVICES ASSESSMENT? I C9.

WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL BRING IT BACK TO THE

BOARD AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> OUR MOVE APPROVAL PERCEPTION THE AMOUNT TO BE 161. 102ND.

WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

I AM OPPOSED SO IT PASSES 3-1. >> THE NEXT ITEM IS TO CONSIDER

[25.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Public Hearing to consider adoption of Final Assessment Resolution for the addition of subdivision properties to the Subdivision Roads Maintenance Municipal Service Benefit Unit and to impose non-ad valorem special assessments for the provision of subdivision roads maintenance services therein (C. Grimm/R. Smith)]

SO I CAN ACTUATE ITEM 25, JUST TO SET THE STAGE WHERE THREE ITEMS THAT ARE BROUGHT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IN CONNECTION WITH THE MAINTENANCE BENEFIT UNIT. THE TWO THAT ARE GOING TO BE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS OF THE ONE WE ARE CURRENTLY ON WHICH IS THE EDITION OF THE NEW SUBDIVISIONS THE NEXT LINE WILL BE FOR RESENDING RATES AND THE EXISTING AND WHEN WE MOVED BACK TO NEW BUSINESS WILL BE FOR THE EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS.

AND CONNECTION WITH ITEM 25 IT IS A FINAL ASSESSMENT TO IMPOSE ASSESSMENTS ON THREE NEW SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY SINCE MAY AND SO VILLAGE PARK UNIT 1C THOSE RATES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED THROUGH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND IN THE FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION.

>> A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

[26.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Public Hearing to consider adoption of Annual Assessment Rate Resolution resetting rates of assessment for certain subdivision properties previously included within the Subdivision Roads Maintenance MSBU for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/R. Smith)]

ITEM 26. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ANNUAL RESETTING RATE OF THE ASSESSMENT AND PROBERT PRETTIES PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE ROADS MAINTENANCE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ITEM, AS I INDICAED THESE ARE EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS WHERE WE ARE REQUESTING THE RATES BE RESET AND IMPOSE THE FIVE SUBDIVISIONS WERE BROUGHT BEFORE YOU AT YOUR JUNE 28 BOARD MEETING AND NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE PURPOSE IS TO RESET THE RATES AND CONNECTION WITH CALCULATIONS THAT WERE PERFORMED WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO FULLY FUND THE NEEDS FOR THE RESURFACING AND MAINTENANCE.

THESE PARTICULAR ONES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SET WHICH IS WHY IT IS BEFORE YOU AND WE PROVIDED NOTICE. THE RATES FOR THE SUBDIVISIONS, THE NEW RATES AND THE MAXIMUM ART LAID OUT IN THE RESOLUTION

THAT IS ATTACHED. >> ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT?

>> THIS IS BECAUSE WHY IT WILL BE OVER THE MAX?

>> THE OTHER ONE WAS NOT OVER THE MAXIMA THIS ONE WILL BE?

[01:25:01]

WHEN WE COME TO THE 100 NEW BUSINESS THEY WILL BE SET AT A

RATE UNDER THE MAX. >> OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEM

NUMBER 26 -- >> FRONT OF YOU GUYS BACK I'M SORRY THIS IS MY FIRST TIME.

>> MY NAME IS DANNY. I'M ACTUALLY A RESIDENT SO WE DID RECEIVE THIS LETTER AND I WANTED TO GET MORE INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT THIS WAS AND WHAT IT ENTAILS AS WE ARE A BRAND-NEW SUBDIVISION. AND WE JUST MOVED IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR AGO. AND I SEE, ROADS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED YET. WE JUST WANTED TO FIND OUT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. THAT IS THE QUESTION I HAVE.

IF YOU GUYS DON'T MIND. >> DO YOU NEED A CARD FILLED OUT FOR HIM. BEFORE YOU LEAVE, CAN YOU FILL OUT A CARD. RICHARD, DO YOU WANT TO EXPLAIN THAT A LITTLE MORE FOR THE PUBLIC?

>> RICHARD SMITH. THE MSB USE STANDS FOR BASICALLY IT SETS ASIDE ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION THAT SUPPORTS NEW HOMES IN THE COUNTIES SINCE THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

AND WHAT IT DOES, THE ROADS WERE BUILT BY THE DEVELOPERS.

A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IS MADE ON EACH ONE AS THEY MOVE IN.

UNTIL THE HOMES ARE BUILT OUT, WE WILL NOT ALLOW THE FINAL TOPIC TO BE PUT ON THE ROAD. BUT THIS BEGINS THE COLLECTION TO MAINTAIN THE ROADS FOR POTHOLED AND PROVIDES FOR RESURFACING IN 20 YEARS. FROM A FAIRNESS STANDPOINT, ANYONE WOULD BE PAYING THEIR TAX BILL A ROADS SERVICING PROJECT

IN 2022. >> BEFORE THE SUBDIVISION IS FINISHED THEIR ROADS WILL BE TOP.

>> WHEN 90% OF THEIR HOMES ARE BUILT THAT WILL ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR, DEVELOPER TO COMPLETE THE ROAD.

IF THEY FAIL TO DO THAT WE HAVE BONDS IN PLACE AND WE WILL DO THAT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE BONDS.

>> WE ARE MAKING SURE THE DEVELOPER FINISHES THE ROAD WHICH END THE PAST HAS NOT BEEN THE CASE AND WE'RE PLANNING FOR

THE FUTURE. >> CORRECT.

THESE ARE NOT ROADS THAT ARE SHORTCUTS.

THESE ARE THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE TO RESURFACE THEIR OWN ROADS IN

20 YEARS. >> THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE WANTING TO SPEAK ON PUBLIC HEARING? ALL RIGHT, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

HOPEFULLY THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION.

AND THERE'S A CARD IN THE FESTIVAL YOU CAN FILL OUT.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> CAN I HAVE RICHARD COME BACK AND GIVE US AN IDEA -- SOME OF THE FEES WENT UP QUITE A BIT.

IS IT A REFLECTION OF WHAT WE ARE IN NOW HOW FAR WE OFF.

>> I SAY IT IS A REFLECTION OF THE COMMODITIES.

THE ASPHALT IS INDIRECT RETALIATION TO THE PRICE OF OIL.

WE ARE ALL. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN, THAT IS HOW THE CURRENT PRICES WERE ACHIEVED.

>> COMMISSIONER, SOME OF THE CALCULATIONS USED ORIGINALLY WERE PROBABLY NOT DONE THE WAY WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THEM.

SO WE WENT BACK AND LOOKED FROM A BUDGET PERSPECTIVE.

WHERE WE WOULD COLLECT ENOUGH MONEY TO HAVE ENOUGH MONEY WE

[01:30:01]

ON THE ONE SURE TALKING ABOUT YOU WOULD DO RESURFACING BUT NOT MAINTENANCE AS NEEDED. I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR

QUESTION. >> THE DIFFERENCE BEING THE PREVIOUS SET THAT WE VOTED ON WAS SO MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE.

THERE ALSO HAS TO BE A FACTOR OF HOW MANY HOMES.

>> THE HOMES AND THE LENGTH OF THE ROAD.

SOME OF YOUR SUBDIVISIONS HAVE MORE INFRASTRUCTURE.

SO RICHARD'S TEAM TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE CONSTRUCTION COST AND IT IS A PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST.

IF YOU HAVE A ROAD THAT HAS A REALLY LONG ENTRANCE ROAD, THAT ONE DOESN'T HAVE THE SAME FEES AND STRUCTURE BUT YOU HAVE THIS LONG ENTRANCE ROAD THE SUBDIVISION HAS TO PAY TO MAINTAIN IT WITH NO HOUSES ON IT.

THOSE ARE FACTORS THAT COME INTO PLAY.

>> ZERO FIVE THAT ARE BEFORE YOU WERE BROUGHT IN.

>> I AM AWARE OF THAT. BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WE ARE MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE OF THE ONES WE JUST APPROVED.

WE ARE AT $177 PER UNIT AND THAT IS SIMILAR TO WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE LAST YEAR END NOW WE HAVE JUMPED IT UP.

>> I WOULD FIGURE, WE USED A NEW CALCULATION.

I THINK STAFF IS CONFIDENT THAT THE NUMBERS WE CALCULATED ARE MORE ACCURATE. AND MORE FULL DISCLOSURE.

WE HAD A HIGH INTEREST RATE ON THE FIRST ONES.

THERE IS NO WAY YOU CAN ACHIEVE THAT INTEREST RATE IN THE MARKET EVER THAT WAS CALCULATED. I THINK STAFF IS CONFIDENT WITH THE MODEL WE DEVELOP THE NUMBER WE GAVE YOU IS ACCURATE.

>> SO IF I AM ONE OF THESE RESIDENTS OR HOMEOWNERS, I THINK MY QUESTION WOULD BE, SHOULD I EXPECT ANOTHER LARGE JUMP IN MY ASSESSMENT IN FUTURE YEARS. IS THAT MORE OF WHAT YOU WANT TO

KNOW. >> WILL WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT, WE WOULD DO IT EVERY FIVE YEARS, TO MAKE SURE IF SOMETHING -- IF WE GO THROUGH ANOTHER MAJOR SPIKE AND WE CAN'T AFFORD ASPHALT, IT WON'T BE RIGHT. BUT WE ARE CONFIDENT BASED ON THE INFLATION WE PUT IN AND THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS PUT IN, THAT THE MODEL WILL HOLD AND AT FIVE YEARS WE WILL LOOK AT IT TO SEE WHERE WE ARE AT. MAYBE AN ADJUSTMENT HAS TO BE MADE BUT THIS WILL NOT BE HAD EVERY YEAR ADJUSTMENT THING.

>> HOPEFULLY THAT QUELLS SOME OF YOUR FEARS WE WON'T REEVALUATE THIS FOR FIVE YEARS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I REMOVE APPROVAL. >> WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE

A SECOND? >> I WILL SECOND.

WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND PAIR.

>> MADAM CHAIR IF I COULD. THIS IS MY BIGGEST CONCERN THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT NUMBERS. I DON'T WANT PEOPLE INVADING THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS THINK THAT BIG INCREASE TO LOOK BACK.

WE KNOW THE PRICE NEVER GOES BACKWARDS.

OBVIOUSLY WE WANT TO KNOW THAT IN THE FUTURE WHEN WE LOOK AT THE THAT THEY HAVE THEIR OWN MONEY.

AT THE SAME TIME THERE IS A GOOD JUMP AND THAT CONCERNS ME AND I'M WONDERING WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S A WAY FOR US, IF WE ARE GOING INTO A FIVE-YEAR MODE, TO GET THERE SOME OTHER WAY, AND

[01:35:02]

BUT THE WAY TROY EXPLAINED IT WE MAY BE CAN'T GO HALFWAY AND THE

REST OF THE WAY NEXT YEAR. >> COMMISSIONER.

>> I WILL JUST LIKE TO CAUTION. WE HAVE A MODEL OF FIVE YEARS TO SEE HOW IT IS DOING. FIVE YEARS AGO WE WOULD HAVE NEVER PREDICTED WHERE WE ARE TODAY.

I WOULD GUESS, IF WE SEE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS SUCH THAT WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THREE YEARS, WERE DOING A DISSERVICE IF WE CONTINUE TO COLLECT A SUM OF MONEY THAT WILL NOT MEET THE NEEDS. THE MODEL IS FIVE YEARS WE ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY.

THAT INCLUDES THIS RESOURCE AS WELL.

>> BUT NO MATTER WHAT WE WON'T KNOW WHERE WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE

BUT WE HAVE TO GO SOMEWHERE. >> WE DON'T KNOW.

I KNOW COMMISSIONER'S PRICES DON'T GO BACKWARDS BUT SOMETIMES THEY DO. SUPPLY AND DEMAND SPIRIT OIL PRICES CHANGE KIND OF LIKE THE ESCROW ON YOUR HOME AND THEREFORE WE NEED TO SCALE BACK. IS THERE A PROCESS FOR THAT.

>> THAT WILL COME INTO PLAY ON THE MAINTENANCE NOT SO MUCH SURFACING. IF THE ROADS WE HAVE THIS HUGE SURPLUS AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. ALL OF A SUDDEN IF THE WEAR AND TEAR AND THE END OF WITH POTHOLES EVERYWHERE WE WOULD

HAVE TO REEVALUATE. >> HAVE A MOTION.

[27.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Final Public Hearing to consider LDC-2022-12. (D. Selig)]

LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 2022 -- 12 THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS CONTINUED THIS ITEM, DO WE STILL HAVE TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING? THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS ADVERTISED.

THE SOMEONE WANT TO TELL US WHAT THIS ITEM IS.

>> THIS ITEM IS A TEXT AMENDMENT IT APPLIED IN THE LAKE ASBURY AREA. IT WAS CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SO THEY COULD HEAR MORE ABOUT IT.

I'M NOT SURE HOW MUCH IT ISN'T REALLY COMING TO YOU PER SE BUT

IT HAS TO DO WITH. >> THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION SUDDENLY AT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE THEY PROVIDED A RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE FROM STAFF SO WE WILL SEE WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WANTS TO DO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE I OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING BACK IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE RV BOAT STORAGE ITEM THAT HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL THE SEPTEMBER 6 MEETING. SEE NONE WE WILL CLOSE THE

[28.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard. Second Public Hearing to consider LDC 2022-13 Planning Commission voted 6-0 to Recommend Approval (M.Brown)]

APPROVAL. >> MADAM CHAIRMAN AND

[01:40:05]

GO OVER THE BACKGROUND. ALL OF THE PROPERTIES THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED IS WEST OF BRANDON FIELD ROAD.

