PROCLAMATIONS/RESOLUTIONS

[7. Approval of Opioid Litigation Participation Forms for participation in the state-wide settlement agreements with (1) CVS, (2) Teva and (3) Allergan]

OPIOID LITIGATION. SO, ATTACHED TO BE AGENDA ARE THREE PARTICIPATION FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH STATEWIDE

[00:20:04]

SETTLEMENTS FOR THE OPIOID LITIGATION.

THESE AGREEMENTS WILL ALL PROVIDE FOR THE ALLOCATIONS UNDER THE CURRENT AGREEMENT THE COUNTY HAS WITH THE STATE AND THEY ARE SPREAD OUT OVER DIFFERENT PERIODS OF TIME AND IT ALLOWS US TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT SPIRIT.

ANY QUESTIONS? I WILL PROBABLY USE THIS TERM IMPROPERLY BUT ARE WE PART OF THE CLASS ACTION SUIT? AND ONLY THE CLASS ACTION PART. WE ARE PART OF A SEPARATE PIECE OF LITIGATION THAT IS A CLASS ACTION UP IN OHIO.

BUT THESE THREE, WE ARE NOT INVOLVED IN THE LITIGATION THEY ARE DRIVEN FROM. THESE ARE DRIVEN FROM A CASE THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BROUGHT AGAINST THESE PARTICULAR ENTITIES AND HAS RESOLVED THAT AND THE STATE IS WANTING TO ALLOW THE DIFFERENT COUNTIES OR MUNICIPALITIES THAT ENTERED IN WITH CONNECTION WITH THE OTHER LITIGATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SAME MANNER WITH THESE SETTLEMENTS.

AND I HAD A DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER, THERE WILL BE SEVERAL POTS OF MONEY COMING IN OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS OR SO.

IT WILL BE COMING IN WITH DIFFERENT RATES, AND I SUGGESTED THAT WE HAVE FOR COUNTY GET TOGETHER TO FIGURE OUT A PROGRAM THAT WILL UTILIZE THE MONEY AS MOST EFFICIENT AS POSSIBLE, TO MAKE SURE HAS THE MONEY DRIBBLES AND IT DOESN'T DISAPPEAR, IT GOES INTO A FUNDING MECHANISM. I DON'T KNOW HOW AS A BOARD WE GET THAT TOGETHER THAT I THINK THE COUNTY MANAGER HAD AN IDEA ON HOW TO PULL THE NONPROFITS AND TO COME UP WITH AN EFFECTIE

PROGRAM. >> WE HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN AN ORGANIZATION, WE ARE TRYING TO GET A DETOX FACILITY FOR THE COUNTY. BECAUSE IT WILL BE COMING IN WITH SUCH A LONG TIME. WE WILL BE LOOKING AT OTHER WAYS, I GUESS WE COULD LOOK TOWARDS THAT AS A COMES IN.

I LOOK TO YOU TO GET WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER THAT THE BOARD CAN GET BEHIND AND SAY WE DID THIS WITH THE MONEY.

RATHER THAN SIT HERE AND LET IT DISAPPEAR.

>> THEY DID A WONDERFUL JOB AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE THERE WAS INVOLVED AND DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS.

IT WAS A NICE THING TO LOOK AT AND HOW THEY DID IT, IT'S REALLY WELL. DO WE HAVE TO APPROVE ANYTHING?

>> YES YOUR EXECUTION OF THE FORMS. A MOTION AND A SECOND. FURTHER DISCUSSION?

[8. Business Tax Ordinance Draft]

ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

OPPOSED IT CARRIES 5-0. ITEM EIGHT BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE DRAFT. ASSISTANT COUNTY MANAGER, ATTACHED IN YOUR PACKET WAS A DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT MIRRORED GREEN COVE SPRINGS AS A BASE. THIS HAS BECOME A COMPLICATED ISSUE FOR US TO MEET THE STATUTE THE STATUTE AS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ON EITHER DOING A -- FINDING A COUNTY ADJACENT TO US OR A MUNICIPALITY AND DURING WITH A COMPARABLE POPULATION THAT DID AN EQUITY STUDY. RIGHT NOW, WE LEGAL COUNSEL WE HAVE BEEN WORKING DAY AND NIGHT TO FIND ONE THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA AND ACCEPTABLE. INDIAN RIVER IS BUT ONE WE ARE MODELING AFTER AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

THEIR FEE WOULD BE A 40-DOLLAR FEE AND SET UP $35 WHICH IS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT BECAUSE WE HAVE TO MATCH THEIR FEE.

NOTHING PRECLUDES YOU AFTER DOING THAT, THAT WE CAN BRING IT DOWN LATER ON BUT YOU CAN'T BRING IT UP.

SO, JUST LOOKING FOR DIRECTION TO MAKE SURE THAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE WAY TO GO AND WE WILL ADVERTISE IN A TIMELY MANNER THAT WE ARE BRINGING IT BACK. WE WOULD LOOK TO BRING THAT BACK IN A MONTH IF THAT IS THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD.

[00:25:01]

ONE THING TO ADD. WE ARE FOCUSED ON INDIAN RIVER AS BEING THE BUTT COUNTY COMPARABLE.

WE ARE STILL WAITING TO CONFIRM ONE OF OUR ADJACENT COUNTIES HAS NOT COMPLIED WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THEM. A LOT OF THE ADJACENT COUNTIES HAVE A COMPLICATED STRUCTURE THAT IS NOT A FLAT RATE.

SO FAR, NONE OF THEM HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO ADJUST THAT SO WE CAN FOLLOW THEM.

THEREFORE WE GO TO THE SECOND TIER WHICH IS THE COMPARABLE COUNTY, WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ANALYZING WHO IS COMPARABLE AND CONFIRMING FAKE HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE STUDY.

THAT IS WHY WE ARE AT THIS POINT THE CLOSEST ONE IS INDIAN RIVER.

AND THEY HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE STUDY.

ANYONE ELSE? WE CAN'T EVER RAISE THE RATE? WE ARE STILL RESEARCHING THAT, THERE IS AN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION THAT WE LOOKED AT IN ALACHUA COUNTY WHERE THEY TRIED TO RAISE THE RATE AND WERE PRECLUDED FROM DOING SO BECAUSE ONCE YOU ADOPT THE COMPARABLE COUNTY OR ADJACENT COUNTY, YOU HAVE TO STICK WITH THEIR RATE EVEN THOUGH, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY CHANGED IT. WE ARE STILL TRYING TO FLUSH OUT WHETHER THERE IS ANOTHER WAY AROUND THAT.

>> THIS PUTS US IN THE BAG WITH SOME OF THE OTHER ISSUES WE HAVE HIT ON LIKE WHERE WE ARE TRYING TO GET THE ADJUSTMENT CHANGE AND THE RATE WAS $15.25 YEARS AGO. TWENTY YEARS FROM NOW, $45 WILL

LOOK LIKE A REAL BARGAIN. >> JUST TO GIVE YOU HISTORY, WHAT WE HAVE FOUND IS MOST OF AND WHY IT IS COMPLICATED IS MOST OF THE COUNTIES OR THOUGHT MUNICIPALITIES HAVE ADOPTED THIS PRIOR TO 1995. THAT IS THE TRIGGERING DATE, IF YOU ADOPTED SOMETHING AFTER 1995 THERE WERE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.

