[Call to Order] [00:00:05] >>> WE ARE GOING TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND WELCOME TO THE CLAY COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONER MEETING FEBRUARY 2ND, 2021. AT THIS TIME PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES. IF YOU NEED TO MAKE OR TAKE A CALL, WE ASK THAT YOU DO SO BY LEAVING THE ROOM THROUGH THE BACK AND GOING INTO THE VESTIBULE. [Pledge of Allegiance] AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO ASK EVERYBODY TO PLEASE STAND AND JOIN THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PLEDGE. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDERGOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> THANK YOU. OKAY. I AM GOING TO START OFF WITH INTRODUCTIONS. MY NAME IS MICHAEL BERET AND I AM THE CHAIRMAN. FROM MY LEFT TO YOUR RIGHT WE HAVE KELLY -- ACTUALLY SHE IS IN THE BACK OVER THERE. WE HAVE OUR CLAY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD REPRESENTATIVE JIM BOSA. AND OUR COMMISSIONER PETE DAVIS. COMMISSIONER BILL GARRISON, CHIAS CHAIRMAN -- THE VICE CHAIRMAN. THE COMMISSIONER JOE ANSALOM AND COMMISSIONER MARY BRIDGEMAN AND COMMISSIONER BO NORTON. WE HAVE TO REORGANIZE THIS BECAUSE EVERYBODY IS MOVED AROUND. WE HAVE OUR CLAY COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR ED LIEMAN AND WE HAVE OUR COUNTY ATTORNEY, COURTNEY GRIMM. AND WE HAVE OUR DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WILL BE ALONG SHORTLY, SHARICE STEWART. OUR SENIOR PLANNER BETH HARSON AND OUR COUNTY MANAGER HOWARD WANAMACKER. AND FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE WE HAVE CHRISTINE BLANCHET. THANK YOU. AND WE HAVE OFFICER ASH FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THIS EVENING. DID I GET EVERYBODY? THE CLAY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION IS AN ADVISORY BOARD TO THE CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. THE DECISIONS MADE BY THIS BOARD ARE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BCC WOULD WILL HAVE THEIR FINAL SAY AT THEIR MEETING ON M. IF THRE IS A SPECIFIC ITEM ON THE AGENDA YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE COMMENT CARDS THAT IS LOCATED IN THE BACK OF THE VESTIBULE. WHEN YOU DO SO, PLEASE BRING IT FORWARD. IF YOU WILL GIVE IT TO BETH -- I'M SORRY. KELLY, ARE YOU TAKING THOSE? OKAY, BRING THEM TO CHRISTINE SO SHE CAN GET THEM TO US. THANK YOU. CHRISTINE? I DID. YEAH. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE MEETING AND IT IS FOR ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT OTHER THAN THE ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA FOR THE MEETING. YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. WHEN THE LIGHT GOES ON -- WHEN THE RED LIGHT GOES ON YOUR TIME IS EXPIRED. FOR THOSE OF YOU IF THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME JOINING US, FIRST OFF WELCOME. WE LOVE HAVING THE COMMUNITY HERE. IF YOU NOTICE ON TOP OF THE PEDASTOOL THERE YOU CAN SEE THREE LIGHTS. EVERYBODY WHO WANTS TO COME UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. THERE WILL BE A GREEN LIGHT AND A YELLOW LIGHT MEANS IT IS TIME TO GET CLOSE TO P WRAING UP. WHEN -- TO WRAPPING UP. WHEN THE RED LIGHT COMES ON IT IS TIME TO STOP. IF YOU DON'T, I WILL ASK YOU TO KINDLY PLEASE STOP. THE ZONING ISSUES HEARD TONIGHT -- I'M SORRY. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT FOR THE ZONING ISSUES HEARD TONIGHT ISSUES SUCH AS TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE, WET LANDS AND ACCESS ARE NOT PERTINENT TO THE DECISION ON WHETHER TO APPROVE FOR REZONING. WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE INTO OUR FIRST ITEM WHICH IS THE [1.  Approval of Minutes] APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES. >> MOVE THEY BE APPROVED. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVORS PLEASE SAY I. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES, THANK YOU. WE WILL OPEN UP OUR FIRST PUBLIC COMMENT. AGAIN, THE FIRST PUBLIC COMMENT IS FOR THREE MINUTES ON ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON OTHER THAN WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT. SEEING NOBODY APPROACHING WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONTINUE WITH THE MEETING. WE WILL MOVE TO OUR FIRST [1.  Public Hearing to consider CPA 2020-11 to amend 1.01 acres on SR 21 from Urban Core (10) to Commercial (Commissioner Bolla District)] PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CPA2020-11 TO AMEND 1.01-ACRES ON STATE ROUTE 21 -- YOU GOT THIS -- >> THANK YOU THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT CPA2020-11 AMENDMENT FROM URBAN 410 TO COMMERCIAL. THIS IS IN COMMISSION DISTRICT 2. THE AGENT IS MATTHEW SCHARMA. I DON'T KNOW IF I SAID THAT [00:05:04] RIGHT. THIS WILL BE HEARD AT THE BCC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 23RD. THIS IS A PARCEL MAP OF THE PROPERTY. AGAIN, THE ACREAGE IS 1.01 ACRES AND THE EXISTING LAND USE AGAIN IS URBAN CORE 10. THE PAW -- PROPOSED LAND USE IS COMMERCIAL. THE MAP ON THE LEFT IS THE EXISTING LAND USE. THE BROWN IS URBAN CORE 10 DESIGNATION AND THE RED IS THE COMMERCIAL. THE MAP ON THE RIGHT SIDE IS THE ZONING MAP. THE GREEN IS AR AND THE DARK GRAY IS THE BB3. IT IS COMMERCIAL. THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE AERIAL IS WHAT IS GOING TO BE A TRAVEL CAMP AND IT IS OUR SALES OFFICE AND THERE IS A CHURCH PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST AND THERE IS A SCHOOL TO THE NORTH, RIDGE VIEW ELEMENTARY THE AFFECT ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE IS LOCATED IN THE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AREA. THERE IS SOLID WASTE CAPACITY. THIS WOULD POTENTIALLY GENERATE 44.7 PEAK HOUR TRIPS AND THE STORM WATER WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED. IF THIS WERE DEVELOPED AS URBAN CORE THERE WOULD BE POTENTIAL FOR TWO DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, BUT IT COULD GO UP TO 10 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. THE PROPOSED LAND USE WOULD HAVE A MAXIMUM AREA OF .4. STAFF RECOMMEND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL -- THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE OF CPA2. AND LET ME SAY ONE OTHER THING. THE REASON THIS CAME TO OUR ATTENTION IS THEY ARE LOOKING TO DEVELOP THE ADJACENT PARCEL AND WE FOUND THIS SLIVER OF LAND THAT WAS PART OF THEIR OWNERSHIP DIDN'T HAVE THE PROPER LAND USE FOR ZONING. THAT'S WHY THIS IS COMING FORWARD. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. THAT PROBABLY ANSWERED A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ABOUT WHY. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? EVERYBODY GOOD? OKAY. AT THIS TIME WE -- IF THERE IS AN APPLICANT PRESENT YOU ARE WELCOME TO FOM -- TO COME FORWARD. WHEN YOU COME FORWARD PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS. >> MY NAME IS MATTHEW 3200 RIVER ROAD AND I AM THE APRIL -- APPLICANT AND HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? >> I JUST HAVE REALLY JUST ONE QUICK ONE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE AERIAL VIEW OF THAT, YOU ARE BASICALLY USING THIS PROPERTY ALREADY. THERE IS LIKE AN ACCESS DRIVEWAY OR SOMETHING ON IT, RIGHT? >> YES, SIR. IT IS A PAVED DRIVEWAY. THE DRIVEWAY WILL MORE THAN LIKELY STAY AS IS. IT IS AN ODD SLIVER OF LAND. >> DOES THAT DRIVEWAY SERVE ANYBODY OTHER THAN YOUR PROPERTY? DOES IT SERVE THE PEOPLE ON THE OTHER SIDE? >> IT DOESN'T, SIR. THE DRIVEWAY USED TO SERVE THE SCHOOL THAT IS BEHIND IT. THEY HAVE A GATE THERE NOW THAT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR SEVERAL YEARS. THE OWNER HERE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. >> THAT'S ALL. >> I HAVE A QUESTION. I LOOKED AT THE PROPERTY AND IT LOOKED TO ME THAT THAT SLIVER MIGHT BE USED BY THE CHURCH FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING NORTH ON BLANDING AND TURNING INTO THE CHURCH. THAT'S THE BEST WAY TO GET IN THERE. CAN YOU SPEAK ABOUT THE CHURCH'S USE OF THAT? >> ACTUALLY, MA'AM, I HAVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HERE FOR THE PROJECT. HE CAN PROBABLY GIVE