THE SUBURBS WERE PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED AS RESIDENTIAL PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF THE MASTER PLAN. AT THAT TIME MANUFACTURING UNITS WERE ALLOWED IN THE ZONING DISTRICTS.

THERE IS A MIX OF THOSE USES IN THESE AREAS RIGHT NOW.

THERE IS JUST OVER 1,000 ACRES PRESENTLY DESIGNATED.

THE SUBURBS ARE NOT WITHIN AN THAT IS WHERE THIS PROPOSED CHANGE WOULD BE MOST LIKELY. OF THOSE THOUSAND ACRES 157 ARE PRESENTLY VACANT. THE RURAL SUBURBS CATEGORY WAS INTENDED TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WITH LARGER LOTS BEING 5 ACRES LARGER IN SIZE.

BY DEFINITION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THE HOUSING IS NOT ALLOWED IN THOSE AREAS. AND AS YOU RECOGNIZE THE PRICE OF HOUSING, THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE SOME RELIEF AND ALLOWING THOSE AREAS TO ALLOW MANUFACTURING UNITS TO BE UTILIZED SPIRIT AS I POINTED OUT PREVIOUSLY THE IDEA TO EXEMPT WAS TO REMOVE THE CONFLICT THAT MAY EXIST FROM LOTS AND CONVENTIONALLY BUILT SUBDIVISIONS.

WE HAVE BEEN RECEIVING AND YOU HAVE PROBABLY GOTTEN A NUMBER OF CALLS, WE HAVE RECEIVED A LOT OF REQUESTS FOR THIS TYPE OF CHANGE. HERE IS THE WORDING SPECIFICALLY FOR THE CHANGE IN THE COLD IN RENT, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DIDN'T VOTE 6-0 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

>> ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF BEFORE YOU OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING?

>> I HAVE ONE CARD ON THIS. MRS. FIELDS.

>> AWAY I DID NOT OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> MY NAME IS JESSICA I WANTED TO THANK YOU.

WE ACTUALLY PURCHASED LAND THAT HAPPENS TO FALL IN THE MASTER PLAN. WE PURCHASED THIS LAND WITH INTENTIONS TO PUT A MANUFACTURED HOME ON IT INKING THIS WAS AN AFFORDABLE OPTION FOR OUR FAMILY.

GIVEN THE HOUSE MARKET AND THE INCREASES YOU TALKED ABOUT IT HAS OBVIOUSLY AFFECTED THE HOUSE MARKET.

SO THIS SEEMED LIKE THE ONLY OPTION WE HAD AVAILABLE SO IT WAS DEVASTATING WHEN WE FOUND OUT WE COULD NOT PROCEED WITH OUR PLANS NOW WE HAVE LAND THAT WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING WITH.

ALLOWING MANUFACTURED HOMES INTO THE SUBURBS WILL GREATLY HELP FAMILIES AND OTHER FAMILIES AS WELL.

WE HAVE OF 11 CHILDREN. SQUARE FOOTAGE IS IMPORTANT.

A MANUFACTURED HOME PROVIDES US WITH MORE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR OUR FAMILY. THE PROPERTY IS IN RURAL PARTS.

IT'S ON A PRIVATE MAINTAINED DIRT ROAD.

THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS AMENDMENT.

>> IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING THIS I WILL CLOSE THE

[01:45:03]

PUBLIC HEARING. >> I'M WILLING TO ENTERTAIN A

MOTION. >> I WANT TO MAKE THE MOTION TO

APPROVE BIG. >> WE HAVE A SECOND QUICKSAND WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND, DISCUSSION.

>> THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE, WE ARE DOING IT FOR THE MASTER PLAN ARE THERE OTHER AREAS WE SHOULD LOOK AT TO DO THE SAME THING

INSTEAD OF ONE AREA. >> LAKE ASBURY HAS SOME OF THE SAME ISSUES. IT'S A LITTLE MORE COMPLICATED BUT WE ARE WORKING ON IT. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THIS IS A CONTINUUM OF HOUSING OR AVAILABILITY FROM FROM APARTMENTS TO RIVERFRONT PROPERTY. THIS DOESN'T EVEN COME CLOSE.

WE NEED TO LOOK FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO MEET THIS OLD -- CONTINUUM. I GREW UP IN A FAMILY OF TEN PEOPLE. I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. WE NEED TO BE COGNIZANT.

THIS IS ONE SEGMENT OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING EQUATION.

IT DOESN'T ME ALL OF THE NEEDS. >> I WAS GOING TO SAY.

LOTS OF CONVERSATIONS BUT THIS ISN'T MY DISTRICT.

WE ALL KNOW FACEBOOK LISTEN TO US.

ON MY FACEBOOK I WAS SCROLLING THROUGH AND I SAID TO MY HUSBAND HERE'S AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR A MODULAR HOME.

HE DID NOT LOSE THE LAND OR THE CEMENT PAD.

IT WAS A FIVE BEDROOM, YOUR FAMILY MAY BE ABLE TO SQUEEZE IN THERE. IT WAS $334,000.

IT DID NOT INCLUDE ANY OF THE OTHER STUFF THAT GOES WITH IT.

OBVIOUSLY THE FOUNDATION. AND YOU KNOW THAT IS MORE THAN WE PAID FOR OUR HOME. WE KNOW FOR FAMILIES, I AGREE WE HAVE TO DO IN WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE SOLUTION.

AND THEY ARE WORKING HARD ON IT. WITH NO OTHER DISCUSSIONS WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY AYE.

BYNUM CARRIES 4-0. I'M SORRY I WAS LATE.

[29.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard. Final Public Hearing to consider Z 2022-18. Rezoning from IS to IB. (District 4, Comm. Condon) Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval. (M.Brown)]

HANG ON, LET ME CLOSE THIS. WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM 29.

THIS IS A FINAL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING FROM I ASKED TO IB FROM INDUSTRIAL SELECT TO INDUSTRIAL HEAVY PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION

VOTED 6-0. >> THIS APPLICATION THE ZONING REQUEST TO CHANGE 94 ACRES FROM INDUSTRIAL SELECT TO INDUSTRIAL HEAVY. THE PARCEL IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST. THE MIDDLEBURG PLANNING DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR. THE PLANNING COMMISSION, YOU HEARD THIS ON AUGUST 2. JUST A LITTLE BACKGROUND.

THE REQUEST CONTAINS THREE PARCELS WHICH ARE PRESENTLY VACANT. AS I INDICATED LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 218 AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 301.

THE FUTURE LAND USES INDUSTRIAL SO THEY HAVE EARMARKED THAT AREA. THE REQUESTED ZONING IS ALLOWED IN THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE. THE PURPOSE OF THE REZONING IS TO FACILITATE A MANUFACTURING FACILITY ON THE LOCATION.

[01:50:07]

THIS IS LOCATED THE PARCEL AS I INDICATED THE PROPOSED ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE.

AND THEY BELIEVE THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USE. PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED 6-0 ON AUGUST 22 RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF TH% PROPOSED APPLICATION. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS

POINT. >> I GUESS WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. MR. MILLER, THE APPLICANT, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO ADD BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN ANY

PUBLIC COMMENT. >> I THINK MIKE DID AND

EXCELLENT JOB. >> IS ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ZONING AND LAND USE CHANGE? LAND USE IS NEXT. ANYONE SPECIFIC? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK FOR A MOTION.

>> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> DISCUSSION. >> HAVE A QUESTION FOR FRANK.

IS THE ZONING CHANGE CRITICAL TO THE INDUSTRIAL USE INTENDED?

>> YES. IF NOT APPROVED --

>> HE WILL KILL THE DEAL. >> MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS IS NOT VISIBLE FROM COUNTY ROAD 18 BUT FROM COUNTY ROAD 301.

>> IT COULD BE VISIBLE FROM 301. BUT IT IS WAY BEHIND THE

SAWMILL. >> SECOND QUESTION.

>> IT WILL TAKE PLACE INSIDE, IS THAT CORRECT?

>> OTHER QUESTIONS? >> ONE OF THE REASONS WE NEEDED TO GO TO INDUSTRIAL RATHER THAN INDUSTRIAL SELECT BECAUSE THEY

HAVE OUTSIDE STORAGE. >> BUT THEY NEED GAS.

>> YOU DON'T HAVE INTERNET CONDUCTIVITY IN THAT AREA.

>> I MEAN YOU CAN GET SATELLITE I AM SURE.

>> >> COMCAST, THEY HAVEN'T COME OFF OF IT, BUT WHEN BROADBENT SEPARATED THEORIES COMCAST AND AT&T IS PUTTING FIVE OR OUT. OUT SOME RESIDENTS WHO HAVE BEEN RECENTLY BEEN ABLE TO CONNECT THROUGH AT&T.

THE MAIN ROAD IS AT&T DOESN'T GO OFF WHICH IS WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE, TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM YOUR SPIRIT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? WE HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THE MOTION CARRIES 4-0.

>> WE ARE TOTALLY SEPARATE. SORRY ABOUT THAT.

[30.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Final Public Hearing to consider Adoption of CPA-2022-07. (District 1, Comm. Cella) Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval. (D. Selig)]

[31.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Final Public Hearing to consider PUD-2022-07. (District 1, Comm. Cella) Planning Commission voted 4-2 to recommend approval with a condition. (D. Selig)]

>> ITEM NUMBER 30. THERE'S A LOT OF TALKING.

ITEM NUMBER 30. FINAL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION CPA COMMISSIONER CELLA DISTRICT.

PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED 6-02 RECOMMEND APPROVAL THIS IS A

[01:55:03]

A SINGLE PARCEL TO URBAN. >> WE DO HAVE A FUTURE LAND USE

ZONING FOLLOWING. >> AND THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED FOR BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 27. HE IS HERE AND CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS. BUT THAT WAS THE REQUEST IF YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO LET HIM WE DO WE STILL NEED TO HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF ANYONE HAS ANY THING AND THEY WANT TO SPEAK ON ITEMS 30 OR 31 WHICH IS THE FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING CHANCE BASICALLY FROM BUSINESS OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS

ITEM? >> I AM ONLY GOING TO EXPLAIN AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING THAT THEY HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT SOME HEIGHT LOCATIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

THE DEVELOPER HAS GONE BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD TO REVISE THAT AND IT JUST DIDN'T GET DONE IN TIME.

TANGIBLE GO BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION OR IT WILL COME TO US QUICKSAND YOU WILL COME TO YOU. IT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SO WE WILL SHOW YOU HOW IT IS DIFFERENT.

>> ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

>> IT COULD CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY.

WHY WOULD NICKEL BACK TO THE PLANNING DIVISION.

>> THERE IS AN ADVISORY BOARD TO YOU.

THEY MADE THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. >> THEY MADE 0 RECOMMENDATIONS.

AS LONG AS YOU ARE MEETING THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS.

THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IT BACK TO THEMSELVES.

THEY RECOMMENDED A 35-FOOT HEIGHT.

>> >> NOW WE ARE WILLING TO AGREE

TO 35-FOOT HEIGHT. >> THEY AGREED TO APPROVE THE FUTURE LAND USE BUT SINCE I WAS COMBINING THEM INAPPROPRIATELY THAT ZONING WAS ONLY APPROVED FOR-2 WITH THE CONDITION OF THE HEIGHT. IT WAS THE HEIGHT LIMIT OF

35 FEET THAT WAS ADDED. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING

AND GO BACK TO THE BOARD. >> I WANT TO CONTINUE THIS UNTIL

SEPTEMBER 27. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

NONE OPPOSE. IT PASSES 4-0.

[32.  5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - First Public Hearing to consider transmittal of CPA-2022-08 to change approximately 1263 acres from Commercial and Agriculture to Mixed Use and Urban Fringe (PC voted 6-0 to recommend approval of transmittal) (E. Lehman)/B, Carson)]

>> ITEM NUMBER TWO TO CONSIDER TRANSMITTAL OF CPA 2022 -- ZERO EIGHT TO CHANGE APPROXIMATELY 1263 ACRES FROM COMMERCIAL AND AGRICULTURE TO MIXED-USE AND URBAN USE.

PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED 6-2. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO CHANGE 1,263 ACRES SOUTH OF STATE ROAD 16 FROM COMMERCIAL AND AGRICULTURAL TO MIXED-USE.

BUT PUBLIC HEARING IS TO CONSIDER TRANSMITTAL BETTER PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE STATE AND REVIEWING AGENCIES.

>> THANK YOU MADAME CHAIRMAN. THIS IS A LARGE-SCALE LAND-USE AMENDMENT FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE FOR THE DRA TO BE -- DRI DEVELOPMENT FOR STATE COORDINATOR REVIEW WHICH IS A MORE INTENSE REVIEW IT IS 60 DAYS.

THE AGENCY PROVIDE THEIR COMMENTS ON THE STATE WILL PROVIDE TO YOU. THIS IS IN THE PLANNING DISTRICT WHICH IS DISTRICT FIVE. THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

THE AGENT IS AN HE COULD NOT BE WITH US TONIGHT SO HE IS HERE

[02:00:09]

THIS IS A SITE MAP AND THE LOCATION SPRINGBANK ROAD IS TO THE WEST. IF THAT GIVES YOU SOME BEARING SPIRIT THE AREA IS 1264 ACRES SPIRIT IN THE UPPER LEFT CORNER THERE IS A SMALL PIECE OF COMMERCIAL AND IT'S HARD TO SEE ON THIS MAP. LAND USE WOULD BE TO CONSERVATION. THESE ARE THE ON THE RIGHT IS THE RURAL FRENCH EVEN THOUGH IT SAYS IT RIGHT HERE THAT IS AN ERA. AND THE PINK IS THE MIXED-USE SO THEY ARE EXPANDING TO A LARGER AREA.