BUT SINCE WE WERE LOOKING AT STG WHY THEIR RATES HAVE NEVER CHANGE. THAT IS BECAUSE THEY ADOPTED IT PRIOR TO 95 AND THE MECHANISM TO CHANGE IT IS COMPLICATED.

IT IS NOT THAT OTHER COUNTIES ARE CHANGING THEM.

ONCE THEY SENT IT, IT IS THERE. THE COUNTIES RATES ARE USUALLY MUCH LOWER IT IS THE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH IS REFLECTIVE OF ORANGE PARK AND GREEN COVE AND THEY HAVE MUCH HIGHER RATES. CAN THEY RAISE THEIR RATES? THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE STATUTORY PROCESS AND TO BE HONEST I HAVE NOT RESEARCHED IT. IF WE ADOPT THE ONE BASED ON THE OTHER STUDY, AND LET US SAY FIVE YEARS FROM NOW WE WANT TO DO A FULL-BLOWN STUDY, WE CAN'T CHANGE IT AT THAT POINT?

>> WE DID NOT HAVE AN ORDINANCE PRIOR TO 95.

>> SO EVEN IF WE DID A FULL-BLOWN STUDY TODAY, --

>> THE FACT THAT THE COUNTY REPEALED THERE'S, IT IS NOT AN OPTION. THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE CAN GO.

I HAVE AN OBSERVATION. I DID NOT REALIZE THE STATUTE DRIVEN EXEMPTIONS. I DON'T SEE ANY ACCOMMODATIONS.

ONE PURPOSES TO CATALOG COMPANIES AND BUSINESSES AND CLAY COUNTY. I DID NOT SEE WHERE, WITHOUT A FEE HAVE TO REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY IN OUR PROPOSED DRAFT ORDINANCE. THAT IS A SHORTCOMING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THOSE BUSINESSES AS WELL AS THE ONES WE WILL CHARGE 8 FEET TO. EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE EXEMPT FROM POINT PAYING A FEE. I THINK WE SHOULD COMPLEMENT THE CATALOG PORTION. I WILL PUT THAT IN THE DRAFT ORDINANCE. I KNOW WE CAN'T PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL EXEMPTIONS BUT MAYBE JUST BE EXEMPT FROM THE FEE.

THAT IS THE ONLY ONE I SAW. THAT IS A GREAT POINT.

ANYONE ELSE? THERE'S NOT A LOT OF CHOICES WE CAN HAVE HERE. LET'S SEE WHAT IS POSSIBLE.

>> WE ARE PRETTY SURE AT THIS POINT, WE WILL CONFIRM THAT AND BRING YOU BACK THE FINAL VERSION AND HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF MAY

[00:30:06]

WE MAY HAVE SOME MORE DISCUSSION FOR YOU AT THE NEXT MEETING.

I JUST HAVE A QUESTION IN REGARDS TO BOTH COMPLIANCE FOR THIS MODEL. IS THERE COMPLIANCE BECAUSE WE ARE TALKING PRIOR TO THIS IT WAS VOLUNTARY.

THERE WAS NO MECHANISM TO ENFORCE NOW WE ARE SAY WE CAN'T BUSINESSES. BEFORE YOU KNOW IT, WHAT DO WE HAVE, IT IS SELF-DEFEATING. WHAT IS THE MECHANISM THEY HAVE FOR MAKING SURE SOMEONE PAYS THEIR $40.

>> WE WOULD HAVE TO DIG IN. I KNOW OTHER COUNTIES THAT WE LOOKED AT EITHER DO A LETTER OR HAVE CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF GO OUT AND IF IT IS NOT PERSON -- LISTED SITE THE PERSON.

WE FACTORED. >> I THINK ST. JOHNS ONLY ISSUE

A LETTER. >> THAT IS CORRECT.

>> I CANNOT IMAGINE WITH ALL OF OUR CURRENT CODE ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES AND WHAT THEY HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT WE WOULD HAVE ONE EMPLOYEE THAT ONLY GOES OUT AND HAMMERS BUSINESSES THAT DON'T PAY THE 40-DOLLAR FEE TO REGISTER THEIR BUSINESS, FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN TO BE ON THE COUNTY REGISTRY.

THE THOUGHT PROCESS IS, WE ARE SPENDING THE MONEY WE TALKED ABOUT BUT TAKING IN LESS THAN WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT PRIOR BECAUSE WE HAVE THESE EXEMPTIONS.

THEN YOU WONDER, WHAT ARE WE DOING.

IF WE CAN'T MAKE SOMEONE PAY THE $40, AND WERE ASKING THEM, TO SEND THE CARD BACK AND WHAT BUSINESS DO YOU HAVE, I'LL DO WE KNOW WHAT WE HAVE. WE ARE STRADDLING THE LINE.

50% OF US KNOW WHAT'S THERE AND THE OTHER HALF DON'T.

>> ON THE FLIPSIDE, TODAY WE KNOW NOTHING.

WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS IN THE COUNTY.

I HEAR IT ALL OF THE TIME. >> I MEAN YEAR WE HAVE?

>> WE HAVE ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE CHAMBER AND THE EDC THAT COULD BE BUSINESS PARTNERS TO KNOW THOSE THINGS AND TO COME TO US AND SAY THESE ARE THE THINGS WE WOULD LIKE TO ATTRACT.

AT THE END OF THE DAY THERE'S PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS.

ANYONE AS THE RIGHT TO HAVE THEIR BUSINESS AND LAND USE THEY CAN HAVE IT. I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND, ARE WE GOING TO GO OUT AND THEN DOES CODE ENFORCEMENT SAY LET'S TARGET THE ONES THAT DON'T HAVE AN EXEMPTION? WE JUST HIRED A 6-YEAR-OLD BOY TRYING TO GET A LAWN SERVICE.

IS HE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE AN

EXEMPTION? >> MY POINT IS, ARE YOU GOING TO GO OUT AND EVERY TEENAGER TRYING TO START THEIR BUSINESS, I HAVEN'T HAD ANYONE EXPLAINED TO ME WHAT GOVERNMENTS PLACE IS, KNOWING WHAT BUSINESSES ARE BECAUSE WE CAN'T VERIFY ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN THEY HAVE A CLAY COUNTY ADDRESS.

THAT IS ANTIBUSINESS. THERE'S A LOT OF BUSINESSES THAT DON'T WANT GOVERNMENT IN THEIR BUSINESS.

WEALTHY EXAMPLE, WE HAD A MEETING AND THEY ASKED US, WHERE ARE YOUR EMPLOYMENT CENTERS AND HOW MANY EMPLOYEES DO EACH BUSINESS HAVE SO WE CAN SCHEDULE WHERE WE WILL STOP THE BUS.

OUR ANSWER IS WE DON'T KNOW. WE DON'T KNOW ANYTHING.