YOU MORE INFORMATION ON THE POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. >> THANK YOU. >> AND HOW IT WILL BE ADDRESSED. HIS NAME IS FRANK MALLY WITH MALLY CONSTRUCTION IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. >> AS THE APPLICANT IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING HIM UP WE JUST NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. >> FRANK MALLEY, 115 SPOONVILLE COURT, ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA 32080. ADDRESSING THAT COMMENT FOR THAT ONE CUTOUT THERE, THEY ARE CURRENTLY USING IT. I DON'T KNOW THAT THE OWNER IS OBLIGATED TO LET THEM CONTINUE TO USE ACCESS TO IT BECAUSE THERE COULD BE A PROBLEM WITH RV'S AND PEOPLE ASH -- -- ARBITRARILY COMING ON TO THE PROPERTY. THAT'S SOMETHING FOR THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER TO DETERMINE. >> THANK YOU. THAT ISN'T -- WAS THE STREET ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY, OR HAS IT ALWAYS BEEN PRIVATE PROPERTY? >> TO MY KNOWLEDGE IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN FOR THE SCHOOL BOARD TO ENTER INTO THAT BACK FENCE ON THE FAR WEST OVER THERE. [00:10:02] >> IT JUST -- HAVING VISITED THE PROPERTY, IT LOOKED LIKE TO ME IT PROBABLY HAS BEEN USED AN INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE CHURCH. IF YOU ARE HEADED NORTH ON 21 IT IS THE MOST CONVENIENT WAY TO GET IN OTHERWISE YOU HAVE TO MAKE A U-TURN. >> I UNDERSTAND COMPLETELY. >> I JUST WONDERED ABOUT THAT. >> ALL I KNOW ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY WAS TO THE SOUTH OF THAT, THE RED LINES. THERE WAS AN EXISTING CHURCH THERE THAT ALSO USED IT. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAD SOMETHING WORKED OUT BETWEEN BOTH SIDES. THAT'S OUT OF MY UNDERSTANDING. >> I NOTICED THERE IS A FENCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS TRUCK. AND DO YOU PLAN TO MOVE THE FENCE TO THE OTHER SIDE OR INCORPORATE THIS? >> RIGHT NOW IF EVERYTHING WORKS OUT, YES, THAT ROAD IS PART OF THE ACCESS TO THE TRAVEL CAMP, AND THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE -- FROM ONE OF THE PLANS I HAVE SEEN THEY WANT TO TALK ABOUT PUTTING RV'S ALONG THAT RED LINE RIGHT THERE. THEY WILL HAVE ACCESS TOWARD THE BACK PART AND THAT'S WHERE THEY WANT TO DISPLAY THE RV VEHICLES. >> SO DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT THE FENCE ON THIS SIDE WOULD BE REMOVED? >> NO. THIS ONE WILL ABSOLUTELY STAY WHERE IT IS AT ON THE SOUTH SIDE BECAUSE THAT'S THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY. I KNOW THERE ARE SETBACKS THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH ON THAT SIDE, AND THEY PURCHASED THAT BECAUSE IT HELPED THE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY BE MORE VALUABLE, OBVIOUSLY. >> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME. >> ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> I DO, BUT IT IS MORE FOR STAFF. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU A QUESTION, IF YOU DON'T MIND. IS THERE AN ACCESS ISSUE FOR THE SCHOOL REGARDING -- I MEAN, -- >> WE ACTUALLY DID THIS TRANSACTION ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO. THEY APPROACHED US LOOKING FOR AN EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY. WE LOOKED IT OVER AND SAID WHY DON'T YOU JUST BUY IT FROM US? WE NEVER USED THAT SPACE. WE WORKED UP THE DEAL TO SELL THAT PROPERTY TO THE OWNER. >> AND THERE IS NO EASE MEANT, NO RIGHT OF WAY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. >> I AM NOT EVEN SURE WHO MIGHT ANSWER THIS. YOU MIGHT EVEN BE ABLE TO, MARY, IF YOU LOOK. DOES THAT CHURCH HAVE A CURB CUT TO GET IN THERE OF THEIR OWN? >> THEY CAN ACCESS THEIR PARKING AREAS FROM THIS ROAD. IT IS A LITTLE HARD TO SEE ON THIS AERIAL. >> I CAN ANSWER THAT. THE CHURCH [INAUDIBLE] >> OKAY. >> IT GOES AROUND THAT WAY. THEY CAN GET IN HERE IF THEY ARE GOING NORTH, BUT THEY HAVE TO GO DOWN TO THE TRAFFIC LIGHT AND MAKE A U-TURN. >> I WAS MAINLY INTERESTED IF THEY HAD A CURB CUT BECAUSE THAT'S HARD TO GET A CURB CUT ON THAT ROAD IF YOU DON'T HAVE ONE ALREADY. OKAY. >> [INAUDIBLE]. >> I'M GOOD. THANK YOU. >> VERY GOOD. WE WILL MOVE INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AGENDA ITEM AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING THEY WOULD LIKE TO ONLY -- TO COME UP TO SPEAK ON ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NOBODY APPROACH WILLING WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK FOR DISCUSSION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE TWO SECONDS. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY I. >> I. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. >> WE HAVE ITEM NUMBER TWO, [2.  Public Hearing to Consider Rezoning Application Z-20-13 AR to BB-3 (Commissioner Bolla District)] PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING FOR APPLICATION ZULU-20-13AR TO BB-3. BETH? TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THIS ITEM IS Z-20-13. I ALWAYS FORGET THAT. THIS IS COMPANION ITEM Z-20-13 COMPANION TO THE CPA ITEM YOU JUST HEARD. APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM AR AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL TO SPECIALTY BUSINESS. THE PARCEL IS APPROXIMATELY 1.01-ACRES LOCATED WITH THE URBAN CORE 10 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. SUBJECT OF THE LAST ITEM. IT HAS PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED TO COM. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A CHANGE IN ZONING TO DEVELOP THE DEALERSHIP PROPERY USING [00:15:04] THE DRIVEWAY ON THE SUBJECT PARCEL FOR ACCESS. SURROUNDING ZONINGS ARE TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST WHICH WOULD BE THE PF'S AND THE AR WHICH IS THE CHURCH PROPERTY. THE PO1 WHICH IS THE SCHOOL, RIDGE VIEW ELEMENTARY AND BB3 TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST WHICH IS TRAVEL CAMP. SOME SITE PHOTOS AND AN AERIAL. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST BE CONSISTENT WITH M COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDED THROUGH CPA2020-11 IF COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF Z-20-13. >> THANK YOU, BETH. ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? HEARING NONE, THE APPLICANT HAS LEFT THE BUILDING SO WE ARE GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS PLEASE COME FORWARD? SEEING NOBODY COMING FORWARD WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND WE WILL BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR A DISCUSSION AND A MOTION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? >> I HAVE A QUESTION. >> YES, SIR. >> DOES THIS -- THIS IS BACK TO ONE OF RALPH'S COMMENTS AT THE LAST MEETING. IT IS BASICALLY THE ZONING ON THE GROUND AND WHAT ELSE IT CARRIES. I DON'T KNOW IF ONE OF THE ITEMS YOU HAVE HERE IS ADULTENT TIN -- ADULT ENTERTAINMENT AS DEFINED IN THE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT. WILL THIS BE AN ISSUE? >> PLEASE. >> I DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL, PETE. THERE IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF DISTANCE. WHEN WE DID THAT ZONING CHANGE A FEW YEARS AGO, THE AREA THAT'S WOULD BE DESIGNATED, I DON'T BELIEVE THIS IS ONE OF THEM. I COULD BE MISTAKEN, BUT I DON'T THINK THIS IS ONE OF THOSE DESIGNATED AREAS SO I DON'T THINK IT WILL AFFECT THAT AT ALL. >> ALL RIGHT. >> GOOD QUESTION. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? FOR DISCUSSION. HEARING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVORS SAY I SNVMENT. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. MOVING TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER [3.  Public Hearing to Consider CPA 2021-01 to Amend FLU Policy 1.4.1(11) and to Delete Policy 1.10.5] 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CPA2021-01. I BELIEVE OUR FEARLESS LEADER HAS THS ONE. THANK YOU, BETH. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THESE ARE TAX AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE FIRST IS TO FLU POLICY 1.4.1/11 REQUIRED TO MEET THE SICKS 380-6 SAYS TO PROJECTS MAY BE DRI'S ANYMORE. 