[6. Five Year Park Lease Agreements and Lease Approval Resolutions for Omega Park, Paul C. Armstrong Community Park, Oakleaf Community Park, Little Rain Lake Park, Carl Pugh Community Park and Twin Lakes Soccer Park (K. Morgan)]

HOPEFULLY. 6 5-YEAR PARK LEASE AGREEMENTS USE RESOLUTION FOR PARKS AND

ECREATION. >> PARKS HAT NOW. SO WE HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE THOUGHT PROCESS AND HOW WE GOT TO TODAY.

SO WERE GOING TO WALK YOU THROUGH THAT. YOU HAVE A COPY OF THE PRESENTATION AND A SPREADSHEET. FOR YOUR REVIEW. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT IS THIS IS, AS OUR COMMUNITY GROWS THIS IS PART OF THE GROWING PAINS.

SO WE NEED TO MANAGE THEM WELL AND DO THIS RIGHT. THE TEAM HAS WORKED REALLY HARD. I WANTED TO PUBLICLY THANK JUSTIN PIERCE FROM THE PARKS AND WRECKED TEAM. AND KELLY LIQUOR FROM THE LEGAL TEAM.

THEY PUT A LOT OF BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS INTO THIS PROCESS. I WANTED TO THANK THEM FOR THEIR DILIGENCE. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE, WHERE WE NOW INCONSISTENT LEASES.

THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE NOW.HEIR TIMING IS DIFFERENT. THERE'S TONS OF INCONSISTENCIES WITHIN THEM. IT VARIES FROM ASSOCIATION TO ASSOCIATION.

EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT. QUITE FRANKLY IT'S HARD TO MANAGE.

SUBLEASES ART MAKING THE COUNTY VULNERABLE RIGHT NOW. THERE ARE OCCASIONS WHERE WE DON'T EVEN, WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THE SUBLEASES HAPPENING. THAT IS SOMETHING WE ARE ADDRESSING IN THIS NEW LEASE PROCESS. RIGHT NOW THE LEASES ARE OPERATING ON A TIERED SYSTEM. TIER 1 ORGANIZATIONS ARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT OPERATE ON $50,000 OR LESS. THE LEASE THE PARK FOR DOLLAR A YEAR.

THE COUNTY TAKES CARE OF ALL THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE. TIER 2, AND WE LISTED THOSE ASSOCIATIONS FOR YOU. TIER 2, OR THOSE ASSOCIATIONS THAT MADE MORE THAN $50,000 A YEAR. WE DO REQUEST THOSE RECORDS ANNUALLY SO WE KNOW WHERE THEY LAND. THE TEARS WERE NEVER DEFINED IN THE LEASE.

IT WAS HARD FOR US TO EVEN CONSIDER MOVING ONE TIER TO HER.

THAT IS KIND OF THE SITUATION WE ARE IN NOW. THOSE TIER ER 2 LEASEHOLDERS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AND STILL PAIN THE COUNTY A DOLLAR.

WHAT WE DID NEXT IS MAD TO COME E UP WITH A SOLUTION THIS WASN'T WORKING FROM ALL THE CONSISTENCIES. WHAT WE DID IS SPENT 2 YEARS DOING A LOT OF RESEARCH.

AND HAVING A LOT OF DIALOGUE WITH THE ASSOCIATIONS. ASKING WHAT WORED, WHAT WASN'T WORKING, DID A LOT OF LISTENING, DID A LOT OF BRAINSTORMING.

WHAT WE DID IS WE ASKED COUNTIES THROUGHOUT THE STATE WHAT THEY DID.

WE FOUND THERE WERE FEE RANGES PER REGISTRANT RANGING FROM $20-$50 PER REGISTRANT.

FOR ANY GIVEN SEASON. SO, WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE LEVELS OF SERVICE.

[00:25:09]

WHAT DO THE COUNTIES PROVIDE, WHAT DO THE MUNICIPALITIES PROVIDE.

WE LOOKED AT A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT PARKS MODELS. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW IS ARE REALLY PROPOSING THE COMPROMISE. THE COUNTY DOESN'T PROVIDE EVERYTHING AND THE ASSOCIATION ISN'T RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING.

IT'S THE COMPROMISE. AS THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP MODEL.