THAT IS ONE EXAMPLE. THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THE ONLY REASON THEY KNOW IS BECAUSE SOMEONE PAID TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. FOR THOSE OF US WHO DON'T KNOW

WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S THERE. >> WELL THAT'S VOLUNTARY.

>> IT IS BUT IF WE WANT TO HELP A BUSINESS WE HAVE SOMETHING TO START WITH. IT IS NOT LIKE WE ARE MAKING MONEY ON THIS. WITH THE CONSTRAINTS, IT IS GOOFY AT BEST. BUT I STILL THINK WE NEED THE

[00:35:01]

DATA IF SOMEONE KNOWS HOW TO GET IT.

THIS WILL BE PASTED -- POSTED ON OUR WEBSITE?

>> OF SOMEONE WANTS TO DO MARKET RESEARCH WHAT BETTER PLACE TO GO. YOU'RE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR CHEAP PLACES TO ADVERTISE. I WOULD WANT MY BUSINESS TO BE ON THEIR. BUT IF YOU DON'T, IS THERE AN OPTION TO OPT OUT. THAT IS WHAT YOU GET INTO.

I AM PROBABLY MORE CONSERVATIVE ON THIS SPEND THE REST OF YOU.

I DON'T UNDERSTAND GOVERNMENTS PLACEMENT BUSINESS, IN THIS INSTANCE, THE BENEFIT. TO ME THERE'S NO BENEFIT WE WANT MORE BUSINESSES AND CLAY COUNTY SO WHY WOULD WE TAX THEM? IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. THE THING WE HAVE TO LOOK AT IS STAFF SPENDING TIME. IF WERE NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THIS LET'S SAY SO NOW. SEEK MY PURPOSE OF BEING HERE IS TO PUSH THESE ISSUES SO WE CAN SAY YES OR NO.

LET'S TAKE A STRONG VOTE. IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO IT, THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT PROBABLY WON'T.

I DON'T KNOW, WHAT THE PENALTY IS, BUT I WOULD FEEL THE MAJORITY WOULD WANT TO BE INVOLVED.

THERE ARE SOME BENEFITS. WHEN THEY WRITE GRANTS, THEY HAVE TO TELL A STORY ABOUT THE COUNTY.

WE DON'T HAVE THE DATA TO TELL A BACKWARD STORY.

SEEK AFFORDABLE HOUSING, HOW MUCH HOUSING DO WE HAVE THAT IS AFFORDABLE. YOU CAN CHERRY PICK SOME SITES BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF SMALL BUSINESSES THAT ARE PROVIDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING. I DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE OR WHERE THEY ARE, BUT THEY CAN BE USED TO MAKE BIGGER DECISIONS.

TODAY WE ARE MAKING DECISIONS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE.

THIS IS AN EFFORT TO GET KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE COUNTY AND MOVE THIS BALL INTO THE 21ST CENTURY.

THAT IS WHAT WE OUGHT TO DO. I'M NOT IN FAVOR.

I THINK WE SHOULD USE OUR PARTNERS WITH THE EDC AND THE CHAMBER. WE HAVEN'T TRIED TO DO THAT WE COULD MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS BY USING OUR PARTNERS WITH EDC AND THAT IS THE DIRECTION I WOULD GO IN.

I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD TAX OUR BUSINESS OWNERS.

I WAS BORN FAVOR WHEN WE STARTED BUT AS WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ITERATIONS OF LOOKING AT WHATEVER ONES WE WERE LOOKING AT TRYING TO FIND A MODEL, DETERMINING THERE WILL BE BUSINESSES THAT HAVE EXEMPTIONS. HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT IS FAIR, IF THEY ARE EXEMPTED. FOR EXAMPLE YOU USED AFFORDABLE HOUSING. HOW DO WE KNOW THERE ARE BUSINESSES THAT DO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

WHEN THEY HAVE AN EXEMPTION AND NOT HAVE TO PAY THE BUSINESS TAX IN THE FIRST PACE. WE SAID WE WOULD REGISTER THEM.

AND NOW EVEN IF THEY DON'T PAY WE DON'T HAVE AN ENFORCEMENT THAT EXISTS. I THINK IT IS PREMATURE TO SEND STAFF IN A SPECIFIC DIRECTION UNTIL WE KNOW MORE ABOUT THAT ASPECT AND THOSE THAT WE GIVE EXEMPTIONS.

WE WILL ASK FOR A LETTER OR POSTCARD.

THAT'S NOT SCIENTIFIC AT ALL EITHER.

I WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR SENDING THAT DATE OFF IN A GRANT APPLICATION IF WE DON'T HAVE AN IDEA.

50% OF THE PEOPLE ARE NOT SENDING THE INFORMATION.

I THINK IT IS PREMATURE TO ADOPT A SPECIFIC MODEL TO MOVE FORWARD IF WE DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER. I'M NOT VOTING TO GO ALONG WITH INDIAN RIVER IF I DON'T KNOW CERTAIN ASPECTS.

I THOUGHT THEY NEEDED MORE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH.

I THINK THE POINT BEING, STAFF HAS SPENT A LOT OF TIME RESEARCHING WHAT WE WILL DO AND HOW WE WILL DO IT.

DO WE HAVE ENOUGH INTEREST ON THE BOARD TO HAVE THEM CONTINUE AT THE HIGH LEVEL, TAKING THE TIME, AT THIS POINT I HAVE NOT

[00:40:04]

SEEN IT. LET'S CARRY IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL. THEN WE WILL TAKE A LOOK AT IT.

[9. Approval to re-set public hearing on Petition to Vacate Right of Way adjacent to the Goose Creek Subdivision and adoption of Resolution to schedule the public hearing]

OKAY, LET'S SEE. NUMBER NINE, APPROVAL OF PUBLIC HEARING TO VACATE RIGHT AWAY GOOSE CREEK SUBDIVISION.

IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ITEM AT THE LAST BOARD MEETING YOU GAVE APPROVAL TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CURRENT BOARD MEETING. THERE WAS A MIXUP WITH GETTING BETTER PUBLICATION CORRECT. WE ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE ADVERTISEMENT AND WOULD LIKE TO BRING IT FORWARD BUT WE NEED YOUR APPROVAL AND APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION SETTING.

OKAY. TAKE A MOTION FOR THE MAY 10 --

SO MOVED. >> SECOND PERIOD.

>> A MOTION IN A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

[10. Mobility Fee Credit Agreement Re: Cheswick Oaks Avenue Extension - Double Branch]

IT CARRIES 5-0. NEW BUSINESS, ITEM TEN.

MOBILITY FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT REGARDING CHESWICK OAKS AVENUE

EXTENSION. >> WE SHOULD HAVE SOMEONE HEAR FROM FAULTY HOMES. SO, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, MARK IS HERE. THIS IS A MOBILITY FEE AGREEMENT TO SATISFY THE OBLIGATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MASTER PLAN, AND TO PROVIDE MOBILITY CREDIT IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN PARTICULAR, BECAUSE I KNOW WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT ACCESS. THEY NEED OVER 600,000 TO BE PAID FOR MOBILITY FEES AND THIS PROVIDES THEM WON HUNDRED 20.

