Jul 20, 2021 Finance and Audit Meeting Agenda

[00:00:06]

>> GOOD AFTERNOON. WE APOLOGIZE THAT WE ARE A COUPLE MINUTES LATE GETTING STARTED.

I WILL NOT CALL TO ORDER THE FINANCE AND AUDIT MEETING OF JULY 20 2021. WE WILL OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IS ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO US THIS AFTERNOON? SEEING NONE WE WILL MOVE RIGHT INTO OUR BUSINESS AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER ONE SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 2020 Ã

[1.  Second Amendment to Agreement #2020/2021-103 with the State of Florida, Department of Juvenile Justice-SWEAT Program (K. Thomas)]

GREG'S GOOD AFTERNOON. ON. >> THIS ITEM IS BEING BROUGHT TO YOU ON JUNE 22 I'M BRINGING YOU AN EXTENSION RENEWAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE. THE STATE REQUIRES THAT IF THEY'RE GOING TO EXTEND OUR AGREEMENT THEY HAVE TO EXTEND BEFORE THE CONTRACT ACTUALLY LAPSES. EXTENDED AT THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS BECAUSE AT THAT TIME STATE GOVERNOR HAD NOT FULLY APPROVED THE CURRENT NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET WHICH STARTED NOW, JULY. SO NOW THEY RENEWED IT AT THE 242 500 THAT WE HAD GOTTEN THE PREVIOUS YEAR. SO NEVER COMING BACK ENTERING UP THAT AGREEMENT BECAUSE THE GOVERNOR APPROVED 135,000 IN THIS YEAR'S BUDGET.

SO IT'S A LITTLE COMPLICATED THE WAY THE STATE DOES THEIR RENEWALS AND THEIR AGREEMENTS BUT, IF IT HAD EXPIRED THEY COULDN'T GUARANTEE THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN AGREEMENT BACK IN PLACE RIGHT AWAY. WE WOULD'VE LOST A COUPLE OF MINUTES OF THE PROGRAM.

>> WHAT WILL THE IMPACT BEAT WITH SIGNIFICANTLY LESS MONEY? >> SO I'M WORKING WITH OUR PROGRAM DIRECTOR. HE HAD SOME MEDICAL ISSUES SO HE'S BEEN OUT FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS. WE ARE LOOKING AT A PLAN OF HOW WE WOULD MINIMIZE SOME OF THE SWEAT EVENTS AND AFTER MINIMIZE SOME OF THE MENTORING AND TUTORING. AND I SAID I'D HAVE THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU BUT LIKE US THAT HE IS NOT BEEN AVAILABLE IN THE STATE IS EAGER TO GET THIS BACK AND SIGNED. I CAN PROVIDE OUR PLAN TO YOU THROUGH INTERACTION, EMAIL IN YOUR BOX OR BRING BACK TO THE

BOARD. >> OKAY. QUESTIONS? >> A GALLON. WE HAVE AN ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, WE HAVE AN AMENDMENT ONE AND THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO. THE ORIGINAL

AGREEMENT WAS FOR 282 44 SO BE LIKE THAT? >> 242 500.

>> LIMIT ONE WAS FOR 45? >> WHICH DOUBLED OUT. THEY AMENDED IT.

>> WAS OUT FOR BOTH YEARS? >> THE FIRST YEAR 2021 IT WAS 20 42,500. THAT WOULD'VE EXPIRED JUNE 30. FIRST AMENDMENT EXTENDED IT AT THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS MEANING THE SAME AMOUNT TO 42 500. AND NOW THEY'RE COMING BACK AND REDUCING IT TO 42 VIEW APPROVED ON JUNE 22 2 135. BECAUSE IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO THE VERY FIRST ORIGINAL AGREEMENT YOU'RE STILL SEEING THAT ORIGINAL 242. I CAN DO A SUMMARY SHEET IF YOU LIKE.

>> YEAH, WELL, SO BOTTOM LINE IS FORGETTING 35,000 FROM THE STATE.