WHAT WERE TO MAINTENANCE OR MOVING TO 2 MODELS OF LEASES. FROM THE TIER 1 IS GOING TO A PER REGISTRANT FEE. OKAY? WERE PROPOSING A 5 YEAR LEASE WITH A $20 PER REGISTRANT PER PARK D. THOSE ARE THE PARENT RUN ORGANIZATIONS.

THE ASSOCIATIONS RETAIN THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE.

THOSE ARE THE 10 YEAR LEASES. THOSE ARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE PAID STAFF.

THE YMCA, THE CLAY POWELL AND CLAY COUNTY SOCCER. SO, THAT'S WHAT WERE PROPOSING RIGHT NOW. SUBLEASES WILL ONLY COME THROUGH THE COUNTY.

RIGHT NOW WERE GOING TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE DECISION THAT A BROAD OVERVIEW OF EACH OF THE OPTIONS FOR THE LEASES. SO YOU HAVE A PICTURE OF HOW WE GOT TO THE COMPROMISE.

OPTION ONE IS THE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE.

THAT'S A HUGE SAVINGS TO THE COUNTY. WE DON'T HAVE THAT IN GROUNDS MAINTENANCE EXPENSE. WE CAN ALSO LEAD DIRECTOR GROUNDS MAINTENANCE CREW TO OTHER PARK PROJECTS AND OTHER COUNTY PROJECTS. THE PROFIT SHARE ON III PARTY SUBLEASES WOULD BE, WOULD EXIST. THE CONS FOR THIS IS AT THE COST BURDEN IS ON THOSE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS AND SOME BEAR THAT COST.

THE RISKS ARE THE FIELDS NOT BE MAINTAINED PROPERLY. WE'LL LOSE OUR QUALITY CONTROL IN THE LOCHS OF CONSISTENCY IN THE PARKS APPEARANCE WHICH IS PART OF OUR COUNTY BRAND.

THE SECOND OPTION IS THE ONE THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING. THAT'S WITH THE COUNTY AND THE ASSOCIATION COST SHARE PROGRAMS MAINTENANCE WITH THE PER REGISTRANT FEE.

EVERYONE HAS TO GET THE GATE. THE COST SHARING BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE ASSOCIATION TO MAINTAIN THOSE GROUNDS. THE GROUNDS THAT THE COUNTY WILL MANAGE THE CHEMICAL OF THE GROUND MAINTENANCE. MOVING, WEEDING, ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE CREW FOR THE FIRST TIME WILL BE ACTUALLY FOCUSING ON ATHLETIC PARKS. WERE GOING TO BE CONTRACTING OUT THE MOWING FOR THE OTHER PARKS. SO WE'VE PREPARED THE BUDGET FOR THAT.

THE COUNTY WILL DEVELOP CONSISTENCY IN SERVICES AND IN PARKS APPEARANCE.

IT GOES BACK TO THAT CONSISTENCY AND QUALITY CONTROL AND WE WILL COLLECT THE RENTALS FOR THOSE THIRD-PARTY RENTALS AND SUBLEASES. THE CONS IS THAT SOME OF THE ASSOCIATIONS ARE GOING TO ASK VARIANCE AND INCREASE IN COST. SOME WILL EXPERIENCE SAVINGS BECAUSE THEY WON'T HAVE TO FARM OUT THE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ANYMORE.

THAT WILL COME TO THE COUNTY AND IT WILL PROBABLY BE AT A SAVINGS.

AND THEN THE ASSOCIATIONS THAT DO LEASE TO PARKS CREATE AN ADDED EXPENSE FOR SERVICES.

EITHER THE COUNTY OR THE ASSOCIATION ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BEAR.

SO THAT'S ONE OF THE TOPICS OF DISCUSSION FOR US. III OPTION IS WHERE THE COUNTY MANAGES EVERYTHING. THE ASSOCIATION JUST SHOWS UP PREDICTORS OF CONTROL OF PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT TO MAINTAIN THE FIELDS. THAT'S ONE OF THE BLESSINGS OF THIS MODEL. YOU MAINTAIN THE FIELDS AT YOUR LEVEL OF SPECIFICATION.

THE COUNTY DEVELOPS CONSISTENCY AND UNIFORMITY. THE COUNTY SETS THE STANDARD.

