[2. Memorandum of Understanding with the University of North Florida (UNF) Board of Trustees, Regarding the Small Business Development Center at UNF (V. Hapner)]

THAT INTERNALLY WITHIN THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. I WILL

RECOMMEND CONSENT. >> THANK YOU. >> ITEM NUMBER 2 IS MOU WITH NORTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES CONCERNING SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.

>> HELLO. NUMBER 2 IS MOU WITH THE SP DC. SO THEY PROVIDE THEIR GOING TO BE PROVIDING A LONG-TERM NO COST CONSULT TO NOT ONLY SMALL BUSINESSES HERE IN CLAY COUNTY BUT ARE NONPROFITS AS WELL TO HELP WITH THINGS LIKE BUSINESS PLANNING. THEY CAN ALSO HELP WITH

APPLYING FOR FUNDING AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. >> IS THIS A NEW CONTRACT OR AN

EXTENSION? >> THIS IS A NEW ONE. >> A NEW CONTRACT. ANDB I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. COVID RELATED, IS THIS TIED TO COVID RELATIONSHIP?

>> THEY DO HAVE SOME ASSISTANCE FOR HELPING THOSE SMALL BUSINESSES GET BACK UP ON THEIR

[00:05:10]

FEET FROM COVID. THEY PROVIDE THE 3 SERVICES. IF THERE'S ANY TYPE OF FUNDING THAT IS OUT THERE DUE TO COVID I KNOW THEY HAVE THE STAFFING, FUNDING AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THEY WILL ASSIST THESE BUSINESSES AND NONPROFITS TO NAVIGATE THOSE SYSTEMS.

>> THE CONTRACTS FOR MOU IS FOR HUNDRED 50,000 4/20 OR 2 YEARS?

>> THIS IS 2 YEARS. >> 2 YEARS. >> IT'S 3 YEARS, 22, 23, AND

24. >> OKAY. 3 YEARS. GOT IT. THANK YOU.

>> ALSO TO LET YOU KNOW WE DID HAVE A VERY SIMILAR AGREEMENT WITH CARES ACT FUNDING. SO

THEY'VE DONE THE SAME, PROVIDED THE SAME SERVICE BEFORE. >> OKAY. DIDN'T THE CHAMBER HAVE A SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT UNIT? THAT WE DID PAY FOR OR WE ARE PAYING FOR?

[INAUDIBLE] >> SO THE SP DC HAS BEEN IN VARIOUS DIFFERENT LOCATIONS.

I'M ASSUMING THAT'S WHAT YOU TALKED ABOUT WITH THE CHAMBER? WE HAVE PAY FOR THAT OVER THE YEARS AS COURTNEY ALLUDED TO. WE PAID FOR THAT FOR CARES ECOMONY. IT'S A SUBSIDY OUTSIDE OF UNF. THIS IS WHILE IT'S ON EXTENSION IS A CONTINUING OTHER SERVICES THAT ARE ALREADY BEING PROVIDED IN THE COUNTY OTHER UNDER FUNDING STREAMS. I'M NOT GOING TO SAY IT WAS BY THE CHAMBER. THE SP YOU SEE IS TO BE IN THE CHAMBER AT ONE POINT IN TIME. SAME GROUP, IT'S CHRIS WHO HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR YEARS IN CLAY COUNTY. THIS IS TO KEEP THAT

DEDICATED AGENT IN CLAY COUNTY. >> THAT'S MY NEXT QUESTION.

WHERE IN CLAY COUNTY? >> WE WILLOFFER, IN OUR NEW OFFICE WE WILL HAVE A SMALL MEETING ROOM AND THAT WILL BE OFFERED UP TO THEM AT ANY TIME FOR THEM TO SCHEDULE CONSULTATIONS OR MEETINGS TO WORK WITH A SMALL BUSINESSES AND NONPROFITS.

>> THAT'S THEIR SERVICES ON DEMAND WHEN THEY NEED WHEN SOMEONE CALLS NEED SERVICE?

THEY ARE WILL BE MANY THAT OFFICE? >> NOT ALL THE TIME. IT WILL OFFER THEM LIKE AN IN-HOUSE SPACE. THEN THEY DO A LOT OF ZOOM AND PHONE CALL

CONSULTATIONS AS WELL. >> THIS REQUIRES QUARTERLY REPORTS. I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE.