SO WILL NOT BE ACCESS. HOW MUCH DOES WE HAVE LEFT AFTER

THIS? >> A LOT.

WE ARE TRYING. ANY QUESTIONS? MY DISTRICT I AM IN FAVOR OF IT IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A

MOTION. >> I WILL MOVE APPROVAL.

>> A MOTION AND A SECOND, FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE IT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

[11. Request for Prospective Buyer Lien Reduction for Alohomora, LLC (C. Stewart)]

NUMBER 11, LIEN REDUCTION? MS. STEWART WOULD YOU LIKE TO SET THE STAGE? GOOD AFTERNOON.

THIS IS A LIEN REDUCTION WITH OUR METHOD THAT IS THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER METHOD. THE INFORMATION IS IN THE MEMO, A COUPLE OF THINGS I WILL GO THROUGH.

THE PROPERTY IS AT THIS AREA. THEY ARE TRYING TO GET THE LIEN REDUCTION PRIOR TO FORECLOSURE ACTION.

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE THAT IS WHY THEY WENT THIS ROUTE.

MR. HOLDER IS THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER.

TODAY WE HAVE AMANDA WALLACE WHO IS THE REALTOR FOR MR. HOLDER FIELD. I'M SORRY I SAID THAT INCORRECTLY. TELL ME YOUR NAME SIR? THIS IS THE BUYER. SO, MOST OF THE INFORMATION IS THEN HERE. THERE WAS A CASE THAT WAS ACTIVE FOR DEBRIS. ALL OF THIS HAS BEEN RECTIFIED AND THEY ARE LOOKING TO GET THIS TAKEN CARE OF TODAY SO THEY CAN DO THE SALE QUICKLY AND BEAT THE FORECLOSURE BY A DAY.

I THINK AMANDA HAS MORE INFORMATION THAT SHE WILL SHARE WITH YOU AND THEY ARE HERE FOR QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? APPLICANT DO YOU WANT TO SAY

ANYTHING? >> ARMY THIRD-GENERATION REAL ESTATE INVESTOR WE DO ACT QUICKLY AND WE ARE RAISING THE FORECLOSURE AND -- FORECLOSURE ACTION IF YOU NEED ME I'M HERE.

T, AMANDA WALLACE I AM HERE TO REPRESENT -- THANK YOU FOR

[00:45:04]

ALLOWING ME TOO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF MR. OLDER FIELD.

I WANTED TO PAINT THE PICTURE SO YOU KNOW THAT MR. OLDER FIELD DID NOT JUST ABANDON HIS PROPERTY.

HE PURCHASED IT WHEN HE WAS 25-YEARS-OLD AS A SINGLE MAN.

HE LATER MET HIS NOW WIFE THEY HAVE A BEAUTIFUL DAUGHTER THEY PURCHASED THEIR HOME IN 2019. THEY CURRENTLY RESIDE IN IT.

IS A LONG-TERM CORRECTIONAL OFFICER.

IT IS AN HONOR TO HELP A PUBLIC SERVANT.

I LIKE TO HELP THE POLICE, FIRE AND THE LITERARY ANY CHANCE THAT I GET. HE AND HIS WIFE AGREED TO ALLOW A FAMILY MEMBER TO MOVE INTO 1284 NORTH STREET AND 2020 THEY STOP RECEIVING PAYMENT. HE TRIED TO MAINTAIN TWO MORTGAGES UP THROUGH 2021, HE RECEIVED A CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION AND WAS LATER FORECLOSED ON.

BELIEVING HE WAS NOT ALLOWED IN ITS OWN PROPERTY NEVER RETURN.

IT WAS NOT UNTIL WORKING WITH A REAL ESTATE AGENT DID HE LEARN HE WAS STILL ALLOWED ON HIS PROPERTY.

WE CONTACTED THE BANK TO GET THE DURING OUR CONVERSATIONS HE EXPRESSED HOW HARD IT HAS BEEN TO WATCH HIS FIRST HOME BEFORE -- FORECLOSED ON. OFTEN PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF THEIR RIGHTS. YOU MAY SAY HE IS A CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. BUT I CAN TELL YOU AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER MYSELF FOR 11 YEARS WE DON'T GET INVOLVED AND REAL ESTATE BECAUSE THAT IS CONSIDERED CIVIL NOT CRIMINAL.

I BELIEVE WE HAVE A COMMON GOAL HERE AND THAT IS TO KEEP CLAY COUNTY BEAUTIFUL. I HAVE LIVED HERE MY ENTIRE LIFE. AND ONE THING THAT MAKES ME HAPPY IS TO DRIVE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY AND SEE NICE HOMES.

I HAVE'S SEEN THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND THERE WAS NO TRASH AT THE HOUSE. THAT YARD WAS MOWED AND THE COMMUNITY HAD STEPPED UP AND STARTED CLEANING THE PROPERTY.

MR. HOLDER FIELD IF HE WAS AWARE OF THE LAW, THESE FINDS WOULD NOT BE WHERE THEY ARE. WE HAVE A SELLER IN A BAD SITUATION. WE HAVE A BUYER MYSELF WHO STEPPED UP TO FIX THAT. WE HAVE MAINTAINED THE LOT YARD TOGETHER. WE HAVE CLEAN THE PROPERTY.

THERE ARE LEGAL COUNSEL TO MAKE SURE HE IS GETTING THE BEST DECISIONS. WE ARE ALL INTERESTED IN THIS.

I AM A CHRISTIAN AND I DON'T BELIEVE IN COINCIDENCE.

ALTHOUGH THIS HAS AFFECTED HIS CREDIT, IN JUST A FEW SHORT MONTHS, THIS IS STILL POSITIVE BECAUSE I WAS GIVING A CHANCE TO BRING THEM OUT OF FORECLOSURE. I PRAY WE ARE ABLE TO WORK TOGETHER AND NOT ONLY REDUCE THE FINE BUT ELIMINATE LIEN RECORDS AND ALLOW HIM TO CLOSE ON HIS PROPERTY TOMORROW.

I ASK THAT YOU ASK YOURSELF, DO YOU BELIEVE IN SECOND CHANCES.

IF YOU WERE IN THIS SITUATION WOULD YOU WANT A SECOND CHANCE.

I AM A FIRM BELIEVER NOT EVERYONE DESERVES TO GO TO JAIL OR A TICKET AND TO BE PUNISHED BUT TO RECEIVE A SECOND CHANCE.

>> THANK YOU. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT REDUCING

THE LIEN TO $2,000? >> YES.

>> AND AFTER BRIEF DISCUSSION WE CAN DOUBLE THAT TO $4,000.

>> $4,000. WHAT WILL YOU DO WITH THIS

PROPERTY? >> IT WILL PROBABLY BE A RENTAL.

>> ARE YOU A CORPORATION? >> I AM A FAMILY-OWNED FIRM.

>> I AM CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE REAL ESTATE HAPPENING WITH THE CORPORATIONS FIND THESE PLACES.

>> I CAN TALK LATER ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THAT.

>> I WILL TAKE A MOTION. >> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE OFFER OF $4,000 WITH OF REDUCE THE LIEN.