BECAUSE THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING. FROM EQUIPMENT, THE ASSOCIATION JUST SHOWS UP. COUNTY COLLECTS III-PARTY RENTAL FEE.

THE CONS TO THIS MODEL IS THAT'S GOING TO TAKE A SIGNIFICANT BUDGET INCREASE FOR US TO MAKE IT THAT WAY. NOT A LINK FROM A PARKS AND RECREATION BUT FROM A GROUNDS

[00:30:02]

MAINTENANCE STANDPOINT. IT WILL TAKE A SIGNIFICANT TIMELINE FOR US TO BE ABLE TO PREPARE FOR THAT. SO, THAT'S NOT AN OPTION RIGHT NOW.

AGAIN, WHICH IS WHY THE OPTION TO, THE COMPROMISED PARTNERSHIP IS WHAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING.

YOU ALSO HAVE A SHEET IN FRONT OF YOU THAT GIVES YOU A GRADE OF WHAT EACH ASSOCIATION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNDER THE NEW LEASE AGREEMENTS. KIND OF PIZZA PICTURE OF WHAT THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR AS WELL AS WHAT THE COUNTY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR.

SO WE WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. >> QUESTIONS?

>> IF FOR MAINTAINING THE PREMISES AND WE CONTRACT WITH 3RD PARTY, WHY IS THE LEASEE RESPONSIBLE TO OPEN /CLOSE AND MAINTAIN A FIELD, WE CONTRACT WITH 3RD PARTY.

>> YES SIR. SO, JUST SO YOU KNOW, JUSTIN AND I HAVE BEEN ON CALLS ON EACH OF THE ASSOCIATIONS. THE PAST 2 WEEKS. JUST REVIEWING EVERYTHING AND THAT HAS BEEN A CONSISTENT REQUEST THAT HAS COME UP THAT WE PLAN TO CHANGE.

WE WILL LOOK AT HIRING PART-TIME STAFF TO TAKE THAT BURDEN OFF OF THE ASSOCIATION.

>> SOMEHOW THEN WE HAVE TO HAVE KEYS TO EVERYTHING? >> WE DO, MOST EVERYTHING WE

DO. >> DO? X YES SIR.

>> I'VE GOT A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS. >> HOPEFULLY YOU TOOK OFF SOME

OF MINE. >> MATERIAL CONDITION OF THE FACILITIES.

HOW DO WE ESTABLISH WHAT THE MATERIAL CONDITION IS TODAY? HOW TO MONITOR IT TOMORROW AND WHEN THE LEASE COMES UP FOR RENEWAL HOW DO WE CHECK TO MAKE SURE IT'S IN WHATEVER MATERIAL

CONDITION. >> THE PARKS TEAM DOES REGULAR PARKS INSPECTIONS.

>> HOW OFTEN DO THEY DO THEM? >> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW HOW OUGHT OFTEN.

>> MONTHLY. >> MANAGER IF I MAY ADD. I PERSONALLY BEEN OUT ON JUSTIN'S INSPECTIONS. HE HAS SET THE BASELINE FOR THE PAST YEAR ON THESE INSPECTIONS.

THAT WAS THE DATA POINT WE NEEDED TO COLLECT. HE GOES OUT AND WITH PRIDE AND HE WRITES THESE ITEMS DOWN OF WHATEVER DISCREPANCY HE FINDS. HE PUTS IN A WORK ORDER IN THE WORK ORDERS EXECUTED BASED, EVERYTHING IS TIMING AND WHAT HAS A HIGHER PRIORITY PERHAPS ON THE LIST. I SEE JUSTIN IS UP HERE. HE DOES AN UNBELIEVABLE JOB ON

THIS AND HE'S TRACK OF IT THIS PAST YEAR. >> IS IS SOMEWHAT COLLABORATIVE WITH THE ASSOCIATION? IN OTHER WORDS IF YOU SAY SOMETHING DOESN'T WORK AND USE IT WORKS AND THEY SAY DOESN'T WORK. OR STRAIGHT ON THAT REGARD WITH

THE ASSOCIATION? ARE WE EMINENT DOMAIN? >> WE DON'T HAVE THOSE ISSUES CURRENTLY WITH THE ASSOCIATIONS. THERE'S A REQUEST PORTABLE THE ASSOCIATIONS CAN SUBMIT WORK ORDERS THROUGH. WHEN WE GET THEM I PUT THEM IN THE PUBLIC WORK SYSTEM AND WE BROUGHT HIM TO FACILITY MAINTENANCE TO HAVE THE WORK WAS COMPLETE. THAT ARE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE TEAM WILL GOD INSPECT THE ISSUE AND DETERMINE WHAT THE COURSE OF ACTION IS. THEN I WILL COMMUNICATE THAT TO THE ASSOCIATION. AT THAT POINT I BECOME THE GO-BETWEEN.