>> SO THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'VE MANAGED THIS CONTRACT. AS FAR AS QUARTERLY REPORTS MOVING FORWARD WE WILL HAVE THAT INFORMATION. I CAN'T SPEAK ON WITH THE OTHER CONTRACTS

REQUIRED. >> I'M JUST TELLINGYOU. I'D LIKE TO SEE IF QUARTERLY

REPORTS ARE REQUIRED I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A TICKLER. >> YEAH.

>> AND LETS ME KNOW WHAT KIND OF SERVICE WERE PROVIDING. >> I'M GONNA RECOMMEND THIS CODE TO COMMISSION. THERE'S A LOT OF MOVING PARTS AND IT'S BEEN HANDLED BY THE PEOPLE.

TRY TO US AND NOT US. I RECOMMEND WE GO TO COMMISSION WITH THIS. THANK YOU.

[3. Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of Veterans' Affairs Regarding the VetraSpec Web-Based Application (V. Hapner)]

>> I'M HERE FOR THE NEXT 120. >> OH YOU GOT THE NEXT ONE TO? LET ME GET MY COMPUTER WORKING HERE. OKAY THE AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS. FOR VIRTUAL

SPEC WEB-BASED. >> THIS IS A PROGRAM THAT BSO USES TO PROCESS OUR CLAIMS. THIS IS THE PROGRAM WE'VE ALWAYS USED. THEY WERE JUST BOUGHT OUT SO IT REQUIRED US TO SIGN A NEW CONTRACT ESSENTIALLY. ALL THE SAME GUIDELINES AND ALL OF THAT AS

THE PAST. >> THIS IS A PLUG INTO TYLER SOFTWARE? I THINK. IT

REFERENCES TYLER'S TECHNOLOGIES. >> TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IS THE ONE THAT WROTE THIS OFFER AND IS ACQUIRE THE COMPANY. SO AS VICTORIA SAID THIS IS YOUR

VETERAN SERVICES OFFER TO ALLOW US TO FILE CLAIMS WITH THE VA. >> SO WE HAVE EVERYTHING WE

NEED ONCE WE GET AUTHORIZATION TO GET INTO THIS APPLICATION? >> AND WE HAVE IT CURRENTLY AS VICTORIA ALLUDED TO ITS CHANGING OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY.

>> THEY WERE ACQUIRED BY TYLER. >> OKAY, I SEE. MR. BRENNAN

WILL BE ONE OF THE USERS COULD. >> HE IS A USER. >> I THINK WE HAVE 2 USERS.

WHO'S THE OTHER ONE? >> WE ARE AUTHORIZED FOR 2 USERS BUT RIGHT NOW WE ONLY HAVE ONE BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO BE A SERVER FIRED BSO TO USE THE SOFTWARE.

>> THAT WAS MY QUESTION. SO WERE AUTHORIZED TO USERS BUT WE WILL USE ONE.

[00:10:04]

>> CORRECT. >> ARE RECOMMEND CONSENT. >> THANK YOU.

>> CHAIRMAN, ALSO TO HAVE THE SECOND POSITION AVAILABLE. THE NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS THAT KEEP BRANDON HAS DONE IN THE PAST IS QUITE SIGNIFICANT. WERE TAKING A LOOK AT THAT TOO.

>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU CAN TELL FROM DATA THAT'S PUT INTO THE SYSTEM. IT SEEMS PRETTY

PERSONAL. >> OH YEAH. >> BECAUSE THEIR CONTROLS AS TO WHO HAS ACCESS AND WHAT IT COULD BE USED FOR WHAT IT CAN'T BE USED FOR AN UP TYPE STUFF.

I THINK THE FEWER THE BETTER. SHE WAS OKAY. ONE IS EVEN BETTER. SO ANYWAY.

>> GASSER. >> IS WHAT WE NEED. HERE'S ITEM NUMBER, WHAT ARE WE ON,

[4. First Renewal to Professional Architectural Continuing Services Agreement #2019/2020-85 with Bhide & Hall Architects, P.A. (G. Price)]

FOR? >> YES, SIR. >> AGREEMENT TO USE THE DAY AND

HAUL ARCHITECTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES. ME. >> GOOD AFTERNOON SIR. JIM PRICE COUNTY FACILITIES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FIRST EDIBLE OF THE DAY AT HOME. IT WILL BE A ONE-YEAR RENEWAL. WILL HAVE ANOTHER ONE PENDING THE WORK THEY DO K THEY DO US AS SATISFACTION. SO FAR THERE TO THE FIRE STATION RENOVATION AND THE CRITERIAERIA PACKAGES FOR FOR THE HEALTH BUILDING. THEY'VE DONE GOOD WORK FOR AS WE LIKE TO KEEP THEM ON FOR ONE MORE YEAR AND WE ASKSK K PENDING PROJECTS FOR PENDING BOARD APPROVAL.