163-3184 STATES THAT ALL DRI COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE SUBJECTED TO THE STATE COURT REVIEW PROCESS. YOU HAVE A AMENDMENT THAT IS DRI SIZED AND YOU GO THROUGH THE PRO IS SUCCESS PURSUANT TO 168. IT ADDRESSES THE FUTURE LANDINGS CATEGORY. THIS POLICY REFERENCES THE DRI PROCESS. IN OTHER WORDS, PLANNED COMMUNITIES ARE DRI'S. WE DON'T HAVE DRI'S ANYMORE. SO PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE POLICY THAT DELETES 380-06 AND REFERENCES TO THE STATE STATUTE OUT. IT INCORPORATES LANGUAGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. SO THRE ARE NO MORE DRI'S. IF YOU HAVE A COMP PLAN THAT IS DRI-SIZED YOU GET IT THROUGH THE 163-3184 REVIEW PROCESS. HERE ARE THE CHANGES. THE CRUCIAL AREA DOWN HERE IS WE HAVE STRUCT -- STRUCK THE REFERENCES. AND WE REFERENCED THE AGREEMENTS PURSUANT OF 163-3221. EXISTING DRI'S CONTINUE TO BE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS THEY ARE STILL EXISTING DRI'S IN THIS COUNTY THAT CONTINUE TO HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. THAT'S ONE CHANGE. THE OTHER IS DELETE POLICY 1.10.5. IT IS THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF STATE ROUTE 16 AND P -- THE INTERSECTION. IT REFERENCES TRAFFIC STUDIES AND THINGS WE NEED TO REMOVE. THE LAND UNDER PROPOSED AMENDMENT FOR THE PARCEL SUBJECT TO THE FLU POLICY 1.10.5 THAT PROPOSED TO CHANGE THE PARCEL TO THE NEW PC LAND USE. YOU ARE SEEING THIS TONIGHT IS THE PC LAND USE. THIS IS A STAFF-DRIVEN AMENDMENT. HOWEVER, THE REPRESENTATIVE OF [00:20:03] THE STATE ROAD 1621 PROJECT IS HERE TONIGHT. I DON'T KNOW IF HE WANTS TO ADDRESS ANYTHING. WE WORKED WITH HIM ON THIS LANGUAGE. HE IS HERE SO IF HE WOULD LIKE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPER STANDPOINT. >> VERY GOOD. >> BEFORE WE MOVE TO MR. HANLINE, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? >> YES. >> ED, DO ANY OF THE EXISTING DRI'S MENTIONED IN HERE, DO THEY TERM OUT AT ALL? LIKE IN POLICY 1.10.5? >> 1.10 PONE -- .5 IS THE 16-21 DEVELOPMENT AND THE 1.1.411 DON'T TERM OUT. EVERY TIME THE GOVERNOR ISSUES AN EXECUTIVE ORDER, THE DRI'S ARE EXTENDED SIX MORE MONTHS. WE GOT TO Z LAST YEAR AND THEY GOT A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION. WE HAVE SOME DRI'S THAT THEIR BUILD OUT IS NOW AT 2056. I PROBABLY WON'T BE AROUND THEN. DRI'S DON'T TERM OUT. >> YOU NEVER KNOW. >> BY THEN SHARICE WILL FIRE ME. SO, NO, DRI'S RETAIN THEIR EXISTING RIGHTS TO DEVELOP AS LONG AS THEY HAVE THIS AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO TERM OUT ANYTIME SOON. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? >> THE APPLICANT, MR. HANLINE, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME FORWARD? PLEASE GIVE US A NAME AND ADDRESS. >> TR-HANLINE IN JACKSONVILLE. JUST REPRESENTING THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STATE ROAD 16 AND 21. WE SUPPORT DELETING POLICY 1.10.5. IT IS ON ITS FACE OUTDATED. IT HAS US DOING THINGS BY THE YEAR 2015. IT HAS US DO -- DOING A PROPORTION GNAT -- PROPORTION AT SHARE AGREEMENT WHICH YOU CAN'T DO ANYMORE. IT IS OUT OF DATE ON ITS BASE AND WE SUPPORT REMOVING THAT. WE HOPE TO BE BACK BEFORE YOU IN THE NEXT MONTH OR TWO WITH SOME PLANS FOR THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY, AND YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT AND REVIEW IT AT THAT TIME. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. >> ANY QUESTIONS? >> DO I HAVE ONE. >> DO YOU HAVE A MOMENT, MR. HANLINE? >> YES. >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IN THIS POLICY THAT IS PROPOSED -- PURR POSED TO BE DELETED IS A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DWELLINGS. ARE YOU LOOKING TO EXCEED THAT NUMBER? >> SO THAT POLICY WAS PUT IN PLACE AT LEAST 10 YEARS AGO. IT FOLLOWED AN ATTEMPT AT DOING A DRI ON THAT PROPERTY WHICH WAS WITHDRAWN. IT WAS WITHDRAWN BECAUSE THE COST OF THE EXACTIONS WERE LIKE $100 MILLION OR SOMETHING. AT THAT TIME THE OWNER WANTED SOME ABILITY TO DO SOMETHING WITH THE PROPERTY. AGAIN THIS IS 10 TO 15 YEARS AGO. THAT WAS NEGOTIATED AS LIKE A FIRST STEP, A PHASE 1 OF WHAT MIGHT