>> OKAY, I NOTICED IT'S A PUBLIC PARK. WE ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE PARK DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF TIME. IT WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED SOMEWHERE THAT ON WEDNESDAY MORNING FROM 8 UNTIL NOON IT'S AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC USE? SO THAT I HAVE TO CALL YOU AND SAY HEY, IF THE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION OF WORKING TODAY, OR ARE THEY PLAYING THIS MORNING OR THIS AFTERNOON OR THIS WEEKEND OR WHATEVER.

WE CAN HAVE SOME KIND OF WEBSITE OR WEBPAGE THAT LISTS, WHICH PARK IS AVAILABLE ON

SATURDAY MORNING. >> S4S ATHLETIC PARKS. WITH PROVEN FLORIDA RAINOUTS WERE VERY COMMON THING. WHEN THE ASSOCIATION SUBMIT THEIR SEASONAL SCHEDULES A LOT OF THAT IS CONTINGENT UPON THE WEATHER. AND MADE ME SAY THE PRACTICE SCHEDULES FROM 5 PM TO 8 PM MONDAYS, TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS.

WEDNESDAYS ARE SUBJECT FOR BRING UP OF DAYS. FROM THERE WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING THAT WE POST. ON THE PARK OF THE WEBSITE IS JUST DATA WE COLLECT.

[00:35:03]

WE DO RECEIVE THOSE PHONE CALLS YOU CAN TALK TO THE CITIZEN AND LET THEM KNOW IF IT'S OPEN.

MOST OF OUR ATHLETIC PARKS THROUGHOUT THE BEAKER OPEN UNTIL 4 OR 5 O'CLOCK.

THAT'S ONE OF THE ATHLETIC THINGS HAPPEN. >> I JUST THINK, IT IS A PUBLIC PARK. THE PUBLIC OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO USE IT.

>> AND THEY ARE. LEASE AGREEMENT THE ASSOCIATION'S USAGE OF THE FACILITIES ARE BASED OFF OF THEIR SUBMITTED SCHEDULES. ANY TIME OUTSIDE OF THAT, THE

PARK IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. >> WHAT WE COULD DO COMMISSIONER IS POTENTIALLY GIVE A CALENDAR OF SEASONS, WHEN FOOTBALL SEASON RUNS. WHEN BASEBALL SEASON RUN SO THE PUBLIC CAN NOTE WHICH FIELDS ARE ACCESSIBLE AND WHICH ONES AREN'T.

>> OKAY. JUST SOME WAY TO MAKE THE PUBLIC AWARE THAT THESE ARE PUBLIC PARKS FOR THEIR USE DURING THOSE TIMES. ANYWAY, THE MORE FIDELITY YOU CAN HAVE IN THAT REGIME THE BETTER OFF WE WILL BE UP HERE. INCLEMENT WEATHER /CANCELLATION. I TOOK THE VERBIAGE TO ME THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GO AND WHEN A THUNDERSTORM ROSE THROUGH YOU GOING TO CANCEL PLAY AND, FOR THAT EVENING.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT. >> NO SIR.

>> I THINK WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY IS THAT SOMEHOW THE COUNTY DURING FOR INSTANCE MAIN STORM WILL CALL, CLOSE ALL PARKS. I THINK WE NEED TO ADD DOC RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK TO THE EEOC WITH CATASTROPHIC, WINTER STORMS OR WHATEVER THAT WE FORECAST.