THIS REQUIRES THAT THE EFFECT THIS IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA. REGARDING TRAFFIC THIS IS THE BYPASS COUNTY ROAD 15. GOING THROUGH IT.

THIS IS 1 MILE EAST OF STATE ROAD 16 SCHOOLS THIS DEFICIENT.

THEY ARE CURRENTLY WORKING ON IMPACT FEES FOR THE COUNTY TO ADDRESS OTHER SERVICES THAT THE COUNTY PROVIDES.

SO IN ADDITION TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT THERE'S ALSO A POLICY AMENDMENT THIS WOULD BE PROPOSALS POLICY ONE-POINT 10.7. THE PROPOSED POLICY WOULD CALCULATE THIS TO 3,000'S FINGER FAMILY AND THIS WOULD BE A MIXED-USE LAND-USE WHICH ALWAYS REQUIRE A PUD.

THAT WOULD BE COMING BACK WITH THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT.

BOTH ITEMS WOULD BE COMING BACK FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

BECAUSE THE REMAINING PORTION IS STRAIGHT ZONING POLICY SHOULD REALLY REQUIRE. THE PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN THIS KNOWN AS THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE ITEMS THAT WERE DESCRIBED IN THE POLICY.

BUT 300,000 RESIDENTIAL AND 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL FOR THE PUD PROCESS WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE. AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSED LAND USE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD.

THEY WOULD COME TOGETHER. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF TRANSMITTAL OF THIS NEW POLICY. AND AGAIN, HE IS HERE IF YOU

HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR BETH?

>> YES, I DO. >> GO OVER TO YOUR SIDE THAT SHOWS THE TRANSPORTATION COMPONENT.

WE TALK ABOUT THE INTERCHANGE, WHAT ABOUT 16 AND 315.

WE SAID ABOUT 4,000 HOMES AND 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE. WHERE DOES THE TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION COME EVALUATION COME IN.

>> ONE OF THE AGENCIES REVIEWING THIS IS FDO T.

[02:05:02]

SO THEY WOULD LIKELY COMMENT ON THE CAPACITY IN RELATION TO THIS

PROJECT. >> 315 IS THE COUNTY SO IT WOULD FALL ON THE COUNTY TO EXPAND A ROAD THAT IS A TWO LANE ROAD.

>> YES, IT WOULD NEED TO CONSIDER THE IMPACT OF 215.

>> WITH NO FUNDING COMING FOR THAT I AM SURE.

>> OTHER QUESTIONS FOR BETH? >> NOT FOR BETH.

>> OKAY, SO WE HAVE THE AGENT TO DO A SHORT PRESENTATION.

> YES, MA'AM. I LIVE IN JACKSONVILLE.

I'M REPRESENTING THE PARK GROUP WHO IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPER OF THIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPER OF GOVERNORS PARK TO THE SOUTH. SHE IS ALSO HERE WITH ME.

I AM SUBSTITUTING FOR RAY WHO IS THE AGENT AND OUR PLANNER.

I WILL TRY TO MAKE MY PRESENTATION BRIEF.

HOPEFULLY THE LAWYER CAN MAKE IT BRIEF AND THE PLANNER MAY BE.

THAT IS RARE. >> I DO WANT TO GET TO COMMISSIONER RELIGIOUS QUESTION WHICH I WILL GET TO IN A FEW MOMENTS ABOUT THIS SPIRIT, DOES THIS ADVANCE THE SLIDES, I TAKE IT. I WILL RUN THROUGH THIS.

THERE WE GO. I WILL RUN THROUGH SOME THINGS HERE. THIS IS A TRANSMITTAL OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. THIS IS THE VOTE TO THE STATE AGENCIES. FOR US IT IS THE START OF THE PROCESS. WHEN IT IS RETURNED WITH THEIR COMMENTS SUCH AS MDOT, IT WILL COME BACK TO YOU FOR A PHONE AND YOUR STAFF FOR REVIEW. AT THAT TIME, WE WILL SHOW YOU A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FULL SITE PLAN AND EVERYTHING THAT GOES WITH A PUD WILL GO THROUGH THIS REVIEW.

THIS IS REALLY JUST THE START OF THE PROCESS, THIS TRANSMITTAL BOAT. I TOO WANT TO POINT OUT A COUPLE OF THINGS. ONE THING, AS SHE MENTIONED THE LIMITATIONS ON BUT UNITS. ANOTHER ONE WE DID AT PLANNING COMMISSION, WAS TO CONFIRM, AS A PART OF THIS AGRICULTURAL USE WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY, THAT IS REQUIRED BY OUR SOLAR. I DID WANT TO MENTION THAT AND MAKE SURE THAT IS PART OF THIS AS WELL.

IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA, YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS. THERE IS SERVICE AND A POLICY STATEMENT THAT IT IS IN AN AREA, AT LEAST IN TERMS OF SERVICES, READY FOR DEVELOPMENT. AS I MENTIONED THIS IS THE TRANSMITTAL PHASE YOU KNOW WHERE IT IS LOCATED.

I WILL GO THROUGH SOME OF THIS QUICKLY.

THIS IS CURRENT USES AND THIS IS THE AERIAL.

THIS IS CONSERVATION. THIS IS THE WETLANDS.

BEFORE BAY WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY.

WE ARE SEEKING AN AMENDMENT TO URBAN FRINGE MIXED-USE AND CONSERVATION, SO BOOK LARGE WETLANDS PARTS OF THIS WILL BE PUT IN CONSERVATION. THAT IS AN ADDED PROTECTION FOR THEM THAT THIS WILL PROVIDE. HERE IS THE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE. YOU CAN SEE THE URBAN FRENCH, AND OF COURSE THE MIXED-USE IS SHOWN UP AT THE TOP.

I DO WANT TO POINT OUT. YOU SEE THE BIG LINE RUNNING THROUGH THE PROPERTY. THAT IS THE GREEN COVE SPRINGS BYPASS PART OF THE GOVERNORS PARK WHICH IS TO THE SOUTH OF US. THE NORTH LINKUP THAT BYPASS IS A REQUIRED PART OF THE DRI. THAT IS OWNED BY AN ENTITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE PARK GROUP, NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT BEING BUILT THAT IS A COMMITMENT AND THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY IS ALREADY OWNED BY THE PARK GROUP. ONE THINK ABOUT THIS COMP PLAN

[02:10:07]

IT WILL HAPPEN SOONER BECAUSE THE MONEY GENERATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA HERE. ONE THING, THIS DOES ACCELERATE THE BYPASS CONSTRUCTION. I HAVE ALREADY SAID, THE GOVERNOR'S PART IS TO THE SOUTH OF THE DEVELOPER.

IF YOU KNOW THEM AND THEIR REPUTATION.

JUST SOME WETLAND INFORMATION AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING.

MIXED-USE AS YOU KNOW HAVE THIS IS AT THE INTERSECTION.

WE HAVE TO MEET CERTAIN TESTS SET FORTH IN YOUR COVE AND WE HAVE MET AND EXCEEDED THOSE AS IT DEMONSTRATES IN HERE.

I JUST WANTED TO GO TO THE FINAL BULLETS.

THIS IS THE LAST SLIDE. THIS IS REPRESENTED.

WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA IT IS A LOGICAL EXTENSION GIVING GOVERNORS PARK TO THE SOUTH. THE CONSERVATION HELPS TO PRESERVE THE WETLANDS WE PASSED THE MIXED-USE TEST.

AS PART OF THIS TRANSMITTAL ANALYSIS THAT WE DID, WE DID PROVIDE A STUDY AND THE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WILL HAVE AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE EXCEPT BASE ROAD SEGMENT THAT IS PROJECTED TO OPERATE BELOW THAT LEVEL SURFACE WHETHER THIS MOVES FORWARD OR NOT SO WE ARE NOT CAUSING THAT.

OF COURSE, YOU HAVE A MOBILITY PIECE SYSTEM IN PLACE AND THAT WOULD PROVIDE FUNDING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA.

YOU NOW HAVE A SYSTEM SET UP FOR TRANSPORTATION, IMPACT SWITCHES YOUR MOBILITY PIECE SYSTEM. WHO HAVE ONE FOR SCHOOL IMPACTS AS WELL. AND THEN AS YOU HEARD MS. CARSON.OUT YOU ARE HAVING A STUDY DONE FOR IMPACTS ON OTHER SERVICES SUCH AS FIRE AND EMERGENCY WHICH IS A GOOD IDEA.

THE SUBJECT TO ALL THAT. I ALSO ONCE MENTIONED, THE ARE NOT SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE UTILITY SERVICES UNTIL EARLY 2025.

NO NEW UNITS WILL COME ONLINE HERE WITHIN THIS AMENDMENT AREA UNTIL 2025 AT THE EARLIEST. THIS IS A LONG PROJECT.

THIS IS A PROJECT SO OUR TIMELINE IS NOT IMMEDIATE.

I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT. WITH THAT, CHRIS AND I ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR ATTENTION

HERE TODAY. >> IF IT IS NOT IMMEDIATE, WHY DO WE NEED TO CHANGE IT RIGHT NOW.

>> PART OF OUR ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE SELLER, WE ARE ALSO THE SELLERS AT GOVERNOR PARK FOR A PURCHASE UP THIS PROPERTY SCHEDULE ON THE PLANNED SCHEDULE, AND IT IS PART OF BOTH OBLIGATIONS AND WE WANT TO START PREPARING.

IT TAKES A LONG TIME, ALONG LEAD UP FOR DEVELOPMENT TO BE IN PLACE AND THOSE UNITS TO BE IN PLACE OR THE PLANNING AND DESIGNING AND ENGINEERING TO BE IN PLACE WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. WE REALLY NEED TO START NOW IN ORDER TO BE READY FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.

ALL OF THIS IS HAPPENING IN CONJUNCTION WITH ONGOING WORK AT GOVERNORS PARK SUCH AS THE DESIGN OF THE INTERCHANGE AND THE OTHER ROAD LINKS. IT MAKES SENSE TO THE SELLER TO

[02:15:05]

TO START THE TRANSMITTAL AND GET THINGS GOING WELL IN ADVANCE.

IT WORKS FOR THE SELLER, IT WORKS FOR US.

>> I AM CHRIS. I LIVE IN JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT.

TO ADD WHAT HE EXPLAINED, WE CURRENTLY OWN THE AREA SOUTH OF THIS. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS TO GET ZONING IN PLACE AND TO PROVIDE DEVELOPED IN A COHESIVE FASHION OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.

THE GOVERNOR'S PART TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENTS RUN RIGHT THROUGH THIS LAND. AND WE ARE CURRENTLY WORKING WITH CLAY COUNTY UTILITY AUTHORITY.

YOU ARE PROBABLY AWARE OF THEIR PLANS FOR MAJOR IMPROVEMENT TO THE WATER WASTE TREATMENT NORTH OF 16 IN THE AREA.

THEIR PLAN IS TO CONNECT A PLANT SITE THAT WE HAVE DONATED TO THEM. IT IS GOING TO THIS FACILITY WHICH REQUIRES PIPELINE ALL OF THE WAY FROM GOVERNORS PARK SOUTH OF THE EXPRESSWAY THROUGH THIS THIS LAND.

WE ARE WORKING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT WELL IN ADVANCE TO WHEN WE CAN BUILD A ROAD. THIS MEETS THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE COUNTY. THE CERTAINTY OF GETTING THIS DONE AND KNOWING WHAT WILL BE THERE OVER TIME HELPS US GET THE IMPROVEMENTS AND HELP THE UTILITY AUTHORITY MAKE THIS HAPPEN WHICH BENEFITS THE ENTIRE COUNTY.

I WANTED TO COMMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION.

THE GREEN COVE SPRINGS BYPASS IS A TRANSPORTATION CONCEPT THAT HAS BEEN ON THE DRAWING BOARD. IT HAS BEEN IMPORTANT TO THE COUNTY FOR A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME.

ULTIMATELY THIS ROAD WILL GO OVER MULTIPLE LAND OWNERSHIP SPIRIT BUT BASICALLY IT PROVIDES A CONNECTION FROM 17, NORTH OF GREEN COVE SPRINGS, TO THE WEST ACROSS 16.

WITHIN GOVERNORS PARK JUST TO THE EAST.

AND THAT ROAD IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE OF WHAT WE KNOW WHICH IS THE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ISSUES.

I AM BRINGING THIS TO REALITY AND BUILDING BAD ROAD YOU TAKE THE TRAFFIC AROUND THE CITY AND OPEN CAPACITY CURRENTLY ON 16 AND 17 THROUGH THE COMMUNITY. THIS WILL SHOW THAT THE THE LAND AND HOW THEY HANDLED THE PROPOSED UNITS AND THEY PROVIDE A BENEFIT TO THE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY.

PROVIDING AN OUTLET FOR TRAFFIC AND TRIPS NORTH OF 16 TO GET TO THE EXPRESSWAY WITHOUT HAVING TO GET ON THOSE ROADS.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR AGENT.

>> YOU ARE BOTH VETERANS OF WORKING THESE DEVELOPMENTS, AND YOU KNOW WHAT IT TAKES 4F.TO PUT SOMETHING INTO ITS PROGRAM.

ALTHOUGH 16 WILL BE DEFICIENT. , IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GOES THERE IT WILL BE A FIVE YEAR DEAL AND YOU'RE ALREADY TALKING ABOUT GETTING STARTED IN 2025.