BE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. OF COURSE, THE RECESSION HIT AND 10 OR 15 YEARS HAS GONE BY SINCE THAT -- SINCE THAT PROVISION WAS ADOPTED. WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THAT NUMBER CAME FROM. NONE OF US REMEMBERS -- EVEN THOUGH I WAS THERE I HAVE NO RECOLLECTION OF WHERE THAT NUMBER CAME FROM. IT IS MORE THAN 4,000 ACRES OF PROPERTY. THAT NUMBER CLEARLY AT THE TIME WAS MAYBE AN INITIAL PHASE OF WHAT COULD BE DONE WITH THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS OF SUCH ACREAGE THAT THAT NUMBER IN AND OF ITSELF DOESN'T COME NEAR TO ADDRESSING THE CAPACITY OF THE PROPERTY. >> WELL, LET ME HELP SOME MEMORIES HERE. I REMEMBER THIS. >> OKAY. >> I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHERE THAT NUMBER CAME FROM EITHER. HOWEVER, THERE WAS A -- THIS IS PROPERTY ADJACENT TO CAMP BLANDING. CAMP LANDING. I AM CONCERNED THAT OUR CAMP LANDING REP IS NOT HERE. ED, WE REALLY NEED HIM HERE. >> MR. LEONARD HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THIS AND HE HAS SENT THE PLANS TO MR. LEONARD, AND I'M SURE HE WILL BE HERE NEXT MONTH IF HE CAN MAKE IT. >> THERE WAS A GREAT DEAL OF CONCERN OF DENSITY CLOSE TO THAT BASE. THERE WAS A GREAT DEAL OF CONCERN OF THE DARK SKIES AT NIGHT. YOU CAN PUT AN AWFUL LOT OF ARTIFICIAL LIGHT ON 4,000 ACRES. THAT'S GONNA BE AT LEAST MY [00:25:02] POINT OF VIEW WHEN WE LOOK AT WHAT YOU COME BACK WITH. >> YES, SIR. >> THAT WE HAVE TO PROTECT THAT BASE. IF IT IS BETWEEN A DEVELOPER MAKING MONEY AND THAT BASE GETTING WHAT THEY NEED, THE BASE IS GONNA WIN. AT LEAST IN MY MIND. >> NO, DEFINITELY UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE THE POINT. LET ME MENTION A COUPLE OF THINGS. NUMBER ONE, ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS I CALLED ED ABOUT THE PROPERTY AND THE PLANS FOR THE PROPERTY AND GAVE ME THE CONTACT INFORMATION AND I GOT IN TOUCH WITH COLONEL LEONARD. I HAVE SENT HIM THE PRELIMINARY PLAN THAT WE FIRST PRESENTED TO THE COUNTY AND ASKED FOR HIS INPUT AND EXCHANGED E-MAILS LAST WEEK AND WE ABSOLUTELY HAVE REACHED OUT ALREADY, AS I SAID AND INTEND TO MEET WITH CAMP LANDING AND GET THEIR INPUT INTO THE PLANS BEFORE WE CAME BACK TO YOU. HE HAS ALREADY SEEN AN EARLY VERSION AND HE WILL HAVE ALREADY SEEN AND HAVE HAD INPUT WITH US ON WHATEVER WE BRING TO YOU IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS. I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO DETAILS, BUT THE PLAN DEFINITELY TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION CAMP LANDING AND OUR PROXIMITY TO CAMP LANDING. I THINK THAT YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE ARE MAJOR STEPS TAKEN THAT ADDRESS THAT CONCERN. SO WE REALIZE THAT THAT IS A PRIMARY CONCERN AND WE WILL BE ADDRESSING THAT AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO PRESENTING OUR PLANS TO BOTH -- THE REVISED PLANS AND DISCUSSING THEM WITH LIEUTENANT COLONEL LEONARD AND PRESENTING THEM TO YOU WHEN WE COME BACK. >> OKAY. THAT WAS U.N. -- THAT WAS ONE OF THE BIG, BIG ISSUES. THEY WERE DOING A LOT OF NIGHTTIME FLIGHT TRAINING OUT THERE, AND THEY NEEDED THE DARKNESS TO DO THAT. THAT WAS VERY IMPORTANT. >> YES, SIR. YES, SIR. >> ALL RIGHT. I JUST WANTED TO SEE WHERE YOU WERE HEADED WITH THAT. >> YES, SIR. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, MR. HANLI NEE E. HANLINE. >> WITH THAT WE WILL BRING IT BACK AND OPEN UP PUBLIC COMMENT. WE WILL OPEN IT UP NOW. IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE, PLEASE COME FORWARD. SEEING NONE WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR DISCUSSION AND A MOTION. >> MR. CHAIR, I WILL MOVE THIS , THE STAFF REPORT HERE. I THINK WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE SOME DISCUSSION IN THE NEXT PHASE WHEN IT COMES THROUGH. >> WE HAVE A FIRST? >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE TWO SECONDS. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY I. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. >> AND THIS WILL BE HEARD ON FEBRUARY 9TH. >> FEBRUARY 9TH? OKAY. MR. HANLINE, YOU HAVE THAT DATE? >> YES, SIR. >> VERY GOOD. >> LET'S MOVE TO ITEM 4 PUBLIC [4.  