THE INDIVIDUAL INCLEMENT WEATHER OR HAZARDOUS /DANGEROUS WEATHER THAT PERCOLATES EVERY AFTERNOON HERE IN FLORIDA. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS CONDUCTING OPERATION. IT'S INCUMBENT ON THEM TO CANCEL THAT GAME WHEN LIGHTNING STRIKES WITHIN 5 MILES OR WHATEVER WE CATEGORIZE THAT AS A DANGER.

I THINK SOMEHOW WE OUGHT TO MAKE SURE THEY KNOW AND THEY PROBABLY DO BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING ALL ALONG. WE OUGHT TO REITERATE THAT IN THE AGREEMENT.

PAST APPLICATION WE LIST 8 TIMES THAT WE APPLY FERTILIZER, OR GONNA APPLY EMERGENT WEED CONTROL, WHATEVER. STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES A PAST APPLICATION LICENSE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. I ASSUME WE HAVE LICENSE PERSONNEL DO THAT?

>> YES SIR WE HAVE A LICENSE TECHNICIAN WHO HANDLES THAT WHOLE COMPONENT.

>> WELL, ON THE OTHER LEASES WERE GOING TO DISCUSS THEY ARE GOING TO DO THAT.

I THINK THEY HAVE TO BE LICENSED AS WELL. LOOKS HOWEVER THEY CONTRACT OUT

WILL HAVE TO BE LICENSED. >> ARE THEY ALL GOT A CONTRACT OUT?

>> YES SIR. >> THAT'S SURPRISING. DO WE HAVE ANY FIRST RESPONDER

REQUIREMENT ON SITE DURING SEASONS OF FOOTBALL, BASEBALL? >> BETWEEN YOURS AND MY CONVERSATION I DID HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHIEF MOSS. IT'S NOT MANDATED THAT THEY HAVE IT. IT WOULD BE AT THE COST OF THE ASSOCIATION TO HAVE EMTS ON

SITE. >> DO ANY OF THEM DO THAT NOW? >> NO SIR.

REX NO? OKAY. INSURANCE PARAGRAPH SPEAKS TO INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. AND IT SPECIFICALLY DELINEATES REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILES.

PICKUP TRUCK IS NOT AUTOMOBILE. N A COURT OF LAW IT WOULD PROBABLY SAY PICKUP TRUCK IS NOT AUTOMOBILE. I THINK WE OUGHT BROUGHT NOT TO NOTARIZE CONVEYANCES WHICH

INCLUDES CARS, TRUCKS, GATORS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. >> 4 WHEELERS.

>> 4 WHEELERS, YEAH. ANY KIND OF MOTORIZED VEHICLE THAT IS ON THE PROPERTY CAN DO SOME REAL DAMAGE TO SOMEBODY IF THEY HIT THEM OR RUN THEM OVER OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THE PARAGRAPH, I THINK IT'S 20 6B WHICH LISTS THE BACKGROUND CHECKS, THERE'S ABOUT 4 NEGATIVES IN A ROW AND I HAVE TO BALANCE THE AMOUNT TO SEE WHAT WERE REALLY SAYING WE COULD MAKE THAT STATEMENT A LOT SIMPLER. LIKE YOU HAVE TO HAVE A BACKGROUND CHECK. IT SAYS IF YOU DON'T HAVE A BACKGROUND CHECK YOU CAN'T DO

[00:40:06]

THIS ON THE SECOND TUESDAY OF PTHE WEEK. IT'S KINDA CRAZY.

LIGHTING RESPONSIBILITY. MAYBE I MISSED IT BUT I DIDN'T SEE IT.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIGHTS? >> THE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ARE

RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITIES ON THE PROPERTY. >> BUT THE MAINTENANCE OF THE

LIGHTING SYSTEM IS US? >> LIKE BALLPARK LIGHTS. >> LIGHTING, THAT'S PART OF OUR

GENERAL MAINTENANCE. >> IS NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED IN THERE?

P>> I BELIEVE IN THE COUNTY RESPONSBILITY THAT THE COUNTY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GENERAL MAINTENANCE OF THE FACILITIES AND BUILDINGS AND WITH PLUMBING AND HVAC AND I'M NOT SURE IF

LIGHTING IS STATED. >> MOSCOW IS ONE OF THE MAJOR SPORTS LIGHTING MANUFACTURERS

THAT. ARE WE UP TO THAT SPEED? >> THERE INSTALLING RIGHTS

RIGHT NOW. >> WE HAVE MESKILL LIGHTING AND IN 2019 IDENT AUDIT WITH MESKILL LIGHTING. WE WENT ALL TO THE BALLFIELDS OF NASCENT RECOMMENDATIONS IN

THE TIMELINE OF WHEN WE NEED TO LOOK INTO REPLACING LIGHTS. >> WE HAVE ANY SELF INSTALLED

FOR SELF MANUFACTURING LIGHTING SYSTEMS IN CLAY COUNTY? >> NUMBER.