THERE IS A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS WHERE IT WILL BE DEFICIENT.

I THINK THAT IS MORE OF A COMMENT AND LET YOU COME IN AND RETURN. THAT IS WHERE WE ARE.

I SEE THE SCHOOL BOARD IS REPRESENTED HERE.

THE SCHOOLS WILL GO DEFICIENT. AND WE CAN WAIT UNTIL THE PUD

[02:20:05]

WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT SCHOOL SITES OR FIRE HOUSES OR PARKS.

WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT FAIRGROUNDS.

AND CHARGING STATIONS THAT SHOULD BE PLANNED FOR.

SO, PROBABLY NOT SOMETHING WE WILL SETTLE ON TODAY BUT IF WE BRING THIS TO THE STATE YOU CAN ASSURE ALL OF THOSE WILL BE ANSWERED BY THE TIME WE ARE LOOKING AT A PUD.

I THINK BACK COUNTY HAS COME TO A POINT WHERE WE CANNOT AFFORD TO FRONTLOAD ALL OF THESE EXPENSES WITHOUT THE HELP OF THE PEOPLE COMING IN TO DEVELOP IT. IF YOU HAVE OTHER IDEAS I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THEM. OTHERWISE I HAVE A HARD TIME SUPPORTING THIS IF WE DON'T COME UP WITH SOME ANSWERS.

>> I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND. WE WILL BE REQUIRED TO ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES BETWEEN NOW. THE TRANSPORTATION THING, I'D LIKE THAT YOU MENTIONED THE CHARGING STATION.

RIGHT NOW WE ARE INSTALLING THOSE, THIS IS EXACTLY BUT THINK THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO. BY PACKAGING THIS IS AS THE INFRASTRUCTURE GETS BILLED. SIT DOWN AND WORK THROUGH THE ITEMS. SPECIFIC TO THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, THE CIRCULATION IN THIS AREA WILL CHANGE DRASTICALLY OUR PRELIMINARY MODELING SHOWS EVERYTHING I WANTED TO SAY WE'RE WORKING WITH CCUA TO PROVIDE THIS PIPELINE TO UP THEIR MASTER PLAN WHAT THEY ARE SHOWING IS THERE WILL BE UTILITIES IN THE AREA. WE DON'T EVEN HAVE PLANS TO START AT THIS POINT. WE JUST WANTED TO MAKE YOU AWARE THERE'S NO WAY TO START BEFORE THAT.

ONCE WE GET THESE PIECES IN PLACE, WE WILL START PRAGMATICALLY GOING THROUGH OUR DEVELOPMENT WHICH WILL START AROUND THE INTERCHANGE AND GROW OUT FROM THERE.

>> I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE POINT OUT TO PEOPLE HERE AND PEOPLE WATCHING. YOUR COMPANY IS COMMITTED TO SPENDING TENS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO BUILD A BYPASS SO THE ROADWAYS, YOU'RE CERTAINLY DOING THAT.

IT'S AN INEXPENSIVE MOVE TO PUT IT THE INTERCHANGE.

AND THE DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. YOU'RE WORKING WITH THE CHARGERS I THINK THAT WILL BE WORTHWHILE. DON'T TAKE THIS WRONG WAY.

YOUR GROUP IS A GOOD GROUP AND YOU BUILD SOLID NEIGHBORHOODS THIS IS HEADED SOUTH COMING FROM ORANGE PARK.

BLUE COLORS MAY BE HEADED TO ORANGEBURG BECAUSE IT IS THE SHORTEST DISTANCE. ORANGE PARK IS SATURATED.

I'M GOING TO BE LOOKING FOR A WAY AROUND ORANGE PARK, HOW DO WE SOLVE THAT. THIS WILL CAUSE THE 80,000 CARS PER DAY, THROUGH THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE TO BE 90,000 OR

[02:25:03]

THIS DEVELOPMENT. >> HOW MANY HOMES ARE COMING OFF

OF 315? >> SARATOGA SPRINGS.

I THINK ABOUT 7,000. TANGIBLES ARE ALREADY COMING TO THE AREA. WE ARE ALREADY IN TROUBLE THERE.

JUST TO ADD TO THAT. >> IF I MIGHT.

I WANTED TO POINT OUT, FOR US, WE CAN'T EVEN APPLY FOR CONCURRENCY OR START THAT PROCESS UNTIL WE GET DOWN THE ROAD. SO THE TYPES OF ANALYSIS THAT YOU ALL ARE TALKING ABOUT, IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC, IN TERMS OF SCHOOLS, IN TERMS OF OTHER SERVICES ARE ABSOLUTELY PART OF WHAT WE WILL BE DOING BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN IT COMES BACK FROM THE STATE AGENCIES AND WE WILL BE WORKING WITH FDO T AS PART OF THAT REVIEW AS WELL. STARTING THIS PROCESS ALLOWS US TO GET TO THOSE ISSUES AND STARTING THE STATE COORDINATED REVIEW. THIS IS NOT CALLED A DRI ANYMORE. STARTING THE STATE COORDINATED REVIEW ALLOWS US TO GET INTO THAT PROCESS, DO THAT WORK, COME BACK AND SHOWED YOU WHEN THE ADOPTION PHASE AND THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMES BEFORE YOU TO SHOW YOU WE HAVE ADDRESSED THOSE ISSUES THROUGH SOME TYPES OF COMMITMENTS OR OTHER CONDITIONS IN THE APPROVAL.

>> SO WHAT HAPPENS IF WE SAY IT IS NOT TIME TONIGHT, WOULD YOU

DO THEN? >> THE NORTH BYPASS CONSTRUCTION. IT WILL SLOW THAT DOWN.

IT WILL PUT US IN A STATE OF UNCERTAINTY IN TERMS OF US IN OUR CELLAR AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THE TRAFFIC ANALYSES AND OTHER PROCESSES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

IT WILL PROBABLY JUST SLOW THINGS DOWN.

NOT DEVELOPMENT. THAT IS YEARS AWAY ANYWAY.

IT WILL SLOW THINGS DOWN IN TERMS OF PLANNING AND ANALYSIS OF THESE IMPACTS TO COME BACK TO YOU.

I WOULD SUGGEST WE WOULD NOT WANT TO DO THAT WE WOULD START THE PROCESS SO WE CAN COME AHEAD OF SCHEDULE AND DEMONSTRATE TO YOU WE WILL BE ADDRESSING THOSE ISSUES AS OPPOSED TO WHEN IT

WILL BE UPON US. >> I THINK THAT IS FAIR.

THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY NOW WHILE THIS LAND IS TOTALLY UNDEVELOPED AND ADJACENT TO A PIECE ON THE SOUTH.

IF WE GET THIS DONE WE CAN REALLY MAKE LONG RANGE PLANNING DECISIONS AND SET FORTH THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE BE PUT IN AND THE RIGHT PROCESS TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT.

IF THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN AND THESE PROPERTIES GET DISCONNECTED YOU WILL HAVE MORE DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN ON TOP OF EACH OTHER AND YOU HAVE TO REACT ON HOW TO ADDRESS THOSE IMPACTS.

THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT TWO PIECES TOGETHER WITH SHARED TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE ADJACENT AND WITHIN THE LOOP OF THE FIRST EXPRESSWAY AND THE AREA THAT WOULD BENEFIT. WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND HAVE A COHESIVE, LONG-TERM PLAN IN PLACE.

>> I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.

THIS IS MY DISTRICTE BEEN TAKEN A HIT IN THE PAST YEAR END A HALF. SO THE UNCERTAINTY YOU'RE SPEAKING ABOUT WE HAVE A LOT OF UNCERTAINTY.

THE BOARD HAS HAD TO DEAL WITH CONSTANT PRESSURE.

SAYING NOT THINK -- NOT NICE THINGS TO US THAT THE COUNTY HASN'T BUILT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN TIME.

WHEN WE ARE ADDING MORE TO THE GAME HERE, WHAT DO WE SAY.

[02:30:01]

I HAVE TWO DAUGHTERS THAT CLAY HIGH RIGHT NOW.

I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD.

MY DAUGHTERS ALREADY SAYING I HAVE A FRESHMAN WHO SAYS MOM I CAN'T GET DOWN THE HALLWAY I'M SLAMMED WITH BODIES.

SO, OKAY, WE ARE SUPPOSED TO GO IN AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO PAY A FEE BECAUSE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FISH -- DEFICIENT.

THAT IS JUST A SMALL PART OF THIS.

WE HAVE OTHER THINGS COMING IN. WE ARE JUST SUPPOSED TO ALLOW THIS? WHEN WE DO JUST HAVE MORE PORTABLES, I DON'T KNOW. THAT IS WHAT I'M THINKING ABOUT HERE. I KNOW IT WILL EVENTUALLY HAPPEN. WE HAVE SUFFERED ENOUGH AND WE ARE NOT READY FOR WHAT IS COMING.

SO TO THE PEOPLE OUT THERE TELLING US THIS EVERY DAY, WE HAVE TO LISTEN. I'M ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE DEALING WITH THOSE ROADS RIGHT NOW. IT WILL BE A TWO LANE ROAD.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD EVENTUALLY.

ONE MORE QUESTION. I THOUGHT WE DON'T HAVE DRI'S

ANYMORE. >> IS THE SAME THRESHOLD.

>> THE GOVERNORS PARK IS. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE

APPLICANT OR THE AGENT? >> ONE MORE.

WHEN STREAMLINE WAS DOING A RUNDOWN, AGRICULTURE AS WELL.

CAN YOU TELL ME HOW BIG OF A COMPONENT THAT WILL BE AS THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT.

>> RIGHT NOW THE LAND ISSUES AS AGRICULTURE ELEMENT.

AND REALLY WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS FROM NOW UNTIL DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS IT COULD BE 5-15 YEARS WE WANT TO SAY THOSE USES THAT EXIST TODAY CAN CONTINUE ON THE PROPERTY UP UNTIL THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT. NOT THAT THEY WILL NECESSARILY BE. AND AGAIN THAT IS IMPORTANT.

WE DO ANTICIPATE IT WILL BE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME BEFORE THINGS CHANGE. TO YOUR COMMENT.

I APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERNS. I WOULD SUGGEST, WITH THIS COMP PLAN AND ZONING ON A LARGE PIECE OF LAND CONTINUOUS TO THE SITE BELOW IT, YOU CAN HAVE THIS ON TOP OF EACH OTHER WITH

INCONSISTENT ROAD CONNECTION. >> IF WE DON'T APPROVE THAT TONIGHT YOU ARE SAYING THAT WON'T HAPPEN?

>> I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO DETAIL.

WE WOULD LOSE THE ABILITY TO CONTROL THE DECISION.

>> AT THAT TIME YOU CAN DECIDE WITH THEIR INPUT WHETHER TO MOVE FORWARD OR NOT. IF WE DON'T DEMONSTRATE THAT WE HAVE ADDRESSED THOSE ISSUES THAT YOU HAVE LISTED, ROADS AND

SCHOOLS, YOU CAN VOTE NO. >> , BUT THIS IS THE THING THAT STARTS THE PROCESS WITH THE STATE AGENCY.

IT DOES NOT APPROVE DEVELOPMENT JUST TRANSPORTS FOR THEIR

COMMENT. >> ANYTHING ELSE?

>> WITH REGARDS TO USING THE OFFICE.

HOW DO WE MAINTAIN THEM OR ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE TO USE THE

PROPERTY AS AGRICULTURE. >> THIS IS A 60 DAY RETURN ON

THE TRANSMITTAL. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE

[02:35:05]

PUBLIC HEARING. >> WE WILL NOW HEAR FROM ANYONE

WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. >> IF YOU COULD MAKE SURE AFTER

YOU SPEAK TO FILL OUT A CARD. >> OH SHE KNOWS.

TEN SHE IS EXPERIENCE. >> I WISH YOU COULD BRING A F-STOPS MAP THAT SHOWS THE OUTLINE.

I JUST WANT TO GIVE SOME BACKGROUND.

THE GENTLEMAN WHO WAS SPEAKING. IF YOU LOOK AT THE PICTURE TO THE LEFT, THE NORTH SECTION, THERE'S A LITTLE RED SQUARE AT THE TOP WE LOOKED AT PURCHASING THAT TO PUT OUR BUSINESS THERE.

SAP WOULD NOT LET US BECAUSE HE SAID THERE WAS A MORATORIUM TO CHANGE THE USE. WE HAD TO LOSE OUT TO PUT OUR BUSINESS THERE. IF YOU GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP, THIS IS WHERE I LIVE. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PROBABLY, FROM THE TIP OF THE NORTH, TO A NAP MILES, CLOSE TO HALF OF A MILE FROM US. THE COMMUNITY THAT SITS THERE, RIGHT AROUND THERE, A LOT OF US HAVE BEEN THERE SINCE BIRTH.

WE ALREADY HAVE TO DEAL WITH A LOT OF PROBLEMS. IF YOU HAVE LIVED THERE, YOU KNOW WE ARE THE ONES THAT CALL AND TALK TO YOU. I WAS IN A MAJOR BRECHT TURNING FROM 16 TO SPRINGBANK WHEN I WAS 17-YEARS-OLD BECAUSE A MAN HIT ME BECAUSE IT WAS A TWO LANE ROAD.

WE FINALLY GOT A TURN LANE. WE HAVE ALL OF THESE OTHER HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT SPIRIT I KNOW HE SAID A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. WE KNOW THEY HAVE TO BE SOMEWHERE. BUT WE LIVED THERE TO THE SOUTH OF THIS. THE COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN THERE DOES NOT WANT THIS. WHAT Y'ALL TOLD US SIX YEARS AGO THERE IS A MORATORIUM, DO IT LIKE YOU GAVE ME WHERE I COULDN'T -- ( INDISCERNIBLE ) I DON'T THINK THEY HAVE ENOUGH OR THEY'RE NOT SHOWING ENOUGH OF THE WETLANDS.