>> COST REMAINS THE SAME? >> OR THEIR CHANGES? >> FEES REMAIN THE SAME,

CORRECT? >> FOR THE D ON THE THE WRONG TERM IT WAS LISTED I THINK WE

CORRECTED THAT. O, >> THAT'S CORRECT SIR. >> WE DO HAVE A CORRECTED COPY AND I THINK IT'S POSTED SO WE WILL MOVE FORWARD. I RECOMMEND CONSENT.

>> THANK YOU SIR. >> ITEM NUMBER 5. NOTICE OF INTENT TOWARD BID TO SHAND

[5. Notice of Intent and Award of Bid No. 21/22-2, Shands Pier Removal Project and Agreement with Hal Jones Contractor, LLC - A Division of Vecellio & Grogan, Inc. (K. Smith/ G.Price)]

SPIRIT REMOVAL PROJECT. THE WHOLE JONES CONTRACTOR. >> YES SO THIS IS A REMOVAL OF THE SHAND SPEAR THAT WAS DAMAGED BY A PRIOR HURRICANE. WE PUT THIS OUT TO BID. WE RECEIVED 2 BIDS. QUITE A FEW THAT CAME TO THE PRE-BID MEETING. WE ONLY RECEIVED 2 BIDS. THE PRICE FROM HAL JONES, $699,000 TO REMOVE IT. THERE WILL BE SOME ADDITIONAL FEES FOR DISPOSAL AT THE LANDFILL. WE LOOK FORWARD TO MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS PROJECT. THE STATE REVIEWED OUR BID BEFORE HE PUT IT OUT. THEY ARE CURRENTLY REVIEWING

THE CONTRACT. SO WE LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING IT STARTED. >> ALL RIGHT, IT'S INTERESTING WHEN I LOOKED AT BOTH BIDS. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BUT THERE'S AN EXTREME DISPARITY THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS. ON THE BED. I PICKED ONE OUT, 6 BASIC 16 FOOT ONE CONTRACTOR WAS GONNA CHARGE A $672. THE OTHER CONTRACTOR IS 60 BUCKS. I DID MY DUE DILIGENCE AND I LOOKED AT THE HOME DEPOT WEBSITE. WHATSIT 6 BY 6 IS REPEATED 6 FOOT COST. IT'S $55.35 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THE $60 IS A REASONABLE NUMBER IS 672 I THINK IT'S KIND OF UNREASONABLE. THERE ARE OTHER CROSS FOR BOTH CONTRACTORS THAT ARE KIND OF, YOU'VE GOT TO

SCRATCH HER HEAD A LITTLE BIT. >> THIS IS UNIQUE PROJECT. THERE'S A FEW UNKNOWNS. WHAT MAY BE UNDERWATER. WE HAVE A GOOD PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. THEY DID SOME LIDAR DRIVE-BY SO WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION. WE WILL WORK VERY CLOSELY WITH THE CONTACTOR

JEAN AND HIS TEAM WE START THE CONSTRUCTION. >> I THINK I READ WERE EXPECTING IT DONE IN 90 DAYS BUT THEY HAVE UP TO A YEAR? > THAT'S CORRECT, YES SIR.

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES WE GAVE THEM SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF TIME. AFTER REACH OUT TO THE PERMITTING AGENCIES AND GET WRITTEN APPROVAL TO BEGIN OR WRITTEN APPROVAL THAT A PERMIT

PIS NOT REQUIRED TO MEET THE STATE REQUIREMENTS. >> DO WE HAVE, THIS IS A HURRICANE MATTHEW FUNDS. THIS GOES BACK A FEW YEARS. IS THERE A TIME LIMIT ON OUR FUNDS

TO USE FOR THIS? >> THE SOONER THE BETTER. THERE IS NOT. WE ARE WITHIN

THE TIMEFRAME. >> OKAY. SO EVEN IF THEY TAKE A YEAR WE WILL BE GOOD?