>> YES. FOR THE STATES BUDGET YEAR WHICH IS GETTING JULY 1. >> AS OPPOSED TO THE 242 500

THAT WE HAVE GOTTEN THE PREVIOUS YEAR. >> I THINK WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW IS WHAT'S THE IMPACT? ARE WE GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE 135 COMPARED TO 242 IS A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION. ONCE THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAM AND I THINK I JUST HEARD YOU SAY

DIRECTOR OF THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN MEDICALLY HELD. >> THAT'S CORRECT. YOU CAN'T

ANSWER THAT. >> I DON'T HAVE ALL THE DETAILS OF HOW WE WILL MANAGE THAT.

EACH YEAR IS DIFFERENT. YOU MAY HAVE KIDS THAT ARE DON'T NEED THE MENTORING AND TUTORING AND MORE ON THE SWEAT SIDE WHICH OF THE DISCIPLINE SIGNED. EACH YEAR IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT TYPE OF YOUTH IS GOING TO COME THROUGH THE PROGRAM. SO, OR JUST GONNA HAVE TO LOOK AT HOW WE MANAGE, AND WHAT ARTICLE NUMBERS ARE ADMINISTERED TO THAT.

>I WILL SAY THERE ARE SOME EXISTING FUNDING THROUGH THIS SWEAT PROGRAM STILL AVAILABLE.

IT MAY NOT BE THAT WE HAVE AN IMPACT OR EFFECT UNTIL THE FOLLOWING YEAR. THOSE FUNDS

CAN ONLY BE USED FOR THIS SWEAT PROGRAM. >> DO WE PAY STAFF TO RUN THIS? YOU KNOW LIKE WHEN TORI WILL BRING US SOMETHING IT WILL BE WITH THE CROP WILL BE AN AMOUNT

[00:05:08]

WE HIGHER OUTSOURCE THE PROGRAM MANAGER. WE PUT OUT A BID AND WE DIDN'T PUT OUT THE BID FOR THAT, WE HAD SO MUCH HIGHLY QUALIFIED THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM THAT HAD JUST RETIRED.

SO WE WAIVE THE POLICY AND CONTRACTED WITH MR. CURTIS, RICK CURTIS. HE SPENT THE PROGRAM DIRECTOR. WE USE THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO MANAGE THE SWEAT EVENTS. THAT'S A GREAT RELATION WE HAVE AT LEAST TWICE A MONTH THEY GO OUT ON SATURDAYS AND AND MANAGE 2 Ã4 ROUPS OF SWEAT YOUTH GROUPS TO PICK UP GARBAGE AND TRASH ALONG THE HIGHWAY NEXT ON UNDER SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT. WE PAY THE OFFICERS DIRECTLY. NOT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. WE PUT OUT A BID FOR MENTORING AND TUTORING SERVICES AND WE SELECT RIGHT MINDSET YOUTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THEY DO SOME PROGRAMS IN THE SCHOOLS AND MIGHT BE FAMILIAR WITH THAT NAME. THEY'VE BEEN DOING THE MENTORING AND TUTORING FOR US. IT'S A PER HOUR RATE THAT WHICH IS PAID DIRECTLY TO BRIGHT MINDS. THEY SUBMIT LOGS AND INFORMATION.

>> DO WE PAY THE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR BY THE HOUR? > YES, WE HAVE AN HOURLY

CONTRACT WITH HIM. AN HOURLY RATE CONTRACT. >> SO I GUESS BOB'S GOING WITH MY QUESTION IS I DIDN'T WANT US TO HAVE THIS LARGE AMOUNT OF NOW ARE VERY SMALL HUNDRED 35,000 A LARGE EVENT USED TO PAY SOMEONE SALARY AND NOT HAVE IT GO DIRECTLY TO THE KIDS THAT WERE TRYING TO MENTOR. SO IT SOUNDS LIKE IF WE REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PROGRAMS WERE GOING

TO HAVE THEN WE WILL REDUCE. >> THE PROGRAM DIRECTORS COST AS WELL. SO THE 2 HAS MUCH

SERVICE FOR US. >> NEVER HEARD OF BRIGHT MINDS. ON THE LOCAL? ARE THEY FROM

JACKSONVILLE? >> THERE LOCAL. THEY'VE BEEN OFFICE OF WITH WILL'S ROOM.