Public Hearing to Amend the Land Development Code to Add Bottling Beverages as a Permitted Use in BFMU] HEARING TO AMEND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADD BOTTLING BEVERAGES AS A PERMITTED USE IN BFMU. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. AGAIN, THIS IS TO ADD BOTTLING BEVERAGES AND MIXED USE. WE WILL REVIEW WHAT THE PROPOSAL. IT GETS A LITTLE EXPLANATION HERE. THEY ARE PERMITTED IN THE BFMU DISTRICT. IT SAYS IT RIGHT THERE. THE USES ARE LISTED ALLOWED ARE THOSE DESIGNATED AS BUSINESS BARK USES IN THE CODE. BOTTLING BEVERAGE IS A USE ALLOWED AS A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, BUT NOT AS USE. THEY ARE PROPOSING A USE THAT WE THOUGHT NEEDED A LAND DEVELOPMENT CHANGE TO BE ALLOWED. THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE SEEING. STAFF PROPOSES TO UH -- TO ALLOW BOTTLING BEVERAGES -- SAY THAT THREE TIMES, AS A SEPARATE PERMITTED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE IN BFMU, BUT TO CHANGE THE LDR TO SHOW BUSINESS BARK USES ARE NOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES AS IT READS NOW. AS WAS APPARENT THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE BOARD FOR MIXED USE. AGAIN HERE IS A MAC OF BRANDON FIELD. HERE. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ADDING BOTTLING BEVERAGES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ALLOWING IT IN THIS ONE AREA OF THE COUNTY. WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO ALLOW BOTTLING BEVERAGES A AS PERMITTED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE AS PART OF THE BRANDON FIELD LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS [00:30:02] AND WE PROPOSE TO CHANGE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT TO BUSINESS PARK USES RATHER THAN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES. THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT, MR. MILLER. WE HAVE BROUGHT THE CHANGES THAT HE SUBMITTED DIFFERENT THAN WHAT HE SUBMITTED AND HE AGREED TO THE CHANGES AND HE IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU, ED. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? HEARING NONE WE WOULD INVITE THE APPLICANT TO COME FORWARD. WE NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AGAIN. >> GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS FRANK MILLER. MY ADDRESS IS ACTUALLY NOW 1 INDEPENDENT DRIVE SUITE 2300 IN JACKSONVILLE. I AGREE WITH ED'S PRESENTATION. WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYER AND QUITE A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN THE COUNTY IN THAT LOCATION AND WE ASK THAT YOU SUPPORT THE CHANGE. CAN I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS? >> ANY QUESTIONS? >> THE ONLY ONE IS ARE YOU FREE TO SHARE WHO IT MIGHT BE COMING IN, OR IS THAT CONFIDENTIAL STILL? >> UNFORTUNATELY IT IS STILL CONFIDENTIAL AT THIS POINT. >> ANY NUMBERS IN TERMS OF JOBS? >> I'M SHOOTING OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD -- >> YEAH, A BALLPARK. >> INITIALLY IT IS SOMEWHERE AROUND A HUNDRED JOBS. POTENTIALLY GROWTH UP TO 200 AND SOMETHING JOBS. THE -- I THINK THEY ARE PAYING LIKE EIGHT MILLION TO CCUA FOR CONNECTION AND THAT SORT OF THING. I'M GOING TO DEFER TO JJ FOR THE DETAILS. I THINK IT IS SOMEWHERE AROUND 90 MILLION IN THE INITIAL INVESTMENT THAT COULD RAISE TO MAYBE CLOSE TO DOUBLE THAT. >> I TAKE IT THAT THIS SITE IS PROBABLY ATTRACTIVE BECAUS IT IS NEXT TO STATE ROUTE 23 FOR TRANSPORTATION. >> I THINK THAT'S PART OF IT. I THINK THE FACT THAT ACTUALLY CLAY COUNTY UTILITY AUTHORITY HAS A MAJOR WATER LINE AND WE SHOULD ALL BE PLEASED THAT CLAY COUNTY UTILITY HAS VERY GOOD WATER, AND THERE IS AN ELECTRIC CALLING -- ELECTRICAL AND GAS AVAILABLE. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. THANKS SO MUCH. >> I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION AND I GUESS IT IS TO STAFF. THERE WAS A COMMENT MADE AND I THINK I HEARD SOMEBODY SAY IT WAS ONLY RECOMMENDED FOR THIS AREA. >> BRAN GONE -- BRANDON FIELD MIXED USE IS THE ONLY AVAILABLE AREA FOR MIXED USE. >> SO FOR A SIMILAR FACILITY THIS IS THE ONLY PART OF THE COUNTY THIS IS RECOMMENDED? >> OH NO. ANY PLACE THAT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WOULD BE ALLOWED THIS. BUT THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE IS -- IS BUSINESS PARK USE IN THE CODE. THAT'S WHY WE MAINTAIN THIS. IT IS THE ONLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE AND THE OTHERS WILL BE CHANGED TO BUSINESS. >> THANK YOU. >> VERY GOOD. WE ARE OPENING PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. SEEING NOBODY COMING FORWARD WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR DISCUSSION. AND FOR A MOTION. >> MR. CHAIR I MOVE THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE STAFF'S LANGUAGE IN THERE. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A FIRST AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SAY I. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. >> AND THIS HAS TWO READINGS, FEBRUARY 9TH AND FEBRUARY 23RD. >> FEBRUARY 9TH AND 23RD, VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL MOVE TO OUR FIRST OF [Old Business/New Business] ANY OLD BUSINESS. ANY NEW BUSINESS? HEARING NONE LET'S MOVE TO OUR REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND DO YOU WANT TO LEAD US THROUGH THAT? >> JUST EVERY FEBRUARY WE ELECT A NEW CHAIRMAN AND A NEW VICE CHAIRMAN. ALL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD HAVE BEEN REAPPOINT SEWED THIS IS OUR BOARD FOR ANOTHER YEAR. WE ARE READY TO SEE IF THERE ARE NOMINATIONS FOR THE NEW CHAIRMAN. >> AS I UNDERSTAND IT, I AM NOT ELIGIBLE SO I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT BEFORE ANYBODY ASKS. I HAVE APPRECIATED THE OPPORTUITY TO BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS. I THINK WE ARE GOING TO START MOVING THROUGH AN ANNUAL CYCLE WHERE WE WILL START MOVING THROUGH THE CHAIRS AND EVERYBODY WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO KIND OF BE IN THIS ROLE AND ENJOY THIS OPPORTUNITY. WITH THAT WE WILL OPEN IT UP FOR NOMINATIONS. >> MR. CHAIR, LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT LAST YEAR THAT I WOULD LIKE IS I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, OTHER THAN YOURSELF, WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THE POSITION? YOU KNOW, RATHER THAN THROWING A NAME OUT THERE. >> -- I FOR ONE WOULD BE INTERESTED IN IT. MARY HAS BEEN HERE FOR AWHILE AND BO HAS BEEN HERE AWHILE. [00:35:03] IF THEY ARE INTERESTED IN TAKING ON THAT ROLE, I THINK IT NEEDS, AS YOU SAY, TO BE MOVED AROUND A LITTLE. >> MAY I SPEAK TO THAT? >> ABSOLUTELY. >> I WOULD LIKE TO, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR BEFORE I DO THAT. >> VERY GOOD. >> I WOULD AGREE. I'VE GOT OTHER COMMITTEES I AM CHAIRING THIS YEAR BEFORE I STEP INTO SOMETHING LIKE THAT AND A LITTLE MORE EXPERIENCE WOULD BE HELPFUL. >> VERY GOOD. >> PETE, ANY THOUGHTS? >> AT THIS TIME, I'M NOT INTERESTED. [LAUGHTER]. >> TO THE POINT. I LIKE IT. BILL? >> THAT WAS AN AWESOME MEETING AND AGENDA. THAT WAS 30 MINUTES. WHOEVER COMES IN BEHIND YOU HAS TO DO THE SAME THING. >> COME ON. COME ON. COME ON. LET'S KEEP IT PROFESSIONAL. >> NO. I THINK IT WOULD BE GOOD AND RALPH BEING THE VOICE LAST YEAR THAT HE WANTED TO CHAIR AND I WOULD BE OKAY WITH THAT. IF MARY DOESN'T WANT TO BE VICE CHAIR I WOULD BE VICE CHAIR. >> DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >> HAVE I -- I MAKE A MOTION THAT RALPH IS CHAIR AND MARY IS VICE CHAIR. >> FIRST AND SECOND. >> THIS IS THE MOST PAINLESS ONE SO FAR. I LOVE IT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY I. >> I. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. EXCELLENT. WE ARE GOING TO OPEN UP OUR LAST PUBLIC COMMENT. SEEING NOBODY COMING UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT. AND WE ARE GOING TO ADJOURN. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE. >> WHEN IS OUR NEXT MEETING? >> MARCH 2ND. >> I KNOW THAT, -- >> MARCH 2ND. COME ON. IT IS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.