>> YES SIR. >> COME TO THINK OF IT I HAD A CONSTITUENT BRING THIS TO MY ATTENTION LAST THURSDAY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT THE HAZARD THAT THE OLD PEER MAY PRESENT TO BOATERS AND WHATEVER ON THE RIVER. AND FOR GETTING RIGHT ON IT. SO HOPEFULLY

[00:15:05]

COMMISSION MEETING WILL APPROVE IT. INK THE CONTRACT TO THE WAY WE GO. I WILL RECOMMEND CONSENT. THANK YOU. THIS IS NUMBER, WHATEVER, 6? THIS IS AN RFQ FOR RATIONAL DESIGN

[6. Notice of Intent and Award of RFQ No. 21/22-16 Professional Design Services, Clay County Department of Health Building (K. Smith)]

SERVICES FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT BUILDING. >> YES SIR. WE PUT OUT THE RFQ AS YOU ARE AWARE OF THE DESIGN BUILD APPROACH DID NOT WORK IN OUR PREVIOUS BIDS. SO WE PUT OUT FOR DESIGN SERVICES. WE RECEIVED BACK 6 PROPOSALS. WE HAD A COMMITTEE OF 3 EVALUATE THESE. WE DID INCLUDE THE HEALTH EPARTMENT STAFF IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS. BUT DAY AND HAUL IS FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROJECT. I FEEL LIKE IT WOULD BE A GREAT PROJECT AND

PARTNERSHIP. >> WHY TO GRADING MATRIX GAVE ZERO FOR THIS LOCATION?

>> THIS IS OUR PUP FUNDED PROJECT. WE CANNOT INCLUDE LOCATION. THAT ARE REFUNDED.

>> OKAY. THAT ANSWERS THAT QUESTION. THE PROBLEM I HAVE PIS THE DAY AND HAUL AND RDB AR FAIRLY CLOSE IN THEIR SCORING MATRIX. IS THERE ANY VALUE TO BRINGING THEM IN AND TALK TEAM

TO THEM ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THE HEALTH APARTMENT BUILDING? >> THE BOARD ALWAYS HAS THE RIGHT FOR PRESENTATIONS. AFTER BRING IN A MINIMUM OF 3 SO IT WOULD BE THOSE TOP 3 YOU JUST MENTIONED. SO THAT'S DEATHLY UP TO THE BOARD. I KNOW OUR COMMITTEE WAS HAPPY WITH THE PROPOSALS AND PUTTING IN HOME WAS RANKED NUMBER ONE. PRESENTATIONS ARE ALWAYS

ALLOWED AND WELCOMED. >> IF WE BRING THE MINUTE WE LIMIT THEIR PRESENTATION TO?

>> 5 TO 10 MINUTES. >> 5 TO 10 MINUTES? >> OR COULD BE SET BY YOUR

RECOMMENDATION. >> I LIKE TO SEE THE 3 TOP BIDDERS THE DAY, HOME AND

WALKER WITH A 5 MINUTE PRESENTATION. >> DO YOU WANT THAT AT THE NEXT B& WE JUST FILE THAT AGENDA. W COULD TRY TO GET THAT. DO WE KNOW IF THEY WOULD BE

AVAILABLE? INDISCERNIBLE. >> SOMETIMES I DON'T GET EVERYTHING I WANT. WHAT DO WE

ESTIMATE THIS? THIS IS JUST AN RFQ, RIGHT? >> REVIEWING THEIR QUALIFICATIONS. DO YOU GIVE DIRECTION FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD WE WILL NEGOTIATE A

CONTRACT AND BRING THAT BACK TO THE BOARD. >> OKAY THAT'S PUT IT ON THE

CONSENT AGENDA. >> THANK YOU. THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMANDING

[7. Mutual Aid Agreement with the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station Jacksonville for the Provision of Fire-fighting Assistance (D. Motes)]

OFFICER NAVAL AIR STATION. >> ASSISTANT COUNTY MANAGER. THIS IS A STANDARD AUTOMATIC MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WITH NAS. IT'S GOOD FOR UP TO 10 YEARS. WE DO HAVE SOME THAT AUTO RENEW. THERE IS HAPPENED TO RENEW AND IT STANDARD WITH HER OTHER AGREEMENTS.