WHEN THEY WANT TO PUT IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT, AND ESPECIALLY AT 16 AND BRINGS. AND I FEEL AT 16 AND SPRINGBANK WILL BE TO CONGESTION. THIS DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE KEY TO MAKE THIS OTHER ONE WORK.

SO PLEASE PUT THIS ALL. >> I JUST WANT TO CRACK ONE THING YOU SAID. THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IS (

INDISCERNIBLE ). >> YOU CAME TO OUR MEETING SO.

>> I WAS HERE TO SEE HOW C. THEY CHANGE THE NAME TO THE

PARK. >> AS YOU KNOW, WHEN I ISSUE

[02:40:04]

HAS THIS TO AND GOING TO THE SCHOOL THEY ARE ZONE, YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED IN OAKLEAF WHERE WE SO WE HAD TO REZONE THAT AREA. UNTIL WE CAN BUILD.

WE JUST WENT TO KUWAIT TWO WEEKS AGO IT COSTS 80 MILLION, COY HIGH SCHOOL TO BUILD AND THAT WAS PRE-COVID-19.

WE ARE ESTIMATING WHAT IT TAKES. WE WANT TO.

>> THAT THE IMPACT PLEASE COME IN.

>> I CAN ONLY MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS.

CAN YOU SAY WHAT YOUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE QUICK.

>> I HAVE NOT DONE THE ANALYSIS. WE'VE ONLY DONE IT FOR SPRING PARK ELEMENTARY. NOW I HAVE ISSUED CONCURRENCY, YES, MA'AM. IT IS CONTINUOUS TO YOUR ZONE.

>> I'M SORRY, I DON'T UNDERSTAND.

>> THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO. THEY WILL STILL GO TO CLAY HIGH SCHOOL UNTIL CLAY HIGH SCHOOL FILLS UP OR WE REZONE THE AREA.

CLAY HIGH IS A FULL SCHOOL CAPACITY WAS EX-WARRANTS WITH THE STATE SAYS THE CAPACITY IS. IS IT FILLING UP, YES.

ALL OF THE SCHOOLS ARE FILLING UP COMPLETELY.

>> WE WILL HAVE TO FINISH PUBLIC COMMENT.

AN COMMISSIONER ASKED FOR FIRE CHIEF.

DID YOU WANT TO FILL IN FOR HIM TODAY? NOT THAT YOU DREW THE SHORT STRAW,.

>> YOU'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE GROWTH.

ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF THAT TO THE 209.

WE CAN'T SUPPORT IT. EVEN WITH THE VERY AGGRESSIVE BUILDOUT THAT YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW, REALLY KIDDED TO USE THAT MONEY. YOU WERE LITTLE DISCUSSED MOVING THAT OUT. HAVING THE FIRE STATION WE DISCUSSED. THE FARM STATION ENOUGH TO.

ABSOLUTELY STATION 15. LAKE ASBURY WOULD HAVE TO BE FILLED. I'M SURE IN THE FUTURE WE WILL HAVE MORE DISCUSSION ON HOW WE FUND THESE STATIONS.

>> HOW THIS IMPACTS PUBLIC SAFETY.

CAP SAID THAT WE ARE NOT AGAINST THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENTS CAN BE BETTER FOR US TO PLAN THAN A SMALL SITUATION THINGS WE'VE HAD OVER THE YEARS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

>> ANY OTHER PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING? SEE NONE I WILL BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR DISCUSSION I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

[02:45:14]

>> TWO THINGS. THIS DEVELOPER WORKED WITH BOTH THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. WE CAME TO AGREEMENT ON DONATIONS OF LANDS AND SCHOOL WHERE EQUIPMENT AND OTHER THINGS FOR FIRE. THAT WAS ALL WORKED OUT.

THAT WAS WORKED OUT DURING A PROCESS WHICH STARTED DURING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE DRI DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

THIS IS THE START OF THE PROCESS.

THIS IS AGREEMENTS WITH THE SCHOOL WE VIEW OUR OBLIGATIONS, IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT AND UNIQUE TO ADDRESS THOSE OF THE TRANSMITTAL PROCESS. BUT IF YOU ARE NOT INCLINED TO SEND THIS TO THE STATE AGENCIES, WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE A CRACK AT DISCUSSING THIS WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

IF YOU WANT TO TAKE A CRACK AT THAT AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS. A DEFERRAL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT WOULD BE BETTER THAN A DENIAL WHICH WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO MOVE FORWARD.

THE FIRST MEETING IN OCTOBER AND WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO TALK JUST SO WE COULD PUT THEM UP. I HATE TO DO THAT BECAUSE THERE'S SOME FOLKS THAT CAME FOR THIS AND THEY PROBABLY HAD TO CLOSE THEIR BUSINESS TO BE THERE.

AND SEE IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO GO ALONG WITH THEM.

>> LET'S GO FOR OCTOBER 11. >> THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES.

>> >> DISCUSSION.

[02:50:06]

>> IT'S KIND OF LIKE PROCRASTINATING AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT WILL GET ANY BETTER. SO I'M NOT FOR IT.

I DON'T -- I'M VOTING NO. >> ONE OF THE THINGS I LIKE HIS THEY ARE LOOK COOL -- THERE NOT AN OUT-OF-STATE DEVELOPER.

THEY HAVE AND THEY CAN SO AND NOW I AM TORN BECAUSE IF IT WERE ACROSS THE STREET IT WOULD BE UNDER THE MORATORIUM.

AND WE KNOW WE ARE NOT READY. WE KNOW THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT THERE I JUST HAVE THAT CONCERN.

I HAVE PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS. I DO APPRECIATE THEY TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND I WOULD BE WILLING TO REVISIT IN OCTOBER AND I

UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS. >> THOSE ARE THE COMMENTS I HAVE. AT ANY RATE, THE ONLY OTHER THING I WOULD ADD, I APPRECIATE GOVERNORS PARK ON THE WORK DONE.

I WAS ON THE SCHOOL BOARD WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED.

MY UNDERSTANDING IF I'M WRONG CORRECTLY.

I THOUGHT IT WAS. HE PUSHED OUT A FEW MORE YEARS.

BUT AT ANY RATE, WE HAVE A MOTION AND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. BOTH OPPOSED.

THE MOTION PASSES THREE HAPPEN ONE.

WE WILL REVISIT THAT ON THE OCTOBER 11 AGENDA.

>> WE WILL RETURN TO ITEM NUMBER EIGHT NONPROFIT FUNDING.

[8.  Non-Profit Funding Plan]

IF THEY ARE STILL HERE. >> VICTORIA WITH COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES. ALL RIGHT.

STARTING OFF THE PROCESS, WE'RE LOOKING AT CREATING A NONPROFIT COMMITTEE. THIS WILL BE THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT.

THE THOUGHT BEHIND THESE INDIVIDUALS COMING TO REPRESENT THOSE THAT WORK WITH OUR DEPARTMENT SO THEY WILL HAVE THE RELATIONSHIPS OF FEEL THEY WERE CURED EACH YEAR THEY ALREADY ADOPT A BUDGET WHICH DETERMINES THE AMOUNT DISTRIBUTED EACH YEAR.

[02:55:34]

>> AND ESTABLISHING THEY HAVE MET THE REQUIRED CRITERIA.

THIS IS WHERE WE WILL BRING THIS TO THE BOARD TO BE VOTED ON

AFTER THE FACT. >> JUST A GENERAL TIMELINE OF SUGGESTIONS. DETERMINING THE FUNDING.

THIS WILL BE OCTOBER 1. SO WE LOOK AT ALLOWING THE SUBMISSION, THE INITIAL APPROVAL, SCORING THEM AND BRINGING THEM BACK TO THE BOARD THAT FIRST WEEK OF NOVEMBER FOR THE FUNDING. WE HAVEN'T QUITE DETERMINED THE RECORDING DATE BASED ON WHAT BACK WE ARE LOOKING AT QUARTERLY. AND THE CHANGE, WOULD BE AT THE END THEY WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO COME TO THE BOARD.

AND NOW WE ARE GOING TO, ONCE THEY HAVE RECEIVED FUNDING TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW THE BOARD OF THE FUNDS WERE USED.

IT'S GOOD FOR THE NONPROFIT. IF YOU GUYS GET TO SEE IN THE COMMUNITY GETS TO SEE SHOWING THE.

>> WITH THE INITIAL APPLICATION THIS WAS THE PART THAT ALLOWS THEM TO APPLY FOR FUNDING. WE WOULD LIKE TO GIVE LOCAL REFERENCE TO THE NONPROFIT. IT MAY NOT WE WOULD PREFER THEM TO BE LOCATED WITHIN CLAY COUNTY.

THEY MUST PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS.

THEY DIDN'T GET TO HAVE THE SLIDE.

BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THIS.

IT IS OUR THESE ARE THE VETERAN ORGANIZATIONS.

WE WOULD LIKE THEM TO BE ESTABLISHED FOR A YEAR.

COULD NONPROFIT WOULD NEED THREE BORD MEMBERS.

[03:00:23]

WE WANT TO SEE A TIMELINE TO BE SERVED ON THE OVERALL IMPACT TO THE COMMUNITY. JUSTIFICATION THEY TELL US WHAT THIS IS IMPORTANT AND HOW WILL MAKE AN IMPACT.

AND SUSTAINABILITY. THIS WOULD LOOK AT, ONCE WE FUNDED THE INITIAL SIDE OF THE PROJECT IS THIS SOMETHING THEY WILL CONTINUE TO TWO. IS THERE A WAY TO DO OUTREACH.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT ONCE THE FUNDING IS USE THEY CAN MAINTAIN THAT. I THINK USING IT FOR OTHER PROGRAMMING. WILL THEY FIND A WAY TO SUSTAIN THIS. KIND OF LIKE NOT BITING OFF MORE THAN YOU CAN CHEW. LOOKING AT THEIR OPERATIONAL BUDGET. WE WANT TO KEEP THEM WITHIN 25% OF THE. JUST LESSONS LEARNED.

>> WE HAVE 10,015,035. WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION OF LOOKING AT THE YEARS AND OPERATIONS.

IT IS OPEN TO ALL. THERE IS AN AREA OF FLEXIBILITY.

IF THEY ARE DOING GREAT THINGS AND THEIR BUDGET IS LARGER AND THEY THINK THEY CAN'T HAVE BOTH ABOUT 35 WE WON'T DENY THEM THE APPLICATION. WE WILL JUST REVIEW FROM THEIR THAT WILL COME FROM THE BOARD TO MAKE THAT FINAL DECISION.

ALL RIGHT, THIS IS MOVING ON TO NON- PROFIT.

INITIAL APPLICATION THEY WILL STAY THE SAME.

THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS WILL INCLUDE A RISK ASSESSMENT AND ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REPORTING AND WE ARE LOOKING AT TO FUNDING LEVELS. SO 35 FOR LOCAL ONE FOR YOUR GENERAL ITEMS THAT THEY CAN APPLY FOR AND 200,004 LEVEL TWO

WHICH IS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. >> SO JUST GO OVER A RISK ASSESSMENT. IT WILL ALLOW THE COUNTY TO EVALUATE THEIR ABILITY TO ADMINISTER FEDERAL FUNDS.

THIS DOES NOT DENY ANYONE FOR APPLYING FOR THE FUNDS.

IF THERE'S ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST THEY THINK WILL CAUSE THEM NOT TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE IT WE NEED TO SEE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION THAT SAYS THIS IS HOW WE WILL DO THIS APART FROM OUR REGULAR OPERATING STANDARDS.

IF IT'S SOMETHING THEY CAN'T HANDLE THIS IS SOMETHING THEY WOULD BE DENIED FOR FUNDING. ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURES.

THEY CAN BE USED FOR PERSONNEL THEY HAVE TO BE W-2 EMPLOYEES.

THEY CAN'T BE 1099 CONTRACT WERE THEY CAN USE IT FOR RENT AND MORTGAGE, UTILITIES, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT AND CAPITAL.

SPECIFIC TO MAINTAINING THEIR FIXED ASSETS AND REQUIRING LAND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THOSE TYPE OF THINGS.

SO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS THIS IS OPERA REQUIREMENTS.

THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT AN ACTIVITY REPORT WHICH IS WITH THE TREASURY GUIDELINES. AND THEY HAVE THREE REPORTING WINDOWS. THEY HAVE TO DO AN INITIAL REPORT TO RECEIVE 50% AND THE REMAINING FUNDS.

AND THE FINAL ACTIVITY TO CLOSE IT OUT, THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO COME BACK AND SHOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING WITH THE FUNDS.

>> JUST A QUICK QUESTION THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE DEADLINES.

>> THAT WOULD BE THE USUAL. BUT THEY DO HAVE UNTIL 2024.

[03:05:06]

THEY HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY AS LONG AS IT FALLS WITHIN THE

GUIDELINES PICKED. >> I KNOW YOU WORK YOU WORKED HARD ON THIS, IT'S VERY COMPLETE.

BESIDES COMMISSION STAFF HAVE WE REACHED OUT TO ANYONE IN THE

NONPROFIT WORLD? >> I KNOW IT WAS BROUGHT UP.

THAT IS SOMETHING WE CAN SEND TO OUR WORKGROUP.