>> A MOTION AND A SECOND. FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

IT CARRIES 5-0. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

>> A THIS BRINGS US TO NUMBER 12.

[12. Notice of Intent to Award and Approval of Agreement for RFP No. 21/22-32, Camp Chow Pool Management (J.Pierce)]

NOTICE TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT RFP AND POOL MANAGEMENT.

>> GOOD AFTERNOON. TODAY I AM COMING TO YOU TO BRING THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD RFP 2122 -- 32 FOR THE SWIMMING TO -- SWING POOL AND INSTRUCTIONS.

[00:50:07]

APPROVAL WILL BE EFFECTIVE AFTER THE 75 HOUR.

WITH ME I HAVE THE PARKS RESOURCE MANAGER IN THE BACK.

HE MANAGES THE SITE. IN ADDITION THE TERM IS FOR ONE YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1 THROUGH APRIL 1.

IT IS A ONE YEAR AGREEMENT. THE MAXIMUM COST OF THE COUNTY WOULD BE $73,100. WE ADD 18 TOTAL PROPOSAL SENT OUT. WE RECEIVED BACK OUT OF THE TWO, ONE WAS DISQUALIFIED FOR NOT A KNOWLEDGE IN THE ADDENDUM ATTACHED. WITH THAT, IF YOU HAVE ANY

QUESTIONS. >> THIS CONTRACT HAS A MAXIMUM YET THE ANNUAL COST OVER THE YEARS HAS BEEN 45.

WHAT ARE WE SCHEDULING THEIR? >> IT IS PREDICATED ON THE USERS THAT UTILIZE THE RENTAL RATE. YOU HAVE ADULTS AT $24 AND CHILDREN AT THREE. SO THE ENTRY FEE IS DEDUCTED

FROM THE TOTAL THAT WE PAY. >> WE HAVE A SET TIME LIMIT.

>> JUST 20 WEEKS. >> HAS US? LASHER IT WAS A TOTAL OF $62,000.

THIS YEAR 73,000 BUT THE COUNTY ONLY $44,038 IN FEES.

THEY PAY THAT LAST YEAR. WITH THE RATES AND THE OPEN SWIM THE CONTRACT HE WENT UP $20 FROM 70-90.

THE LIFEGUARD FOR PRIVATE PEOPLE RENTALS WENT UP $10.

POOL MAINTENANCE WENT UP $5 PROVERB.

AND GROUP SWIM LESSONS WHEN A. >> YOUR EXPECTATION WOULD BE WE WOULD USE MORE THAN THE $45,000 WE HAVE IN THE PAST PROBABLY?

>> YES. AND WE ARE REALLY HOPING FOR A LOT OF TENANTS THIS SUMMER. HOPEFULLY WE WILL GET THAT DOWN THE LITTLE BIT. BUT THE POOL WILL BE UTILIZED

THROUGH LABOR DAY. >> MR. CHAIR, I WAS GOING TO ASK WHAT THE REVENUE WAS BEFORE THAT.

LAST SUMMER WE STILL HAD COVID-19 AND DID NOT HAVE THE NORMAL TENANTS. LOOKING AT HOW WE ARE OVERBOOKING IN TERMS OF PEOPLE BEING OUTSIDE AND TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ENTERTAINMENT I'M SURE WE WILL DO MORE THAN WE DID THAT SHE APPEARED. THE OTHER THING WE ARE FORTUNATE TO HAVE A PARTNER LIKE THE YMCA BE LOCAL, I SAW AN ARTICLE, THEY ARE SAYING THE LIFEGUARD SHORTAGE COULD SHUT DOWN ONE THIRD OF PUBLIC POOLS ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

SEEK UNDERSTANDING THAT, WE TOOK A BID A FEW YEARS AGO AND GOT BURNT BY A COMPANY THAT COULD NOT PERFORM THE CONTRACT.

I THINK THE FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE YMCA THAT WAS THERE AT THE TIME, IS THERE. AND PALM BEACH IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT A SHORTAGE OF LIFEGUARDS AND THEY HAVE NOT IT FELT PRIME SEASON.

WE ARE FORTUNATE WE HAVE A PARTNER THAT IS LOCAL.

BUT IT IS ALSO A NOTE THAT SAID IN 5-10 YEARS WE MAY NOT HAVE ENOUGH TEENAGERS TO BECOME LIFEGUARDS BECAUSE OF THE BIRTH RATE GOING DOWN. THAT IS SOMETHING WE MAY WANT TO

KEEP AN ION. >> I'M NOT ASKING YOU TO SOLVE THAT PROBLEM BY YOURSELF. IT MAY BE SOMETHING WE MAY WANT TO WORK WITH THE YMCA ON REGARDING THE POOL.

>> LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO WHILE YOU RETIRE.

>> WE MAY HAVE SOME SENIORS. >> IT MAY FORCE US TO LOOK ELSEWHERE TO SATISFY WHAT WE NEED.

>> I WILL WATER IT DOWN AND PUT MY CANE OUT.

>> ON THAT NOTE, I WILL SECOND. >> MAKE SURE IT IS THE APPROVAL

OF THE BID AWARD AS WELL. >> AS STATED BY THE ATTORNEY.

[00:55:04]

>> OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A

SECOND. >> OKAY A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

[13. Agreement for Broadband Infrastructure with Comcast Cable Communications, LLC(T. Nagle)]

OPPOSED IT CARRIES 5-0. BROADBAND.

>> THIS IS THE CONTRACT FOR THE BROADBAND.

THIS WOULD COVER TWO AREAS. THE AREA NORTHEAST OF KEYSTONE HEIGHTS, THE CITY LIMITS. THE CONTRACT IS THREE-POINT $3 MILLION WITH COMCAST COVERING 3.5 OF THAT.

THE COUNTY'S INVESTMENT WOULD BE $1 MILLION.

AND $1 MILLION UPON THE PROJECT BEING COMPLETED.

I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE

AIR. >> A THIS IS JUST PHASE ONE.

WE ARE JUST LOOKING FOR MONEY TO DO THE REST OF THEM.

>> THEY WROTE IT SO WE COULD EXPAND AS WE SUBMIT FOR STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS. THIS WILL BE ACTIVE WITH A SHOVEL READY PROJECT. WE HEAR A LOT FROM OUR CONSTITUENTS ON WHEN THEY TRIED TO WATCH US ON COMCAST CHANNEL 260, THEY CANNOT HEAR US.

IF YOU COULD ASK THEM TO ADJUST THE VOLUME.

WE WOULD APPRECIATE THAT. OUR CONSTITUENTS LIKE TO WATCH

US. >> AND THE DIRECTION, BIGOTRY OAKES HEADED TOWARDS MCRAE AND KEYSTONE HEIGHTS FOR THOSE OF US HOPING THEIR ADDRESS IS WITHIN THE FIRST PHASE.

I DISCUSSED THIS WITH CHARLIE, THE BASE RATE IS $30, AND IF WE DO THIS RIGHT THAT CAN BE REIMBURSED SOMEHOW.

>> BILL WITH COMCAST NBC UNIVERSITY UNIVERSAL.