>> THIS AGREEMENT ARE THERE ANY CHANGES FROM LAST AGREEMENT? >> YES.

>> YES, THE PRIOR AGREEMENT HAVE A PROVISION FOR REIMBURSEMENT. THAT OPERATED BOTH WAYS. THE NAVY REVISED THEIR TEMPLATE AND THE LEAD OF THAT PROVISION. WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR MONTHS BECAUSE THEY DO INTEND TO INCLUDE THAT PROVISION BACK IN. BUT BECAUSE OF THE TIMING WE NEED TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THIS AND ONCE THEY REVISE THEIR TEMPLATE WE WILL

BRING IT BACK TO YOU. >> IS A COMMON PRACTICE WITH US WITH ORANGE PARK AND GREENE CO,

NOT WRINKLE. >> IT'S COMMON THAT WE JUST RECIPROCATE THE SERVICES IN THE

CHARGES ARE FOR EACH ENTITY. >> BUT I JUST HEARD IS NES IS GOING TO, IS LOOKING TO GET

REIMBURSED. >> THE MANY YEARS WE'VE HAD IT THEY'VE NEVER UTILIZE THE PROVISION AND NEITHER HAVE WE. SHE HAS BEEN RECIPROCAL. FOR WHATEVER REASON HAVE TAKEN AND

OUT. BUCKS BUT THEY PLAN TO PUT IT BACK IN? >> YES.

>> IT WAS IN BEFORE THEY JUST NEVER ACTIVATED IT? >> YES.

[00:20:02]

>> CONSENT AGENDA. THANK YOU. BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR GRANTS ORDERED UNDER 50,000. ITEM

[8. Budget Resolutions for Grants Awarded under $50,000 (M. Mosley)]

NUMBER 8. >> I'M STANDING IN FOR MEGAN THIS AFTERNOON. ITEM NUMBER 8 IS THE BUDGET RESOLUTIONS FOR FOR GRANTS THAT THE COUNTY RECEIVED. THEY WERE UNDER $50,000 EACH WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE GRANT. THE FIRST ONE IS FOR A $10,000 INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES GRANT. THE NEXT ONE WAS $46,871.04-ONE GRANT. BUDGET INCREASE OF $1066 FOR THE MOSQUITO CONTROL GRANT AND 41,200 FOR THE HAZMAT GRANT. I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

>> YEAH, I WANT TO NOTE THE LIBRARY ENCLOSURE ATTACHMENT WAS INCORRECT AND WE'VE SUBMITTED A REVISED CORRECTED COPY FOR THE LIBRARY GRANT. SOMEHOW THEY LOST $10,000. I FOUND IT AND WE'LL PUT BACK IN. SO GREAT. JUST FOR THOSE ON HOME VIEW. I DON'T SEE ANY

[9. First Responders Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act Grant Application (M. Mosley/G. East)]

PROBLEM WITH IT SO I WILL RECOMMEND CONSENT. >> THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM IS PERMISSION TO APPROVE A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE FIRST RESPONDERS COMPREHENSIVE ADDICTION AND RECOVERY ACT GRANT. IF RECEIVED THIS WILL GO TO FUNDING THE COMMUNITY PARAMEDIC PROGRAM. AND THE CHIEF IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE GRANT.

>> THIS GRANT WE ARE APPLYING FOR WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO THE CURRENT OPIOID PROGRAM WE ARE ALREADY DOING. I WILL PROVIDED FOR 3 POSITIONS. PRIMARILY FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF THE PUBLIC ON REVERSAL AGENTS. WE WILL WORK WITH PARTNER AGENCIES AS WELL AS PROVIDE ADMINISTRATIVE HELP WITH OUR PROGRAM. WERE OBVIOUSLY GROWING QUITE FAST. IT WILL ALSO PROVIDE A PEER COUNSELOR FOR US TO BE ABLE TO USE AS A CASE MANAGER. SO WE CAN BETTER

WORK WITH HUMAN SERVICES AND CLEAN BEHAVIORAL. >> VIOLENT QUESTION IS THE GRANT FOR 2 MILLION OF 4 YEARS AND WE ASKED FOR 350. SO 350 PER YEAR RIGHT?

>> YES SIR. >> BUT COULDN'T ASK FOR 500 PER YEAR TO MAXIMIZE A GRANT?