>> THERE ALL COMMERCIAL GRADE? >> THE LACROSSE HAS PORTABLE SO THERE WOULD BE A DIFFERENCE IN

THIS.HE LACROSSE, WHAT YOU CALL THAT THING. >> THE LACROSSE BOX.

>> THE LACROSSE BOX HAS THAT NEAR THE LIBRARY HAS PORTABLE LIGHTING.

>> I GUESS MY CONCERN IS ANY KIND OF SELF MADE LIGHTING SYSTEMS LIKE I CAN SHOW YOU

SOME IN ORANGE PARK. >> MOST OF THE ASSOCIATIONS WOULD BE HER OFF WITHOUT.

THIS OF THEM HAVE THESE PARKS HAVE LIGHTING THAT WOULD RIVAL THE JUMBO SHRIMP AND THE POWER

BUILT TO GO WITH IT. >> THAT SILLY QUESTIONS I HAVE. >> I IMAGINE THIS PROBABLY NEEDS TO GO TO DISCUSSION. I CAN'T IMAGINE IT WOULD NOT. I GUESS I WONDER WHAT THE LOGIC AND THOUGHTS ARE BEHIND AND KEEP IN MIND FOR OR 3 OF THE 4 PARKS THAT ARE IN TIER 1 ARE IN MY DISTRICT. I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO TELL ME WHERE WRONG.

IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS NEW LEASE AGREEMENT IS A HUGE TAKE AWAY FROM ASSOCIATIONS WHO MAKE LESS THAN 50,000 ANNUALLY. AND IT'S A HUGE GIFT, AND ADD TO ASSOCIATIONS WHO ALREADY HAVE MORE MONEY. THAT FEELS WRONG TO ME JUST INHERENTLY.

IT FEELS LIKE WERE REWARDING THE ASSOCIATIONS THAT MAY BE CALLED NOT-FOR-PROFIT.

CLAY POWELL, THE YMCA. CLAY COUNTY SOCCER. WERE REWARDING THOSE.

AND THAT PARENT RUN ORGANIZATIONS TO YOUR POINT EARLIER THIS MORGAN WERE, ARE THE ONES THAT WERE TAKING AWAY FROM. SO I WANT YOU TO TELL ME WHERE

I'M MISSING SOMETHING. >> OUR GOAL IS TO BRING CONSISTENCY AND TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF PARTNERSHIP. WITH THE ASSOCIATION IN THE COST OF PROVIDING THE PLAYING FIELDS. IT BREAKS OUR HEART TO DO THAT TOO.

WE WISH WE HAD ENOUGH MONEY TO BE ABLE TO DO IT FOR FREE. THAT'S THE IDEAL SITUATION.

WERE JUST NOT THERE. THIS WAS THE BEST COMPROMISE WE COULD COME TO WHERE AT LEAST

EVERYBODY HAD SKIN IN THE GAME. >> OKAY. SO I'M NOT WRONG.

WERE TAKING AWAY FROM THOSE WHO HAVE LESS. TO GIVE TO THOSE THAT HAVE MORE. CAN THEY ALL PAY TAXES. THEY GET SPOSORSHIPS BUT.

>> EVERYONE IS ON AN EVEN PLAYING FIELD AND EVERYONE RECEIVES THE SAME TYPE OF

SERVICE. >> OKAY. I HAD SOME OTHER CONCERNS BUT I WILL HOLD THOSE TO THE DISCUSSION. I'VE SHARED WITH YOU ALL MY CONCERNS FROM FIRST CONVERSATIONS I'VE SHARED WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER.