I HAVE BEEN IN THIS 23 YEARS, 23 IN THE JACKSONVILLE AREA.

WHAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO IS THE FEDERAL AFFORDABLE CONNECTIVITY PROGRAM WHICH IS A $30 SUBSIDY THAT THE FCC PROVIDES.

COMCAST IS A MEMBER OF THAT PROGRAM.

AND WE DO THAT THROUGH INTERNET ESSENTIALS TO GET THE INTERNET TO GET INCOME CONSTRAINT COMPLY -- QUALIFY FOR THE PROGRAMS. THOSE PARTICULAR CUSTOMERS GET THE SERVICE FOR FREE BECAUSE OF

THE SUBSIDY. >> BUT THAT IS JUST THE FIRST YEAR OF THE SERVICE. IF THEY WANT TO EXPAND THEY CAN AND IT IS UP TO THEM TO DO THAT. THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.

>> I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT PLAIN TO THE PEOPLE WATCHING ON TV.

IT'S ALSO MY UNDERSTANDING IF STATE OR FEDERAL MONEY IN ADDITION TO WHAT WE SPENT, THE STRATEGY IS YOU WILL BE READY TO GO WITH AN EXPANSION OF THE PROGRAM AND ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS SECURE THE MONEY AND FUNNEL IT TO YOU.

>> EXACTLY, THE WISDOM OF THIS CONTRACT VEHICLE, AND I THINK TROY AS WELL AS KELLY, THEY WERE ABLE TO WORK THIS OUT.

WE WENT THROUGH A DOCUMENT TO MAKE SURE IT WAS COMPLIANT.

IT REALLY SETS YOU UP WELL. WE CAN PARTNER WITH YOU TO

SERVICE THE OTHER SERVICE AREAS. >> THIS IS VERY ROBUST AS WELL AS. I WILL BE WORKING WITH THEM

[01:00:43]

THROUGH GRANTS DIRECTLY AND OTHER WAYS TO DO THAT.

THIS IS THE BASIC SYSTEM. JUST TALKING ABOUT THE TEAR THIS CAN BE FOR 995, 429-95-4100 DOWN AND TEN OF.

IT IS A VERY ROBUST SYSTEM. >> THIS PROGRAM IS THE SUBSIDY FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE $30, THE PROGRAM WOULD

BECOME FREE AT THAT POINT. >> THERE ARE QUALIFYING THERE ARE LEVELS FOR DIFFERENT PEOPLE. MY WIFE IS A PHYSICIAN.

SHE WANTS A HIGH-RESOLUTION WHEN IT COMES TO DATA.

THAT IS A DIFFERENT SUBSCRIPTION FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS NOT.

FOR BUSINESS WE HAVE THE A TEN GIG SYSTEM.

THE RESIDENCE MAY NOT NEED THAT. THAT PRICE POINT, I DON'T HAVE IT IN FRONT OF ME. THAT IS ALL AVAILABLE IN THESE AREAS AS WELL AS EXISTING. BUT THAT PARTICULAR AREA WOULD QUALIFY FOR THE SPEEDS OF THE OPTIONS.

>> I THINK THE QUESTION IS BROADER THAN THAT.

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT THE ADOPTION RATE TO BE IN THESE AREAS?

>> 80% OR 20%? >> RESIDENTIAL,.

>> YOU CAN BET, IT CAN BE 50-60%, WE WILL TAKE THAT.

AND OTHER COMMUNITIES I HAVE SEEN IT HIGHER THAN THAT.

YOU HAVE DONE A BUSINESS MODEL AND YOU ARE EXPECTING A RETURN.

WHAT KIND OF MAN ADOPTION RATE, YOU DO KNOW YOU DON'T KNOW?

SOME OF IT IS PROPRIETARY,. >> WILL HAVE TO KILL ME IF YOU TELL ME. WE SEE THE GROWTH IN CLAY COUNTY. I WATCH WHAT'S GOING ON WITH YOUR ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. THIS IS A GREAT PLACE TO DO BUSINESS. A NATURAL FORTUNE 50 COMPANY IS WILLING TO PARTNER WITH YOU ON THAT.

>> YOU HAVE ANSWERED MY QUESTION.

THE SERVICE YOU'RE PUTTING IT IS SUITABLE FOR SOMEONE DOING AN IT

BUSINESS. >> THE SAME SYSTEM.

IT IS THE ABILITY THAT IS THERE. THE SAME SYSTEM.

THE SAME SYSTEM IN ATLANTA, AND SAN FRANCISCO.

>> SO THIS WOULD BE WITHIN THE REALMS OF POSSIBILITIES.

>> LOCATE ONE HERE. ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE.

>> AND ANYBODY ELSE? I WILL TAKE A MOTION.

[01:05:01]

>> MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> A MOTION AND A SECOND.

>> CAN YOU MAKE SURE IT INCLUDES THE ADVANCE PAYMENT? ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

OPPOSE SAME SIDE IT CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, I WANT TO THANK KELLY BECAUSE SHE HAS WORKED NIGHT AND DAY TO GET THIS DONE.

>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU BILL.

>> ALL RIGHT, THIS IS THE 5:00 P.M. TIME CERTAIN SPIRIT WE

[14. 5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Approval of Resolution directing the placement of the School Board's Referendum on the ballot of the November 8, 2022 general election]

ARE THERE. WHO WANTS TO LEAD THE SCHOOL

ISSUE. >> I CAN INTRODUCE IT AND I THINK YOU HAVE A CHAIRMAN HERE. THIS IS THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION WE HAVE RECEIVED THAT WILL DIRECT THE BALLOT FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION. THIS IS A REQUEST TO APPROVE THE CONTINUATION OF AN ADDITIONAL TAX AND IF YOU RECALL IT WAS THREE YEARS AGO THAT THE BOARD MOVE FORWARD AND APPROVED THIS TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT. YOU CAN ONLY DO IT FOR FOUR YEARS AND IT WILL BREAK EXPIRE. THEY WANT THIS ON THE BALLOT AGAIN TO APPROVE IT FOR ANOTHER FOUR YEARS.

>> WE WILL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.

>> A THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO YOU WANT MY NAME AND ADDRESS.

>> I'M THE CHAIRMAN THIS YEAR. IT IS GOOD TO SEE ALL OF YOU TODAY. THE LAW BECAME BACK IN 2018 REQUIRED ALL SCHOOLS IN FLORIDA TO HAVE EITHER AN ARMED RESOURCE OFFICER OR AN ARMED GUARDIAN FROM BELL TO BELL, EVERY DAY THAT SCHOOL IS IN SESSION. IN 2018 THEY WENT TO.

>> TO PROTECT STUDENT AND STAFF AS WELL AS REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE.

NOW, I WANTED TO SHARE WITH YOU THE OTHER THINGS BESIDES PERSONNEL. AND WHAT WE HAVE DONE.

SAFETY AND SECURITY HAVE INCLUDED FENCING, FRONT OFFICE ENHANCEMENT SINGLE KEY INITIATIVES.