LEANNE WHO IS MY LIAISON AND IN THE AUDIENCE, SINCE HER MONTHLY NEWSLETTER. WE HAVE A BIG GROUP WE CAN SPEAK WITH. WE CAN SEE IF THEY HAVE ANY INPUT BEFORE ANY FINAL DECISIONS ARE MADE.

>> >> SUGGESTIONS IF THERE ARE ANY TO IMPROVE WHAT YOU'VE DONE. THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY COMMENT I HAVE. OTHERWISE I THINK IT IS COMPLETE AND DETAILED AS FAR AS HOW TO MOVE FORWARD.

>> ONE THING TO POINT OUT, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE CHANGES. EVERYTHING YOU LEARN AS YOU GO, AS THINGS GROW WE HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY TO LOOK AT THE REQUIREMENTS WE TRIED TO BUILD EVERYTHING IN.

>> THIS IS SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID WITH TOURISM IN TERMS OF PUTTING TOGETHER VARIOUS EVENTS THAT LOCAL GROUPS APPLY FOR.

THERE IS AN ALGORITHM AND IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY YEAR WE HAVE TWEAKED IT TO BE MORE EFFICIENT. I SEE THIS AS SOMETHING VERY

SIMILAR. >> JUST OUTREACH IS IMPORTANT.

YOU MENTIONED THAT IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO TOUCH BASE WITH THEM.

SOME OF THEM ARE LEGACY RECIPIENTS WHICH PROVIDE AFTERCARE FOR WORKING MOTHERS OR FAMILIES.

AND THERE ABILITY TO MATCH THAT WITH THE COMMUNITY OR THE COUNTY, HOW DO THEY FIT INTO THIS MATRIX? HOW DOES 108,000, BY THE WAY THE COUNTY IS GROWING AND NOT

EVERYONE IS RICH. >> A LOT OF OUR LEGACY FUNDS AS YOU CALLED THEM FIT WITHIN THE PARAMETERS.

AS FAR AS WHAT WE HAVE MET. SO WE COULD MAKE SOME TWEAKS TO SEE HOW WE COULD FUND THIS BECAUSE THEY DO RECEIVE A LARGER SUM FROM US SEE WHAT THAT MATCH LOOKS LIKE.

I WOULD SUGGEST DIGGING INTO HOW OUR FUNDS ARGUES IS IN $108, WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE IF WE CUT THE FUNDING.

I HAVE MORE RESEARCH ON HOW WE COULD INCORPORATE THAT INTO THIS

PROGRAM. >> I THINK WE'S FOLK WHICH IS --

>> WE DID SEPARATE -- FROM OF THE LEGACY FUNDS.

WE LOOK AT THE FUNDS THAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO, THESE WE ARE REQUIRED TO FUND. THEY PROVIDE A SERVICE WE CANNOT PROVIDE. THOSE ABDOMENS SEPARATED THEY WILL NOT COME TO THE BOARD AND A TYPICAL NONPROFIT STANDARD.

THOSE WILL BE CONTINUED TO BE FUNDED.

SO WE HAVE A CHALLENGE WITH THE COMMODITIES HOUSE WITH OUR SEXUAL ABUSE ALLOCATION THAN WHAT WE CURRENTLY USE FOR CLAY B APRIL. THOSE TYPES OF ITEMS AND WE HAVE SOME LICENSE PLATE FUNDS THAT ARE VERY SPECIFIC.

BILLS WILL CONTINUE TO BE FUNDED BUT IN A SEPARATE MANNER.

>> OTHER QUESTIONS FOR VICTORIA? >> IF I MAY.

>> ONE THING I WOULD ASK FOR THE BOARD'S DIRECTION ON.

[03:10:04]

IF THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS LIKE FAMILY SERVICES THAT YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE OUR FUNDED WE PUT AT THAT AS PART OF THE BUDGET PROCESS. WE HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF NON- PROFIT FUNDING THAT IS FLAT FROM LAST YEAR.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE BOARD IS AWARE OF YOUR EXPECTATIONS TO FIND WHAT YOU FUNDED IN THE PAST AND NEW NONPROFIT THE FUNDING IS PROBABLY NOT THERE IN YOUR PROPOSED BUDGET.

IF THAT MAKES SENSE. I THINK THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO DOES IT OUTSIDE OF THE LEGACY FUNDS.

>> IF THAT IS YOUR DIRECTION, WE NEED TO KNOW THAT.

HOWEVER MAKING SURE WE INCORPORATE THE BUDGET.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> OF MY IS WE CREATE A PROCESS AND YOU HAVE TO BE AWARE OF THE UNINTENDED PROCESSES.

WE HAVE FAMILIES DEPENDENT ON THAT.

THEY ARE NOT GOING TO ME THE CONSTITUENTS NEEDS.

>> WHEN TRYING TO PASS UP PROCESS AND IMPLEMENT A PROCESS IN 30 DAYS. THAT IS VERY AGGRESSIVE.

MAYBE WE OUGHT TO HAVE AN INTERIM TIME.

BUT FOR INSTANCE, IF WE IMPLEMENT THIS AS WE READ IT THEY ALREADY HAVE $300,000 WORTH OF RESOURCES WITH THEIR FEDERAL MATCH. I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS.

>> I NEED TO LOOK INTO THAT MORE.

>> IF WE PASS IT TONIGHT. THEY WILL HAVE TO CUT SERVICE TO CLAY COUNTY. I DON'T THINK THAT IS THE DESIRE

OF THIS COMMISSION. >> THAT IS NOT THE DESIRE OF THIS AT ALL. THE GOAL IS TO SUPPORT THE

COMMUNITY IN ANY WAY JAN CAN. >> WHAT DOES THIS FEDERAL MATCH LOOK LIKE. HOW ARE THE FUNDS BEING USED AND WHAT PART OF OUR FUNDING SERVICES.

ARE THEY PROVIDING THE VOUCHERS, WHAT ARE THEY USING.

>> THEY COVER AFTER SCHOOL. >> THIS IS COVERED BY THE STATE.

>> THIS IS A FULL-TIME JOB. THAT'S HARD TO DO.

>> CHILDCARE IS EXPENSIVE. >> I THINK WE NEED NOT MOVE FORWARD FOR PASSING THIS TONIGHT.

WE NEED TO GET SOME STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED.

I KNOW WE HAVE BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS AND MAYBE WE TAKE A LOOK AT REHASHING WHAT WE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST AND PUT SOME NUMBERS IN THERE'S NO WAY WE CAN GET STAKEHOLDERS TOGETHER AND INCORPORATE WHAT THEY HAVE BEFORE WE PULLED ON A BUDGET.

I DON'T THINK WE CAN. >> LOOKING AT TROY'S SUGGESTION MAY BE GOOD. KEEPING IT HOW IT WAS BUT

ALLOWING FOR ADDITIONAL -- >> THAT IS THE DIRECTION WE NEED FROM THE BOARD. TRADITIONALLY YOU HAVE DONE PRESENTATIONS AND SAID, YES, I WANT THIS BUDGET AND I DON'T.

[03:15:01]

I GUESS THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT TRAINS OF THOUGHT WE CAN GO DOWN. ONE IS WE FUND EVERYBODY.

WE PUT OUT THE PROCESS. WE FUND EVERYONE THE WAY WE DID LAST YEAR. YOU MATCH IT FOR THE NONPROFIT SPIRIT THE OTHER WAY, A HYBRID APPROACH.

THERE ARE CERTAIN ONES WE KNOW WE NEED TO FIND.

YOU EARMARK THOSE. AND THE REST OF THEM YOU MAY GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND INSTEAD OF STARTING THE APPLICATION PROCESS YOU STARTED IN NOVEMBER THAT WOULD GIVE YOU THE HYBRID APPROACH AND YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO FUND THIS ONE.

YOU KNOW THE SERVICE HAS TO BE DONE WHILE WE PHASE IN A MORE

NONPROFIT TYPE SYSTEM. >> THAT WOULD BE THE HYBRID APPROACH. IT WILL SIMPLIFY WHAT TROY SAID.

WE HAD TO HAVE A WAY TO THAT'S DIFFERENT NONPROFITS THAT WERE LOOKING AT THE FUNDS TO APPLY FOR.

IF I COULD SUGGEST, IN THE SLIDES THAT SHE HAS MAYBE WE HAVE ONE MONTH SO INSTEAD OF OCTOBER I GUESS, ONE OTHER ITEM, WHAT WOULD BE A TARGET NUMBER THE BOARD WOULD LIKE.

IT IS HARD TO THINK ABOUT THAT. WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT THE 260 LEVEL WOULD AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENS IS, WE HAVE ALWAYS HAD THE SAME GROUPS AND THEY ALL PROVIDE CRITICAL CARE.

SOME OF THEM YOU GET BIGGER BANG FOR THE BUCK.

THAT IS WHERE WE ARE KIDDING IT. AND WE WOULD HAVE A TARGET NUMBER FROM THE BOARD. AND YOU WOULD HEAR FROM DIFFERENT BOARDS. WHEN TRYING TO CAPTURE THE NEW ONES THAT YOU'VE HEARD. AND WE WILL HAVE HEARINGS COMING UP AT ROUNDABOUT NUMBER. IF YOU DON'T HAVE A NUMBER RIGHT NOW, IT WOULD BE HARD TO WAIT FOR THE NEXT BOARD MEETING.

BUT WE WOULD FUND THE ONES IN THERE RIGHT NOW.

WE COULD STILL REQUIRE AN APPLICATION SO YOU HAVE MORE

VISIBILITY. >> IS THERE A NUMBER YOU WANT US TO TARGET. WHAT YOU CAN SAY I DON'T HAVE A NUMBER BUT CAN WE USE OUR BOOK FUNDS.

>> WE ARE CLOSING THE DEADLINE. TWO YEARS SOUNDS LIKE LONG TIME, TWO YEARS WILL BE UPON DOES. SO IF WE WANT TO DO THIS WE PROBABLY NEED TO MOVE THE PLAN FORWARD.

WERE NOT ASKING FOR A BOAT TONIGHT.

JUST MORE INFORMATION TO TAKE THIS AND WE WILL BRING BACK A

PLAN FOR VOTING LATER ON. >> WE WILL HAVE YOUR LOWER

PROJECTS. >> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER ONE.

WE LOOK AT FOR THE BIGGER PROJECTS I DON'T HAVE A GOOD

EXAMPLE. >> LIKE YOUR.

>> COMBINED WE HAD $800,000. THAT IS SOMETHING WE WILL HAVE TO WORK WITH HOW DO YOU WANT TO DIVIDE THAT.

[03:20:01]

GIVEN THAT IS A BOARDS DECISION. >> ANY FEEDBACK.

>> I THINK WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WHAT THAT DOES TO THE LEGACY COSTS. IN SOME CASES WE ARE OBLIGATED.

>> WE HAVE SEPARATED THOSE ISSUES.

>> >>

>> WE CURRENTLY HAVE A GRANT THAT MEETS THE 6%.

THIS BRINGS MORE MONEY AND FEDERAL FUNDING ON THIS MATTER

SHORT GRANT DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR. >> THE GRANT THE COUNTY GIVES THIS $108,000. THE MATCH BRINGS IN OVER $1 MILLION AND DEL MATCHES THE GRANT DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR.

>> >> I THINK THAT IS $108,000 WELL

SPENT. >> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. OTHER COMMENTS, COMMISSIONER?

>> I WOULD SAY, WE LOOK AT FUNDING THE LIKE TO SEE, NON- PROFITS AND TAKE THIS MONEY MAYBE $150,000 TO AUGMENT ADDITIONAL -- LATER EXECUTION, NOVEMBER DECEMBER.

THEN LEAVE THE MONEY WHERE IT IS THAT THE CATEGORIES AND SEE WHAT WE CAN'T. I DON'T KNOW.

>> THERE'S A LOT OF ABOUT THIS. WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID. THERE'S A LOT I THINK IS VALUABLE. I LIKE THE SCORING CRITERIA.

TO YOUR POINT, I LIKE THE ACCOUNTABILITY TO COME BACK AND PRESENT TO US. BUT I AGREE THERE ARE SOURCES THAT HAVE BECOME DEPENDENT ON COUNTY FUNDS AND I DON'T WANT TO DO IT SIX WEEKS BEFORE WE PASS A BUDGET.

BUT, I AGREE, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT ELSE IS OUT THERE.

WHO ELSE CAN PROVIDE SERVICES FOR OUR RESIDENTS BECAUSE ULTIMATELY THAT IS THE INTENTION FOR THE TAX DOLLARS IT IS NOT ABOUT PREFERENCE IT IS ABOUT WHO CAN PROVIDE THE BEST RESOURCES FOR THE CITIZENS. I DON'T WANT TO PULL THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER ANYONE SIX WEEKS BEFORE BUDGETING.

ESPECIALLY NOT HAVING GOTTEN THAT FEEDBACK.

>> MY SUGGESTION MAY BE AS WE MOVE FORWARD, WHATEVER ONCE YOU HAVE BROKEN OUT KEEP US AT 270 RANGE THIS WOULD GIVE US WHAT WE NEED IN TERMS OF MATCHING FUNDS. IT WILL GIVE US THE LEGACY AND THEN WE WILL HAVE ANOTHER PART OF NONPROFIT MONEY SO WE CAN SEE

WHO NEEDS HELP. >> THIS WILL BE FOCUS ON

NONPROFIT AS WELL? >> IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE

[03:25:03]

SOME OF YOUR NONPROFITS MAY NOT SERVE THAT PURPOSE.

>> BUT THEY ARE ALL BEFORE DECEMBER 24.