THEY DO A LOT OF PROGRAMMING THESE TO DO SOME SUMMER CAMPS. I THINK THIS LAST YEAR THEY DIDN'T GET TO DO AS MANY BECAUSE OF COVID. ALSO WE PUT THEM IN CONNECTION WITH NASSAU COUNTY BECAUSE LAST YEAR STARTED A SWEAT PROGRAM AND WE RECEIVED FUNDING THROUGH THE STATE. SO THEY NOW ALSO HELP MANAGE THE SWEAT AND AWESOME COUNTY. ACTUALLY DO THE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND THE YOUTH MENTORING AND TUTORING SERVICES.

>> DOES THE COUNTY EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACT WITH BRIGHT LINES OR JUST THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE?

>> THE COUNTY DOES. YES SIR. >> I RECOMMEND WE GO TO FULL COMMISSION WITH THIS. SIMPLY, I'M INTERESTED IN WHAT IS THE IMPACT. REPORTED TO HAVE FOR MIX AND MATCH?

>> I THINK MR. CURTIS, I DID HEAR HE IS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL SO I WILL TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN GET SOME, GET TOGETHER BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT BOARD MEETING.

>> OKAY. THANKS. >> WE DO USES FUNDING FOR TEAM CORE. THERE'S QUITE A FEW OF

[2.  First Renewal to Agreement #2017/2018-149 with Erosion Control Seeding & Mulching, Inc. (C. Latham)]

CHANCE TO GO THROUGH THE PROGRAM. >> OKAY. GREAT, THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT ITEM NUMBER 2. FIRST RENEWAL TO AGREEMENT 2017/22 Ã 149 WITH EROSION CONTROL SEATING AND WATCHING, INCORPORATED. GOOD AFTERNOON, YOU'RE NOT MR. LATHAM.

>> NO I'M NOT MR. LATHAM. I MELTED WITH DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES. THIS IS THE FIRST RENEWAL WITH EROSION CONTROL. EROSION CONTROL IS OUR CONTRACTOR FOR ALL OF OUR LANDFILL MAINTENANCE. OUR POST CLOSURE OF ALL THE CLOSED LANDFILLS IN THE COUNTY AND THEY ALSO HELP US THERE AT OUR COLLECTION CENTERS WITH MOWING AND CARING FOR THINGS AND ROSEMARY HILL AS WELL. THIS IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT. WHEN WE BID LAST TIME THEY WERE THE ONLY QUALIFIED BIDDER AND WE'VE DONE WORK WITH THEM FOR SOME TIME NOW. THEY ARE ACTUALLY ALSO A SUBCONTRACTOR UNDER WASTE MANAGEMENT. THEY GRIND ALL OF OUR YARD WASTE WHICH IS GOOD FOR US AND THAT THEY ARE ALWAYS ON SITE. IF WE NEED SOMETHING THEY ARE READILY

AVAILABLE TO US. >> QUESTIONS? >> NO, ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH

THEIR PERFORMANCE? >> VERY SATISFIED. YES SIR. THEY ARE VERY RESPONSIVE TO US.

>> WOULD YOU RECOMMEND WE APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT. >> YES SIR I RECOMMEND

[3.  Notice of Intent and Award of Bid #20/21-42, Paul C. Armstrong Park Drainage Improvements and Accompanying Agreement with XGD Systems, LLC (G. Price)]

APPROVAL. >> I RECOMMEND CONSENT. >> I AGREE.

>> ITEM NUMBER 3 NOTICE OF INTENT AND AWARD A BID 2021 Ã 42 PAUL ARMSTRONG PARK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND A COMPANY AGREEMENT WITH H GD SYSTEMS. GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN.

>> GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN. I HAVE BACKUP HELP, TONY, TO TALK ABOUTTHE PLANS OF THE PARK IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT. THIS WAS BID OUT. WE HAD PRE-BIDDING ABOUT 9 DIFFERENT

[00:10:09]

DIFFERENT TYPE OF FIELDWORK. FROM OUR REVIEW ARE COMFORTABLE. THE NUMBERS LOOK GOOD. WE DID HAVE THE ENGINEER TAKE A LOOK AT IT AS WELL. WE RECOMMEND AWARD AND APPROVAL OF

THE AGREEMENT. >> OKAY, QUESTIONS? >> I'VE A FEW QUESTIONS. THE ENGINEERING DIAGRAMS WERE NOT PROVIDED. I NOTICED A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BIDS OF THE BIDDERS DEBATED ON THIS CONTRACT. THEN I LOOKED AT WHAT BACKUP I WAS GIVEN, THE CONTRACT IS BASICALLY TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE OR HOW TO USE A LESSON ABOUT THE FLOODING. I MEAN DID ONE BITTER THINK HE HAD TO ELIMINATED WHAT IS LESSON MEAN

I THINK THAT'S A TRANSPORT UTILIZING? >> I DON'T THINK ELIMINATION IS IT. THE ISSUE RIGHT NOW FLOODING IS STANDING WATER BEING USED INTERCHANGEABLY.

THE BITTER HISTORY OF THE PARK. YEARS AND YEARS OF GROUND MAINTENANCE THERE HAS SHIFTED THE LANDSCAPE AT THE PARK. IMPROVEMENTS THERE HAVE ALSO SHIFTED THE ACTUAL NATURAL FLOW OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. THIS IS THE MAIN ISSUE WE ARE TRYING TO ADDRESS. GET IT BACK TO THAT BASELINE FOR A GOOD FIELD. SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ACTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN ARE INPUTTING SWELLS IN BETWEEN THE FIELDS. REGRADING THE FIELD SO THAT THEY FLOW EVENLY TOWARD THE SWELLS AND REPLACING AND IMPROVING UPON THE ACTUAL INLETS AND DRAINAGE PIPES.

WHICH ARE REALLY OLD AND CLIMBED UP AT THE MOMENT. TO ALLOW THAT FLOW FROM THE FIELD SPREAD OUT NICE AND EVENLY SPREAD OUT SWELLS AND SPREAD THE OUTLETS OUT TO THE OUTLINING AND DRAINAGE AREA THAT WILL BE BUILT TO THE SOUTH. IT'S ESSENTIALLY A

REFRESH OF THE OLD INFRASTRUCTURE THERE. >> DO YOU HAVE AN EXPLANATION

OF WHY THE HUGE DIFFERENCE IN BIDS? >> SO ORIGINALLY DURING ESTIMATIONS WITH THE ENGINEER RECORD WE CAME UP WITH 273 IS GOING TO BE OUR APPROXIMATE ESTIMATION BASED ON OUR END WITHOUT GOING OUT THERE AND BIDDING MATERIALS. THIS FALLS IN LINE WITH THAT AS SOMEONE COMING UNDER BY ABOUT 40 GRAND. LOOKING AT THE OTHER PRICE

SHEETS. >> 548 AND 583. ASK IF YOU HONE IN ON ITEM NUMBER ONE SIR BETWEEN THE 2 THAT ARE OVER $500,000. ONE OF THEM HAS $130,000 THE OTHER ONE HOUSE $5000. IF YOU HONE IN TOWN TO WHERE HE SAW THE. SOMEONE HAS ONE OF THEM HAS 2:30,000 THE OTHER ONE HAS 51 THOUSAND IN THAT REGARD. SO THAT'S INCONSISTENT JUST IN MY VIEW.

INCONSISTENT IN THE ACTUAL BIDS THAT WERE COMING OUR WAY. IF THEY WERE SIMILAR AND THEY WERE STILL AROUND $500,000 I COULD MAYBE SEE IT THAT WAY. THAT WITH THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PRICES FROM XGD SYSTEMS. THE FACT THAT THEY ARE BASED ON THE COMPANY MAKEUP ITSELF THIS IS A COMPANY, A LARGE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WOULD LIKELY HIRE IF IT WAS FOR COMPONENT OF A LARGER PROJECT. THEY ARE SPECIALISTS. THIS IS SOMETHING WHERE THIS IS ALL THEY DO IS DRAINAGE AND SPORTS FIELDS AND GOLF COURSES. WHICH APPLIANCES ARE PROBABLY EVEN TIGHTER AND GOLF COURSES. I KNOW WE BROUGHT UP THE GOLF COURSE WAS HER PRIMARY FOCUS. I THINK THAT WOULD BE ABOUT TOUGHER TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH ESPECIALLY WITH THE CLIENTELE USING THE