I THINK WERE ASKING AN AWFUL LOT OF THESE ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN LIKE CERTIFIED COACHES, CERTIFIED REFEREES. WHEN YOU ARE RUNNING AN ORGANIZATION YOU HAVE BASEBALL, SOFTBALL AND T-BALL GAME ON EVERY FIELD AT A PARK WITH 9 FIELDS AND YOUR OFFICIALS ARE

[00:45:05]

GOING TO COME FROM YOUR HIGH SCHOOLS. THAT'S WHERE MOST OF YOUR OFFICIALS ARE TO COME FROM. TO REQUIRE THEM TO HAVE THE CERTIFICATION CLASSES I JUST THINK WERE PUTTING UNDUE FINANCIAL BURDEN ON ORGANIZATIONS.AGAIN, KEEP IN MIND MY POINT OF VIEW COMES FROM THE ORGANIZATIONS AND WHEN YOU SAY LESS THAN 50,000 A YEAR AND MORE THAN 50,000 A YEAR. DOES IT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MOST OF THE ONES THAT ARE LESS THAN 50,000 A YEAR OR MORE LIKE LESS THAN 10,000 A YEAR. SO, I GUESS I WOULD HOPE THAT FOR THE DISCUSSION IT MIGHT BE WORTHWHILE IF SOMEONE CAME BACK TO THE COMMISSION, AT LEAST THIS COMMISSIONER AND SAID, WHAT IS OUR END GOAL? IS OUR END GOAL TO END PARENT RUN ORGANIZATIONS? IF THAT'S THE CASE WERE GOING TO END THESE EVENTS IN MIDDLEBURG, AND KEYSTONE HEIGHTS. AND WE ARE SEPARATING, OR WIDENING THE GAP BETWEEN THE HAVES AND HAVE-NOTS. IF THAT'S OUR GOAL NUTS WHAT WERE ACHIEVING. I JUST NEED TO KNOW THAT SO I COULD GO BACK AND COMMUNICATE THAT TO MY CONSTITUENTS. BECAUSE THAT'S WERE GOING. AND I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE.

I TOOK A SCREENSHOT LAST NIGHT IN PREPARING FOR THIS MEETING. SO, SUPPLY T-BALL AND KEYSTONE HEIGHTS CURRENTLY IT COST $90 PER PLAYER FOR THE SPRING SEASON.

TO PLAY T-BALL IN BRADFORD COUNTY WHICH FROM KEYSTONE HEIGHTS IS 15 MINUTES AWAY.

FROM CLAY HILL IT'S 20 MINUTES AWAY. IT COST $75.

AND TO PLAY T-BALL IN MELROSE WHICH FROM KEYSTONE HEIGHTS IS 7 MILES AWAY.

IT IS $65. AND THEN THAT'S WHAT WERE UP AGAINST ALREADY AND WERE GONNA GO ADD 20 BUCKS PER PLAYER ONTO THAT. I WILL SAVE ALL THIS FOR NEXT WEEK. I'VE BEEN PRESIDENT OF THAT ASSOCIATION.

ONE OF THOSE ASSOCIATIONS. I HAVE BEEN A SINGLE MOM WITH 2 KIDS TRYING TO GIVE YOUR KIDS SOMETHING AND THEN YOU'RE ADDING 40 BUCKS ONTO $250, $235 TO HAVE 2 KIDS PLAYING.

I JUST WONDER WHAT OUR END GOAL IS. >> I CAN TELL YOU IT'S DEATHLY NOT TO END PARENT RUN ORGANIZATIONS. WE WANT KIDS OUT PLAYING BALL.

THAT'S DEFINITELY THE GOAL. I UNDERSTAND YOUR PERCEPTION AND WE WILL COME BACK PREPARED

TO GIVE YOU MORE INFORMATION AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. >> THANKS.

SO YOU GOODWOOD DISCUSSION? PDISCUSSION ON THAT ONE? >> WE NEED TO SET THE

[7. Ten Year Park Lease Agreements and Lease Approval Resolutions for Plantation Sports Complex, Walter Odum Community Park, Eagle Harbor Soccer Complex and Tanglewood Community Park (K. Morgan)]

COMMISSIONER. >> 10 YEAR LEASE AGREEMENTS. TO WANT TO GO THROUGH THOSE?