>> WE WILL HAVE TO. THE CRITERIA IS, WILL THEY MEET

THE OBJECTIVES. >> CANNOT REFRAME YOUR COMMENT?

WE HAVE. >> WEEK TO LOOK AT POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE NONPROFITS TO APPLY.

THEY COULD SET THEIR OWN ASK BUT THAT IS THE ONLY ISSUE.

>> THAT IS WHAT WE DID FOR ONE TEAM AND EVERYONE ASKED FOR MORE AND WE HAD TO PUT A MAXIMUM ON IT AFTER THE FACT.

MAYBE WE CAN COME BACK WITH A PROPOSAL.

FOR MAY BE IT'S UNLIMITED. MAY BE 50% OR WHATEVER.

BUT STILL HAVING A CAP ON THE SMALLER ONES.

THERE IS A CAP SO THE BOARD DOESN'T HAVE TO DO IT AFTER THE

FACT. >> HOPEFULLY THE FIRST MEETING

IN SEPTEMBER. >> WILL YOU HAVE AN EXTRA WEEK.

>> WE CAN BUILD THE APPLICATION AND HAVE IT FLOAT OUT IN A

TIMELY MANNER. >> WE HAVE INFORMATION TO MOVE

FORWARD. >> I'M GLAD I BROUGHT MY INK

PEN. >> EVERY GOOD WITH THAT ONE, ARE YOU YOU READY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ITEM NUMBER TEN.

[10.  Request for Prospective Buyer Lien Reduction for Julissa Lopez (C. Stewart)]

>> GOOD EVENING. >> HOLD ON JUST A SECOND.

TEN SO YOU GUYS HAVE ALL OF THIS INFORMATION IN YOUR PACKAGE YOU HAVE THE MEMO. YOU HAVE STANDING IN FRONT OF US OUR CLIENT. HE IS THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY THAT WE RECEIVED THE PERSPECTIVE BUYER LEAN REDUCTION FROM.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ME YOU HAVE THE MEMOS WERE DO YOU WANT TO GO OVER A COUPLE OF THINGS OR DO YOU WANT TO LET HIM

SPEAK? >>

>> IT IS ONE OF THE PROPERTIES,. >> I'M SURE YOU'RE WONDERING WHY

[03:31:04]

THAT WAS REPAIRED YEARS AGO. IMAGINE THIS BEING A SITUATION WHERE YOU LEAVE ON VACATION ON THE TOILET OVERFLOWS AND NO ONE IS HOME TO TURN OFF THE WATER. THAT IS WHY WE ARE DEALING WITH THIS SITUATION. YOU HAVE TO ABSENTEE OWNERS THAT ARE STILL CURRENTLY MARRIED BUT UNDERGOING MARITAL TROUBLES.

THEY DON'T SPEAK TO EACH OTHER. THEY ARE LIVING IN CALIFORNIA.

THERE HAS BEEN NOBODY THAT HAS BEEN ABLE TO OR IS BEEN ABLE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.

THIS PROPERTY IS AN EYESORE. IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE PICTURES. THE COMMUNITY NEEDS FOR THIS TO HAPPEN. IF YOU CARE, THIS IS HOW BAD THE COMMUNITY NEEDS FOR THIS TO BE PREPARED.

AS YOU CAN SEE THE YARD HAS BEEN MAINTAINED BY A PRESERVATION COMPANY. THE OTHER VIOLATION HAS TO DO WITH THIS DILAPIDATED, THE SCREEN ROOM IN THE BACK.

SELLERS HAVE NO MONEY TO MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY OR MAKE THE REPAIRS. ONCE AGAIN, THESE PENALTIES HAVE BEEN COMPOUNDING AND IN SOME CASES BY THE DAY OR THE WEEK FOUR YEARS. WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY HERE TO WIPE THE SLATE CLEAN AND ALLOW A NEW PROPERTY OWNER TO COME IN AND MAKE THIS A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY FOR THE COMMUNITY AGAIN. YOU MAY WONDER DO THEY HAVE A LOT OF MONEY, NO THEY DON'T. AS I UNDERSTAND IT, AT THE BARE MINIMUM THEY WILL BARELY BREAK EVEN, WILL PROBABLY BE NEGATIVE BASED UPON HOW MUCH THEY OWE THEIR MORTGAGE COMPANY.

SO, AGAIN THIS IS A TERRIBLE SITUATION AND TERRIBLE FOR THE COMMUNITY. AND A TERRIBLE TRAGEDY FOR THE PROPERTY OWNERS. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE $160,000 IN PENALTIES THAT FAWCETT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TURNED OFF YEARS AGO BUT BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND BEING ABSENTEE AND BEING IN DISTRESS, THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND TO THIS.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT AND WHY WE ARE HERE TODAY, ASKING FOR A NEW OWNER TO MAKE THIS A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY AGAIN I WILL ANSWER ANY PROPERTY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AND THE SITUATION THE SELLERS FIND THEMSELVES IN.

>> THANK YOU. >> I AM JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHAT THE BUYER WILL BE DOING TO THE PROPERTY.

>> MY. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO THE

[03:35:02]

>> MADAM CHAIR I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT FEES.

>> APATHETIC. >> WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND TO ACCEPT THE REQUEST FOR THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER LEAN REDUCTION TO THE AMOUNT OF STAFF COSTS. ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. THE MOTION PASSES 4-0.

>> AND MS. STEWART WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.

[11.  Approval of Agreement with James Moore & Co., P.L. regarding Professional Auditing Services (H. Boucher)]

HELLO. >> THIS AGREEMENT LIKE YOU SAID IS WITH JAMES MOORE AND COMPANY FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES.

THIS IS A THREE YEAR AGREEMENT ENDING FISCAL YEAR 2024.

THIS HAS AN OPTION FOR THREE RENEWALS FOR 1-3 YEARS.

OUR NORMAL PURCHASING POLICY IS A RENEWAL FOR ONE YEAR.

THERE WAS NO DISCUSSION IN PROS AND CONS OF HAVING AUDITORS FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME VERSUS HAVING ROTATION OF AUDITORS.

SO WE ARE ADDRESSING THAT. IN THE AGREEMENT WE HAVE A PARTNER ROTATION EVERY FIVE YEARS.

ANY QUESTIONS. >> IS THERE ANY REASON FOR THE DISCOUNT IN LATER YEARS IS NOT THE INITIAL YEAR.

>> IN THE INITIAL FEE IT IS HIGHER.

THEY WILL HAVE EXTRA WORK THEY HAVE TO DO TO GET ON BOARD AND GET FAMILIAR WITH EVERYTHING WE DO HERE.

WE ALSO HAVE ADDITIONAL FEES IN THE FIRST YEAR FOR OUR TRANSITION TO WORK DAYS SINCE WE DID IT AND THIS YEAR.

THEY HAVE TO DO EXTRA PROCEDURES FOR THE TRANSITION FROM Q1-Q2.

>> ARE THERE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR HEATHER?

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL.

>> ME UP A MOTION, IT CARRIES 5-0.

[12.  Request to use alternative procedure to notice public hearings for the consideration of potential purchase and sale agreements for the purchase of identified real property for the Bonded Transportation Program (C. Grimm/E. Dendor)]

>> EVERYONE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THE MOTION CARRIES 4-FOOT 0.

[13.  Approval of Wetland Mitigation Credit Reservations for the Bonded Transportation Program, Cathedral Oak Parkway Project, and approval of advance payment for required deposits. Funding Source: Workday Project # = PRJ100203, Fund # = 320, Fund Code = BOND, IF, Cost Center # = 6105 (C. Grimm/E. Dendor)]

WE WANT ADVANCE PAYMENT BECAUSE THE WAY THE BANKS ARE FUNCTIONING THESE DAYS THEY HAVE LIMITED CREDITS AND WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE ADVANCE DEPOSIT TO SECURE OUR

[03:40:01]

>> IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS WOULD YOU TAKE IT TO

THE BOARD. >> WE HAVE A MOTION THAT

[14.  Presentation of Annual Assessment Rate Resolution establishing the rate of assessment for graded road maintenance of properties within the Hidden Waters MSBU for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Gardner)]

THE MOTION CARRIES 4-FOOT 0. THE ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2,223.

>> THIS IS THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR ONE OF THE ROADS.

IT IS NOT THE SAME. >> ANY QUESTIONS?

>> THIS IS 24 YEAR. >> IT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR QUITE SOME TIME. TENSIONS WHAT, 1998?

>> I THINK OVER TIME IT HAS CHANGED.

>> ARE THERE QUESTIONS. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL. DAD'S RIB A MOTION TO APPROVE

THE SECOND? >> A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ALL OPPOSED.

[15.  Presentation of Annual Assessment Rate Resolution establishing the rate of assessment for graded road maintenance of properties within the Oak Forest MSBU for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Gardner)]

ITEM NUMBER 15 PRESENTATION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE SANCTIONING THE RATE OF ASSESSMENTS WERE GRADED ROAD MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE OAK FOREST MSBU FOR FY

2022-23. >> THIS ONE HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 93-94. AND THE ASSESSMENT RATE WILL BE

THE SAME AT $229. >> OKAY, ANY QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND.

[16.  Presentation of Annual Assessment Rate Resolution establishing the rate of assessment for graded road maintenance of properties within the Blue Jay Drive Roads MSBU for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Gardner)]

>> ITEM 16 PRESENTATION OF ANNUAL RENT ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RATE OF ASSESSMENT OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE BLUE JAY DRIVE ROADS MSB YOU 2,023.

>> THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF THE MSB USE FOR BLUE JAY AT THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT WOULD BE ONE OR $25 WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IT WAS LAST YEAR.

>> OKAY. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. NONE OPPOSED.

[17.  Presentation of Certificate to 2022 Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Roll for Black Creek Hills Water System MSBU (C. Grimm)]

>> THIS IS FOR A UTILITY SYSTEM THAT WAS HOOKED UP FOR THIS COMMUNITY. AND EACH PARCEL AS ASSESSED $210.44 BASICALLY THE LOAN UNTIL IT IS SATISFIED AND IT REMAINS

THE SAME EACH YEAR. >> ANY QUESTIONS?

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO

APPROVE. >> ME UP A MOTION.

DO WE HAVE THE SECOND? >> MEMO MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN

[18.  Presentation of Annual Assessment Rate Resolution establishing rates of assessments for certain subdivision properties previously included within the Subdivision Roads Maintenance MSBU for FY 2022-23 (C. Grimm/T. Gardner/R. Smith)]

>> ITEM NUMBER 18 PRESENTATION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RATES OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN SUBDIVISION PROPERTIES PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION ROADS MAINTENANCE MSB YOU FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23.

THIS IS THE THIRD CATEGORY. THESE ARE SOME FOR SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN INCLUDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE RATES, THEY ARE BEING INCREASED BUT NOT ABOVE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY SAID. THE LIST, TO LET YOU KNOW AND

[03:45:02]

AT $193.95. >> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND PERIOD.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

[19.  Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Clay County, Florida, ordering the Clay County Value Adjustment Board to certify the assessment rolls of Clay County, Florida, pursuant to Section 197.323, Florida Statutes (C. Grimm/J. Horan)]

THE MOTION CARRIES 4-0. >> ITEM NUMBER 19 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CLAY COUNTY FLORIDA WATERING THE CLAY COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD TO CERTIFY THE ASSESSMENT ROLES OF CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 19 7.3 230 FLORIDA STATUTES.

>> THE TAX COLLECTOR AS HAS ROUTINELY DONE REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD BY A RESOLUTION AND REQUIRE IT TO MOVE FORWARD AND CERTIFIED THE ASSESSMENT ROLE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL OF THE HEARING SPIRIT SO THEY USUALLY DO NOT INCLUDE THOSE HEARINGS UNTIL AFTER THE NOVEMBER 1 TIMEFRAME.

SO ATTACHED TO YOUR AGENDA IS THE RESOLUTION WHEREBY YOU WOULD BE ORDERING THEM TO MOVE FORWARD AND ADOPT THE ROLE PRIOR TO THAT TIME. IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES AS A RESULT, THEN THE TAX COLLECTOR GOES BACK AND USES HER CORRECT

PROCEDURE TO HANDLE THOSE. >> OKAY, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? UP.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT

THE RULES. >> WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND.

[20.  Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners adding Radar Road, Town Center Boulevard, and Tynes Boulevard/Royal Pines Drive to the County Roadway System for which level of service standards shall be maintained, identified on the existing transportation map in the data, inventory and analysis for the transportation element of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and providing an effective date (C. Grimm/E. Lehman)]

ITEM NUMBER 20 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDING RADAR ROAD, TOWN CENTER BOULEVARD AND TIMES BOULEVARD AND ROYAL PINES DRIVE TO THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM FOR WHICH LEVEL OF STANDARDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED, IDENTIFIED ON EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MAP IN THE DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> IS TO ADD RADAR ROAD TO THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM.

THE REASON FOR THAT IS IN ORDER TO UTILIZE IMPACT FEES TO DO THE IMPROVEMENTIN CONNECTION WITH RADAR ROAD THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES THEM TO BE PART OF THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM.

THEREFORE WE WOULD LIKE TO ADD RADAR ROAD TO THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM. IN DOING SO RADO ROAD CONNECTS WITH 17 AND TOWNCENTER BOULEVARD , AND IT WAS REALIZED THAT TOWNCENTER BOULEVARD IS NOT LISTED AS PART OF THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM. THAT IS LIKEWISE BEING ADDED IN ORDER TO MAKE THAT CONNECTION FOR RADAR ROAD.