GOLF COURSES. >> SO, BASED ON THE PRICE DEVIATIONS OF THE PRICE SHEETS ALONE IN THE CONSISTENCY OF XGD SYSTEMS AND THAT BEING CLOSE TO ORIGINAL ESTIMATION OF 273 I

[00:15:01]

RAIN? >> SPENDING 1/4 MILLION DOLLARS TO REDUCE THE FLOODING AND SURFACE WATER. IT COULD BE A COUPLE, IT COULD BE A 10 YEAR 10 INCHES PER HOUR. WE HAVE CRITERIA IN THIS ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ON A 3 INCH PER HOUR RAIN THAT IT WILL FLOOD WHAT

WILL GET SOGGY? I DON'T KNOW. YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING. >> CORRECT. I THINK THE WAY WE CAN ADDRESSB PRINCE CAN THE FIELD REDUCE A RATE OF RAINFALL.

>> A CAN. I WALKED THE GROUNDS MORE THAN A FEW OCCASIONS. THE ISSUE IS THE PARTS OF SHIFTED AND TURNED INTO BASINS AND SPOTS WHERE THEY DON'T WANT BASINS. THAT'S WHY THEY CAN'T PLAY. THERE'S BASICALLY CATCH POINTS ON THE FIELDS NOW VETERAN EXISTENCE AS A RESULT OF THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OVER THE YEARS SHIFTING THE LANDSCAPE. OUR ENGINEER RECORD THEY CAN GET A CI RESURVEY OUT THERE TO MAKE SURE THERE INSPECT WITH HIS PLANS. BUT THAT'S ABOUT THE BEST WE CAN DO UNTIL THE NEXT. THIS WOULD TAKE PLACE ON OR AROUND FALL BALL. WE WOULD BE ABLE TO KNOW TO BE HONEST WITH YOU UNTIL THIS TIME NEXT YEAR WHEN WERE

GETTING EVERY DAY FOR 2 WEEKS 2 INCHES. >> JUST WONDERING IF THE NFL, THE NATIONAL BASEBALL LEAGUE PASS STANDARDS. THIS FIELD CAN TAKE 3 INCHES OF RAIN IN OUR

ANIMAL THOUGHT. >> I IMAGINE IT WOULD BE A LOT EASIER FOR THEM THEY ONLY HAVE ONE PLACE FOR US TO DEAL WITH. THE MAIN ISSUE IS YOU HAVE 3 FIELDS TRYING TO SPREAD LOAD THE DRAINAGE AND CRITIC THOSE SWELLS TO MITIGATE THOSE THAT ARE COMING OFF. IT'S TERRIBLE COMPLICATED. I THINK WE GOT A LITTLE BIT. WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE TOUGHER THAN AN MLB FILLED THAT THE COVER UP. YOU KNOW WHEN IT STARTS RAINING. AS THE COUNTY AND TO KEEP THE CONSTITUENTS HAPPY AND KEEP THEM PLAY NEXT SPRING THIS IS THE BEST WE CAN DO.

>> SO YOU'RE GUARANTEEING THAT XGD SYSTEMS WILL ELIMINATE ALL FLOODING AT ARMSTRONG PARK

QUICKBOOKS ELIMINATION, REDUCE OR MITIGATE SIR. >> ASSIST ELIMINATE OR LESSON IS WHAT IT SAYS SPECIFICALLY. AND THERE'S MORE TO THIS. IT'S THE NUISANCE FLOODING AND STANDING WATER CONDITIONS AT THIS PARK WHERE IT'S UNUSUAL FOR EXTENDER. OF TIME EVEN

AFTER MY RAINFALL. >> JUST TO GIVE YOU BACKGROUND REASON SENSITIVE TO THIS AS OUR RESIDENTS HAVE A LOT OF FLOODING PROBLEMS. NUMBER SPENDING 1/4 MILLION DOLLARS HERE ON A COUPLE OF PLAYING FIELDS. THERE'S NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. EXCEPT OUR RESIDENTS HAVE SEVERE FLOODING PROBLEMS. WE DON'T HAVE THAT LEVEL, I'M NOT SURE WE EXERT THAT LEVEL OF CORRECTION IN THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS AS WE DO WITH THESE PARKS. WE BELIEVE RIGHTFULLY SO MAYBE NOT SO RIGHTFULLY SO. SOMETHING TO CONSIDER.