FILM AND SINGLE POINT OF ENTRY. >> IT IS GOOD TO SEE ALL OF YOU.

>> I DO WANT TO EXPLAIN, I KNOW THAT THREE YEARS AGO THERE WAS A DIFFICULT DISCUSSION ON HOW TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE INTERNALLY THE SCHOOL BOARD LOOKED AT IT AND IF THIS IS THE BEST SOLUTIN.

THERE'S A LOT OF MONEY TO PROVIDE THIS SERVICE TO OUR SCHOOLS. I THINK IT IS INCUMBENT UPON ALL OF US TO LOOK AT BEST PRACTICES AND OPTIONS AVAILABLE AND I'M

SATISFIED WITH THE DECISION. >> I AGREE.

>> MY UNDERSTANDING WAS, WE ARE JUST PASSING THIS ALONG FOR THE

[01:10:02]

VOTERS TO DECIDE. >> A WILL FOR APPROVAL.

FURTHER DISCUSSION. >> ADOPTION OF.

[15. 5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Final Public Hearing to consider adoption of Z-22-06. (District 3, Comm. Renninger) Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval. (D. Selig)]

>> THIS IS IN THE RICHMOND AREA WHICH IS DISTRICT THREE.

THIS HAS NINE BEDROOMS AND FIVE AND A HALF BATHROOMS BUILT BY A PREVIOUS LIVING FACILITY THAT SPECIALIZE IN CLIENTS THE APPLICANT TONIGHT IS LOOKING TO MAKE THIS ASSISTED LIVING FOR SENIORS. THE PROPERTY.

>> STAFF HAS LOOKED AT THIS APPLICATION IT IS CONSISTENT WITH A ZONING CODE. ON APRIL 5 THEY VOTED 7-02 APPROVE THE ITEM AND SAPS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.

JUST FOR YOUR INFORMATION. >> HE WON'T BE CHANGING TOO MUCH

IN ITS FUNCTIONALITY. >> I'M ANGELA I AM THE APPLICANT'S AGENT. DELETE MY ADDRESS.

SOMETIMES YOU DO SOMETIMES YOU KNOW.

I'M WITH THE LAW FIRM THE APPLICANT IS HERE TODAY IS PROBABLY MUCH BETTER SUITED. I'M HERE THE LEGAL LAND-USE

DISCUSSION. >> GOOD EVENING THANK YOU FOR HAVING US. THIS IS THIS IS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DELAYS OR SPECIAL NEEDS.

>> HOW WOULD SOMEONE GET TO GO THERE.

>> ARE WE HAVE ADVERTISING REFERRALS TO DO THIS.

[01:15:22]

IT IS MINIMAL BECAUSE A LOT OF THEM DON'T MOVE THAT MUCH.

IF ANYTHING, IT'S MOSTLY INDOOR WITH A NEW.

HOURS? >> YES.

>> I THINK I HEARD MEDICARE MEDICAID.

IS INCOME LIMITED? >> MEDICARE DOES NOT PAY FOR

ASSISTED LIVING. >> AVERAGES DEPENDING ON IF IT IS A PRIVATE SUITE OR THINGS LIKE THAT.

>> WOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED IN? >> YES MEDICAID,.

>> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. PUBLIC HEARING.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS? CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW TAKE A MOTION. WILL FOR APPROVAL.

A MOTION AND A SECOND. FURTHER DISCUSSION ALL IN FAVOR

[16. 5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard - Final Public Hearing to consider adoption of PUD-2022-04.(District 5, Comm. Burke) Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval. (M. Brown)]

SAY AYE. IT CARRIES 5-0.

ITEM 16. THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

WHAT IS ITEM 16 ABOVE. WE COULD MAKE THESE DESCRIPTIONS

A LITTLE BETTER ON YEAR I THINK. >> I WILL ATTEMPT TO DO THAT IN THE FUTURE. THE APPLICANT HAS A TEXT CHANGE TO THE EXISTING PUD. THIS IS LOCATED AT COMMISSION DISTRICT FIVE. THE EXISTING PUD WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 1989 AND AMENDED AND 2007.

THE MAJORITY IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AND THIS WOULD APPLY ONLY TO THE REMAINING. AS APPROVED, IT ALLOWS FOR A GAS STATION RESTRICTED. AND ALL OTHER USES ARE PROHIBITED. THE REQUEST AMENDMENT WOULD CHANGE OUT THE OPERATION OF THE CONVENIENCE STORE.

ALL OF THE OTHER CONDITIONS WOULD REMAIN THE SAME.

THIS IS JUST A REQUEST TO CHANGE OUT THE CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STATION USE WITH A FAST FOOD USE FOR 24 HOURS.

THIS SHOWS YOU THE LOCATION OF THE PARCEL OUTLINED IN BLUE.

THIS SHOWS YOU THE PROPOSED TEXT CHANGE, IT REPLACES I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THE LAST SENTENCE. LIMITED TO THE LOCATION AND

[01:20:02]

HENLEY. THAT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEN THEY HEARD THIS.

I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID VOTE 7-02 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE TEXT AMENDMENT WITH THAT CHANGE OF RESTRICTING THE LOCATION OF THE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, OR FAST FOOD USE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW 24 HOUR FAST FOOD USE ALONG WITH THE RECOMMENDED RESTRICTION THAT IT BE RESTRICTED TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION. SO, I THOUGHT THERE IS ONE

ENVELOPE. >> THIS EXISTED LONG BEFORE THE MASTER PLAN CAME TO BE. IT HAS ALLOWABLE USES WHICH INCLUDES EVERYTHING WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICTS.

AND THE DRIVE-THROUGH'S ARE ALLOWED IN THOSE DISTRICTS.

>> IS IT ONE OF THE ONLY PROPERTIES ALLOWED? ALSO THE RESTRICTION, IF I'M FOLLOWING THE QUESTION RIGHT, THE MAJORITY OF THE VILLAGE CENTER USE, PROHIBITS DRIVE-THROUGH, BUT THE ACTIVITY CENTER DOES ALLOW DRIVE-THROUGH SPIRIT THIS IS AN FUTURE LAND USE.

>> I ASKED BECAUSE ANOTHER PERSON CALLED ABOUT A PROPERTY ON HINDLEY ROAD. THAT IS WHY I'M WONDERING IF THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS -- IT IS LIMITED IN CERTAIN AREAS.

THIS ALLOWS IT PRESENTLY. >> THIS MAY BE FOR THE APPLICANT BUT, I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT INTERESTED.

HOW MUCH ARE THEY INTERESTED IN. BECAUSE THIS IS A LOT OF PROPERTY. YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE AERIAL.

THAT, THE FAST FOOD USE IS IN THE NORTHWEST COURT RIGHTED THAT INTERSECTION. IT IS IN THAT AREA.

>> THE REST OF IT IS ANYTHING ALLOWED, BB ONE AND BB TO ZONING DISTRICT. YOU HAVE A -- A LOT OF COMMERCIAL USES THAT CAN GO OUT THERE.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO NO -- >> SUSAN MAY BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT, I THINK IT IS LESS THAN 2 ACRES BUT I'M NOT SURE.