>> WE STILL CARRY ON. WE WERE TRYING TO KEEP IT REALISTIC SO WE COULD GET THE GRANT. WE MODELED SOME ONE AFTER WHAT PINELLAS COUNTY DONE. HAVE A POPULATION OF OVER 900,000.

THEY MAXED IT OUT WITH WHAT WE WERE TO WAS ALONG THE SAME LINES. BUT, WITHOUT POPULATION

BASE IT WAS HARD TO GET TO 500,000 A YEAR. OFF OF THAT MODEL. >> ABOUT MODEL WITH OUR POPULATION. YEAH, I KNOW OPIOID ADDICTION IS A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM IN EVERY COUNTY. BUT THEN AGAIN IF YOU DON'T NEED IT WE ASKED FOR IT. IF YOU CAN'T MANAGE IT.

>> WE FELT THIS WAS MANAGEABLE. THE POSITIONS OF WHAT WE WERE ASKING FOR. WE DIDN'T WANT TO OVERSHOOT. WE ALREADY HAVE THIS PROGRAM GOING. THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. WE GET NARCAN FROM THEM. WE DID OVER 207 NARCAN KITS LAST YEAR. THIS WOULD ADD TO THAT CAPACITY AND IT WOULD ADD EDUCATION AND PREVENTION SIDE OF IT.

[10. Modification #1 to Subgrant Agreement R0039 with the State of Florida Division of Emergency Management, Regarding Fire Hazmat Sustainment FY19 (M. Mosley/J. Boree)]

>> OKAY. THANK YOU. I WILL RECOMMEND CONSENT. >> ITEM NUMBER 10 IS MEDICATION FOR THE SUB AGREEMENT GRANT FOR OUR 0039 WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. THIS IS FOR THE HAZMAT SUSTAINMENT FOR FY 19. THE QUESTION IS WHY WE GOING

BACKWARDS. >> I KNEW YOU'D BE UP TO READ MY MIND.

>> THIS IS A SUPPLY-CHAIN CONSTRAINT AND WE BEEN WORKING WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN REDOING THIS. THERE WAS QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS OVER WHO COULD SIGN IT. DID HAVE TO GO TO THE BOARD OR THE COUNTY MANAGER. WE BEEN WORKING THROUGH SOME OF THAT. I WILL PASS IT OFF TO CHIEF LORI IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

>> BUT IT'S 10 MONTHS LATER. >> I CAN'T CONTROL WHAT OUR STATE PARTNERS DO SIR.

>> I DON'T REALLY HAVE MUCH TO ADD. JUST ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. TROY HIT THE MARK

ON THAT ONE. >> WAS THE EQUIPMENT? WHAT EQUIPMENT DIDN'T COME IN A COME

FIND IT? >> IT'S BEEN SOME THE BIOHAZARD TYPE DETECTION CHEMICALS, TUBES, SOME OF THE MAINTENANCE THAT GOES ALONG WITH THE PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT.

JUST HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO GET THAT EQUIPMENT DO TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN ISSUES. THE GIFT THAT

JUST KEEPS ON GIVING. >> AND IT'S AVAILABLE NOW? >> THAT'S WHAT WERE BEING TOLD BY THE SUPPLIERS. THAT'S WHY WE'VE REQUESTED THE EXTENSION WITH THE STATE.

[00:25:02]

>> AND SO WERE CORRELATING WITH THE STATE AND THEY'RE ALL BOSOM BUDDIES HERE? AND THEY WILL APPROVE IT. MY ONLY CONCERN IS WHEN I SEE A GRANT THAT EXPIRED 10 MONTHS AGO AND WERE JUST OUT SAINT MOTHER MAY I PLEASE. SOONER OR LATER THEY'RE GOING TO SAY SORRY.

>> WE BEEN WORKING WITH THE STATE ON THIS A PART OF IT LIKE I SAID WAS A CHANGE IN OUR GRANT POLICY. THEY HAD TO DO A REVIEW OF A NEW GRANT POLICY TO DETERMINE WHO COULD SIGN ON THIS MORNING. THE ASKED THE BOARD TO SIGN AND EXECUTE. GOING FORWARD WE'VE GONE BEEN ADVISED THEY WILL TAKE THE COUNTY MANAGER'S SIGNATURE BECAUSE HER POLICY NOW ALLOWS