>> YES SIR. I GREW UP IN ORANGE PARK PROPER. I KNOW ALL ABOUT THE FLOODING.

>> THANK YOU TONY. >> SO? >> I WOULD RECOMMEND CONSENT.

IT'S THE LOWEST BIDDER. >> IT IS I APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION. VERY SUSPICIOUS OF A COMPANY WHO SAYS IT COST $103,000 TO MOBILIZE AND THEN ACCOMPANIED THAT'S PUTTING IN $24 A SQUARE YARD OF SOD TO YOUR POINTS ON THE GOLF COURSE. WHEN THE OTHER COMPANY IS A DOLLAR 77 A SQUARE YARD. IT'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE. HOPEFULLY WERE NOT GETTING THE WEED SOD.

IF IT'S GREEN AND IT KEEPS THE EROSION AWAY. >> AS LONG AS IT HAS ROOTS

MOUNT. I'M JOKING. >> WELL, WEEDS WELL AS WELL AS GRASS. I'M GOOD WITH CONSENT.

BY THINKING YOUR POINTS ARE WELL TAKEN. I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU TONY.

>> THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT MR. COUNTY MANAGER. >> MADAM CHAIR ON ITEM NUMBER

[COUNTY MANAGER]

[00:20:02]

IF THE BOARD REMEMBERS, IF YOU TAKE LAST YEAR INTO CONSIDERATION DURING COVID-19 MAYBE IT TOOK A LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS AND WHY IT WAS REDUCED TO 135. THAT'S WHAT I LOOKED ABOUT FOR THAT. NUMBER 3 TOO. AS IN THE CONTRACT SOME SPECIFIC THINGS WITH REGARDS TO DRAINAGE WITHIN THE CONTRACT. THERE'S AT LEAST 7 ITEMS. THERE'S ALSO UNDER THE ADDITIONAL NOTES IT DOES TALK ABOUT ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR APPROVAL.

ADDITIONAL ELEVATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THESE THINGS IT IS QUITE A BIT OF MONEY WHEN IT DOES COME TO DRAINAGE LIKE MELLE MEL. THERE ARE THINGS WITHIN THE CONTRACT WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S TO OUR SPECS INTO OUR STANDARDS TO MAKE SURE IT'S DRAINING PROPERLY. THEN FINALLY WE SEE A SPIKE WITHIN THE COVID-19 NUMBERS. BETWEEN THE AGES OF 25 OR 35. CAN'T STRESS ENOUGH FOR THE COMMUNITY TO GET OUT THERE AND GET VACCINATED. AND THEN REMAIN CAREFUL. REMAIN VIGILANT. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE A STANDARD. IF YOU'RE NOT FEELING WELL YOUR COUGHING AND YOUR SICK. IT'S TIME TO NOT BE WITHIN THE WORKPLACE AND GO HOME. WHICH WE ACCOMMODATE OUR TEAM MEMBERS APPROPRIATELY THAT WE TOO. OTHER THAN THAT POSING ANY QUESTIONS? ENDING ANY QUESTIONS? ASK I HAVE DONE.

>> THANK YOU MA'AM. >> I LIKE TO RECOGNIZE BEAVER UNDERSHERIFF WITH US THIS

AFTERNOON. THANK YOU. JEFF ANYTHING TO ADD? >> NO, ALL IS WELL IN THE

COUNTY TODAY. >> GREAT. OF COURSE THE CLERK OF F THE COMPTROLLER'S CE AND NOTHING FROM THEM. SEEING NOTHING ELSEELSE WE WILL ENTER THE MEETING.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.