JEFF QUESTIONS YOU WILL GO THROUGH? >> NUMBER IT'S A SIMILAR CONTRACT. I HAD SIMILAR CONCERNS BUT, I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE SHOULD DO FOR THE CONSENT OR DISCUSSION AGENDA. YOU WANT TO PUT IT ON THE

DISCUSSION AGENDA. >> I HAVEN'T GOTTEN ANY CALLS ON ANY OF THOSE.

>> ON WHICH ONES? >> ON THE TENURE AGREEMENTS. >> WELL.

>> NONE OF THEM ARE IN MY DISTRICT SO MAYBE I WOULDN'T. >> BACK HERE ARE GONNA PUT THE 5-YEAR? 5 YEARS GOING TO BE UNDER ER DISCUSSION WE COULD PUT THE 10

EAR UNDER CONSENT. THE BASICALLY THE SAME THINGS. >> IT COULD GO EITHER WAY MADAM CHAIR. I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY DISCUSSION ON LENGTH OF TIME

THE OTHERS MAY WANT TO DISCUSS ON THAT. >> WORTHWHILE JUST TO DISCUSS BOTH OF THEM. OKAY, THAT'S FINE. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANTED OUT ON A 10 YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT? WOULD IT HAVE A PRESENTATION ON

[8. Fleming Island Athletic Association, Inc. Sublease Agreement and Approval Resolution-Neptune Park (K. Morgan)]

THAT ONE DELAY? >> IT WAS ALTOGETHER. >> THEN ON THE NUMBER 8.

>> THE NEPTUNE PARK LEASE, WE SUBLEASE THAT PROPERTY FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD.

OUR LEASE IS UP IN 2022. WE DO NOT WANT TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH FLEMING ISLAND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION. ON A TIMEFRAME BEYOND WHAT WE HAD TO LEASE 4. ONCE WE RENEW THAT LEASE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD WE WILL TRUE UP THE DATES TO BEGIN IN THE ALIGNMENT WITH

THE LEASES GOING FORWARD. >> IS AN EXPECTATION FOR SCHOOL BOARD WILL NOT RENEW THAT WITH

[00:50:05]

US? >> NO MA'AM. >> WE SHOULD GOING CONSENT.

>> I WAS THINKING CONSENT TOO. NO ISSUE THERE? THANK YOU.

THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. I KNOW Y'ALL DID PUT A LOT OF TIME IN THIS.

YOU SPENT A WHOLE LOT OF TIME WITH ME AND I APPRECIATE THAT. MY FEELINGS DO NOT REFLECT THAT

[9. Second Renewal to Agreement #2017/2018-77 with England-Thims & Miller, Inc. for Continuing Construction Engineering Inspection Services (R. Smith)]

I APPRECIATE THE WORK YOU'VE DONE. OKAY, SECOND RENEWAL TO AGREEMENT 2017/2018 Ã77 WITH ENGLAND THAMES AND MILLER FOR PROVISION OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE TERM OF 327 21 THROUGH 326 22 WITH ALL THE OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAINING THE SAME. MR. SMITH?

>> THIS IS AN ONGOING CONTRACT WITH THEM. SEE INSPECTION SERVICE FOR SUBDIVISIONS. WE DON'T PAY ANYTHING. THESE ARE FIRMS WE'VE APPROVED

THAT THE DEVELOPERS HIGHER. >> ARE THERE ANY PERFORMANCE ISSUES OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS

OR SO? >> ARE THERE PERFORMING CR INSPECTIONS?

>> THE PERFORMANCE ISSUES NOT IN QUALITY BUT NOT THE QUANTITY.

THE 2 FIRMS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO INSPECTIONS ON TOP PART OF THE DESIGN.

WERE ADDING 2 FIRMS TO THIS IN THE COMING MONTHS. SO WITH THE ADVENT OF ADDITIONAL PROJECTS WE WILL HAVE 4 FIRMS FOR THE DEVELOPERS TO CHOOSE FROM.

THE PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN OKAY. >> WOULD RECOMMEND WE GO CONSENT.>> METOO.

THANK YOU MR. SMITH. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION?

[DISCUSSION]

>> MADAM CHAIR COULD WE REAPPROACH MAY BE NUMBER 8 IN LOOKING AT T THAT.

IT ENTERED DEPENDENT ON 6 AND 7. BECAUSE A CLAY POWELL. >> BE APPROVED IT ON THE