AND LASTLY TIMES BOULEVARD, IT IS BEEN ADDED TO THE COUNTY ROADWAY SYSTEM. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN WHEN IT WAS COMPLETED AFTER THE AGREEMENT WAS DONE IN CONNECTION WITH ARMSTRONG PROPERTIES. IN CONNECTION WITH THESE IF THE BOARD ADOPTS THE RESOLUTION THEN AT THE SEPTEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION, THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, IN ORDER TO UPDATE TO INCLUDE THEM ON THE TRANSPORTATION MAP WILL BE BROUGHT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BROUGHT TO YOU AT

ONE OF YOUR SEPTEMBER MEETINGS. >> ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

>> OUTDID TOWNCENTER BOULEVARD NOT BE PART OF THE COUNTY, HOW

DID THAT HAPPEN? >> IT PROBABLY WASN'T NEEDED TO BE AT SOME POINT AND TIME BECAUSE IT WASN'T PART OF THE IMPACT FEES STUDY IT HAS JUST BEEN AROUND.

>> IS IT BECAUSE IT STARTS IN THAT WEIRD LOCATION NEAR THE ROUNDABOUT? IS IT STILL CALLED TOWNCENTER

BOULEVARD? >> IT GOES ALL OF THE WAY FROM

2202 THE 17. >> THAT ACTUALLY STARTS EARLIER

THAN THAT. >> SO IT STARTS BACK THERE.

IT IS A MAJOR ROADWAY. >> OKAY.

IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS I WILL ENTERTAIN

MOTION. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

[03:50:01]

>> CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS. YOU CALLING IN THEIR WITH US

THIS LONG. >> COMMISSIONER AUDITOR.

[COUNTY MANAGER]

YOU HAVE TALKED ENOUGH TONIGHT. COUNTY MANAGER.

>> MADAM CHAIR COMMISSIONERS TO ITEMS. VERSUS JT EIGHT THEY ARE DOING OUR TRANSPORTATION STUDY AND IT IS NOT GOING ENTERED WAY. SHOULD SEE THAT BACK HERE THIS SPRING. THEY ARE ALSO UPDATING THEIR MARKETING AND ENGAGEMENT. THESE ARE THE RED, BLUE AND MAGENTA AND GREEN. AND TO MAXIMIZE THIS THEY ARE PROPOSING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER TO RIDE FREE.

AND IT FITS WITHIN OUR BUDGET THEY WILL BURN THE COST OF ADVERTISING 235,000 HOMES AND WE WILL WORK WITH THEM ON THE COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT. NOT ONLY DO YOU GET A BREAK ON GAS TAX YOU WILL GET A BREAK ON OUR TAX THIS IS JUST FANTASTIC.

WHAT THE FLYER WILL HAVE ON IT, WILL BE A SERVICE MAP SO I GIVE YOU DIRECTION ON HOW TO BOOK THE TRIPS, AND THERE WILL BE A NUMBER FOR A CALL TO SERVICE. I WANTED TO BRIEFED THE BOARD ON THAT AND SEE IF I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME ON THAT.

I THOUGHT IT WAS GREAT TO PROVIDE AWARENESS AND I WILL BE PLANNING INDIVIDUALLY IF YOU WANT TO RIDE A PARTICULAR ROUTE LET ME KNOW AND WE WILL GO OUT ON THE FIELD TRIP.

>> ONLY QUESTION I HAVE, WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO USE AS A

MAILING LIST. >> DID CHARLES SAY -- I THINK THEY JUST DID IT BY AREA IT WAS A CERTAIN DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE ROUTE I BELIEVE. THREE QUARTERS OF A MILE.

>> THE SECOND ITEM, JUST AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO SPEED UP SOME WORKSHOPS. WE HAVE A SEPTEMBER 6 WORKSHOP AT 4:30 P.M. WE WILL HOLD A WORKSHOP IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE EVERYONE TO THAT.

THAT WILL HELP US REWRITE OUR LB SEES AS SOMETHING WE COULD ELIMINATE AT A FUTURE WORKSHOP. AND WE HAVE ANOTHER ONE SCHEDULED, I DON'T THINK THAT ONE IS HARD AND FAST.

IT WILL BE IN DECEMBER. >> WHAT TIME IS THAT?

>> IT IS TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 6 AT 4:30 P.M.

RIGHT AFTER FINANCE AND AUDIT AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. IN A FINAL NOTE I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO DRIVE AROUND, KIND OF A TRADITION FOR THE COUNTY MANAGER TO GO AROUND WITH THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IN THE MORNING, JUST A FANTASTIC STAFF.

THE GROUP GOES OUT THERE. THE VOLUNTEERS.

I REALLY WANT TO THANK THEM. AND WE HAD VOLUNTEERS FROM OUR ORGANIZATION TO HELP OUT. I KNOW JUSTIN WAS THERE AND A FEW OTHERS. I WANT TO THANK THEM ALSO.

BUT PENDING ANY QUESTIONS, THAT IS ALL I HAVE.

[33.  Acceptance of Resignation from the Tourist Development Council]

>> LET'S SEE. WE ARE AT LETTERS FOR ACTION.

WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM THE ANY

OPPOSED. >> MADAM CHAIR HE RAN OUT OF TIME OPERATING A COUPLE OF HOTELS AND COULDN'T GET AWAY TO BE PART OF THE TDC SO HE IS RESIGNING.

HE WILL GO ON THE WEBSITE HAS A POSITION FOR BEING OPEN.

I KNOW GARY HAS RECOMMENDED. >> IS NOT A MOTION TO ACCEPT?

>> I'M SORRY MISS YOUR MOTION. THE KEYWORD I DIDN'T HEAR.

THERE WAS NO MOTION YOU DREW IT OUT OF ME.

>> THERE'S A MOTION. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

[34.  Discussion of Appointment to the Tourist Development Council]

[03:55:11]

>> RAVEN APPLICATION FROM BURKE. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS IS NEW TO THE TDC AS A VACATION RENTAL, SO SHE TOLD ME THIS IT IS LIKE AN AIRBNB OWNER NOT ENDORSING ANY SPECIFIC BRAND BUT SOMETHING

THEY'VE NEVER HAD BEFORE. >> THAT WILL GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO DELVE INTO AN AREA THAT WILL BE GROWING.

WE HAVE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE ACCOMMODATION BUSINESS.

HE WILL HELP US GET OUR FEET ON THE GROUND AND FIGURE OUT WHERE WE GO WITH THAT. IT IS AN EVER-GROWING SEGMENT AND SOMETHING WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT.

SO I WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

[LETTERS OF DOCUMENTATION]

>> SECOND PERIOD. >> WE HAVE A MOTION NANOSECOND ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. CARRIES 4-FOOT 0.

[PUBLIC COMMENTS]

FEEL FREE TO COME UP. >> GOOD EVENING.

I KNOW YOU ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR TEXAS COMING IN.

I WANT TO SAY SOMETHING. WE HAVE SEVEN TAXING AUTHORITIES, SOME WILL MEET ON SEPTEMBER 8.

THE REMAINING FIVE, I DON'T KNOW WHY THIS IS SCHEDULED AT THE SAME TIME AS OURS. I STARTED MAKING THEY HAVE TO GET THAT OUT SOON BECAUSE THEY ARE DEALING WITH 18 COUNTIES ON THE RIVER THERE LOWERING MY TAXES.

[COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS]

>> I WILL BRING IT BACK TO COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.

>> COMMISSIONER. >> I'M MAD THAT MATT LEFT I WANTED TO SEE IF WE COULD GET A REBATE FROM THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. AND JUST TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, OUR MEETINGS ALWAYS THE 2ND AND 4TH TUESDAY OF THE MONTH AND THEY HAVE BEEN SINCE I STARTED COMING BACK INTO ZERO ZERO THREE. I THINK THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT HAS 18 DIFFERENT COUNTIES THAT ARE PART OF THE MIX AND I THINK THEY PICK A DATE THAT THEY THINK WILL BE AVAILABLE TO GET AS MANY PEOPLE THERE AS POSSIBLE.

THERE ARE OTHER COUNTIES THAT HAVE MEETINGS ON THE SAME DAY AS WE DO. MAYBE THEY CAN EVIDENT AT DIFFERENT TIME BUT HE WAS ASKING ABOUT THE PROCESS.

THE PROCESS IS OUR MEETINGS ARE THE 2ND AND 4TH TUESDAY.

I DON'T KNOW. THIS MAY BE JUMPIN THE GUN BUT WE HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THE RESULTS AS MOST PEOPLE KNOW.

BUT IT WAS PRIMARY DAY TODAY. A CULMINATION OF EARLY VOTING IT WENT VERY SMOOTHLY. AS THE COUNTY MANAGER INDICATED HE TOOK A TOUR WITH THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS AND THE CHAIRMAN IS THERE IN THE MIDST OF THE VOTING AND ACTIVITY.

[04:00:06]

>> AND WITH THAT, I WILL PASS IT BACK TO YOU.

>> COMMISSIONER RENNINGER. >> I THINK THE ELECTION WENT WELL DUE TO THE CANVASSING BOARD MEMBERS.

>> THE ALTERNATE. I DO WANT TO COMMENT ON THE LAST COMMISSION MEETING. WE HAD A CONSTITUENT COMPLAINT ABOUT CATS AND THE COUNTY MANAGER AND I WENT OUT AND SURVEYED THE PROPERTIES FOR AN HOUR OR SO.

AND INCONCLUSIVE AS TO WHAT THE REAL PROBLEM WAS AND WE SENT ANIMAL CONTROL TO GO TO THE PROPERTY AND WE ARE WAITING TO SEE WHAT THEIR OBSERVATIONS WERE.

I DO WANT TO COMMENT ON AN INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED ON WELLS ROAD AND THAT WAS A SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC ACCIDENT THAT RESULTED IN A 23-YEAR-OLD MAN WHO WAS REAR ENDED AND ENDED UP GETTING BURNED 93% OF HIS BODY. SPENT FOUR MONTHS IN GAINESVILLE CENTER. I WAS ASKED BY HIS GRANDMOTHER TO LOOK INTO THIS. I HAVE SPOKEN TO THE SHERIFFS AND FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL AND THE DMV.

>> STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. >> IS GETTING LATE.

>> THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE CLAY COUNTY RESIDENT THAT CAUSED THE ACCIDENT. HAD 100 VIOLATIONS IN THE LAST EIGHT YEARS, DRUGS TO DRIVING WITHOUT A LICENSE OR INSURANCE.

DRIVING WITHOUT A SEATBELT. MANY DIFFERENT VIOLATIONS.

I SPOKE WITH OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE AND I SPOKE TO JENNIFER TO SEE IF THERE IS A WAY TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS.

HE HIT THIS YOUNG MAN WITHOUT A LICENSE AND FOUR MONTHS LATER HE RECOVERED HIS LICENSE AND GOT CLUB CALLED RUNAROUND LIGHT.

-- A RED LIGHT. HE WAS IN THE AREA FOR FOUR MONTHS, AND INSPIRED OUR OUR LAST MEETING.

I'M TRYING TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER THERE IS A BENEFIT GOING ON THIS SATURDAY. ANYWAY.

IT WAS A TRAGIC SITUATION. WHEN I FIRST GOT THE END -- E-MAIL I THOUGHT I DON'T ADJUDICATE THE LAWS.

BUT I CAN ADVOCATE FOR THE GRANDPARENTS.

A REALLY BAD SITUATION. KEEP HIS PARENTS IN YOUR PRAYERS AND HOPEFULLY SOMETHING GOOD. BUT ANYWAY.

THERE MAY BE SOME KIND OF FURTHER ACTION HERE.

THAT IS ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU.

>> I JUST WANT TO REITERATE SOMETHING HE SAID EARLIER.

THERE WERE SOME ACCUSATIONS MADE EARLIER WE DON'T CARE ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY. THERE IS A GROUP THAT HAS BEEN COMING FOR A WHILE. THERE ARE SOME LAWS THAT WE ARE BOUND BY. IN MOST CASES WE HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS YOU LOOK INTO THINGS AND YOU FIND OUT THERE HAS BEEN OTHER LAND IN THE SAME DEVELOPMENT THAT THEY SAID WAS FAR MORE AT RISK FOR A CRASH AFFECTING IT AND THEY CHOSE NOT TO KEEP THAT LAND UNDEVELOPED. SO I FEEL, YOU FEEL ATTACKED WHEN PEOPLE SAY YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY BUT I DO.

THAT PROPERTY WHEN FORESAIL. WE HAVE THINGS WE NEED TO CHANGE

[04:05:15]

THEY SAY SOMETHING BACK ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE SOMEONE DOESN'T LIKE THE OUTCOME ISN'T THE WAY THE ORDINANCES THAT GOVERN THE STATE OF FLORIDA OR CLAY COUNTY WORK.

NOT SOMETHING THAT CAN BE PUT ON THE AGENDA TO TALK ABOUT MORE.

THE FINAL THINK IS WE ARE ELECTED TO CONDUCT BUSINESS OF THE COUNTY SO WE DO IT IN THE PUBLIC BUT IT IS NOT NECESSARILY A BANTER BACK AND FOURTH. THAT PUBLIC COMMENT IS FOR.

THAT MAY SOUND HARSH, BUT THAT IS THE DECORUM AND ELECTED BOARD IS SUPPOSED TO SERVE. WITH THAT I WILL STOP MY LITTLE.

>> YOU CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PUBLIC AIRPORT AND A PUBLIC AIRPORT. THE WHITE FLIGHT IS SPLIT.

>> I CALL IT SOMETHING DIFFERNT WHEN IT WAKES ME

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.