>> WITH THE 24 HOURS APPLIED TO THE WHOLE 8 ACRES?

>> THAT IS THE CONDITION THAT THEY ADDED TO LIMIT THE USE JUST TO THAT NORTHWEST CORNER, THEY FELT THE REST OF THE PARCEL, ESPECIALLY AS YOU'VE GOT FURTHER DOWN YOU HAD RESIDENTIAL ACROSS THE WAY AND THEY FELT IT WAS IT APPROPRIATE.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> WHAT IS THE PORTION THAT DOESN'T BELONG WITH WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING?

>> ALL OF THAT WAS PART OF THE PUD.

BUT -- I'M NOT SURE THE VACANT AREA I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT IS

FOR. >> THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

THEY'VE ALREADY DONE THE CUT FOR THE DRIVE.

>> IS 9024 HOUR FACILITY? >> WHAT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF HINDLEY FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER? THE GAS STATION? IS THAT THE GAS STATION IN

[01:25:04]

FRONT? >> THERE IS A HOUSE.

>> AND DIRECTLY ACROSS IS A HOUSE BUT CATTY CORNER IS THE

GAS STATION. >> A I AM HERE TUESDAY I SPOKE

WITH ED BEFORE THE MEETING. >> THIS WAS APPROVED IN 1989, BACK IN THE GOOD OLD DAYS WHEN THERE WASN'T MUCH GOING ON.

IT INCLUDES ALL OF THE RESIDENTIAL ON THE ROAD THE WINN-DIXIE, IT INCLUDES THIS PARCEL HERE.

THE PUD SOUTH OF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING RIGHT NOW, THIS IS THE WINN-DIXIE. ON THIS CORNER, WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT, THE PARCEL ON THE MAP IS THE ACUTE CARE CENTER.

THEY DO HAVE CONSTRUCTION. THERE'S A ROAD AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. IT GOES FROM THIS ROAD, IT DROPS SOUTH BEHIND THE PROPERTY WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, IT GOES SOUTH, AND CONNECTS TO THAT SHOPPING CENTER.

THIS IS ALL UNDER SINGLE OWNERSHIP.

THIS IS THE LAST PIECE OF VACANT PROPERTY AND IT HAS BEEN ON THE BOOKS SINCE 1989. THE USE WAS BASED ON THE ZONING.

IN THE MASTER PLAN, THIS HAD COMMERCIAL ZONING UNDER THIS PUD. THAT IS WHY IT IS ONE OF THE ONLY PROPERTIES LEFT WITH THIS ZONING.

THE CORNER IS PERMITTED FOR A 24 HOUR WORK GAS STATION.

SO IF THIS WERE NOT FAST FOOD IT WOULD BE A RACETRACK WITH CAAPÉS AND LIGHTS. THE PROPERTY IS UNDER CONTRACT.

IT IS A SPECIFIC RESTAURANT. WE ARE SEEKING TO ALLOW THE USE JUST ON THAT CORNER FOR AN ACRE AND AN ACRE AND A HALF FOR THAT FAST FOOD ESTABLISHMENT. THAT IS THE ONLY CHANGE THAT THIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH. QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> IF YOU COULD. CAN WE PUT THAT BACK UP.

I SEE THE CORNER THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

THE AREA YOU HAVE IN YOUR SITE PLAN.

IS THIS SOMETHING THAT CAN BE DONE EVEN AFTER THE MCDONALD'S

GO IN? >> THIS IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THEIR APPROVAL AS WE SPEAK.

WHEN THOSE BUILDINGS ARE DONE THE TREES WILL BE PUT IN.

BECAUSE IT IS IN MAY KACZMAREK, EVEN THOUGH WE HAD ZONING THIS WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE SAME TIME.

ALL OF THAT WILL BE DONE AT THE SAME TIME.

ALL OF THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE DONE CONCURRENTLY.

>> I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE RESIDENCES AND NOT SURE IF IT GOES INTO THE CONDO UNITS. BUT I'M NOT SURE IF THEY WOULD

SEE THIS IN THE BEGINNING. >> MCDONALD'S IS A FRANCHISE.

[01:30:02]

THE FRANCHISE OWNER WILL MAKE A DECISION AND THERE MAY NOT BE A

24 HOUR USE. >> ANYTHING ELSE? WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

BRING IT BACK. COMMISSIONER BURKE, WHAT IS YOUR

PLEASURE. >> I MOVE APPROVAL.

>> A MOTION AND A SECOND PERIOD FURTHER DISCUSSION.

[17. 5:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard. Final Public Hearing to Consider Mobility Fee Subsidies for Most Uses (C. Stewart for E. Lehman)]

ALL IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

IT CARRIES 5-0. >> NUMBER 17.

MOBILITY FEE SUBSIDIES. WHO'S ON THE HOOK FOR THAT ONE.

>> MOVING BACK IN TIME TO FEBRUARY WITH THE DISCUSSIONS WE TALKED ABOUT CHANGING SUBSIDIES FOR THE MOBILITY FEES.

SO WE ARE BRINGING THIS BACK TO YOU TODAY.

ESSENTIALLY IN YOUR PACKET WHICH DIDN'T GET CONFUSING YOU HAVE THE OLD SET AND THE NEW SET. AND WHAT WE DID WAS WHAT WE DISCUSSED. WE TOOK OUT A LOT OF THE SUBSIDIES WHICH WE THOUGHT AND YOU AGREED WITH WERE NOT NECESSARY. BUT WE DID LEAVE THE THE QUALITY RESTAURANT AND BACKED OUT OF THE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT.

I CAN GO THROUGH THESE OR GIVE EXAMPLES.

WHAT I WOULD SAY, INFORMATION I NEED FROM YOU TODAY, I WILL USE THESE EXAMPLES. IT IS WHAT IT IS, THAT THESE ARE WHAT I CAN THINK OF. WITH A QUALITY RESTAURANT I NEED TO KNOW YOUR THINKING. WE HAVE A QUALITY RESTAURANT BUT WE ALSO HAVE SOME VERBIAGE THAT IS CALLED QUICK TURNAROUND, SIT DOWN. I WILL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE.

A SITDOWN RESTAURANT THAT HAS WAITERS AND WAITRESSES BUT A QUICK TURNAROUND. IF WE WANT TO INCLUDE RESTAURANTS THAT ARE LIKE THAT IN THE STUDY.

I JUST NEED TO KNOW THAT. WHAT WE WILL DO, YOU CAN FOLD ON IT TODAY. WE WILL ADD ANOTHER LINE THAT SAYS QUICK TURNAROUND AND QUALITY WILL BE IN THEIR TOGETHER. IF YOU ARE THINKING OF A RUTH CHRIS OR SOMETHING ELSE AND YOU JUST WANT THAT QUALITY WE SUGGEST NOT ADDING THAT LINE IN THEIR.

TO GIVE YOU A QUICK EXAMPLE. THIS POINT HAS QUALITY RESTAURANT AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

THE ONES LEFT ARE THE ONES THAT ARE FROM THE DISCUSSIONS THAT SHOULD BRING JOBS TO THE SUBSIDIES REMAINING.